Actingup
Mostly Harmless
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2018
- Posts
- 1,156
So, I got lucky with a 3rd place in a contest a few weeks ago, which was obviously a nice thing to happen. The over-analyst in me decided to look at two questions:
1) does the infamous score-bombing after a win happen (and how bad is it)?
2) is the extra attention on the story reflected in extra readership overall?
1) The first question is easy to answer: yes (although it's probably not that important in the scheme of things). The graph below shows (x-axis) scores for my published stories as of the day before the contest end, and (y-axis) the difference between the score now and the score then. The contest story (red dot) has been pushed down from 4.89 (at that time) to 4.75. The others are more or less the same or slightly higher. If some of that comes from 1-bombs, then the sweeps will probably pick those bombs up next time anyway, so I think that in this example it's really neither here nor there.

2) The graph below is a time series of total view counts for eight of my stories through the contest period until now (dates in international format). The red line is the contest story. This graph has surprised me. The contest story has virtually doubled its readership and votes (not shown) since the contest end, which is really nice - in fact I'm rapt and I don't want to minimise that. The other stories, however, have not been impacted - they continue to slowly accumulate reads and votes, but there has been no obvious broader impact. Not that I was expecting fame and fortune, but if I had been, I would have been sorely disappointed. Perhaps that would be different for a first placing, but I guess the take-home message for me is that regardless of the success or otherwise of individual stories, overall it's the slow grind of accumulating readers and improving skills that is really important.
Also, for that story, getting extra readers is way more important than the minor effect on the score of any bombing.
I'd be curious to hear about other experiences?

1) does the infamous score-bombing after a win happen (and how bad is it)?
2) is the extra attention on the story reflected in extra readership overall?
1) The first question is easy to answer: yes (although it's probably not that important in the scheme of things). The graph below shows (x-axis) scores for my published stories as of the day before the contest end, and (y-axis) the difference between the score now and the score then. The contest story (red dot) has been pushed down from 4.89 (at that time) to 4.75. The others are more or less the same or slightly higher. If some of that comes from 1-bombs, then the sweeps will probably pick those bombs up next time anyway, so I think that in this example it's really neither here nor there.

2) The graph below is a time series of total view counts for eight of my stories through the contest period until now (dates in international format). The red line is the contest story. This graph has surprised me. The contest story has virtually doubled its readership and votes (not shown) since the contest end, which is really nice - in fact I'm rapt and I don't want to minimise that. The other stories, however, have not been impacted - they continue to slowly accumulate reads and votes, but there has been no obvious broader impact. Not that I was expecting fame and fortune, but if I had been, I would have been sorely disappointed. Perhaps that would be different for a first placing, but I guess the take-home message for me is that regardless of the success or otherwise of individual stories, overall it's the slow grind of accumulating readers and improving skills that is really important.
Also, for that story, getting extra readers is way more important than the minor effect on the score of any bombing.
I'd be curious to hear about other experiences?
