Non-con question

[Essene]

Hi,

Haven't been writing for awhile (changed my screen name), and I have a question about writing guidelines especially where it pertains to non-consent.

It's been my understanding in the past that actual non-consent or rape is frowned upon, and that Literotica really only allows consensual non-consent stories to be submitted.

Not that I actually want to, but if I chose to write a story about a miserable woman who is repeatedly raped against her will, and never likes it for even a moment, would that be allowed by the editors?

I'm sure it wouldn't garner many votes, but is it allowed?

 

[Lauren Hynde]

Probably not. It's more of a rapee fantasy than a raper fantasy category. Doesn't need to be "consentual", but if she doesn't end up enjoying it, it probably won't fly.

 

[dr_mabeuse]

If you're exploiting the rape for erotic purposes -- getting off on the fact that she's getting raped -- I would say forget it. They're not going to allow it. If it's a detail in a larger story, it might work.

 

[champagne1982]

Well, the category includes reluctance so you can make your characters unwilling participants in their own denouement. I have a non-con that even includes the word rapist. That's what's happening in the story even though my victim reluctantly enjoys it, due to her physiology.

I'm thinking POV and scenario play a large part in how the Lit editors will view the story. Tasteful and sensitive handling of the descriptors used in the story are a large part of how erotic it will be. So, write with care and tell a good story and if it fits then I'm sure the site will put it up.

 

[DeeZire]

There is a rape of sorts in my Halloween story 'The Bleaker House Ghost'. Actually, there are two, but the other one is more implied than described.

I've seen speculation that bots are screening stories, which could indicate why mine slipped through. There's another reason why mine could have been allowed, but in the interest of not posting spoilers, I'll keep that to myself.

 

[Weird Harold]

It's been my understanding in the past that actual non-consent or rape is frowned upon, and that Literotica really only allows consensual non-consent stories to be submitted.

The distinction is between rape fantasy and rapist fantasy; the former is permitted, the latter is not.

It is a difficult distinction to make, but it all hinges on whether it is the sex or the power-trip that is presented as erotic. I'd say that if you have doubts about whether it will be rejected for being too violent, it probably will be.

 

[Edward Teach]

I seem to remember a big argument several years ago about a brutal rape story, written more or less as a parody, that was allowed because the victim orgasmed and that that was considered the criteria for Lit. The victim had to enjoy it. I could be wrong -- eh, probably not.

Eddie the Elephant

 

[Sean Renaud]

It's just a Literotica myth that you can't put out pure rape. I've got stories where the girl doesn't even survive the rape. If you don't involve young children and or animals you can get pretty much anything through. There is a line of brutality where you get cut off but you have to try, we're talking spit roasting a girl while anally raping her try.

Hell if you read enough stories around here the child rule can be circumvented by simply neglecting to make it too blatant that the person is a child. I'm waiting for someone to really test the animal rule. I mean according to the rules a Unicorn qualifies as a magical animal and thus isn't an animal and thus is allowed. It's a horse. . .with a horn on it's head. I want to see some one try to push that past the censors just to see how it goes.

But as far as the rape no it doesn't need to be enjoyed by the victim. That's just a story people tell.

 

[voluptuary_manque]

It's just a Literotica myth that you can't put out pure rape. I've got stories where the girl doesn't even survive the rape. If you don't involve young children and or animals you can get pretty much anything through. There is a line of brutality where you get cut off but you have to try, we're talking spit roasting a girl while anally raping her try.

Hell if you read enough stories around here the child rule can be circumvented by simply neglecting to make it too blatant that the person is a child. I'm waiting for someone to really test the animal rule. I mean according to the rules a Unicorn qualifies as a magical animal and thus isn't an animal and thus is allowed. It's a horse. . .with a horn on it's head. I want to see some one try to push that past the censors just to see how it goes.

But as far as the rape no it doesn't need to be enjoyed by the victim. That's just a story people tell.

Uh, if you check out the traditional, (not the soppy modern version) unicorn it's a big goat with a single horn. You know, beard, cloven hooves . . . Not a horse, at all.

 

[Edward Teach]

It's just a Literotica myth that you can't put out pure rape. I've got stories where the girl doesn't even survive the rape. If you don't involve young children and or animals you can get pretty much anything through. There is a line of brutality where you get cut off but you have to try, we're talking spit roasting a girl while anally raping her try.

You can too spit roast and anal rape her if she asks you to and then cums every rotation. I'm pretty sure Bluey wrote a story like that that got an E and won a prize. But don't fuck with me over it, check with Bluebell7.

Edward the Authority

 

[Sean Renaud]

Uh, if you check out the traditional, (not the soppy modern version) unicorn it's a big goat with a single horn. You know, beard, cloven hooves . . . Not a horse, at all.

