FUCKING DICK SIZE

When they are in the mood a hard cock always looks good.
When they're in the mood..... exactly. But when they are, I guess the sight of our thick cocks is intoxicating. (Right, girls? I'm begging for confirmation! We have egos that need to be stroked )
 
When they are in the mood a hard cock always looks good.
My girl's cock ALWAYS looks good to me even when it is just hanging flaccid between her legs. I always tell her that it is what provides so much pleasure for the both of us, her fucking and me being fucked. I always want it.
 
Women are way more considerate of men's bodily insecurities than men are of theirs. Men's fixation with huge breasts has been a punchline to a million jokes and has provided countless laughs on damn near EVERY sitcom on TV. ..I grew up in the 70's - every TV show from Happy Days, to One Day at A Time, to Green Acres has had male characters lustfully gasp when a huge breasted woman comes into the scene. Just imagine if the women characters did the same whenever a guy with a cartoonishly huge dick bulge came into a scene.

And imagine if the HOOTER's parent company opened a chain of restaurants called PYTHONS! ...Where all the male servers were dudes with huge dicks who wore very tight speedo bathing suits. :ROFLMAO: I'm quite sure men would be quite affronted and would cry foul. Women, on the other hand, have reacted to the existence of Hooters with little more than an eye roll.
I think that is all correct. I don't know how much of women being more considerate of men's insecurities is due to our intrinsic nature versus not wanting to deal with the nasty backlash. But for much of the time period you reference the patriarchy basically taught men that behaviour was okay when looked at objectively it is absurd.

Women also look at men somewhat different than the other way around. We are drawn to physical features and attractiveness, but not in the same way. It isn't necessarily any more virtuous or any less sexual in nature - although sometimes it is and I do think that non-physical characteristics might hold more sway for us. But even if we restrict our perspective to the purely physical men and women are very different. Comparing big tits to a big dick is probably the closest parallel in terms of sexually oriented features. But I might be just as inclined to compare nice tits to a man's muscular torso. Either way, highly imperfect comparisons because we have fundamentally different physical appeal IMO.

In any event, for whatever reason I just don't see women as quite as inclined to ogle men to the same degree or in the same way, at least not their bulges. I doubt that PYTHONS or any other male thirst trap oriented restaurant would have a sustainable business model, but if it did it would probably be due to a clientele of primarily gay men. 🫢
 
I think that is all correct. I don't know how much of women being more considerate of men's insecurities is due to our intrinsic nature versus not wanting to deal with the nasty backlash. But for much of the time period you reference the patriarchy basically taught men that behaviour was okay when looked at objectively it is absurd.

Women also look at men somewhat different than the other way around. We are drawn to physical features and attractiveness, but not in the same way. It isn't necessarily any more virtuous or any less sexual in nature - although sometimes it is and I do think that non-physical characteristics might hold more sway for us. But even if we restrict our perspective to the purely physical men and women are very different. Comparing big tits to a big dick is probably the closest parallel in terms of sexually oriented features. But I might be just as inclined to compare nice tits to a man's muscular torso. Either way, highly imperfect comparisons because we have fundamentally different physical appeal IMO.

In any event, for whatever reason I just don't see women as quite as inclined to ogle men to the same degree or in the same way, at least not their bulges. I doubt that PYTHONS or any other male thirst trap oriented restaurant would have a sustainable business model, but if it did it would probably be due to a clientele of primarily gay men. 🫢
IMHO, men view sex as a way to connect their penis to a vagina that craves it. Women view sex as a way to connect their soul to another's soul. Would many women turn away Richard Gere if he had a 4" penis? I doubt it. But men, stupidly, will ignore an incredibly sexy woman because she has a small bustline.
 
IMHO, men view sex as a way to connect their penis to a vagina that craves it. Women view sex as a way to connect their soul to another's soul. Would many women turn away Richard Gere if he had a 4" penis? I doubt it. But men, stupidly, will ignore an incredibly sexy woman because she has a small bustline.
For me, a small bustline IS what would make a woman incredibly sexy.
 
IMHO, men view sex as a way to connect their penis to a vagina that craves it. Women view sex as a way to connect their soul to another's soul. Would many women turn away Richard Gere if he had a 4" penis? I doubt it. But men, stupidly, will ignore an incredibly sexy woman because she has a small bustline.
Not me, while I love tits if all sizes, the small woman is probably getting my attention first....
 
That look on her face as she has the big cock in her hand and guiding it to her slit. You can see the bliss as that cock opens her up and slides balls deep.
There's easing it up her hole.... or banging her hard. Any preferences?
 
IMHO, men view sex as a way to connect their penis to a vagina that craves it. Women view sex as a way to connect their soul to another's soul. Would many women turn away Richard Gere if he had a 4" penis? I doubt it. But men, stupidly, will ignore an incredibly sexy woman because she has a small bustline.

I think that men and women do think about and approach sex from somewhat different perspectives. Some kind of emotional or mental connection is arguably more important for us than it is for men. Either gender can get turned off by a physically attractive person with a shitty personality, but I do think that women are more sensitive to this dynamic.

