NancyPan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2014
- Posts
- 908
Being interested in appearance and being visually sexually aroused are vastly different. As a submissive male in an FLR, my wife up is quite interested in my appearance. She must approve of my clothing before we go out, for example. She would never tolerate my having a vpbeer belly.Not exactly sure what you're trying to say, but I think we are more in agreement than not.
My point is this... To think women aren't as interested in "looks" as men seems a stretch and is perhaps wishful thinking (for men)...
Just look at Hollywood. For every Marilyn Monroe, Jayne Mansfield, Ann-Margret, and Sophia Loren there is an Erol Flynn, Rock Hudson (yes, I know), Cary Grant, Gregory Peck, Robert Redford and Brad Pitt. Women swoon as much over "sexy" as men do! Now, the fact that this doesn't factor into their husband choice is probably more a matter of economic realities, than preferences. Anyway...
However, although She might comment on handsome men, She does not describe sexual arousal from visual images (nor do most women choose to watch porn when they masturbate).
Being interested in male attractiveness is far different from being sexually aroused by visual stimulus. Of course attractiveness is important in partner selection. Go back to your original post, you suggested yjat it was a “male trope” that men were more visually aroused (sexually) than women. No one suggested that women weren’t interested in male attractiveness.