Democrats in history - Let's take a look.

Psst - I'm not a Republican. If you actually read my posts instead of following the mantra of the tree-swingers, you would know that.

I haven't read all of your posts, but I am curious. What are you, politically speaking?
 
No, it wasn't "in-kind". Rob called you "Mr. Kraft" insinuating that you're a man. No slur at all, but it sure got your boxers all in a twist didn't it?

You called him "faggot" and "fag-boy" (no argument that these are both slurs for homosexuals) several times, then tried to admonish him for making personal attacks while referring to other posters as "faggots" and "fat-assed hags".

So not only are you a raging hypocrite with regards to the personal attack rant , you're also tossing around derogatory slurs for homosexuals..

Not very smart and easily provoked make for a bad combination.

He's almost as bad as Cap'n Hypocrite.

With a little more seasoning and vitriol, Mr. Kraft might be ready in a few years to step up to the AJ/Ish/Miles level.
 
Is this true, that democrats are either: 1) "Elites" who feel superior and want to "help" people whom they deem inferior or 2) People who feel they they can't thrive on their own and want someone to take care of them.
 
The new left aren't Democrats Karen, they're wannabe slave masters and overseers. Having practiced with the black population, and succeeding in enslaving them once more in the entrapment of soft bigotry, they are now planning on doing the same for everyone else.

Of course the clowns posting here seem to see themselves as part of the 'controling' group when indeed, they're just the more willing of the slaves. And those that become a little 'too intellectual' will be fed to the lions, or just get a bullet in the brain. They might even survive the bullet because in most of their cases the brain is atrophied beyond repair anyway.

Ishmael

What? All I could hear was "blah, blah, I'm a fucking moron."

Jesus, is that all you do? fantasize about putting a bullet in someone's brain or sneaking up behind and stabbing then in the base of the skull for a quick, silent death? You should get out more. Don't they open the gates to your facility a few days a week?
:rolleyes:
 
What? All I could hear was "blah, blah, I'm a fucking moron."

Jesus, is that all you do? fantasize about putting a bullet in someone's brain or sneaking up behind and stabbing then in the base of the skull for a quick, silent death?
:rolleyes:

Awww, Ulaven, let the old guy enjoy his projectin'!
 
The new left aren't Democrats Karen, they're wannabe slave masters and overseers. Having practiced with the black population, and succeeding in enslaving them once more in the entrapment of soft bigotry, they are now planning on doing the same for everyone else.

Of course the clowns posting here seem to see themselves as part of the 'controling' group when indeed, they're just the more willing of the slaves. And those that become a little 'too intellectual' will be fed to the lions, or just get a bullet in the brain. They might even survive the bullet because in most of their cases the brain is atrophied beyond repair anyway.

Ishmael

ROTFL.

I'm soooo glad Obama got elected.
 
Unfornately, racism and classism is alive and well in both parties, but as for Democrats, they certianly are not the party of Thomas Jefferson anymore....
 
ROTFL.

I'm soooo glad Obama got elected.

This summarizes the high points of the Obama administration so far:

The Road to Economic Demoralization -- Washington Is Going the Wrong Way
By Larry Kudlow


There's no question that current government policies for taxes, spending and regulation are causing the United States to lose competitiveness in the global race for capital, prosperity and growth.

Of course, China has been moving in the direction of free-market capitalism for years. To some extent, this shows the positive benefits of America's free-trade policies and its open-mindedness in helping nurture not only Chinese growth, but also middle-class prosperity worldwide.

But what's particularly galling about Obamanomics is that we may well be losing our competitive edge with Europe. While Europe is ever so slightly moving toward Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, the United States is shifting toward an overtaxed and overregulated model that smacks of Francois Mitterrand. That's something no one should want to tolerate.

Heavy government controls at home, along with an income-leveling social policy couched in economic-recovery terms, is no way to run a railroad. At the simple stroke of a computer key, world investment flows to its most hospitable destination. That includes a reliable currency. But in President Bush's last year and President Obama's first, the United States has become a less hospitable destination for global capital. That should worry everybody.

But let's first look to the China story.

