Phone number in Texas abuse report linked to Colo. woman

HB1965

Litster
Joined
Jun 1, 2007
Posts
27,794
Phone number in Texas abuse report linked to Colo. woman

From Associated Press
April 23, 2008 7:37 PM EST

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. - A phone number used to report alleged abuse at a polygamist retreat in Texas has been linked to a woman suspected of making false abuse claims in Colorado, according to an affidavit made public Wednesday.

It's not yet clear whether authorities suspect Rozita Swinton, 33, of Colorado Springs, made the calls that triggered an April 3 raid of the compound. The arrest warrant affidavit released Wednesday says that several calls alleging abuse there were made using several phone numbers, including the number linked to Swinton.

The more than 400 children found at the retreat in Eldorado are now in state custody. Texas officials and lawyers have said that even if the call that prompted the raid turned out to be a hoax it would not affect their custody case because the state acted in good faith.

Swinton's whereabouts were unknown and she did not immediately return a phone message. It wasn't known whether she had an attorney.

Swinton was arrested April 16 and later released on a misdemeanor charge of false reporting in a February case in Colorado Springs with no known ties to the raid in west Texas. She's accused of posing as a teenager named "Jennifer" and falsely claiming in a 911 call that her father had locked her in her basement for days, the arrest warrant affidavit released Wednesday said.

Swinton pleaded guilty to misdemeanor false reporting in a 2005 case out of Castle Rock, Colo.; a one-year sentence was deferred. She had claimed in phone calls to be a 16-year-old named Jessica who was suicidal after giving birth; there was no baby.

"The investigator ... was surprised at her age because she sounded like someone who was in her mid- to late teens even though she was 30," Castle Rock police Lt. Douglas Ernst said.

The warrant also links Swinton to calls made throughout October from a "Dana Anderson." The caller claimed to be a young woman being abused by her pastor at Colorado Springs' New Life Church, and later as a 13-year-old student at Liberty High School who said she was being drugged and sexually abused by her father.

Officers linked the calls to Swinton in March after a Colorado Springs counselor got someone named Dana Anderson to acknowledge that her first name was Rozita, the document said.

In mid-April, Texas Rangers called Colorado Springs police regarding their investigation into the Eldorado polygamist retreat, Yearning for Zion Ranch.

The calls that triggered the raid of the ranch were purportedly made by a 16-year-old girl who said her 50-year-old husband beat and raped her. Texas authorities have not found that girl but say they have found evidence other children were abused.

Texas Ranger Brooks Long asked Colorado Springs police about two telephone numbers, both with Colorado Springs area codes, that were used to make calls to a Texas crisis center. One of the phone numbers, the document says, "was possibly related to the reporting party for the YFZ Ranch incident," and was one of the numbers police had connected to Swinton.

The document says the calls were made sometime since October but was not more specific. The raid was triggered by three calls made March 29 and 30 to the Newbridge Family Shelter in Texas.

Texas authorities also are investigating a separate batch of calls made to a crisis center in Washington state.

Authorities have called Swinton a "person of interest" in the Texas case. Two Texas Rangers were with Colorado officials when they searched Swinton's home.

Texas authorities said the search turned up several items suggesting a connection between Swinton and calls regarding the Eldorado retreat and other Texas and Arizona compounds owned by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, a renegade Mormon sect. The items weren't identified.

Texas Department of Public Safety spokeswoman Tela Mange on Wednesday said only that the Texas Rangers' investigation is continuing.

The calls that triggered the raid were made by someone using the name named Sarah Barlow, according to Long.

Flora Jessop, executive director of the Child Protection Project, a Phoenix-based organization that helps girls and women leaving the polygamous culture, said she has recorded nearly 40 hours of conversations with someone who said her name was Laura. "She claimed to be the twin sister of Sarah, who made the initial call in Texas," said Jessop, a former member of the FLDS church.

The caller got most of the details of the sect right, from specifics of the religion and culture, to the of homes in Hildale, Utah, and Colorado City, Ariz., where she said she was being held, Jessop said. She added, however, that other things she said made her suspicious, such as calling her parents "Mom" and "Dad" instead of "Mother" and "Father," as FLDS members do.

Texas' child welfare agency says its investigation into the ranch, including interviews with children, has found evidence of abuse. They allege that the sect encourages adolescent girls to marry older men and have children, and that boys are groomed to become future perpetrators. Sect members deny the allegations.

Documents related to Swinton's arrest had been sealed by a judge at the request of Texas authorities. The arrest warrant affidavit was released Wednesday after The Associated Press filed a motion to unseal the records Monday.

http://my.earthlink.net/article/nat?guid=20080423/480eb440_3421_13345200804231816809222
 
what a fuck up.

since when did the state take children, purely in the basis of anonymous calls?
since when were children taken into care, simply because their parents shared the religion of and lived near the accused?
 
Last edited:
since when did the state take children, purely in the basis of anonymous calls?
since when were children taken into care, simply because their parents shared the religion of and lived near the accused?

