After 2050, where will Conservatives go?

[LJ_Reloaded]

Whites won't be a majority by then. There's almost no room for Conservatism, especially warmongering politics and exploitationist "free trade" economics, outside the white population; it gets no purchase among minorities.

Where will all those beleaguered whites, alienated in the country they conquered and befouled for the last several hundred years, go to find refuge?

Germany, perhaps?

 

[LaRocha]

Latino Americans, Cuban Americans etc. are notoriously conservative. Won Florida for Bush twice.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

There will always be whites and conservatives otherwise the planet would starve and walk barefoot.

 

[LaRocha]

your shoes came from east asia

 

[Liar]

2050? I can't be bothered to think past next weekend.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

your shoes came from east asia

No one wears shoes in East Asia; they gotta sell them to white people in America.

 

[voluptuary_manque]

Since by 2050 the world will start a precipitous population decline they will also run out of people to deride.

 

[sr71plt]

In 2050 the current liberals (those still breathing) will be the then conservatives.

 

[PoppingTom]

Where will all those beleaguered whites, alienated in the country they conquered and befouled for the last several hundred years, go to find refuge?

Germany, perhaps?

Off course, not.

We have Sharia at that time, and make the 6th plea of jihad against America, cause we have no more money.

 

[3113]

Whites won't be a majority by then. There's almost no room for Conservatism, especially warmongering politics and exploitationist "free trade" economics, outside the white population; it gets no purchase among minorities.

You're like not serious, right? Warmongering politics and exploitation free trade gets no purchase among minorities? You really think that?

Haven't been to Africa much, have you.

And you don't think the Taliban is conservative? Warmongering? And there's no exploitation "free trade" economics going on in China?

Don't cry for the loss of white Conservatives. When they're gone, there will be plenty of others to take their place. In fact, they're already there among minorities and have always been there and always will be there.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You're like not serious, right? Warmongering politics and exploitation free trade gets no purchase among minorities? You really think that?

Haven't been to Africa much, have you.

This. Is. Not. Africa. People around here just want to handle their own business. You ever see M.E.C.H.A. or La Raza or any of those groups clamoring for any kind of foreign invasion? Hell, even the Nation of Islam isn't talking about war against the Jews anymore.

And you don't think the Taliban is conservative? Warmongering? And there's no exploitation "free trade" economics going on in China?

Well then, great - Conservatives can go to China, and choke on their pollution. Or hang out with the warlords in Somalia.

Don't cry for the loss of white Conservatives. When they're gone, there will be plenty of others to take their place. In fact, they're already there among minorities and have always been there and always will be there.

The number of minority Conservatives out there could fill a telephone booth. You get the same handful of black conservatives making rounds across the country trying to make it look like they're a significant presence.

If Conservatism didn't jump the multiracial shark in America with Bush, they sure as hell did with Sarah Palin and the Tea Party.

Can't wait to see the 2010 exit polls...

 

[3113]

This. Is. Not. Africa.

You. Miss. The. Point.

Africa is not dominated by white people. The folk there who are creating laws to kill gays, keeping women enslaved, and running kleptocracies are blacks. So...use your brain here...Use it hard...that means that you don't get rid of conservative inclinations just by making people with white skin vanish. Because anyone of any race can do those conservative things.

Ditto China. No whites creating the pollution, free-trade shit and all that there, are there? So. If white conservatives go...such thinking still exists. Doesn't it?

So, yes. Right here, right now, in the U.S. most conservatives are white. But if you went around to black churches asking them to legalize gay marriage...would you find a lot of liberals? How about if you talked to them about illegal immigrants from Mexico? Don't be so sure that erasing the whites will leave the U.S. with liberals. Big white man is good for uniting people who big white man hates. Without him...they may decide to hate each other.

 

[Pure]

note:

wiki:

The five largest ancestry groups in South Carolina are African American (29.5%), American (13.9%), English (8.4%), German (8.4%) and Irish (7.9%). For most of South Carolina's history, African slaves, and then their descendants, made up a majority of the state's population. Whites became a majority in the early 20th century, when tens of thousands of blacks moved north in the Great Migration.

 

[al_Ussa]

There will always be whites and conservatives otherwise the planet would starve and walk barefoot.

