depression and BD/SM

loneranger8921

Experienced
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Posts
99
I am wondering are depressed people more apt to think they might want to be in bd/sm relationship. I am seeing an increase of submissive women who tell me they are fighting depression. Is it life in general that is producing more depressed people out there? Is anyone else finding this or is it just the pool of people i am encountering right now?
 
i dont think it is depression alone the desire to get attention in any way possible could be a cause for extreme submissiveness
 
No depression here and have never been someone who does anything to try to get attention.
 
Can you expand on this please?

most people value their honor within the rules accepted in society the deviation is only due to the desire for gains and not to overcome depression alone
 
So many people these days live a life of physical ease and all too easily available distraction that they are in increasing numbers, depressed. That's my opinion.

If we still had to work our asses off to keep a roof over our heads, food on the table and so on, I suspect we would all be better off mentally.

Have you ever worked so hard physically for such a sustained period of time that you actually felt exhausted but happy? That's part of what is missing in our lives of relative ease.

Plus, these lives leave us too much time to focus on ourselves which leads to discontent, loneliness, guilt and other nearly paralyzing things.

Now I'm not saying I'd like to go to back to the hunter / gatherer way of life but I do feel that everyone needs more physical work and more meaningful work to feel happy and worthy in the world.

D/s is great. When I'm feeling guilty, a spanking or something can help a bit. It's certainly no cure for depression.

As stated above I think that greater numbers of people are depressed. Also greater numbers are willing to say they are depressed therefore greater numbers of people involved with BDSM will say they are depressed but IMO, this doesn't provide a link between the two. Not at all.

It is all too easy to draw false causal data from linking things like this. Too often people do that with anything considered edgy or different that others are or like. It's most often false, not to mention somewhat demeaning and belittling, to the group of people involved in such. In simple terms this question is really, BDSM = mental illness?

:eek:
 
So many people these days live a life of physical ease and all too easily available distraction that they are in increasing numbers, depressed. That's my opinion.

If we still had to work our asses off to keep a roof over our heads, food on the table and so on, I suspect we would all be better off mentally.

Have you ever worked so hard physically for such a sustained period of time that you actually felt exhausted but happy? That's part of what is missing in our lives of relative ease.

Plus, these lives leave us too much time to focus on ourselves which leads to discontent, loneliness, guilt and other nearly paralyzing things.

Now I'm not saying I'd like to go to back to the hunter / gatherer way of life but I do feel that everyone needs more physical work and more meaningful work to feel happy and worthy in the world.

D/s is great. When I'm feeling guilty, a spanking or something can help a bit. It's certainly no cure for depression.

As stated above I think that greater numbers of people are depressed. Also greater numbers are willing to say they are depressed therefore greater numbers of people involved with BDSM will say they are depressed but IMO, this doesn't provide a link between the two. Not at all.

It is all too easy to draw false causal data from linking things like this. Too often people do that with anything considered edgy or different that others are or like. It's most often false, not to mention somewhat demeaning and belittling, to the group of people involved in such. In simple terms this question is really, BDSM = mental illness?

:eek:

Good stuff here, FF.

I have to confess when I started reading this forum I thought, jeez, does (almost) every pyl suffer from depression?? Because that's how it looked on the surface. But I think it's more societal, and I'm just used to dealing with RL people who are very active and don't deal with this sort of issue.
 
I think if one is subject to depression, the lifestyle can give one a sense of belonging, being worthwhile and appreciated. Regardless of the reason, it can give one's life purpose with support, devotion, praise, rewards and punishments allowing escape and giving someone else the right to take control

PlayMssy
 
So many people these days live a life of physical ease and all too easily available distraction that they are in increasing numbers, depressed. That's my opinion.

If we still had to work our asses off to keep a roof over our heads, food on the table and so on, I suspect we would all be better off mentally.

Have you ever worked so hard physically for such a sustained period of time that you actually felt exhausted but happy? That's part of what is missing in our lives of relative ease.

Plus, these lives leave us too much time to focus on ourselves which leads to discontent, loneliness, guilt and other nearly paralyzing things.

Now I'm not saying I'd like to go to back to the hunter / gatherer way of life but I do feel that everyone needs more physical work and more meaningful work to feel happy and worthy in the world.

D/s is great. When I'm feeling guilty, a spanking or something can help a bit. It's certainly no cure for depression.

As stated above I think that greater numbers of people are depressed. Also greater numbers are willing to say they are depressed therefore greater numbers of people involved with BDSM will say they are depressed but IMO, this doesn't provide a link between the two. Not at all.

It is all too easy to draw false causal data from linking things like this. Too often people do that with anything considered edgy or different that others are or like. It's most often false, not to mention somewhat demeaning and belittling, to the group of people involved in such. In simple terms this question is really, BDSM = mental illness?

