Western Civilization Depends On Men And Masculinity

Men did half the work, but take most of the credit, so they also take most of the blame. This civilization is at the end of its road. It has done all it can achieve with industrial technology, fossil fuels, and the European values of eternal progress and infinite expansion. There's nowhere left to expand. We're well past the peak of progress as everything becomes slowly worse while diehard believers shout their denials.

Thanks for your fatalistic input there Mr. Socrates. 🙄

Here’s your hemlock. Off you go.
Buh-bye now. 🙋‍♀️
 
Thanks for your fatalistic input there Mr. Socrates. 🙄

Here’s your hemlock. Off you go.
Buh-bye now. 🙋‍♀️

To be fair, I think I get what they were saying. It is true that many 19th century Western ideals have run their course. It's wrong to say we're past the peak of progress; rather, we now have new, more humanistic definitions of progress.

Alas for insecure people like Rightguide, this includes changing social norms so that authoritarian and violent men are no longer at the pinnacle of the power pyramid. Trump/MAGA are the last pathetic gasp of this movement. It's why Rightguide's screed is neither threatening nor persuasive—it just comes across as weak.
 

This is precisely the last gasp I referenced.

Thankfully, the tide is already starting to turn, where multiple rightwing parties are starting to lose the power they gained. Which shouldn't be a surprise—their political agenda leads to increased misery for most people, and eventually people will remember that nationalist/populist propaganda never matches reality.

Moreover, with some exceptions, left-of-center policies remain far and away more popular, including here in the US. It's true that the far right has successfully leveraged economic insecurity (caused by right wing neoliberal policies) into generating fear and hatred of immigrants, which is precisely why nationalists have won more elections lately. But even in these nations, support of left-wing, humanistic policies remains high—which is why, even where right wing parties have gained seats, they haven't been able to turn that into actual power (the US is an exception, unfortunately).

And so, the countries themselves are continuing to trend left. Yes, there is the last gasp of the rightwingers, and I don't deny that they are doing a lot of damage, but it will not last much longer.
 
Last edited:
Men did half the work, but take most of the credit, so they also take most of the blame. This civilization is at the end of its road. It has done all it can achieve with industrial technology, fossil fuels, and the European values of eternal progress and infinite expansion. There's nowhere left to expand. We're well past the peak of progress as everything becomes slowly worse while diehard believers shout their denials.
Mars? Take reichguide with you.
 
What is your bet that Reichy is pointed and laughed at for his "manly" physique?
 
October 22, 2025

Western Civilization Depends on Men and Masculinity​

By Mark Keenan

For centuries, men built and defended Western civilization -- from its farms and cities to its laws, its art, and its moral order. But in just a few generations, that foundation has been shaken. Masculinity, once honored as the engine of strength, protection, and leadership, is now treated as a social problem. The very qualities that sustained families, communities, and nations are being redefined as “toxic.” Today, masculinity itself is treated as something to be “reformed” or “re-educated.” What happened? How did the very qualities that built the modern world become objects of suspicion and ridicule?
The truth is simpler: Western civilization depends on men and masculinity -- and it cannot survive without them.​

The Quiet War on Manhood

Since the mid-20th century, Western culture has undergone an ideological shift that redefined traditional masculinity as something outdated, even dangerous. The cultural shifts of the 1960s promised liberation but gradually replaced personal responsibility and family order with self-gratification and state dependence. Where strong families once formed the backbone of the West, an alliance of ideological radicalism and excessive consumerism has turned both men and women into disconnected individuals -- easier to manipulate, easier to control.

This erosion of masculine identity didn’t happen by accident. It was shaped through decades of social conditioning that cast male authority as oppressive, fatherhood as optional, and discipline as cruelty. In recent years, even government agencies have launched programs to ‘redefine’ masculinity, echoing language once confined to activist circles. The result is a culture where men are encouraged to suppress their natural instincts -- their drive to lead, protect, and provide -- in favor of emotional conformity. The modern man is expected to apologize for being male.

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...ilization_depends_on_men_and_masculinity.html

No truer words have been spoken.​
At least you're aware that nobody is depending on you.
 
And the most intolerant and hateful women can't even stand that.........western women HATE men on a level that's not even really describeable. They literally want their fathers, brothers and sons to be castred and feminized to the extinction of the species. They literally celebrate murdering their own offspring they hate white people SO much.

