US Strikes Iran

(Israel & Mossad say the Iranians still have the enriched uranium - and so do the Iranians). It doesn’t help matters that the IAEA has no clue about what is going on in Iran at the moment.

trump flat out stated gabbard was 'wrong' about the nuclear capability/intentions, and now this? is she feeling the heat?

so did he hire someone eminently useless for the job, or is she doing her job well but is producing facts stubbornly conflicting with trump's agenda?

as for trump, who campaigned on no more foreign wars and it wasn't America's place to engage in 'regime-changing' conflicts, he's certainly changed his public tune. I don't disagree that a regime change is long overdue and likely beneficial for Iran though my knowledge on the subject is limited.
 
trump flat out stated gabbard was 'wrong' about the nuclear capability/intentions, and now this? is she feeling the heat?

so did he hire someone eminently useless for the job, or is she doing her job well but is producing facts stubbornly conflicting with trump's agenda?

as for trump, who campaigned on no more foreign wars and it wasn't America's place to engage in 'regime-changing' conflicts, he's certainly changed his public tune. I don't disagree that a regime change is long overdue and likely beneficial for Iran though my knowledge on the subject is limited.
Totally agree. Either Gabbard's suddenly incompetent, or she’s presenting facts that don’t fit the criminal's current narrative, and now she's getting heat for it. He built his brand on staying out of certain wars, but now he’s pushing the exact thing he used to criticize. Hard not to notice the shift.
 
WASHINGTON − A preliminary Pentagon intelligence assessment has found the U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities set back Iran's nuclear program by a few months, according to a U.S. government source familiar with the intelligence findings.

Early evidence has shown the bombing did not reach depths necessary to destroy the facilities, which are buried deeply underground, according to a second U.S. official.

However, initial assessments show that they did not reach depths to destroy Iran’s nuclear capability completely, said another U.S. official familiar with the intelligence but not authorized to speak publicly.

A third U.S. official confirmed the findings in the Defence Intelligence Agency report, which was first reported by CNN.
the report has been seen by some congress critters. Team trump loudly declares it all as 'totally false.'

Democratic lawmakers said the White House canceled June 24 classified briefing for the House and Senate on Iran, lambasting the Trump administration for not keeping Congress in the loop.

The briefing would have included Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and other officials, according to a screenshot of the invitation shared on X by Rep. Jason Crow, D-C.O.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...31&cvid=edbfd004d8304074a90def4f3ddb6896&ei=5
 
trump flat out stated gabbard was 'wrong' about the nuclear capability/intentions, and now this? is she feeling the heat?

so did he hire someone eminently useless for the job, or is she doing her job well but is producing facts stubbornly conflicting with trump's agenda?

as for trump, who campaigned on no more foreign wars and it wasn't America's place to engage in 'regime-changing' conflicts, he's certainly changed his public tune. I don't disagree that a regime change is long overdue and likely beneficial for Iran though my knowledge on the subject is limited.

They (DonOld AND Tulsi) are all over the place (and their loyalty to America is questionable at best).

That ^ is a problem.

🤬

Also:

I know Netanyahu (Israel) wanted DonOld (the U.S.) to get involved to take some heat off Israel (understandable, as the U.S. and Israel ARE “in this together”). Netanyahu’s lobbying was likely the deciding factor for DonOld’s decision: Netanyahu probably played DonOld by suggesting that the U.S. was the only one capable of taking out Fordo (AND that it needed to be done quickly before Iran could restore some semblance of air defense - which WAS a real concern), when, in reality, Israel could have done a hell of a number on Fordo all by themselves (Israel has some 5,000 pound bunker busters that they can deliver quite precisely).

😳

😑

Also:

I know for a fact that if DonOld hadn’t acted when he did, Israel sure as hell wouldn’t have waited "two weeks" to deal with Fordo. Netanyahu basically said Israel would figure out a way to deal with Fordo if DonOld dithered (or refused to participate).

Now it is what it is.

If the Iranian people don’t rise up during this window of opportunity and force a regime change to a more progressive government (open to FULL IAEA inspections, etc, then Israel AND the U.S. still have unfinished business (“Mission NOT Accomplished”).

Again: it is what it is.

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
We don't need Giuliani, that 22-year-old bag boy from Publix has everything well in hand. We are safe from any retaliatory terrorist attacks thanks to Trump's exceptional hiring skills.
 
Trump got ahead of himself and now is embarrassed and angry. He needs to LEARN FROM IT but it's not likely he will. What's really disturbing is that he seems to think Iran is trustworthy over a negotiated ceasefire - THAT is disturbing. And yeah, Donny, one missile launched IS testing you. Israel responded appropriately.

1750844390093.png
 
Pickled Pete is claiming that the FaKe nEwS about Iran's capability not being that obliterated was a leak from the Pentagon. He's ordered a leAk enQuiRy to establish who made up the story that indicates that the Liar in Chief was well, lying.

It's mind-blowing. Is it a leak or is it fake?

At least he knows all about leaks. Maybe this news came from a Signal Chat with random journalists.
 
I don't think he believes Iran is trustworthy in anyway, he's not that naive.
Iran counted the missiles that the US fired at them and fired exactly the same number back at US bases. It was very much a 'measured and proportionate response'.

It turns out that Iran is a great deal more trustworthy than Trump can imagine (which is a low bar).
 
Trump and Hegseth admit doubts about level of damage to Iran nuclear sites

Lies, lies, lies, yeah


President calls intelligence ‘inconclusive’, while defence secretary describes harm to facilities as ‘moderate to severe
 
Back
Top