We know that China is already our principal banker, to the tune of nearly $1 trillion. As President Obama's record spending and borrowing continues -- he'll be the greatest bond salesman in American history -- our financial reliance on China grows daily. But that's not all.
Fortune magazine recently reported that the number of U.S. companies in the world's top 500 fell to the lowest level ever, while more Chinese firms than ever made the list. Thirty-seven Chinese companies now rank in the top 500, including nine new entries. Meanwhile, the number of U.S. firms has fallen to 140, the lowest total since Fortune began the list in 1995. This is not good.

China also surpassed the United States as the world's biggest automaker in the first half of 2009, with June sales soaring 36.5 percent from a year earlier. The Chinese registered 6.1 million car sales for the first half of the year. That way outpaced American sales, which were only 4.8 million.
And China has no capital-gains tax. It only has a 15 to 20 percent corporate tax. The United States, on the other hand, is raising its cap-gains tax rate to 20 percent. It's also increasing its top personal tax rates.

In fact, the scheduled income-tax hike along with a much-discussed 4 percent health-care surtax will balloon the top U.S. tax rate all the way to 51 percent. And there's more. In order to finance so-called health-care reform, congressional Democrats are now talking about raising the tax rate on capital gains and dividends by another 1.5 percent, while installing a value-added tax (VAT) that would begin at 1.5 percent.
So top tax rates in the United States may edge into the mid-50 percent range. Compare that to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) average of only 42 percent. And when those tax hikes kick in, the top U.S. tax rate will rank above that of France, Germany and Italy. That can't be good.

Incidentally, our 40 percent corporate tax rate is already almost 15 percentage points higher than the corporate rates in most of Europe.
Washington's enormous expansion of the state-, local- and federal-government spending share of gross domestic product to over 40 percent -- including Bailout Nation, TARP and takeovers in numerous industries -- is eerily reminiscent of Old Europe's old policies. And in an ironic twist, Europe seems to be moving toward a lower tax-spend-and-regulate, Reagan-type approach, while the United States is regressing to the failed socialist model of Old Europe. This makes no sense.

Higher tax rates undermine the incentive model of growth. At the margin, investment risk and work effort become less rewarding. On top of this, Obama's regulatory moves toward greater government control of the economy will further drown animal spirits in a sea of red tape born of bureaucratic officialdom.

Think about this in terms of the threat to nationalize heath care, which is over 15 percent of the economy. Additionally, Washington's
cap-and-trade proposals will essentially nationalize the entire energy sector -- another 15 percent of the economy -- sending long tentacles into every nook of the economy that's impacted by energy, which is virtually everything.

And all this comes on top of the U.S. government's takeover of auto companies, banks, AIG, Fannie and Freddie. Instead of Schumpeterian gales of creative destruction, we're on the road to economic demoralization.

Here's the clincher: Year-to-date, Dow Jones stocks are off 8 percent, while China stocks are up 71 percent. The world index is up 4 percent. Emerging markets are up 25 percent. They're all beating us. None of this is good.
We're going the wrong way. That's why stock markets are not voting for the United States any more.
 
The new left aren't Democrats Karen, they're wannabe slave masters and overseers. Having practiced with the black population, and succeeding in enslaving them once more in the entrapment of soft bigotry, they are now planning on doing the same for everyone else.

Of course the clowns posting here seem to see themselves as part of the 'controling' group when indeed, they're just the more willing of the slaves. And those that become a little 'too intellectual' will be fed to the lions, or just get a bullet in the brain. They might even survive the bullet because in most of their cases the brain is atrophied beyond repair anyway.

Ishmael

Look at the Kennedy - Nixon debates.

Both guys were excellent. Nixon had good facts and presented them okay -- sort of; Kennedy had charm and charisma, yes, but he also had facts to support his assertions.

Those days are gone, it seems. The left is now 100% bankrupt intellectually, as far as I can see. Today it's nothing but:

BUSH'S FAULT
PALIN SAID SHE CAN SEE RUSSIA FROM HER HOUSE
[ name ] IS A RACIST - IF YOU DISAGREE, YOU ARE TOO
REPUBLICANS ARE ALL RACISTS
WE INHERITED ALL OF OUR OWN FUCK UPS FROM BUSH
BUSH DID IT
CHENEY DID IT TOO

... and the sad part is that that's what Americans base their votes on.

It's no wonder that I can only count half a dozen left intellectuals posting here. The rest are "Karen's a guy" people who are too unsure of their chops to post a real thought here.