Texas?

There a settlement in south eastern British Columbia that is supposed to be linked to the Texas one both in life style and exchange of persons.
For whatever reason nothing has happened there yet.

See what happens.
 
what a fuck up.

since when did the state take children, purely in the basis of anonymous calls?
since when were children taken into care, simply because their parents shared the religion of and lived near the accused?

The call seems to have been a screwup, but once in the compound, they found enough pregnant teenagers to warrant closing down the whole operation, religious underpinnings or not. Until they get sorted out which child is whose, they can't discern who was the abuser, who was the abusee, and who was just standing nearby.
 
what a fuck up.

since when did the state take children, purely in the basis of anonymous calls?
since when were children taken into care, simply because their parents shared the religion of and lived near the accused?

Exactly! What's worse is they still plan to pursue the case even though the woman has a record of making false allegations
 
Last edited:
Exactly! What's worse is they still plan to persue the case even though the woman has a record of making false allegations


Authority is caught between a rock and a hard place here. They want to eradicate the practices of the cult but if they do the consequence are quite drastic not to mention expensive. What was once called 'deprogramming' is pretty difficult and can never produce ideal results.

Then there are memories of Waco ... Oklahoma City bombing.
 
Authority is caught between a rock and a hard place here. They want to eradicate the practices of the cult but if they do the consequence are quite drastic not to mention expensive. What was once called 'deprogramming' is pretty difficult and can never produce ideal results.

Then there are memories of Waco ... Oklahoma City bombing.

Yes there is a fine line being tread here. The question arises for me that I need to look into the practices of this "cult" before I can (1) call it one and (2) register an opinion because I see something wrong with a system that would allow a case to go forward when the informant is a proven liar
 
Yes there is a fine line being tread here. The question arises for me that I need to look into the practices of this "cult" before I can (1) call it one and (2) register an opinion because I see something wrong with a system that would allow a case to go forward when the informant is a proven liar

If somebody fakes a call to say there's a crack deal going down, and the police come and find a crack deal going down, and they arrest the perps and take their weapons and the crack and the money, are you suggesting they should just give those things back when they find the call was faked?
 
If somebody fakes a call to say there's a crack deal going down, and the police come and find a crack deal going down, and they arrest the perps and take their weapons and the crack and the money, are you suggesting they should just give those things back when they find the call was faked?

No I'm suggesting that I don't know enough about this case to say that there was abuse going on. Just because the community they lived in was polygamous doesn't mean that children were being abused. I need to see more information before I register an opinion.
 
A report here said she had the "voice of a child" even though she is an adult.

I started a compound thread when the story was breaking. I asked if we could just hold off on sending the SWAT team out until a law had been broken. At least have some of those pesky facts pointing out the wrong doings. LIT did not want to hear it.

Colorado Springs is full of looney fucking religious whack jobs. Stay the hell out of that city.
 
what a fuck up.

since when did the state take children, purely in the basis of anonymous calls?
since when were children taken into care, simply because their parents shared the religion of and lived near the accused?
Since Janet Reno......welcome to America
 
Still about Texas. Not Janet Reno.
I’m trying to illustrate why I think the government feels it has the right to just enter an establishment anywhere and anytime the feel its appropriate. Don’t forget about that little kid from Cuba. Oh, yeah, he was in Miami not Texas….

I don't agree with that, nor the Waco event or the little cuban boy. Government needs to butt out of it....
 
I’m trying to illustrate why I think the government feels it has the right to just enter an establishment anywhere and anytime the feel its appropriate. Don’t forget about that little kid from Cuba. Oh, yeah, he was in Miami not Texas….

I don't agree with that, nor the Waco event or the little cuban boy. Government needs to butt out of it....

The government had to be in that thing about the boy from Cuba. It was an international legal matter. The US would have been looked on badly had they not returned the boy to his father. What they were forced to do was because the family of the mother decided to trump the law. It doesn't compare to the other situations.

It's Texas that is choosing to act in this way.
 
Who gives a rat's ass....

Perhaps I should restate this then. Under International Law the boy's father had a right to reclaim him. Had the US not assisted in this process the US would have been seen as obstruction justice. While none of us would prefer that he be returned to that terrible country, but the law is the law
 
Doesn't Texas have the right to protect it's underaged children?

I have to admit I am torn over the situation. I don't want a government that can just barge in and do whatever it wants. But I don't want communes with 14 year old girls being offered up to old men for marriage purposes either.
 
No I'm suggesting that I don't know enough about this case to say that there was abuse going on. Just because the community they lived in was polygamous doesn't mean that children were being abused. I need to see more information before I register an opinion.

Seriously now, you are thinking you need more information? How can that be possible considering the extensive news coverage? This was not a happy little community where the families just happened to be poly. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D90B2K480&show_article=1

When a community has 53 girls between 14 and 17, and 31 of those girls are either pregnant or have given birth, that would be considered evidence of abuse and yes, crime. Statutory rape IS still on the books.
 
Back
Top