I'm just going to take your word on it rather than debate mythology. Besides unless they were minotaurs or satyrs or something vaguely human I fail to see what the important distinction is. There was a story on here a few years back (for all of one week so I assume the censors found it) that was called The Doggies or something along those lines and it dealt with super smart dogs that had been bred to speak and were just as inteligent as humans and worked exclusively with women and they had to "bond" with their women in order to work more closely with them. I'm not sure why a genetically altered dog is any less magical than say a werewolf.

PArticularly if you take the traditional werewolf which turns from a man to a wolf. Not to a wolfman. The wolfman is a hollywood construct.

 

[cloudy]

It's just a Literotica myth that you can't put out pure rape. I've got stories where the girl doesn't even survive the rape. If you don't involve young children and or animals you can get pretty much anything through. There is a line of brutality where you get cut off but you have to try, we're talking spit roasting a girl while anally raping her try.

Hell if you read enough stories around here the child rule can be circumvented by simply neglecting to make it too blatant that the person is a child. I'm waiting for someone to really test the animal rule. I mean according to the rules a Unicorn qualifies as a magical animal and thus isn't an animal and thus is allowed. It's a horse. . .with a horn on it's head. I want to see some one try to push that past the censors just to see how it goes.

But as far as the rape no it doesn't need to be enjoyed by the victim. That's just a story people tell.

Oh, by all means...let's try to slip things through that Laurel and Manu don't want on their website, just so we can feel "naughty." And then, let's watch as they get fed up with everyone doing that, and shut the whole thing down.



Idiot.

 

[Edward Teach]

Oh, by all means...let's try to slip things through that Laurel and Manu don't want on their website, just so we can feel "naughty." And then, let's watch as they get fed up with everyone doing that, and shut the whole thing down.



Idiot.

I ain't trying to start no shit, but he PMed me and called you a name. I defended you but you might want to take it up with him anyway.

 

[Safe_Bet]

I ain't trying to start no shit, but he PMed me and called you a name. I defended you but you might want to take it up with him anyway.

Oh, man! He didn't call her a Goober did he?

She HATES it when she gets called that! It's not that it's not true, but he should have stuck to names like cunt or bitch that she doesn't mind.

 

[cloudy]

I ain't trying to start no shit, but he PMed me and called you a name. I defended you but you might want to take it up with him anyway.

If he's too chickenshit to say it to me himself, then....bless his little heart.

 

[cloudy]

Oh, man! He didn't call her a Goober did he?

She HATES it when she gets called that! It's not that it's not true, but he should have stuck to names like cunt or bitch that she doesn't mind.

Goober-betsy.

 

[Edward Teach]

Oh, man! He didn't call her a Goober did he?

She HATES it when she gets called that! It's not that it's not true, but he should have stuck to names like cunt or bitch that she doesn't mind.

Now, I've been drinking a little so my memory may be a little off but I think it only has something to do with ignerunt southren flat chested Chippewah. Now I could be wrong but that's waht i remember and I told him I thought she was Cherrykey and a damn good un.

 

[tickledkitty]

Goober-betsy.

*nods*

Uber goober.

(And don't any of you literate types tell me I forgot the umlaut. )

 

[Safe_Bet]

*nods*

Uber goober.

(And don't any of you literate types tell me I forgot the umlaut. )

Asshole!

 

[Edward Teach]

*nods*

Uber goober.

(And don't any of you literate types tell me I forgot the umlaut. )

Yankee wanker.

 

[tickledkitty]

Yankee wanker.

I thought it was Wankee yanker.

 

[Edward Teach]

I thought it was Wankee yanker.

If you say so, you're the expert. But I still love you.

Your story is great - gave it a 5

 

[tickledkitty]

If you say so, you're the expert. But I still love you.

Your story is great - gave it a 5

I love you too.

Thank you.

 

[slyc_willie]

Hi,

Haven't been writing for awhile (changed my screen name), and I have a question about writing guidelines especially where it pertains to non-consent.

It's been my understanding in the past that actual non-consent or rape is frowned upon, and that Literotica really only allows consensual non-consent stories to be submitted.

Not that I actually want to, but if I chose to write a story about a miserable woman who is repeatedly raped against her will, and never likes it for even a moment, would that be allowed by the editors?

I'm sure it wouldn't garner many votes, but is it allowed?

Just doing a quick flip through the non-con section, I found one at random called "You can cry a river." Not my cup of tea, but it was definitely a rape story, with no enjoyment on the woman's part whatsoever.

The only things Lit explicitly denies in our stories are beastiality, underage sex, and snuff. They leave it up to the readers to decide if a story is worth reading.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Or you could try Wendigo, Ravished and Eaten or Utterly Destroyed by me where the girls in question don't even SURVIVE the story. It's pure Litmyth that you can't put out pure rape. It's just that enough people believe it to keep the myth alive.