Western Civilization Depends On Men And Masculinity

[HisArpy]

Ah, is someone jealous because I can touch a vagina and you can't?

What can I say, my lap is filled with pussy every day.

https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2014/04/13/20/49/cat-323262_1280.jpg

 

[Hel_Books]

What can I say, my lap is filled with pussy every day.

That's what's so great about the internet. Nobody can tell if you're an incel!

 

[Meekly_Anna]

That's what's so great about the internet. Nobody can tell if you're an incel!

He likes them young and hairy.
Natural.

 

[HisArpy]

Not sure where you're going with this idée fixe. You seem to think your civilisation works on men and masculinity. You've been proven wrong again and again by posters here and now you seek to blow smoke up everyone's arse by whining, "But I'm talking about civilisation and you're only talking about society!"

The topic is civilisation, not blowing smoke, snowflake. Please try to keep up!

dudly, Western Civilization depends on men is the topic. It's literally the title of the thread.

Who gets to participate based on skin color/sex is a society thing, not a civilization thing.

Unless you think skin color, or pussy hair, alone are what pumps oil out of the ground, builds the machines which transport the goods made from that oil, creates the transportation network of roads/highways/canals/shipping ports, and all the rest we have to have. Things we have so that certain members of society can sit at home and bitch about how men gave them that luxury while simultaneously saying that they're 2nd class citizens because they can't get up and do for themselves even if men would let them.

 

[HisArpy]

He likes them young and hairy.
Natural.

You mean red headed.

 

[Hel_Books]

dudly, Western Civilization depends on men is the topic. It's literally the

If your idea of "depends" is that it's men what keep civilisation on the Caligula/Torquemada/Mussolini track, and you're somehow proud of that, then you're simply demented!

 

[HisArpy]

That's what's so great about the internet. Nobody can tell if you're an incel!

I like how you believe that's an insult. It only underscores how stupid you are.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

You mean red headed.

And hairy.
Fine by me. To reach its own.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
That's what's so great about the internet. Nobody can tell if you're an incel!

I like how you believe that's an insult. It only underscores how stupid you are.

I like how you automatically assumed it was an insult!

 

[ll74]

AGAIN, the thread is about Western Civilization, not society. All I did was show you that society often has reasons to restrict people's participation in certain areas. You might not agree with those restrictions, but often there's a rational basis for them, as my illustration with Johnson Controls shows.

Again, Western Civilization includes modern governments and technology. And again, if historically women have been restricted from participation through societal restrictions created by men (which may or may not be for their "protection"), then discussing their role in civilization advancement should take that into account.

You agreeing with those restrictions is irrelevant.

 

[HisArpy]

I like how you automatically assumed it was an insult!

Well then, explain it's relevance to what was being discussed and how it doesn't match your usual style of slinging insults as a matter of course.

 

[HisArpy]

And hairy.
Fine by me. To reach its own.

^must not be a red head. Or being clean and well groomed.

 

[HisArpy]

If your idea of "depends" is that it's men what keep civilisation on the Caligula/Torquemada/Mussolini track, and you're somehow proud of that, then you're simply demented!

Civilization doesn't care who writes the rules. Civilization cares about keeping the lights on and food on the table and that no one is going to come along and just take your stuff.

You keep trying to equate civilization with society and then complain that society is the problem because you're not able to just go take whatever it is you want because "the rules" won't let you.

 

[HisArpy]

Again, Western Civilization includes modern governments and technology. And again, if historically women have been restricted from participation through societal restrictions created by men (which may or may not be for their "protection"), then discussing their role in civilization advancement should take that into account.

You agreeing with those restrictions is irrelevant.

Civilization is about having enough stuff that you don't have to do it all yourself. Civilization is people working together to produce and distribute stuff people want. Civilization is being able to peacefully coexist with strangers and foreigners. It is the fundamental basis of being "civil."

Rules have been written to help facilitate all of that, but those rules do not create civilization, produce the goods, nor get them to those who desire those goods. And if some of those rules were made in a way which restricts participation by specific classes of people, that's irrelevant. Unless you also consider trade restrictions and other trade laws and sanctions designed to allow free trade between nations (note; NOT civilization) as the same as laws which have restricted women in their roles in SOCIETY (again, NOT civilization).

Civilization depends on men who go do the things that people need done. Men who are physically strong enough to extract the raw materials that can be made into the things people need/use/want. Men who are courageous enough to step out into the wilderness and explore with an eye for developing new sources for the things people need/use/want and who can use the physical ability nature gave them and survive while they do it.

Yes, there are some women who can do that but for the most part, because of their lack of physical strength, those jobs are typically reserved for men.

 

[ll74]

Civilization is about having enough stuff that you don't have to do it all yourself. Civilization is people working together to produce and distribute stuff people want. Civilization is being able to peacefully coexist with strangers and foreigners. It is the fundamental basis of being "civil."

