Will American women be more or less satisfied...

Crying is what your side does.
You create a new thread every time you cry so you can let everyone know.

My side just gets to work destroying your efforts to sabotage Western Civilization.
Lol....of course. Obviously you're doing the good work for decades and will eventually destroy your enemies....lol

Make another thread about it.
 
We used to be leaders, warriors, providers, now they want us to be emotionally available, non-toxic, plant-based support animals who cry on cue and ask for consent before thinking a thought. I’m not saying don’t have a heart. I’m saying don’t trade your spine for a subscription to feelings.com. So no, I’m not going to apologize for being a man. I’m not going to whisper my opinions, walk on eggshells, or pretend my biceps are problematic. I’m not "toxic," I’m just not afraid to be male in a culture that treats manhood like an infection. And if that offends the woke, tough. The world was built by men who didn’t care if someone’s feelings got hurt. ;)
And they ended up alone. Go figure.
 
Looks like it's time to get back in shape, the new Sydney Sweeney commercials have the TikTok tubbies crying "Nazi propaganda." Woke ads are on life support. No more plus-sized balloon-shaped underwear models chasing men out onto the porch for a gasp of fresh air and a quick prayer for testosterone. The woke left seems obsessed with assaulting men’s senses, shoving cellulite in their faces like it's a virtue. We’re talking moon craters on Planet Booty, better known as Braille for the blind date.
Preach on! Lol. :)
 
You create a new thread every time you cry so you can let everyone know.


Lol....of course. Obviously you're doing the good work for decades and will eventually destroy your enemies....lol

Make another thread about it.
Cry harder. I’ve been dismantling your half-baked ideas for years, piece by piece, fact by fact, while you flail around like emotional outbursts are a form of scholarship. You bring feelings to a logic fight and act surprised when you leave the field bloodied and soiled. Every debate ends with you fleeing the facts and your dignity leaking down your leg.
 
Cry harder. I’ve been dismantling your half-baked ideas for years, piece by piece, fact by fact, while you flail around like emotional outbursts are a form of scholarship. You bring feelings to a logic fight and act surprised when you leave the field bloodied and soiled. Every debate ends with you fleeing the facts and your dignity leaking down your leg.
Your need to declare victory in everything you do is very similar to Arpy. Nothing you have said or done has impacted me in any way.
 
Your need to declare victory in everything you do is very similar to Arpy. Nothing you have said or done has impacted me in any way.
BS, You can't help but reply negatively to everything either of us says.
 
Yes, I post to a forum about stupid shit you say.
To a liberal, “stupid” is anything that punctures your bubble of ignorance. If you haven't heard it on NPR, read it on a Reddit thread, or seen it on a protest sign, it must be dangerous misinformation. You confuse being uninformed with being enlightened and mistake your emotional meltdowns for moral authority.
 
To a liberal, “stupid” is anything that punctures your bubble of ignorance.
Yes, you cry about liberals daily

If you haven't heard it on NPR, read it on a Reddit thread, or seen it on a protest sign, it must be dangerous misinformation. You confuse being uninformed with being enlightened and mistake your emotional meltdowns for moral authority.
I read more right wing sites then left.
 
Yes, you cry about liberals daily


I read more right wing sites then left.
So you skimmed a headline on Fox once and now you're a fair-minded philosopher? Reading right-wing sites with your eyes closed doesn’t count. That’s not balance, that’s digital tourism with a panic attack.
 
Yes, you cry about liberals daily


I read more right wing sites then left.

You don't read crap. Which is why you're always crying for some kind of cite so that you can do a quick scan of the headline and then think you're totally clued in.
 
You don't read crap. Which is why you're always crying for some kind of cite so that you can do a quick scan of the headline and then think you're totally clued in.
All of that supposed reading he claims to have done, but have you ever noticed one of his favorite openers are, "WTF are you talking about?"
 
You don't read crap. Which is why you're always crying for some kind of cite so that you can do a quick scan of the headline and then think you're totally clued in.
Oh look, Arpy has something to say about me.


Shocker
 
All of that supposed reading he claims to have done, but have you ever noticed one of his favorite openers are, "WTF are you talking about?"

I've noticed, as I'm sure others have also noticed.

He says it's because he needs context so that he can properly reply. BUT, if he was as clued up as he claims to be, he wouldn't need any context because he'd already have it.

Basically he's an argumentative gas bag.
 
Oh look, Arpy has something to say about me.


Shocker

Surprise! Betcha you didn't see that coming now did you? Prolly because I didn't cite to anything so you didn't have any context.
 
Surprise! Betcha you didn't see that coming now did you? Prolly because I didn't cite to anything so you didn't have any context.
Tell me more about your feelings. I'm interested 👍
 
You haven't done that once

to any user

in 100k+ posts.

with either of your screen names.

😆
BS, I have only that number of posts you see under my AV. I have no other personalities here on Lit. RoryN is the forum’s resident conspiracy janitor, rummaging through old threads, convinced everyone who humiliates him must be a shadow account from 2007. He’s the village idiot of the internet, every time he gets intellectually pantsed (which is daily), he screams “sock puppet!” like it’s a legal defense. Paranoia is his only personality trait. He can’t win an argument, so he accuses every smarter poster of being the same person, as if a second account explains why he's always the dumbest guy in the room. He’s not debating, he’s spiraling in public.
 
Back
Top