Another chasitiy question

[The_Good_Sub]

My mistress decided I need to wear a cb3000 24/7. Since I started wearing it, and my mistress took control of my sexual activity I don't orgasm very often. Sometimes once/twice a month, sometimes more, whatever. Sometimes there is a lot of orgasm edging in between and I've read a bit on "retrograde" sperm and have heard that milking can help reduce the risk. But everything refers to actual ejaculation either by ruined orgasm or edging while massaging the prostate. Both of these are fine for her. I am wondering, since I usually have a ton of pre-cum when she uses a dildo on me anally, is that sufficient milking or not. Does it need to be ejaculate per say? I'm asking because she wants new ways for her to deny my satisfaction while keeping my frustrated and still be horny.

thanks

 

[Etoile]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrograde_ejaculation

That is totally freaky. Especially this:
"To induce pregnancy, the male's urine may be centrifuged and the isolated sperm injected directly into the woman."

 

[The_Good_Sub]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrograde_ejaculation

That is totally freaky. Especially this:
"To induce pregnancy, the male's urine may be centrifuged and the isolated sperm injected directly into the woman."

wow, quoting wiki does not answer my question at all. i know what retrograde is. so anyway could answer the question now?

 

[Etoile]

wow, quoting wiki does not answer my question at all. i know what retrograde is. so anyway could answer the question now?

It wasn't meant to be answering your question. You mentioned you've read up on that topcoat, so I certainly figured you would already know what it was. It's not likely that anyone else here know, though, so my post wasn't really directed at you, but rather as a fill-in of information that others might also wonder about.

 

[BiBunny]

wow, quoting wiki does not answer my question at all. i know what retrograde is. so anyway could answer the question now?

Could you BE more obnoxious to the one person who actually bothered to comment to your thread?

 

[graceanne]

Could you BE more obnoxious to the one person who actually bothered to comment to your thread?

Seriously.

And people wonder why we don't answer threads like this.

Asshole.

 

[satindesire]

Could you BE more obnoxious to the one person who actually bothered to comment to your thread?

Not such a 'good' sub, eh?

Seriously.

And people wonder why we don't answer threads like this.

Asshole.

It's the backup of retrograde semen, it's infected his brain with too much testosterone.

 

[graceanne]

Not such a 'good' sub, eh?



It's the backup of retrograde semen, it's infected his brain with too much testosterone.

Ah, testosterone poisoning. Poor guy. *shakes head*

 

[satindesire]

Ah, testosterone poisoning. Poor guy. *shakes head*

They say a good dose of chemical castration will cure that. But then again, me even saying this risks cock-humiliation boners from our bone head. So I'll cease fire and sit here with my chocolate milk and cookies and shamelessly spectate on the fire.

 

[Sir_Winston54]

They say a good dose of chemical castration will cure that. But then again, me even saying this risks cock-humiliation boners from our bone head. So I'll cease fire and sit here with my chocolate milk and cookies and shamelessly spectate on the fire.

Don't sit too close to the fire. Might not be good for the lil 'un.

:: Plumps up a pillow, puts it on the hassock so you can raise your feet and avoid edema of the feet/ankles. ::

 

[The_Good_Sub]

sorry, tone of voice doesn't translate well over the internet, and i wasn't trying to sound like an asshole, just sarcastic.
/goes to corner

 

[Etoile]

Wow, I just noticed my iPod somehow corrected "topic" to "topcoat" - crazy!

 

[satindesire]

Wow, I just noticed my iPod somehow corrected "topic" to "topcoat" - crazy!

I hate posting from the iphone for that very same reason. Grr!

 

[gregor2001us]

So getting back to your question, if you are wondering if you need to ejaculate at some frequency and in sufficient amount to maintain health, the answer seems to be it is uncertain.

A study was done of men who had ejaculated alot vs little during their early adulthood and whether that had any effect on their potential for prostate cancer later in life, if I remember correctly. The conclusion was more frequent ejaculation reduced the incidence of prostate cancer. But that does not really equate to what you are doing, I do not think, so you have to consider your risk tolerance in the face of uncertainty.

I am essentially in your shoes, and feel comfortable with it. Actually highly aroused, wink.

Cheers!