Will Trump Suspend Habeas Corpus For Illegals?

Deportations using normal process is fine....we started bitching when the covid emergency orders remained even though there was no reason.

None of those deportations required emergency powers and skipped court hearings when needed.
So you think those millions upon millions all got a separate trial before being kicked out? They got the same "due process" that Trump has given. The difference is, there were no communist judges appointed by Democrats to undermine the Executive and the Constitution.
 
So you think those millions upon millions all got a separate trial before being kicked out?
That's not what due process means. Some were expedited removals as required by the law. Others received proper due process.

They got the same "due process" that Trump has given.
That's very simply a false statement. None of the deportations used the AEA to avoid due process prior to this administration.

And no administration even discussed suspending habeas to hit their numbers


Because they weren't fascist fucks.
The difference is, there were no communist judges appointed by Democrats to undermine the Executive and the Constitution.
you are delusional.
 
That's not what due process means. Some were expedited removals as required by the law. Others received proper due process.


That's very simply a false statement. None of the deportations used the AEA to avoid due process prior to this administration.

And no administration even discussed suspending habeas to hit their numbers


Because they weren't fascist fucks.

you are delusional.
You're delusional. Due process is what an Article II federal immigration judge says it is.
 
You're delusional. Due process is what an Article II federal immigration judge says it is.
Immigration judge being involved is the part you seem to be missing there....also the part missing from the current administration's efforts which have been at issue.
 
We can still learn a lot from fruit. Fruit simply embraced the strawberry, although it is actually a nut. Fruit does not run through the streets and calls: "Strawberries out!" or "strawberries steal our jobs!" Let's be more like fruit.
 
We can still learn a lot from fruit. Fruit simply embraced the strawberry, although it is actually a nut. Fruit does not run through the streets and calls: "Strawberries out!" or "strawberries steal our jobs!" Let's be more like fruit.

The problem is that the "fruits and nuts" have actually been doing that for awhile now.
 
Were they shipped to concentration camps in countries they didn't come from?

You're a fucking muppet.
Which concentration camps would that be? please cite. You obviously don't know what a concentration camp is, DIMWIT!
 
They had due process.

Fucking idiots don't seem to understand what that means.
So, they were all hauled before a judge, individually, to plea their cases with a host of pro bono attorneys to represent them? *chuckle*
 
That's what you took from my post?
Go back into hiding, your piece of shit traitor.
What you wrote implies that the DHS resorts to sending migrants to concentration camps or forced deported to a country other than their country of origin. Cite any factual evidence as to why you believe that is actually happening. DOOFUS!
 
What you wrote implies that the DHS resorts to sending migrants to concentration camps or forced deported to a country other than their country of origin. Cite any factual evidence as to why you believe that is actually happening. DOOFUS!
CECOT.
 
What you wrote implies that the DHS resorts to sending migrants to concentration camps or forced deported to a country other than their country of origin. Cite any factual evidence as to why you believe that is actually happening. DOOFUS!
They've sent multiple Venezuelans to El Salvador.
 
What you wrote implies that the DHS resorts to sending migrants to concentration camps or forced deported to a country other than their country of origin. Cite any factual evidence as to why you believe that is actually happening. DOOFUS!
I was being factitious, you histrionic muppet.

1000027398.jpg

Do you think American citizens belong here?
 
May 12, 2025

Will Trump Suspend Habeas Corpus for Illegals?​

By Paul Dowling

Will Americans soon witness President Trump’s issuance of an executive order suspending habeas corpus for criminal aliens and American enemies who have participated in an invasion against the United States, and who have chosen to remain in our country against the rule of law?

The writ of habeas corpus goes back to 500 B.C. and is a legal action which allows a prisoner to challenge the authority of the jailer to continue holding him. The legal term habeas corpus literally means “you should have the body” in Latin. This legal privilege allows incarcerated citizens to seek relief from unlawful confinement as outlined in the Suspension Clause of the U.S. Constitution: “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”

The privilege of the writ of Habeas Corpus has been suspended four times: in areas that were in rebellion during the American Civil War; in eleven South Carolina counties that were under threat by the Ku Klux Klan during Reconstruction; in two provinces of the Philippines during an insurrection in 1905 when the Philippines were a U.S. territory; and in Hawaii subsequent to the bombing of Pearl Harbor by the Empire of Japan.

