So are you cut or uncut?

Has any one heard of the medical condition where the foreskin to tight whereby preventing maintaining an erection?
 
Simple enough premise, some of us fellas are circumcised while others kept our foreskins. Which are you? Using Lit picture posting guidelines you get another opportunity here to show and tell. Follow the picture posting rules guys or a moderator doing their good work here will make everything go away. 😉
I'm Jewish, there's my answer.
 
Has any one heard of the medical condition where the foreskin to tight whereby preventing maintaining an erection?
Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans (BXO) is a chronic inflammatory condition that primarily affects the foreskin and glans of the penis, and is also known as lichen sclerosus.
 
Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans (BXO) is a chronic inflammatory condition that primarily affects the foreskin and glans of the penis, and is also known as lichen sclerosus.
Looking down I can't currently see any symptoms - phew! Must be us constantly working the foreskin to keep it flexible and the areas in risk well ventilated. Will tell GF to keep it up for health-reasons!
 
Looking down I can't currently see any symptoms - phew! Must be us constantly working the foreskin to keep it flexible and the areas in risk well ventilated. Will tell GF to keep it up for health-reasons!
Wise strategy , however , for those afflicted , conservative measures are sometimes insufficient and circumcision is the optimum solution. Misdiagnosis as balinitis and scarring over time are warning signs .
 
I'm Jewish, there's my answer.
That "rule" is almost a certainty but it is not 100% watertight. I know a Jewish man who wasn't cut soon after birth, mainly because his parents didn't actively practice any religion and/or/but maybe wanted to protect him, given that he was born in German-occupied France in 1943. He decided to get cut in his teens, but he might just as well not have done so. And, actually, he would have been better off not to. Today he's in his early eighties and still suffers from occasional bleeding as the cut was not done properly.
 
That "rule" is almost a certainty but it is not 100% watertight. I know a Jewish man who wasn't cut soon after birth, mainly because his parents didn't actively practice any religion and/or/but maybe wanted to protect him, given that he was born in German-occupied France in 1943. He decided to get cut in his teens, but he might just as well not have done so. And, actually, he would have been better off not to. Today he's in his early eighties and still suffers from occasional bleeding as the cut was not done properly.
I've read about the ritual circumcision being done in each and every concentration camp during World War 2, but I fully understand.
 
Back
Top