Especially the white ones. IDK what it is but middle class to rich white women hate men on such a deep level it's WILD. And they either don't realzie it or are in total denial about it.....TOTAL denial. LIke democrats or confused MAGA's who haven't realized they are MAGA's yet like IL74..... pretending Dems are the most pro-2A and hardcore border hwaks that ever were!!
Why so histrionic, chan?
 
October 22, 2025

Western Civilization Depends on Men and Masculinity​

By Mark Keenan

For centuries, men built and defended Western civilization -- from its farms and cities to its laws, its art, and its moral order. But in just a few generations, that foundation has been shaken. Masculinity, once honored as the engine of strength, protection, and leadership, is now treated as a social problem. The very qualities that sustained families, communities, and nations are being redefined as “toxic.” Today, masculinity itself is treated as something to be “reformed” or “re-educated.” What happened? How did the very qualities that built the modern world become objects of suspicion and ridicule?
The truth is simpler: Western civilization depends on men and masculinity -- and it cannot survive without them.​

The Quiet War on Manhood

Since the mid-20th century, Western culture has undergone an ideological shift that redefined traditional masculinity as something outdated, even dangerous. The cultural shifts of the 1960s promised liberation but gradually replaced personal responsibility and family order with self-gratification and state dependence. Where strong families once formed the backbone of the West, an alliance of ideological radicalism and excessive consumerism has turned both men and women into disconnected individuals -- easier to manipulate, easier to control.

This erosion of masculine identity didn’t happen by accident. It was shaped through decades of social conditioning that cast male authority as oppressive, fatherhood as optional, and discipline as cruelty. In recent years, even government agencies have launched programs to ‘redefine’ masculinity, echoing language once confined to activist circles. The result is a culture where men are encouraged to suppress their natural instincts -- their drive to lead, protect, and provide -- in favor of emotional conformity. The modern man is expected to apologize for being male.

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...ilization_depends_on_men_and_masculinity.html

No truer words have been spoken.​
Ohhhhh another right wing blog post. Not a whole lot of thinking happening there. And of course we know why it got you all hard!

The baby blues mess with your heart too much? You read it for the “articles@ do you??
 
Masculinity, once honored as the engine of strength, protection, and leadership, is now treated as a social problem. The very qualities that sustained families, communities, and nations are being redefined as “toxic.” Today, masculinity itself is treated as something to be “reformed” or “re-educated.”
Recognising toxic masculinity is not calling all masculinity toxic. (Normally this is where I would add "But you knew that"...but I don't think you did, Reichguide.)
 
This is precisely the last gasp I referenced.

Thankfully, the tide is already starting to turn, where multiple rightwing parties are starting to lose the power they gained. Which shouldn't be a surprise—their political agenda leads to increased misery for most people, and eventually people will remember that nationalist/populist propaganda never matches reality.

Moreover, with some exceptions, left-of-center policies remain far and away more popular, including here in the US. It's true that the far right has successfully leveraged economic insecurity (caused by right wing neoliberal policies) into generating fear and hatred of immigrants, which is precisely why nationalists have won more elections lately. But even in these nations, support of left-wing, humanistic policies remains high—which is why, even where right wing parties have gained seats, they haven't been able to turn that into actual power.

And so, the countries themselves are continuing to trend left. Yes, there is the last gasp of the rightwingers, and I don't deny that they are doing a lot of damage, but it will not last much longer.

👍

I would add:

What are those European
voters rejecting when they vote for their version of "far right" parties (some of which would be labeled leftist socialists in the U.S.).

🤔

It seems many European voters are voting against right wing (intolerant, authoritarian, misogynistic, zealously religious) immigrants who they blame for an increase in rape & violence against women. Am I wrong???

🤔

Of course, there ARE genuinely toxic right wing European parties & voters, but I don’t see them as holding great sway with European voters. Am I wrong???

🤔

I would say that things are a bit different in the U.S., where DonOld & the MAGAt republicans have embraced a brand of overt toxic intolerance, racism, fascism, & misogyny that is couched in America’s intolerant, racist, elitist, authoritarian, misogynistic patriarchal religious founding / history. But even DonOld & the MAGAt republicans recognize (subconsciously?) the threat of SOME right wing immigrants who are even more intolerant, violent, authoritarian, misogynistic & religiously radical than DonOld & the MAGAt republicans, and DonOld & the MAGAt republicans oppose their presence in America (though DonOld & the MAGAt republicans seem to just be protecting their turf rather than being opposed to the violence, authoritarianism, misogyny, and radical religiosity of SOME right wing immigrants).

