J
JAMESBJOHNSON
Guest
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You think? I don't think so.CHARLEY
Moderators yield to pressure from obsessive whiners such as STELLA. people like STELLA will pester a moderator to death, till they give in or quit. STELLA doesnt respect the owner's policy, she wont respect a moderator. So the line has to be drawn with her.
You think? I don't think so.
PS. Why does Stella threaten you so much?
Forgive me, please, folks, but may I make a few remarks ?
I'm new to all this and I frankly don't understand a great deal of the allusions to various sexual practices understood by others, but the concept of 'Moderation' is an interesting one.
If there is no post of "Moderator", then self-moderation must be the answer. Now, bearing in mind that the range of "acceptable" behaviour (in terms of language used and 'personal' attacks) is going to be quite wide, at the very least, we need to think a bit harder.
Let me give you an example.
/quote
My name be Kenesha LaTeesha Williams.
I an African-American Girl who just got an award for being the bess speler in class. I got 67 on the speling tess plust 30 point for being black 5 point for not bringin drugs to class 5 point for not bringin guns to class and 5 point for not gettin pregnut during the cemester. It be hard to beat a score of 120.
Da white boy who sit nex to me is McGee from Macon .. He got a 94 on the tess but no extra point on acount of he have da same skin color as the opressirs.
Granny ax me to thank all Dimocrafts and Liberuls for suportin afermative action. You be showin da way to true eqwallity.
I be gittin in medical skool nex an mabe I be yo docter when Barrac take over da healtcare in dis cuntry.
/unquote
Now, we in the UK have a few jokes of a similar trend, but to me that joke is not "racist" at all, but a very sad (and amusing) comment on the quality of education, with maybe a whack at some specific policies. If the joke was not so specifically American, I'd put it into the Humour thread on a couple of boards I occasionally play in, confident that others would see it my way.
Following one spat by SafeBet (I forget which), I wrote a PM to her and received a very civilised reply (for which, thanks). I don't agree with the tenor at least one reply ("Just go screw yourself," etc), because, apart from being a bit long, it added nothing to the debate and I personally think there are better ways of criticising a comment.
Jokes are a very personal thing. But, to me, the joke is always about someone "outside" the main stream, be it gender, orientation or mental capacity. The joke is not usually intended to "insult & denigrate others" per se, but to highlight a quirk of 'situation'. There was, at one time, a big debate about the 'Jew'. The best people to tell those jokes were themselves ! Similarly, some of the best jokes about non-Caucasian (I don't like this PC-heavy stuff like "persons of colour") are told by themselves (listen to Lenny Henry on the subject).
I could probably think of several other examples, but I'll shut up now.
Thanks for the time.
Handley_Page
![]()
Moderation is about helping people get along, no?
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here. Does the offended person have an obligation to be "nice" about their anger and hurt?Thank you for putting right, Stella.
I should, perhaps, have mentioned better the wording of some of the criticisms, not just in the Humour thread, but in other places. It's as if the respondent whacks out a few fast words without thinking of the impact or import of those words. For an 'author' should surely think of the words - yes ?
I don't think we need a moderator.
We need to be more aware of "Self-Moderation", perhaps.
We can add this to the list of examples.I do want to thank safe_bet for quoting DG Hear's Humor thread assessment of her in posting #5. I would have missed it otherwise, because I don't read the humor thread (which, if she were adult, she also could just not do if she doesn't appreciate the humor posted there). However, I'm delighted that assessment was repeated, because it has safe_bet pegged perfectly.
The person who trolls a thread with numerous huge red, off-topic, posts in an attempt to kill it because their militant martyrdom is offended is far more offensive than the thread they're trying to kill.We can add this to the list of examples.
The person who points out that DG's thread is vile is not a vile person.
Hmm, could you please show me where Weird Harold has been a "homophobic, bigoted, racist, anti-woman, hate-speech spewing asshat"? This IS supposed to be the show-and-tell thread, after all.Weird Harold: Thank you for putting me on your ignore list. My goal in life is to be on the ignore list of EVERY homophobic, bigoted, racist, anti-woman, hate-speech spewing asshat. Two down, too damn many to go!
Hmm, could you please show me where Weird Harold has been a "homophobic, bigoted, racist, anti-woman, hate-speech spewing asshat"? This IS supposed to be the show-and-tell thread, after all.
Hmm, could you please show me where Weird Harold has been a "homophobic, bigoted, racist, anti-woman, hate-speech spewing asshat"? This IS supposed to be the show-and-tell thread, after all.
I'm not saying he is or not. Just that I haven't seen any posts that show that. (But I don't read every post on the AH, as I have a life to live.) From what I can see, he put you on ignore because he thought you were annoying. That's kinda not the same thing.
Who says I wear pants?I have to agree with Liar, even though his pants may be afire.![]()