FIRED

Except it does. If you say something is bad and then you do the bad thing, then you are knowingly doing something bad.

You can rationalize or blame others but it is still you doing the thing. .doesn't matter how long of an explanation you need to make it ok for yourself

I don't mind at all. Sometimes you have to do bad things form the greater good. It's a matter of degree. First, one has to define what is bad, of course.

ALtho I would say again that cancelling leftists, firing them, etc, for laughing at and supporting a murder is in no way comparable to cancelled conservatives for standing up for societal norms. One is good, the other is evil.
 
Oh please, I find the abundance of inept Americans quite fascinating, its like watching a ostrich stick its head in the ground
My use of Social Media and what I consume from it is entirely upto me, I would definitely not take advice from the likes of you, but thank you nonetheless
I am sure you'll keep being retards, you guys will have the same problems , maybe even worse since you'll keep turning a blind eye for far longer

But please, keep up you're "Arguments" and "Debates", they make Patrick Star look intelligent

I'm not surprised at your post. Coming from someone who posts as if he's oh so smugly superior, it was expected.
 
Absolute shit show from the extremists here…….one set embracing the murder of a political enemy on account of him “being offensive” - and the other set getting very sensitive about manners and decorum, having shown none in the first place.

Give your heads a fucking shake dickheads.
 
You know, watching these evil small brained libtards losing their jobs and crying online about it, is as enjoyable as watch election results last November. So many more will be let go come Monday morning when they show up for work.
 
Odd, that he’s not cooperating? 🧐. Very curious indeed…almost like…he’s trying to protect someone.
 
What does this mean?
I’ve posted some reservations I have with this investigation. You can go look those up.

As far as this goes. He’s caught red handed, turned in by family members, gives himself up with no fight. Caught dead to rights by any measure.

Why would you not cooperate at this point? My contention is he’s either covering for others that helped or giving them cover to maybe destroy evidence?

Speculation on my point I know. There are many things that don’t add up.
 
I’ve posted some reservations I have with this investigation. You can go look those up.
Ok

As far as this goes. He’s caught red handed, turned in by family members, gives himself up with no fight. Caught dead to rights by any measure.
Ok

Why would you not cooperate at this point? My contention is he’s either covering for others that helped or giving them cover to maybe destroy evidence?
Because he's a suspect.

Speculation on my point I know. There are many things that don’t add up.
So who is he covering for and why?

You've not answered my question and instead introduced more questions.
 
I’ve posted some reservations I have with this investigation. You can go look those up.

As far as this goes. He’s caught red handed, turned in by family members, gives himself up with no fight. Caught dead to rights by any measure.

Why would you not cooperate at this point? My contention is he’s either covering for others that helped or giving them cover to maybe destroy evidence?

Speculation on my point I know. There are many things that don’t add up.

By not cooperating he makes the police and the DA work for it. The more the government has to work to gather evidence, the more likely they'll make a mistake that can be exploited to a possible not guilty verdict.

It's unlikely, but OJ managed to do it so it's not impossible either.
 
By not cooperating he makes the police and the DA work for it. The more the government has to work to gather evidence, the more likely they'll make a mistake that can be exploited to a possible not guilty verdict.

It's unlikely, but OJ managed to do it so it's not impossible either.
Do suspects generally not cooperate?
 
Back
Top