:eek:

I agree with most everything here. To add to it, I also think sudden availability of information that has happened in the past 50 years, and especially in the past 15 since the internet, has made people more aware of all mental illnesses. If you look across the board, (most) all mental illnesses are growing in numbers but I don't think it's that there are actually more cases, I think its that many went undiagnosed because people didn't know what to look for or thought they would be labelled if they sought treatment since they were unaware of how many others shared the symptoms. That, combined with very sedentary lifestyle promoting issues like depression like FF said, is more likely to contribute to depression symptoms.

Most everyone has unfortunate turns in their lives, but it has also become commonplace for medical and psych professionals to slap broad labels on it and prescribe medications rather than truly face and help patients handle the emotions beneath. If a pill can make it invisible, why take the time? The medical profession seems to be run by prescription companies these days, and that fact annoys me.
 
I agree with most everything here. To add to it, I also think sudden availability of information that has happened in the past 50 years, and especially in the past 15 since the internet, has made people more aware of all mental illnesses. If you look across the board, (most) all mental illnesses are growing in numbers but I don't think it's that there are actually more cases, I think its that many went undiagnosed because people didn't know what to look for or thought they would be labelled if they sought treatment since they were unaware of how many others shared the symptoms. That, combined with very sedentary lifestyle promoting issues like depression like FF said, is more likely to contribute to depression symptoms.

Most everyone has unfortunate turns in their lives, but it has also become commonplace for medical and psych professionals to slap broad labels on it and prescribe medications rather than truly face and help patients handle the emotions beneath. If a pill can make it invisible, why take the time? The medical profession seems to be run by prescription companies these days, and that fact annoys me.

i agree with both of you
 
I am wondering are depressed people more apt to think they might want to be in bd/sm relationship. I am seeing an increase of submissive women who tell me they are fighting depression. Is it life in general that is producing more depressed people out there? Is anyone else finding this or is it just the pool of people i am encountering right now?

I have noticed an unusually large number of subs and submissives that show signs of situational depression. I feel in some cases, it's triggered by baggage they wrongly still carry from childhood conditioning/abuse and/or being sexually abused.

In the aftermath of either scenario outlined above, it's misplaced blame that one uses to beat themselves down with over and over until they finally find a way to blame themselves for such wrongful acts being committed against them in the first place. Then they continue to spend a lifetime marinating their wounded soul in the juices of a past they can't accept, properly understand or move past due to misplaced self-blame.

JMO.......
 
I suspect as well that as people become aquainted with the terminology of mental illnesses, it comes to mean less. It may be overdiagnosed, and quite often self diagnosed ie; "I've been kinda down in the dumps a lot lately, I must be depressed".

There's nothing wrong with people being more in tune with their emotions, and certainly having a larger vocabulary to express how you feel is usefull. Self diagnosis occasionally seems like missappropriation however, which can feel belittling to people who are genuinely struggling, and eventually leads to people with legitamate medical issues being told "oh every one get's a bit of that now and then, just deal with it" by people who have no idea what they're talking about and no right to diagnose let alone dismiss phychological issues.

(I had problems with a former employer telling me that ADD was nothing to be concerned about, everyones got a little of it).

To posit another broad sweeping generalization, it seems to me that a much greater portion of single people looking to hook up on personals sites are likely to be lonely and/or depressed, thus falsely increasing the number of "depressed submissives" that you are noticing.

When you start getting in to demographics, you've got to cross check your other demographics before drawing conclusions.

QFT :)
 
I have noticed an unusually large number of subs and submissives that show signs of situational depression. I feel in some cases, it's triggered by baggage they wrongly still carry from childhood conditioning/abuse and/or being sexually abused.

In the aftermath of either scenario outlined above, it's misplaced blame that one uses to beat themselves down with over and over until they finally find a way to blame themselves for such wrongful acts being committed against them in the first place. Then they continue to spend a lifetime marinating their wounded soul in the juices of a past they can't accept, properly understand or move past due to misplaced self-blame.

JMO.......

:mad:

I have to say, it always angers and saddens me when people suggest that a significant percentage of submissives are victims of childhood sexual abuse. They're always referring to women too. Are male subs also victims of sexual abuse or can they be credited as free thinking adults with the self awareness and self confidence to seek out what gratifies them sexually?

And what the hell do you mean by 'unusually large number?' How many actual, real life submissive women have you personally got to know and played with? And no, a chatroom doesn't count.

Although many people are drawn to the internet because they can express themselves anonymously and discuss traumatic life events without embarrassment or shame, many more are drawn because they're socially dysfunctional and/or compulsive fantasists. People who are practising BDSM safely, sanely and consensually with no emotional hang ups are much less likely to seek out places like this forum, because they have no need for it. Put simply, they have better things to do with their time.