However, women aren't above having a purely or primarily physical attraction. But I don't think we are as caught up with the visual stimulus in the same way men are. Most guys I know would be happy to get an unsolicited titty pic, but I have yet to meet a woman who has any interest in receiving an unsolicited dick pic. Are we wired different or are tits objectively just more attractive than dicks? I think maybe a bit of both. I do tend to think that women are the fairer sex. There are some genuinely gorgeous men out there. But I think (with absolutely no support) that if aliens came to us and looked at a cross section of female and male humans at their best - no words, no interactions, just visuals - and were asked which gender was "fairer" or more attractive they would pick women.

So, personally I think men are wired or at least conditioned to be more inclined to ogle and objectify physical characteristics. But I also think that women generally have more attractive physical characteristics to ogle.
 
men view sex as a way to connect their penis to a vagina that craves it. Women view sex as a way to connect their soul to another's soul.
When it comes to sex, my gf is definitely the man - she wants to get her cock in my hole and fuck hard until she satisfies herself. Like a woman, I love feeling her inside me connected to me in the most intimate way.

When she is done, she rolls over and goes to sleep immediately. I cuddle up next to her feeling so happy that her sperm is deep inside me.
 
I get SO excited when I pull it out and it’s HUGEEEE
My wife claims that is the fun part of a new man. Getting those pants down and seeing what he has. When she sees that it is a really big one, she can almost feel hear her pussy telling her to get ready and take it.
 
There's easing it up her hole.... or banging her hard. Any preferences?
Depends on her state of arousal and the size of the cock. A really big one needs to start slow unless she is already for it. She does like it when they give it to her in just one stoke too.
 
I think that men and women do think about and approach sex from somewhat different perspectives. Some kind of emotional or mental connection is arguably more important for us than it is for men. Either gender can get turned off by a physically attractive person with a shitty personality, but I do think that women are more sensitive to this dynamic.

Very true. I've never been to a sex club, but I'm pretty sure that a very handsome but also very obnoxious man would find very few woman who are interested in sex with him. But a beautiful and sexy woman, who is equally obnoxious, would find her dance card would still be quite full.

I doubt that PYTHONS or any other male thirst trap oriented restaurant would have a sustainable business model, but if it did it would probably be due to a clientele of primarily gay men. 🫢

Totally agree. In fact what you describe is precisely what happened when Hugh Hefner launched Playgirl magazine. He expected that women, now that they were experiencing more sexual freedom, would love ogling at pictures of gorgeous naked men. Nope! It was dud with women, but a huge hit with gay men.
 
Last edited:
So, personally I think men are wired or at least conditioned to be more inclined to ogle and objectify physical characteristics. But I also think that women generally have more attractive physical characteristics to ogle.
It actually is well-documented science that males are more aroused by visual stimulation than women, hence the advertising industry as well as porn profiting from this “weakness.” And, yes, IMHO, women are gorgeous and here for lesser males like us to worship.

BTW, Policywank, I really miss your avatar. It always gave me a tingle in a special place. nancy
 
It actually is well-documented science that males are more aroused by visual stimulation than women,
I'm not so convinced. ..I think that may instead be a male-serving trope that justifies men pressuring women to "watch their girlish figures" while ignoring their own beer bellies.

If it's documented somewhere, I'd like to see it.

As a kid I remember the girls all had their bedrooms plastered with posters of the cute boys in music, TV, and movies. Sean and David Cassidy, Bay City Rollers, Harrison Ford, Robert Redford, just to name a tiny few.
 
None of that refutes my point. But I do agree that men and women respond to nude images somewhat differently. But what would those differences be if we were raised identically.
Now you raise the oldest question in psychology, “nature vs. nature.” As you may know, modern science has largely answered this question. There are, in fact, notable brain differences between males and females, some of these triggered by differences in hormones, but there are other factors. There is extensive material available on this topic, but I will direct you to one (which happens to deal with the complex topic of transgender): “Gender Revealed” by Daniel Parkinson, M.D. (a psychiatrist).

And, of course, males are not, and never will be raised as girls, so even if your point had validity, this is the world we live in. To your point, though, there is little question that western society (the media) exploits and objectifies women and their bodies. But you are conflating issues. This has more to do, IMO, with patriarchy and who has had the power and money in this country.
 
And, of course, males are not, and never will be raised as girls, so even if your point had validity, this is the world we live in.
Not exactly sure what you're trying to say, but I think we are more in agreement than not (or, maybe not).

My point is this... To think women aren't as interested in "looks" as men seems a stretch and is perhaps wishful thinking on men's part.

Just look at Hollywood. For every Marilyn Monroe, Jayne Mansfield, Ann-Margret, and Sophia Loren there is an Erol Flynn, Rock Hudson (yes, I know), Robert Redford, Sean Connery, and Brad Pitt. Women swoon as much over "sexy" just as much as men do - maybe, more!

Now, the fact that this doesn't factor into their choice of husbands or partners is probably more a matter of economic realities, than preferences. Anyway...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top