In suspending the writ, Trump would be following in the footsteps of Abe Lincoln, who suspended habeas corpus as a war power to protect the Union when the public safety required it. And today’s criminal interference by judges -- who seek to prevent arrests and deportations of criminally-present terrorists, murderers, sex-traffickers, and rapists -- requires that Trump consider suspending the writ for those enemy aliens to whom lawless judges are giving aid and comfort. This would involve a proper invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, declaring an unlawful invasion of our country (as facilitated by a treasonous Biden Administration) and empowering the Department of Defense to make arrests of the invaders.

Much more here: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/05/will_trump_suspend_habeas_corpus_for_illegals.html

Criminal Federal District Court Judges acting unconstitutionally in directing the Article II powers of the elected President could be a justification in the defense of the nation against this Biden-directed foreign invasion.
Hey, dipshit!

Mexico’s security chief confirmed that 17 family members of cartel leaders crossed into the U.S. as part of a deal between Ovidio Guzmán Lopez and the Trump administration. MORE ⬇️

1000027414.jpg
 
Under federal law, people who enter or re-enter the U.S. without authorization are subject not only to civil immigration detention and deportation proceedings but also criminal sanctions. The deportation proceedings is due process. Biden didn't follow immigration law. Migrants crossing our border illegally should be held in detention till their immigration status is adjudicated. Biden should be in prison for failure to protect our borders. I don't blame migrants for pursuing a better life, I blame Biden for failing to uphold the law.
So those 30 million crossed the border and they should have been locked up until tried and sent back? I think Joe dealt with that, realizing Republicans didn't authorize funds to build such fortresses, staff them, and appoint enough judges to try them as well.

There is enough blame to be shared for the 'both-sides-ism' factor.

So, is the felon building those prisons today and hiring the judges today? Or is that not an 'On day one, I will fix the problem?'
 
You aren't focused on his.criminality being proven in court. You literally want the courts to go after him to prevent his future actions.

He may be a criminal, and people may sue him, but they aren't doing so to prevent his future fascism...nor should they. That is your issue which is blatantly obvious ...


I do understand that people with political power will be targeted with more lawsuits which may or may not be frivolous....the courts should weed out the latter over time. But I do hope that that number is low because most people believe in the court system and the law.


Go after people who commit crimes because they are criminals.

Trump can be an asshole and not be a criminal (that is not a statement of whether he is a criminal or not or whether he is an asshole or not)
Trump was already convicted in several cases. Coincidentally, he was an asshole in each one. Somehow, the title of president now puts him above the law. But not in my book of judgment.
 
^someone is having a very bad day and can't quite figure out that shutting up is the best thing she could do right now.
Hey, bubba. Take a pill from your own advice bottle. If you stop... she will. Right now, you are just a plaything and don't realize it—a dim bulb at the back of the theatre.
 
So you think those millions upon millions all got a separate trial before being kicked out? They got the same "due process" that Trump has given. The difference is, there were no communist judges appointed by Democrats to undermine the Executive and the Constitution.
No, millions of people don’t get individual criminal trials—that’s not how immigration enforcement works. But yes, due process still applies, even in immigration proceedings. That’s not a loophole—it’s the law.

The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that "No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Notice it says “person,” not “citizen.” That includes immigrants—documented or not.

This was affirmed in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), where the Supreme Court explicitly stated that “once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, and they are entitled to due process.”

Also, under 8 U.S. Code § 1229a, individuals facing removal are entitled to a hearing before an immigration judge—again, part of the due process system. It's not perfect, and it’s overwhelmed, but it’s still the law.

As for the idea that judges appointed by Democrats are “communist” and out to undermine the Constitution—that's not an argument, it’s a talking point. Judges are bound by precedent and law, not loyalty oaths. The judicial branch exists to keep the executive from doing exactly what the founders feared: acting above the law.
 
They've sent multiple Venezuelans to El Salvador.
CECOT is not a concentration camp. The other issue is prior to March Maduro refused to take his gang members.
So those 30 million crossed the border and they should have been locked up until tried and sent back? I think Joe dealt with that, realizing Republicans didn't authorize funds to build such fortresses, staff them, and appoint enough judges to try them as well.

There is enough blame to be shared for the 'both-sides-ism' factor.

So, is the felon building those prisons today and hiring the judges today? Or is that not an 'On day one, I will fix the problem?'
And yet Trump did it under the same conditions as Biden. The democrats wanted open borders. If you can’t control entry no amount of judges is going to solve anything. The blame is squarely on Biden and his puppeteers . Obama had the common sense to deport millions.
 
Back
Top