voluptuary_manque
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2007
- Posts
- 30,841
Exactly! Like I said above, the last time we came to the aid of a not-very-squared-away ally, it cost us 58,000 of my brothers and sisters. Georgia started it, they can finish it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hold on Keebler, I really don't get this. Was the US really close with Georgia? Were we hinting that we'd stand behind them in a showdown with Russia? Because that's kind of idiotic think to promise them, isn't it? Georgia is Russia's neighbor. There's no way we're going to ship military aid to Russia's neighbor, let alone put troops in there and start a war with Russia itself. Georgia must have known that.
What am I missing here?
Exactly! Like I said above, the last time we came to the aid of a not-very-squared-away ally, it cost us 58,000 of my brothers and sisters. Georgia started it, they can finish it.
Here's how to tell: Look at the Russians - are their lips moving?
(BTW, I like Russians as people, but as a political entity I trust them as far as I can throw a T-62 tank.)
Roxanne, sometimes I agree with you and sometimes disagree, but I love the posts like this where I go "damn, she knows how to make a point."
![]()
I was listening to NPR on the way home from work today. I find it amusing to hear how no one is "really" sure what's happening.
The Georgians say they bomed their airport.
The Russians say "Na! You're smoking something!"
And back and forth. Amusing and... frightening really.
Well, it would seem like we wanted to see just how far we could bluff the Russians, and we found out. We could bluff them as far as Georgia, and there they called our bluff and we apparently folded. We were bluffing all along.
I feel for the Georgians, but I have to say, the idea of expanding NATO to the very doors of the Kremlin always seemed like madness to me, like we were rubbing Russia's face in it. Better we should have overseen some Confederation of East Central States or something and signed a treaty with them. You can't surround a former power like that and repeatedly disrespect them and not expect strong repercussions.
I wonder how George is going to square this with the Anti-terror thing? Aren't the Russians helping terrorists?
I guess it's not a big deal if no one intervenes. After all, it's Russia going into her back yard, isn't it? Just like Hitler did, all those years ago in the Sudetenland
If Bush had exercised a little more restraint in the "War on Terror" and not just gone for easy targets in places where men wear dresses and get around by camel, it's likely that we'd be in a far better position to deter real threats to world stability, like Russia.
I'm not disagreeing with Roxanne's opinions about Russians, just reminding folks that Joseph Stalin was a Georgian, not a Russian.
By culture he was Georgian, by descent he was Ossetian (something which was regularly pointed out by his enemies).
Curious..... How ironic is all that? Hardly heard of the place before and now it turns out to be the source of a lot of historical problems!! Great post!
I was too busy ranting to bother with Rox's throw away line about Russian prevarication...... witty tho it wasrose
(and we do like wit, here)(and Rox)...
But I did have this like-flash....
How you can tell when Dubya is lying?
Cheney's lips move.
-KC
The way to deal with the Russians is to increase oil exploration as rapidly as possible. About 70% of the value of the Russian Bourse is in Oil and Gas. However the Russian economy depends on Oil continuing to sell at $105 to $115 a barrel. If the West can get oil down to those levels in real terms the Russian government is in trouble. Oil is Russias strength but also her weakness . Is Bush smart enough to see that.
When you do battle, even if you are winning, if you continue a long time it will dull your forces and blunt your edge; if you besiege a citadel, your strength will be exhausted. If you keep your armies out in the field a long time, your supplies will be insufficient.
When your forces are dulled, your edge is blunted, your strength is exhausted, and your supplies are gone, then others will take advantage of your debility and rise up. Then even if you have wise advisors you cannot make things turn out well in the end.
Therefore I have heard of military operations that were clumsy and swift, but I have never seen one that lasted a long time. It is never beneficial to a nation to have a military operation continue for a long time.
Therefore, those who are not thoroughly aware of the disadvantages of the use of arms cannot be thoroughly aware of the advantages of the use of arms.
Sun Tzu - The Art Of War, Chapter 2: Doing Battle
Or decrease our demand for it....(oil) Much easier.. Much faster... Much more sustainable....
But that is yet another Threadjack..... That makes four for me alone today, I think!
-KC
I'm going to reply to your threadjack on the "other thread" about animal rights, since there is where it belongs.
1. GET THE HELL OUT OF MOSCOW!
2. NPR just said that the Georgians got on the street and held up flags and fists supporting their president and telling Russia to go "fuck itself" (probably not using such eloquent words as I just did). So this makes me wonder...
Little guy... flipping of big guy with much bigger tanks... when little guy obviously knows its backup just backed out. Hmmm... It seems the little guy is being rather foolish.
3. Note how Russian President (under puppet handler Putin) said "we're quitting" right before UN got intense on negotiating a "quit"
Lots of food for thought.
I guess it's not a big deal if no one intervenes. After all, it's Russia going into her back yard, isn't it? Just like Hitler did, all those years ago in the Sudetenland
If Bush had exercised a little more restraint in the "War on Terror" and not just gone for easy targets in places where men wear dresses and get around by camel, it's likely that we'd be in a far better position to deter real threats to world stability, like Russia.