Rules have been written to help facilitate all of that, but those rules do not create civilization, produce the goods, nor get them to those who desire those goods. And if some of those rules were made in a way which restricts participation by specific classes of people, that's irrelevant. Unless you also consider trade restrictions and other trade laws and sanctions designed to allow free trade between nations (note; NOT civilization) as the same as laws which have restricted women in their roles in SOCIETY (again, NOT civilization).

Civilization depends on men who go do the things that people need done. Men who are physically strong enough to extract the raw materials that can be made into the things people need/use/want. Men who are courageous enough to step out into the wilderness and explore with an eye for developing new sources for the things people need/use/want and who can use the physical ability nature gave them and survive while they do it.

Yes, there are some women who can do that but for the most part, because of their lack of physical strength, those jobs are typically reserved for men.

Civilization depends on men and women.

But you keep crying about how masculinity needs to be acknowledged and honored

Lol

Maybe you or Reichy can make five more threads on the topic. It truly screams how masculine you are.

 

[Rotadom]

The senile pussy just says it's illegal for late night talk shows to be mean to him.

Trump hates this thread

 

[HisArpy]

Civilization depends on men and women.

But you keep crying about how masculinity needs to be acknowledged and honored

Lol

Maybe you or Reichy can make five more threads on the topic.

Society depends on both men and women working together for the good of the whole in whatever roles fit them.

Civilization doesn't care about that.

And your lame attempts to disguise your (as usual) lack of fundamental understanding of the topic by deflecting into Ad Hom irrelevancies isn't helping you.

But, you're not going to do anything except revert to type so I'm done here. Enjoy posting your reply and thinking you did more than make yourself look foolish again.

 

[AlexBailey]

Civilization is about having enough stuff that you don't have to do it all yourself. Civilization is people working together to produce and distribute stuff people want. Civilization is being able to peacefully coexist with strangers and foreigners. It is the fundamental basis of being "civil."

Rules have been written to help facilitate all of that, but those rules do not create civilization, produce the goods, nor get them to those who desire those goods. And if some of those rules were made in a way which restricts participation by specific classes of people, that's irrelevant. Unless you also consider trade restrictions and other trade laws and sanctions designed to allow free trade between nations (note; NOT civilization) as the same as laws which have restricted women in their roles in SOCIETY (again, NOT civilization).

Civilization depends on men who go do the things that people need done. Men who are physically strong enough to extract the raw materials that can be made into the things people need/use/want. Men who are courageous enough to step out into the wilderness and explore with an eye for developing new sources for the things people need/use/want and who can use the physical ability nature gave them and survive while they do it.

Yes, there are some women who can do that but for the most part, because of their lack of physical strength, those jobs are typically reserved for men.

Apparently civilization depends on mansplainin’.

 

[Rotadom]

Apparently civilization depends on mansplainin’.

If that's the case, why is HisArpy doing the explaining?

 

[HisArpy]

Apparently civilization depends on mansplainin’.

Yes, laff your ass off. I'm certain that will prove your moral and social superiority.

Or you could go put on a dress and go dancing again. That'll show me.

 

[ll74]

Society depends on both men and women working together for the good of the whole in whatever roles fit them.

Which changes over time.

Civilization doesn't care about that.

Lol

And your lame attempts to disguise your (as usual) lack of fundamental understanding of the topic by deflecting into Ad Hom irrelevancies isn't helping you.

Your need for masculinity to be the prime factor in civilization isn't my issue. You literally just admitted that women and men work together to advance civilization. Which was precisely my point.

But, you're not going to do anything except revert to type so I'm done here. Enjoy posting your reply and thinking you did more than make yourself look foolish again.

I always enjoy it when people need to publicly declare being done with discussion and blame me for it.

 

[Rotadom]

And your lame attempts to disguise your (as usual) lack of fundamental understanding of the topic by deflecting into Ad Hom irrelevancies isn't helping you

Or you could go put on a dress and go dancing again.

Poor birdbrain . Hypocrisy with a YUGE side of homophobia.

 

[AlexBailey]

Yes, laff your ass off. I'm certain that will prove your moral and social superiority.

Or you could go put on a dress and go dancing again. That'll show me.

Look at your posts. You make discussions personal by insulting people then whine about things getting off topic.

You’re a paper tiger pussy and only of value because men can’t get along without trying to fuck each other over.


So, back to the subject of this thread:

* How many “men’s jobs” aren’t being threatened by the development of AI and robotics and other technologies you claim to help enable through your legal work?

* How is society and civilization going to handle the loss of income for individuals when Musk and Bezos ramp up production of their labor saving devices?

* Do you think businesses will bother to pay masculine men to do things that are cheaper to do with automation?



(I doubt you’ll take these questions seriously because you don’t communicate in good faith and they are challenging to your narrative, but I still want to watch how you sidestep the issues and ignore the very real challenges faced by many people. )

 

[Rotadom]

Look at your posts. You make discussions personal by insulting people then whine about things getting off topic.

He's a hypocrite and a .

He always whines about what he literally just did to someone else.

 

[AlexBailey]

He's a hypocrite and a .

He always whines about what he literally just did to someone else.

Apparently that’s a demonstration of masculinity.