Holy lawsuit, Batman

Liar

now with 17% more class
Joined
Dec 4, 2003
Posts
43,715
...or Will The Real Batman Please Stand Up?
...or There Can Be Only One. No wait, wrong movie.


Mayor of Batman sues WB, Nolan
Southeastern city in Turkey fights for name
By ALI JAAFAR


Batman has a new adversary: Batman.

The mayor of an oil-producing city in southeastern Turkey, which has the same name as the Caped Crusader, is suing helmer Christopher Nolan and Warner Bros. for royalties from mega-grosser "The Dark Knight."

Huseyin Kalkan, the pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party mayor of Batman, has accused "The Dark Knight" producers of using the city's name without permission.

"There is only one Batman in the world," Kalkan said. "The American producers used the name of our city without informing us."

No one from the town of Batman has explained why it took so many years to take legal action. Batman first appeared as a comicbook character in 1939 and the "Batman" TV series started in 1966. Tim Burton's first bigscreen rendition for Warner Bros. came out in 1989. Undoubtedly the fact that "Dark Knight" is about to pass the $1 billion mark at the B.O. played a part in stirring the ire of the Turkish hamlet.

The mayor is prepping a series of charges against Nolan and Warner Bros., which owns the right to the Batman character, including placing the blame for a number of unsolved murders and a high female suicide rate on the psychological impact that the film's success has had on the city's inhabitants.

Former natives of Batman are also said to have encountered obstacles when attempting to register their businesses abroad.

The mayor is working on gathering evidence he claims will show that the city of Batman predates the 1939 debut of Bob Kane's superhero in DC Comics.

"We are only aware of this claim via press reports and have not seen any actual legal action," a Warner Bros. rep said in a statement.

While the town of Batman has suddenly shown great interest in the property, there's no evidence that the citizenry has ever shown much loyalty to the Caped Crusader -- not even on Halloween.
 
I think if they win every resident should be made to run around in black tights, while saying Zowie! and POW!
 
Maybe I missed something, but I didn't see any real reason to sue (to be read: excuse to sure). HIgh suicide rate? Murders? That's like sueing Jake Gyllenhaal (sp?) because someone beat up a gay cowboy.

Q_C
 
Former natives of Batman are also said to have encountered obstacles when attempting to register their businesses abroad.

.

OK. This bit I can understand. all the rest? Baloney.
 
I'm sending both those stories to a friend of mine who's a huge DC comics fan. :D
 
Isn't another definition fo "batman" a valet? :confused:
Yes, indeed, but it is specific to the British Military: "A batman (or batwoman) is a soldier or airman assigned to a commissioned officer as a personal servant."

It's use appeared in WWI: "The official term used by the British Army in the First World War was Soldier-Servant. Every officer was assigned a servant, usually chosen by himself from among his men. The term Batman replaced this in the inter-war years. By the Second World War, only senior officers of the Army and Royal Air Force were officially assigned their own batmen, with junior officers usually having the services of one batman between several officers. Batwomen also served in the women's services."

Quotes from Wiki.
 
I think they should win the lawsuit, but instead of money, residents have to run around in aforementioned black tights.

Also, Adam West should get to be mayor.
 
I'm surprised the people of Turkey haven't sued the US before, since we eat turkeys every Thanksgiving. :D
 
Back
Top