Except that places like Dubai and Singapore are thriving while people like you live in trailer parks in the middle of nowhere. I would say we are doing quite well for ourselves. But then, our women are considerably better looking than the fat hambeasts that you're stuck with.

Africa is not dominated by white people. The folk there who are creating laws to kill gays, keeping women enslaved, and running kleptocracies are blacks.

Not everyone in Africa is black. I have family there that can attest as much. Several countries like Algeria, Morocco, Egypt and the like are not black at all.

Also, that anti-homosexuality bill in Uganda is being pushed through by evangelical christians in the US.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Except that places like Dubai and Singapore are thriving while people like you live in trailer parks in the middle of nowhere. I would say we are doing quite well for ourselves. But then, our women are considerably better looking than the fat hambeasts that you're stuck with.

Dubai, you say?

http://www.dubai-livethedream.com/dubai-economy.html
As of 2009, Dubai was so deep in debt that each of their citizens owed $400,000 to foreign entities.

You should also see the way they treat their workers:
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/the-dark-side-of-dubai-1664368.html

I'm sure you won't answer this now that you've been shown to not know what you're talking about...

 

[Zeb_Carter]

Whites won't be a majority by then. There's almost no room for Conservatism, especially warmongering politics and exploitationist "free trade" economics, outside the white population; it gets no purchase among minorities.

Where will all those beleaguered whites, alienated in the country they conquered and befouled for the last several hundred years, go to find refuge?

Germany, perhaps?

Like you name implies you ask loaded or is that reloaded questions. And I would guess you are a California liberal from you location blurb.

And as explained to you very clearly by 3113 just because Whites may become a minority in the future doesn't guarantee that conservatism goes by the wayside like you hope. More and more of those who are minorities are turning to conservatism as they grow older and wiser. And as explained by 3 most nationalities who come to the US to chase the American dream are conservative by nature having fled socialistic totalitarian governments themselves and their children will be brought up to embrace that conservatism.

And not all of us who have conservative leanings are white to begin with nor are we all ultrarightwing nuts who go bombing abortion clinics or beating up gays nor do we wish all liberal would dry up and blow away. Well not all of them, the pretty girls can stay.

 

[3113]

Not everyone in Africa is black. I have family there that can attest as much. Several countries like Algeria, Morocco, Egypt and the like are not black at all.

I didn't say everyone was black. I said that blacks (non-anglos if you want to be more specific) were the majority. The argument was that when non-whites become the majority in this country conservatism will vanish--that all minorities are liberal. I'm pointing out that the evidence seen in other countries that are not dominated by anglos prove that one can't count on that. Can one?

Also, that anti-homosexuality bill in Uganda is being pushed through by evangelical christians in the US.

It was certainly suggested by them...but I doubt it'd be getting anywhere if the majority of Ugandans weren't also Christian...and homophobic. Which makes it a problem of religion and culture, not race.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I didn't say everyone was black. I said that blacks (non-anglos if you want to be more specific) were the majority. The argument was that when non-whites become the majority in this country conservatism will vanish--that all minorities are liberal. I'm pointing out that the evidence seen in other countries that are not dominated by anglos prove that one can't count on that. Can one?


It was certainly suggested by them...but I doubt it'd be getting anywhere if the majority of Ugandans weren't also Christian...and homophobic. Which makes it a problem of religion and culture, not race.

Anglos are not a majority anywhere except in England and maybe Australia. They certainly are not in the US, although Anglos may be a plurality.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Like you name implies you ask loaded or is that reloaded questions. And I would guess you are a California liberal from you location blurb.

And as explained to you very clearly by 3113 just because Whites may become a minority in the future doesn't guarantee that conservatism goes by the wayside like you hope. More and more of those who are minorities are turning to conservatism as they grow older and wiser.

And this last part is factually wrong. The exit polls simply do not support this. They support a downward trend in non-white support for warmongering and free trade Capitalism, to say the least.

And opposition against gay marriage is practically disintegrating among all younger demographics.

 

[Boxlicker101]

To answer your question as to where Conservatives will go in 2050: To the White House, to Congress, to various state legislatures and governors' and mayors' mansions and other places of authority. In other words, to the same places they sometimes go now. Liberals will be doing the same thing. I expect that Conservatives will be in much the same position in three years, with the White House, the Senate and the House of Reps, as the Liberals are now, after the voters rebel against the excesses of the current pols in power. I expect them to control the House as of Jan 2011 and for the Senate to be almost evenly divided. There may well be more independents in either house of Congress as popular office holders distance themselves from both parties. There may even be a third party in the center.

