Helen Andrews Explains How Feminization Is Destroying Civilization

[Rightguide]

The Great Feminization​

Helen Andrews​

October 16, 2025

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

Much more here: https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

It's about, among other things, "warriors and worriers" and how “The rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female.”

 

[dkovic77]

The Great Feminization​

Helen Andrews​

October 16, 2025

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

Much more here: https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

It's about, among other things, "warriors and worriers" and how “The rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female.”

Seems just want you and the grossly underqualifed warrior ethos would say. Glad you keep scouring to find things to back up your opinion.

 

[Rightguide]

Seems just want you and the grossly underqualifed warrior ethos would say. Glad you keep scouring to find things to back up your opinion.

Read the whole article before commenting out of emotion.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The Great Feminization​

Helen Andrews​

October 16, 2025

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

Much more here: https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

It's about, among other things, "warriors and worriers" and how “The rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female.”

Why are you blaming others for you being such a whiny little bitch?

 

[dkovic77]

Read the whole article before commenting out of emotion.

Read the whole article from MAGA publishing? Nah?

Come up with legit mainstream sources that will actually be reviewed by others first.

Nope, you can’t do that. Why would I even click on the link?

 

[Rightguide]

Read the whole article from MAGA publishing? Nah?

Come up with legit mainstream sources that will actually be reviewed by others first.

Nope, you can’t do that. Why would I even click on the link?

Your ignorance is showing: https://www.compactmag.com/contributor/helen-andrews/

 

[ll74]

Feminism isn't destroying anything except fragile men's egos.

 

[dkovic77]

Your ignorance is showing: https://www.compactmag.com/contributor/helen-andrews/

Nothing you post is worth reading. If you like it, it must be flawed. You prove it over and over.

 

[Chernosoth]

Nothing you post is worth reading. If you like it, it must be flawed. You prove it over and over.

"Disagreeing with me proves you are wrong." You make the source seem more legitimate by attacking OP so vehemently. Something that may have been ignored is now worth a click.

 

[Baztrachian]

Read the whole article before commenting out of emotion.

He can't help it. He's been feminized.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Feminism isn't destroying anything except fragile men's egos.

It has nothing to do with egos shit for brains.

 

[OralAllOver]

The Great Feminization​

Helen Andrews​

October 16, 2025

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

Much more here: https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

It's about, among other things, "warriors and worriers" and how “The rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female.”

My god you are stupid. When was last MAJOR war ... or wars EVERY spring?
Famine?

We are richer, safer and healthier than any other time

PUT DOWN your iPhone and go borrow one from warrior Napoleon.

Wow, fake tough guy with cinderblock-level intelligence

 

[Bn2f]

"Disagreeing with me proves you are wrong." You make the source seem more legitimate by attacking OP so vehemently. Something that may have been ignored is now worth a click.

Ok. I’ll say it.
You’re dumb as fuck.
You see a sign saying alligators are in the lake and you jump in.
One only needs to follow down an RG bullshit rabbit hole once to know not to go again. You both can cry moar about how the lady bits have a ‘no swimming’ sign up for you both.

 

[ll74]

It has nothing to do with egos shit for brains.

Lol...of course not sweetie

 

[Lazaran]

In 2019, I <snip right wing propaganda>

Meanwhile:

Helen Andrews is an American conservative political commentator and author. She is a former senior editor at The American Conservative and the former managing editor of the Washington Examiner. Andrews received a BA in religious studies from Yale University.





Rightard



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[icanhelp1]

The Great Feminization​

Helen Andrews​

October 16, 2025

In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.

The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.

The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.

This cancellation was feminine, the essay argued, because all cancellations are feminine. Cancel culture is simply what women do whenever there are enough of them in a given organization or field. That is the Great Feminization thesis, which the same author later elaborated upon at book length: Everything you think of as “wokeness” is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

Much more here: https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/

It's about, among other things, "warriors and worriers" and how “The rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female.”

TOXIC FEMININITY!!

 

[dkovic77]

"Disagreeing with me proves you are wrong." You make the source seem more legitimate by attacking OP so vehemently. Something that may have been ignored is now worth a click.

If folks follow the MAGA brain suck mind set, then that’s on them.

Calling out folks needs to be done. If folks are curious then let them waste their time.

 

[dkovic77]

TOXIC FEMININITY!!

View attachment 2571963

Traitor Tater! Look at you chiming in.

You working the fryer at your rally? Making some money?

 

[Bn2f]

TOXIC FEMININITY!!

View attachment 2571963

WRONG!

Toxic republican feminist views caused these 3 people, among many others, to drastically change their appearances.

 

[dkovic77]

WRONG!

Toxic republican feminist views caused these 3 people, among many others, to drastically change their appearances.

View attachment 2571967

All folks who had work done…

 

[dkovic77]

And is Venmo in the Epstein files? Or that just his inspiration?

 

[Chernosoth]

Cancel culture is a contrived set of excuses for firing huge numbers of people with office drone jobs we can't sustain anymore. It took a feminine route because we were at the feminine end of the feminine-masculine oscillation. Now we are starting to swing back. We may settle at some sort of balance or swing over to hypermasculinity. Trump is more masculine in his cancelling: you're fired, GTFO.

 

[Baztrachian]

We are richer,

Thanks to President Trump!

safer

Thanks to President Trump!

and healthier than any other time

Thanks to President Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

 

[Rebel5soul]

The Summers blow up was PROOF of the mental vacuity of a good chunk of the female Harvard faculty. Clearly they struggle with the English language.

 

[stxjimmy]

Thanks to President Trump!



Thanks to President Trump!



Thanks to President Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Lenny Bruce lives.