BLoved
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2010
- Posts
- 1,457
And I believe a submissive is responsible for more in the relationship than just weeding out loons and choosing the one s/he submits to. S/he is responsible for the relationship to stay functional, for letting the dominant party know if s/he sees something is about to go very wrong and also for dealing with the consequences of things gone wrong. Just to name a few. I know that you don't agree with this, at least based on what you replied to me in your previous post, so we can just agree to disagree.
As I said in the OP and in the "previous post":
He must listen to and understand his beloved, being willing to reconsider decisions or positions as a result of listening to her thoughts and feelings.
I have stressed many times the need for communication.
No, a claim of BDSM shouldn't grant immunity and I wouldn't limit a submissive's right to charge his/her abuser. But a dom could be charged with many things BDSM even if there was no abuse at all, at least here where I live. That was my point.
Unless bdsm is being conducted in front of a police officer/etc, I do not see how anyone is going to be charged unless it is the submissive who calls the police.
Unless you are saying that an abuser faces criminal prosecution for abuse, and that this is the risk a 'dom' takes, I fail to see your concern.