ElectricBlue
Joined 11 Years Ago
- Joined
- May 10, 2014
- Posts
- 17,990
Diddling sounds like fly fishing to meI dunno about that, some of the best diddlers have no men in them at all![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Diddling sounds like fly fishing to meI dunno about that, some of the best diddlers have no men in them at all![]()
Lesbian flyfishing erotica sounds pretty niche, but I'm not saying no...Diddling sounds like fly fishing to me.
Paging @onehitwanda. Your services are required in the lobby.Lesbian flyfishing erotica sounds pretty niche, but I'm not saying no...
There's a plot bunny for the next contest.
God damn it.Paging @onehitwanda. Your services are required in the lobby.
Maybe this is a regional thing or depending on who you hang around with, but diddler to me means a child molester.I dunno about that, some of the best diddlers have no men in them at all![]()
After P.Diddy’s CSA case was publicized, I’d say that’s how everyone should read it now (due to the obvious “P.Diddler”) and using it in more benign contexts is risky to say the least.Maybe this is a regional thing or depending on who you hang around with, but diddler to me means a child molester.
It would be like tagging your story with the words "porn" or "erotica". A bit pointless.I searched for stories with the tag "stroker" and got 11 hits. That seemed odd. It shows up so much here in AH. How come more authors aren't using it as a tag? You'd think it would be one of the most useful.
Not at all!!! The conversations on Lit make it vividly clear that some stories here are "strokers" and some are not. I'd think a reader would be happy to know up front where a story lies.It would be like tagging your story with the words "porn" or "erotica". A bit pointless.
I got eleven pages of results for stories with "stroker" in the title and description, and fourteen stories tagged with "stroker", but the point is made. By contrast, searching for "slow burn" produces 774 pages of results with "slow burn" in the title and description and twenty-four pages of results tagged with "slow burn".I searched for stories with the tag "stroker" and got 11 hits. That seemed odd. It shows up so much here in AH. How come more authors aren't using it as a tag? You'd think it would be one of the most useful.
You're right, it's not an important difference, but I'm curious. This is what I get when I search for "stroker" in the tag portal. Can you see what's different for you?I got eleven pages of results for stories with "stroker" in the title and description, and fourteen stories tagged with "stroker", but the point is made.
I think it's an authors' artifice. There's no reason to believe readers use the term when looking for stories. In any event, they're only going to find the eleven you found, so it barely registers on the dial. Remember also that it's authors who select tags, not readers, so it's a most uncommon term, given the tiny list that you've found.Not at all!!! The conversations on Lit make it vividly clear that some stories here are "strokers" and some are not. I'd think a reader would be happy to know up front where a story lies.
I used the search page and searched tags for "stroker." The fourteen stories it returned were the 11 it gave you plus two audios by DrStoney and a BDSM tale by BelleCanzuto. So maybe the tags portal doesn't return audios. The tag on BC's story was "bdsm stroker" rather than just "stroker."You're right, it's not an important difference, but I'm curious. This is what I get when I search for "stroker" in the tag portal. Can you see what's different for you?
View attachment 2547268
I don't think readers use the expression at all - unless they're also authors and they're also AH regulars.Not at all!!! The conversations on Lit make it vividly clear that some stories here are "strokers" and some are not. I'd think a reader would be happy to know up front where a story lies.
Why not?There are short stories designed to help women get off, but I don't see so many of them (especially on Lit), and I wouldn't think of calling them strokers.
I get positive comments from women on my strokers. Mostly for my voyeur stories. I think that a well-crafted stroker can appeal to any gender.I see 'stroker' as a story designed to appeal to men, to accompany a favourite activity. Fairly short, easy to understand, doesn't require extra thought. Generally repeating the man's fantasy back at him.
There are short stories designed to help women get off, but I don't see so many of them (especially on Lit), and I wouldn't think of calling them strokers.
The word "stroke" seems to me to describe male masturbation, but not female masturbation.Why not?