This is strictly a prediction, and we will know more on Nov. 2. That is slightly more than six months from now.

 

[Zeb_Carter]

And this last part is factually wrong. The exit polls simply do not support this. They support a downward trend in non-white support for warmongering and free trade Capitalism, to say the least.

And opposition against gay marriage is practically disintegrating among all younger demographics.

I wouldn't put much faith in exit polls. On the other hand blind polls are a better indicator of how Americans, not matter their race, feel about the way things are going in the country.

I would also assume from your usage of such words as "warmongering" and the phrase "free trade Capitalism" you feel those of us who do believe in Capitalism owe you something. As for Warmongering just as many liberals have gotten this country into conflicts as conservatives.

If I remember my history...

Woodrow Wilson got us into the WWI
Franklin D. Roosevelt got us into WWII
Harry S. Truman got us into Korea
John F. Kennedy got us into Viet Nam

All Democrats.

So who is the warmongers again?

 

[JackLuis]

-

If I remember my history...

Woodrow Wilson got us into the WWI
Franklin D. Roosevelt got us into WWII
Harry S. Truman got us into Korea
John F. Kennedy got us into Viet Nam

All Democrats.

So who is the warmongers again?

A little about Viet Nam.

LBJ kept us in Viet Nam, to extend Ike's patronage of Anti-Soviet forces. That sounds bipartisan to me.

JFK could have been snuffed because of his containment of Republican excesses, and had instituted the Special Forces to deal with such conflicts. I'm not saying he was killed because he opposed the "World View" of entrenched interests in business and Government, but who knows?

For real War Mongering though, you just can not top George and Dick. Not even Richard Perl, well on second thought...

Nope, W and a Dick have to be at the top of the War Mongering Hall of Infamy.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Dubai, you say?

http://www.dubai-livethedream.com/dubai-economy.html
As of 2009, Dubai was so deep in debt that each of their citizens owed $400,000 to foreign entities.

You should also see the way they treat their workers:
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/the-dark-side-of-dubai-1664368.html

I'm sure you won't answer this now that you've been shown to not know what you're talking about...

Wow, I'm surprised no one else called Al Ussa on bullshit of this magnitude.

I'd have 200 people on my ass if I made such an obvious mistake like this...

 

[Boxlicker101]

Originally Posted by LJ_Reloaded
And this last part is factually wrong. The exit polls simply do not support this. They support a downward trend in non-white support for warmongering and free trade Capitalism, to say the least.

And opposition against gay marriage is practically disintegrating among all younger demographics.

I wouldn't put much faith in exit polls. On the other hand blind polls are a better indicator of how Americans, not matter their race, feel about the way things are going in the country.

I would also assume from your usage of such words as "warmongering" and the phrase "free trade Capitalism" you feel those of us who do believe in Capitalism owe you something. As for Warmongering just as many liberals have gotten this country into conflicts as conservatives.

If I remember my history...

Woodrow Wilson got us into the WWI
Franklin D. Roosevelt got us into WWII
Harry S. Truman got us into Korea
John F. Kennedy got us into Viet Nam

All Democrats.

So who is the warmongers again?

If I happened to walk out of the polling place and somebody with a clipboard asked me if I had voted against "warmongering and free trade Capitalism" I would think he or she was some kind of a nut. I would answer in the affirmative, just to avoid any hassle.

To be honest, Zeb, I believe it was necessary to get into WW1 and WW2 and probably Korea too, although we could have done a better job of getting a peace treaty in Korea.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I wouldn't put much faith in exit polls. On the other hand blind polls are a better indicator of how Americans, not matter their race, feel about the way things are going in the country.

I would also assume from your usage of such words as "warmongering" and the phrase "free trade Capitalism" you feel those of us who do believe in Capitalism owe you something.

Actually, we owe you something. A trip to the dustbin of history, that is.

Go out there and watch the Tea Parties. Take note of all the minorities participating. Notice that in a crowd of a thousand Tea Partiers, you can count the non-whites on two hands?