People of both genders carry baggage because of all kinds of things. To suggest that a large percentage of female subs are childhood abuse victims who can't cope with their emotional issues in a healthy way maligns the whole community. It reduces our sexual nature to a compulsion born of mental illness. It suggests that submissive women simply aren't capable of knowing what's best for themselves and seeking it out in a safe, consensual and mutually gratifying way. It's a shockingly chauvinistic perspective, as is that of any self-styled dominant who imagines that BDSM is a substitute for professional therapy, who arrogantly assumes he can 'save' or 'heal' a submissive woman who has suffered abuse, whether sexual, physical or psychological, from a parent, a stranger or a previous partner.

It gives predatory assholes who think female subs are easy meat who will tolerate physical, sexual and mental abuse a fucking hard on.

It insults every woman who has survived abuse, come out stronger and then made the informed choice to explore sexual submission with a loving, trusted partner.

It undermines every woman who submits freely and simply because it gives her a sexual thrill to do so.

You are scarily ignorant if you can't see the wider ramifications of generalised statements like the one you've made.

ETA: And no, I have never been abused, sexually or otherwise.
 
Last edited:
:mad:

I have to say, it always angers and saddens me when people suggest that a significant percentage of submissives are victims of childhood sexual abuse. They're always referring to women too. Are male subs also victims of sexual abuse or can they be credited as free thinking adults with the self awareness and self confidence to seek out what gratifies them sexually?

And what the hell do you mean by 'unusually large number?' How many actual, real life submissive women have you personally got to know and played with? And no, a chatroom doesn't count.

Although many people are drawn to the internet because they can express themselves anonymously and discuss traumatic life events without embarrassment or shame, many more are drawn because they're socially dysfunctional and/or compulsive fantasists. People who are practising BDSM safely, sanely and consensually with no emotional hang ups are much less likely to seek out places like this forum, because they have no need for it. Put simply, they have better things to do with their time.

People of both genders carry baggage because of all kinds of things. To suggest that a large percentage of female subs are childhood abuse victims who can't cope with their emotional issues in a healthy way maligns the whole community. It reduces our sexual nature to a compulsion born of mental illness. It suggests that submissive women simply aren't capable of knowing what's best for themselves and seeking it out in a safe, consensual and mutually gratifying way. It's a shockingly chauvinistic perspective, as is that of any self-styled dominant who imagines that BDSM is a substitute for professional therapy, who arrogantly assumes he can 'save' or 'heal' a submissive woman who has suffered abuse, whether sexual, physical or psychological, from a parent, a stranger or a previous partner.

It gives predatory assholes who think female subs are easy meat who will tolerate physical, sexual and mental abuse a fucking hard on.

It insults every woman who has survived abuse, come out stronger and then made the informed choice to explore sexual submission with a loving, trusted partner.

It undermines every woman who submits freely and simply because it gives her a sexual thrill to do so.

You are scarily ignorant if you can't see the wider ramifications of generalised statements like the one you've made.

ETA: And no, I have never been abused, sexually or otherwise.

I kind of agree with your rebuttal of your quoted post, but I am really curious to know if anyone has done any actual research into correllations between childhood or domestic abuse and submissiveness. from my own albeit limited experience, it seems there is a similar rate of incidence between bdsm and nilla folks. curiously my Dom was abused as a kid but i wasn't. I'm the one with the sexual hangups though ;)
 
I kind of agree with your rebuttal of your quoted post, but I am really curious to know if anyone has done any actual research into correllations between childhood or domestic abuse and submissiveness. from my own albeit limited experience, it seems there is a similar rate of incidence between bdsm and nilla folks. curiously my Dom was abused as a kid but i wasn't. I'm the one with the sexual hangups though ;)
I think it would be really hard to do this, just based on trying to find an appropriate sample. Sexual studies are usually based on self-reporting (hello, Mr. Kinsey!) and neither BDSM nor previous experiences with abuse are commonly self-reported.
 
I don't personally know many subs other than myself, and at the moment I'm pretty well balnced out, but in saying that I had depression for a year or so when i was younger. I think the main thing that makes people submissive is codependency.
 
I think it would be really hard to do this, just based on trying to find an appropriate sample. Sexual studies are usually based on self-reporting (hello, Mr. Kinsey!) and neither BDSM nor previous experiences with abuse are commonly self-reported.

I completed a fair number of online surveys distributed via an academic research list that were about sexual practices and porn viewing. Obviously that would limit the sample to academics and students but once you identify people who are into BDSM, then you could invite them to interview. you could also approach bdsm websites and ask if you can post a survey on there.

and is there a problem with self-reporting? it's not like the data would be any less valid than if it were observed empirically. in fact I can't see how you could actually get the data without interviewing anyway. and interviewees often report abuse in interviews. no one I know has ever reported bdsm activities, but then the context of the interviews I have conducted would preclude that rather.
 