To me, they lose the argument when they abandon the thread topic and change it into "Karen's a guy." They think it's "winning" since I don't continue posting evidence in support of the thread topic. But I wasn't going to anyway. The initial post has the quotes on which I rely.

There response? Karen's a guy..... oh, and nobody saw no videos, right? Right?????

As a matter of fact, I can almost guarantee that they didn't read the opening quotes. They simply saw KAREN KRAFT creating a political thread and decided to launch their limp-dick equivalent of "Bush's fault" -- the mantra of the intellectually vacuous.
 
Look at the Kennedy - Nixon debates.

Both guys were excellent. Nixon had good facts and presented them okay -- sort of; Kennedy had charm and charisma, yes, but he also had facts to support his assertions.

Those days are gone, it seems. The left is now 100% bankrupt intellectually, as far as I can see. Today it's nothing but:

BUSH'S FAULT
PALIN SAID SHE CAN SEE RUSSIA FROM HER HOUSE
[ name ] IS A RACIST - IF YOU DISAGREE, YOU ARE TOO
REPUBLICANS ARE ALL RACISTS
WE INHERITED ALL OF OUR OWN FUCK UPS FROM BUSH
BUSH DID IT
CHENEY DID IT TOO

... and the sad part is that that's what Americans base their votes on.

It's no wonder that I can only count half a dozen left intellectuals posting here. The rest are "Karen's a guy" people who are too unsure of their chops to post a real thought here.

To me, they lose the argument when they abandon the thread topic and change it into "Karen's a guy." They think it's "winning" since I don't continue posting evidence in support of the thread topic. But I wasn't going to anyway. The initial post has the quotes on which I rely.

There response? Karen's a guy..... oh, and nobody saw no videos, right? Right?????

As a matter of fact, I can almost guarantee that they didn't read the opening quotes. They simply saw KAREN KRAFT creating a political thread and decided to launch their limp-dick equivalent of "Bush's fault" -- the mantra of the intellectually vacuous.

Kerry beat the shit out of Bush in the televised debates. "Iraq didn't attack us, Mr President, Osama Bin Laden attacked us" ring any bells? But the repo attack machine killed him with lies.

As for the thread being hijacked, you're the one that made a big issue out of it. If you hadn't had such a public meltdown, we probably wouldn't be sat here pissing ourselves laughing at you.
 
Good one.

You missed the video too?

How sad.

Let's take a look at some of your threads, shall we?

Speaking of sad.

"Wah! Someone said something bad about me. So instead of being an adult I'm going to go bump a bunch of their threads with pictures."

SeanH nailed it. You're too fucking stupid to see that you're reaction to that sort of thing just makes it happen more often. If you had half a brain in that vacuous little skull of yours you would laugh it off and ignore it. By pitching a hissy fit you're just giving the accusation legs.

THE ALL CAPS THING REALLY LET EVERYONE KNOW HOW MUCH IT WASN'T TRUE TOO! :rolleyes:
 
Kerry beat the shit out of Bush in the televised debates. "Iraq didn't attack us, Mr President, Osama Bin Laden attacked us" ring any bells? But the repo attack machine killed him with lies.

As for the thread being hijacked, you're the one that made a big issue out of it. If you hadn't had such a public meltdown, we probably wouldn't be sat here pissing ourselves laughing at you.

No, Kerry sunk Kerry when someone decided to run Kerry's looney television testimony in front of Congress when he returned from the Viet Nam war, though some liberals might call that a "Republican lie" cause they're like that you know...truth is "relative" to them.
 
No, Kerry sunk Kerry when someone decided to run Kerry's looney television testimony in front of Congress when he returned from the Viet Nam war.

Bullshit, the GOP slandered the hell out of Kerry at every opportunity. Just like they did to one of their own (McCain) in the primaries earlier. Rove slash and burn campaigning.
 
I wonder if Mr Kraft knows that bumping old threads with the intention of flooding the board is against the rules?
 
No, Kerry sunk Kerry when someone decided to run Kerry's looney television testimony in front of Congress when he returned from the Viet Nam war, though some liberals might call that a "Republican lie" cause they're like that you know...truth is "relative" to them.

Riiiight. Because a returning war hero testifying about Viet Nam is what swung it. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top