😳

Weird…

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Recognising toxic masculinity is not calling all masculinity toxic. (Normally this is where I would add "But you knew that"...but I don't think you did, Reichguide.)

When the only masculinty you don't call "toxic" is cuckery....it is.

Toxic masculinity isn't even a thing....it's just a feminist hate term used to demonize masculinity because it upsets the Karens who can't hang and their cucks.
 
Yeah; what I think this country needs is just more "big dick energy." If you're well endowed, flaunt it. If you have a micro-penis, just fake it till ya make it. They make cock-sleeves now so just wear one of those for your next one night stand. "Big Dick Energy" will save the day, I'm telling ya. Brought to you by Pete Hegseth (micro-peen) , Kash Patel (micro-peen), and Stephen Miller the Cuck of all Cucks.
 
It's my experience in life that the guys who are most obsessed with masculinity are actually more concerned about their latent desires.

Chad is a solid name for a closeted MAGAt who contributes to Grindr crashing in various cities hosting republican events.

👍

Just sayin’…

😳

👉 Chad 🤣

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
When the only masculinty you don't call "toxic" is cuckery....it is.
Then it's a good thing we're not doing that, isn't it?

Toxic masculinity isn't even a thing....it's just a feminist hate term used to demonize masculinity because it upsets the Karens who can't hang and their cucks.
Come back when we no longer see people questioning whether rape victims asked for it, just for starters on a very, very long list.
 
Nobody is histrionic Phil.

You're just triggered and deslusional....regular issue on the left.
You are, chan. You're spouting off stupid pedophile rants like the trumptard you are, I'm here laughing at your dumb ass. Did your cookie come without a fortune inside?
 
The pendulum is swinging back.

The societal progression was incremental. It all started with equal rights for women and equal pay for equal work. Fine, but it was soon noted that men had the riskier jobs and those jobs paid more. Sooooo, along comes the notion that women are the equal of men and any job a man can do, so can a woman (Patsy Schroeder was one of the leads on this one). Women sued to get those jobs and that lead to the reduction of physical standards. Once that was achieved then it became fashionable to push the notion that women were the equal of men in ALL respects. Now, the women leading the charge on that one knew deep down that that was a pile of horse shit so in order to make their dystopian dream come true they had to destroy the notion of manhood and they had to start the process in elementary school. And here we are today. :rolleyes:
 
The decline of traditional masculinity led to the election a weak playboy as President.

This is a great point. Our current president does not represent real masculinity, any more than he represents real patriotism. It's phony, easy, virtue-signaling masculinity. A real man doesn't abuse women or brag about what he can do to them. A real man doesn't cheat people. A real man doesn't push other foreign leaders out of the way in a crowd; he deals with them respectfully. A real man doesn't boast about himself all the time and seek praise and awards. He lets his achievements speak for themselves. We've had plenty of "real men" in the White House--men who fought in wars, or led men in war. Right now we have a petty child man in the White House. His election is an indication that something has gone badly awry with how "conservatives" think of masculinity and patriotism.

I would agree with two points in the original post--that Western civilization is worth preserving, and that masculinity, properly understood, is important to a well-functioning society. But I'd also say that the current White House occupant might be an even bigger threat to Western civilization than all the feminized liberals the OP doesn't like.
 
TDS is manifest even when the subject has NOTHING to do with electoral politics. The fucking morons just can't help themselves.
 
The pendulum is swinging back.

The societal progression was incremental. It all started with equal rights for women and equal pay for equal work. Fine, but it was soon noted that men had the riskier jobs and those jobs paid more. Sooooo, along comes the notion that women are the equal of men and any job a man can do, so can a woman (Patsy Schroeder was one of the leads on this one). Women sued to get those jobs and that lead to the reduction of physical standards. Once that was achieved then it became fashionable to push the notion that women were the equal of men in ALL respects. Now, the women leading the charge on that one knew deep down that that was a pile of horse shit so in order to make their dystopian dream come true they had to destroy the notion of manhood and they had to start the process in elementary school. And here we are today. :rolleyes:
Always take it too far. Go to any American school and the top students are girls. Women are winning in the competition for intelligent minds. Boys are too busy playing video games and pulling their puds to PornHub to do any studying. So women are taking over the higher paying jobs. I see it daily. Young women engineers with loser out of work boyfriends.

I don't find fault with physical standards for jobs like firefighters. But those fights are in the past. Today's boys and men are just hurting themselves with too many distractions. No goal-setting. So women bypass them on the career ladder in jobs that require intelligence.
 
Back
Top