I completed a fair number of online surveys distributed via an academic research list that were about sexual practices and porn viewing. Obviously that would limit the sample to academics and students but once you identify people who are into BDSM, then you could invite them to interview. you could also approach bdsm websites and ask if you can post a survey on there.

and is there a problem with self-reporting? it's not like the data would be any less valid than if it were observed empirically. in fact I can't see how you could actually get the data without interviewing anyway. and interviewees often report abuse in interviews. no one I know has ever reported bdsm activities, but then the context of the interviews I have conducted would preclude that rather.

The only problem with self-reporting is from a statistical standpoint. You don't get a wide cross-section of BDSM practitioners. You get a wide cross-section of BDSM practitioners who are willing to respond to the survey. It doesn't make the collected data completely invalid, but it does skew them, because it's not a complete sample. Forgive me, I've been taking sociology classes. :)
 
I am wondering are depressed people more apt to think they might want to be in bd/sm relationship. I am seeing an increase of submissive women who tell me they are fighting depression. Is it life in general that is producing more depressed people out there? Is anyone else finding this or is it just the pool of people i am encountering right now?

I don't think so.
Maybe it's because it's more 'socially acceptable' , or even trendy :rolleyes: to admit to being depressed and maybe, just, people are more open about it.
 
The only problem with self-reporting is from a statistical standpoint. You don't get a wide cross-section of BDSM practitioners. You get a wide cross-section of BDSM practitioners who are willing to respond to the survey. It doesn't make the collected data completely invalid, but it does skew them, because it's not a complete sample. Forgive me, I've been taking sociology classes. :)

well to be honest, there is no such thing as a 'complete' sample, except in census type surveys and that is a problem with any form of social research that isn't wholly qualitative and based on statistical incidence. If it weren't for qualitative research or purposeful sampling techniques we would know very little about the impact of child abuse on adults in later life, attitudes towards risky sex, the impact of racism/sexism/disabelism on individuals and a whole host of other questions.

The idea that SR needs to have a 'complete' sample is one that is usually pushed by quant researchers, but even people like Hammersley acknowledge that sampling is actually just one part of it and is more pertinent when looking at large scale trending on a national/international basis.

Research with 'hard-to-reach' groups, which this indubitably falls under, tends to use more qualitative methods and frequently snowball sampling. as a statistician, you could argue that the results are not valid because of the sample technique, but believe me, most social researchers use these techniques and get government funding to do so. Additionally even if you could produce the statistically speaking 'ideal' sample, there would be huge issues with the data as well, as you are no doubt aware. researchers use the appropriate instruments to answer the question, and in this instance, the most appropriate instrument would be an identifying survey followed up by semi-structured individual interviewing
 
well to be honest, there is no such thing as a 'complete' sample, except in census type surveys and that is a problem with any form of social research that isn't wholly qualitative and based on statistical incidence. If it weren't for qualitative research or purposeful sampling techniques we would know very little about the impact of child abuse on adults in later life, attitudes towards risky sex, the impact of racism/sexism/disabelism on individuals and a whole host of other questions.

The idea that SR needs to have a 'complete' sample is one that is usually pushed by quant researchers, but even people like Hammersley acknowledge that sampling is actually just one part of it and is more pertinent when looking at large scale trending on a national/international basis.

Research with 'hard-to-reach' groups, which this indubitably falls under, tends to use more qualitative methods and frequently snowball sampling. as a statistician, you could argue that the results are not valid because of the sample technique, but believe me, most social researchers use these techniques and get government funding to do so. Additionally even if you could produce the statistically speaking 'ideal' sample, there would be huge issues with the data as well, as you are no doubt aware. researchers use the appropriate instruments to answer the question, and in this instance, the most appropriate instrument would be an identifying survey followed up by semi-structured individual interviewing

You win the internets. :eek:
*bows to your superior knowledge*
 
I'm almost certain that I saw something recently about a study that had determined that its participants who were into BDSM were no more likely to have been abused than the ones who weren't. But for the life of me, I can't remember where I saw it. :eek:
 
You win the internets. :eek:
*bows to your superior knowledge*

meh, social research, it's my job. and I love it. makes me get a bit arsey at times though. apologies for the lecture. normal shallowness and glibness will be resumed shortly.
 
meh, social research, it's my job. and I love it. makes me get a bit arsey at times though. apologies for the lecture. normal shallowness and glibness will be resumed shortly.

No no, it's quite all right! I am a gung-ho sociology student, but you know this stuff. I appreciate the lecture!
 
Back
Top