TheWritingGroup
Writing Group
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2024
- Posts
- 1,064
What have you got against crocodile dung vaginal suppositories?Ancient Egypt. Just avoid the local contraception methods at the time ...
-Annie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What have you got against crocodile dung vaginal suppositories?Ancient Egypt. Just avoid the local contraception methods at the time ...
Not my cup o' tea. LOLWhat have you got against crocodile dung vaginal suppositories?
-Annie
Edward would've agreed with you!I've always thought the turn-of-the-century (Edwardian) period was sexier than the Victorian.
I'm refraining from making a comment about how you wish she'd tick your box. That would be too tacky.Honestly, the Post-Edwardian period ticks all my boxes.
hun, I'd do her until the bed collapsed into splinters underneath us. We're so far beyond tacky that the stars are different.I'm refraining from making a comment about how you wish she'd tick your box. That would be too tacky.
As someone with a breeding kink who loves to include it in her stories, I see that as an absolute win.Any period before the 1930's has to deal with sex = baby making.
Well...in an era and society in which men held all the power, seducing and baby-trapping a wealthy aristocrat was a pretty good plan to get ahead in life.When I read a biography of Napoleon III, I couldn't wrap my head around so many women having casual affairs with the French elite, but they did.
Women having affairs with Nappy III and the other French elite seemed to rarely get pregnant. For example, Harriet Howard was Nappy III's mistress from 1846 (when she was 23) to 1852. She didn't have a kid during that time. Or if she did, the pregnancy was kept secret and the baby quietly disposed of. Nappy III dumped her to marry Eugénie de Montijo and immediately got her pregnant. Virginia Oldoini, Countess of Castiglione, was Nappy III's mistress for two years, and they had no kids. Nappy III's mistress from 1857 to 1861 was Marie-Anne Walewska. They had no children in that time. Quoting Wikipedia, "[Walewska's] relationship with the Emperor was not exclusive. In January 1858, it was reported that the Emperor had sexual intercourse with every woman at court who initiated it, and during 1859, he had a somewhat more serious affair with the Clothilde de La Bédoyère." In 1863, Nappy III started an affair with Marguerite Bellanger which resulted in one son. Bellanger's son is the only child of Nappy III's many, many affairs that I can find as being recognized by Nappy III.Well...in an era and society in which men held all the power, seducing and baby-trapping a wealthy aristocrat was a pretty good plan to get ahead in life.
I was talking generally rather than about any one historical figure or time period, but my point still stands: in the pre-women's liberation era, becoming the wife, mistress, or concubine of a powerful man was one of the few ways a woman could attain any kind of power or financial security, especially if she could bear his children, hence why the pre-birth control era of history is such fertile ground for erotica.Women having affairs with Nappy III and the other French elite seemed to rarely get pregnant. For example, Harriet Howard was Nappy III's mistress from 1846 (when she was 23) to 1852. She didn't have a kid during that time. Or if she did, the pregnancy was kept secret and the baby quietly disposed of. Nappy III dumped her to marry Eugénie de Montijo and immediately got her pregnant. Virginia Oldoini, Countess of Castiglione, was Nappy III's mistress for two years, and they had no kids. Nappy III's mistress from 1857 to 1861 was Marie-Anne Walewska. They had no children in that time. Quoting Wikipedia, "[Walewska's] relationship with the Emperor was not exclusive. In January 1858, it was reported that the Emperor had sexual intercourse with every woman at court who initiated it, and during 1859, he had a somewhat more serious affair with the Clothilde de La Bédoyère." In 1863, Nappy III started an affair with Marguerite Bellanger which resulted in one son. Bellanger's son is the only child of Nappy III's many, many affairs that I can find as being recognized by Nappy III.
Especially if you want to write about anal sex. A lot of women died in pregnancy and childbirth, and anal sex was sex without a death wish.I was talking generally rather than about any one historical figure or time period, but my point still stands: in the pre-women's liberation era, becoming the wife, mistress, or concubine of a powerful man was one of the few ways a woman could attain any kind of power or financial security, especially if she could bear his children, hence why the pre-birth control era of history is such fertile ground for erotica.
Did women in 19th century Europe do a lot of anal sex? Or oral sex? Instead of vaginal sex. Or did they use the rhythm method to minimize pregnancies?Especially if you want to write about anal sex. A lot of women died in pregnancy and childbirth, and anal sex was sex without a death wish.
Did women in 19th century Europe do a lot of anal sex? Or oral sex? Instead of vaginal sex. Or did they use the rhythm method to minimize pregnancies?
Isn't that what they used in "The Great"?A lemon slice--up to half a lemon--in the vagina was also a thing. Had to live where lemons were available.
I haven't heard that. Can you put it in context for me?Isn't that what they used in "The Great"?
Something I forgot re rhythm in my first post. Women often didn't have a choice of when they had sex, so there wasn't much point to using it. Some professionals might have been able to exercise a choice and use rhythm, but then there's the problem of it not working all that dependably.Did women in 19th century Europe do a lot of anal sex? Or oral sex? Instead of vaginal sex. Or did they use the rhythm method to minimize pregnancies?
A show about Catherine the Great. Elle Fanning and Nicholas Hoult. Absolutely hilarious, as long as you remember the tag line "An occasionally true story".I haven't heard that. Can you put it in context for me?
I get it. I misunderstood.A show about Catherine the Great. Elle Fanning and Nicholas Hoult. Absolutely hilarious, as long as you remember the tag line "An occasionally true story".
ETA: Huzzah!
My main primary source for Victorian sex is 'Walter's' My Secret Life. Of course it is only one source, however extensive, and so must be interpreted carefully, but my memory is that oral was quite common, and often preferred for a variety of reasons, but that anal was unusual, although the narrator reports on a number of women who had a 'letch' for it.I can't be very specific about 19th century Europe, but everything was probably in the mix. They had a lot of motivation to find alternatives. At least up to the industrial revolution, a lot of the men died in wars and a lot of the women died in childbirth. Women might have had the same attitude toward childbirth that men had to war. It's hard to say if that's true, especially since most of history is written by men.
19th-century erotica shows all manner of acts.
People didn't have a great handle on the cycle back then, so it wasn't all that reliable. There's an old riddle (not sure how old), "What do they call women who rely on rhythm?", "Mothers."
Health problems associated with feces were also not that well-known, so there wasn't as much stigma associated with anal sex.
Oral sex is always good, though sternly discouraged by the Roman Catholic Church. Condoms of various types started to become available in the 19th century, but there were often legal barriers. Latex condoms were invented in the early 1920's.
Somewhere here I have two "menus" from 19th century brothels--one in France, one in New York. Both list anal sex with a price not a lot higher than "basic service." The New York example placed an age limit on anal sex. I guess young men didn't have enough control and might hurt the working girl.
I wrote a 16th century story with a courtesan as a main character and started wondering how a courtesan wasn't pregnant all the time. This may or may not be relevant to later periods. There are several answers, but anal sex was probably part of the mix. It's hard to find real information, but there's correspondence from France at about that time indicating that marital sex was often anal sex.
A lemon slice--up to half a lemon--in the vagina was also a thing. Had to live where lemons were available.
I found a couple written lists of penance required for different unapproved sex acts, but I don't have them now. Different bishops probably produced different lists, and the lists and penance varied over time. The lists were maybe more remarkable for what was left off than for what was on the list. I don't recall that marital anal sex was listed. If it was, then the penance was mild. In contrast, anything with the woman on top was strictly punished.
Especially if you want to write about anal sex.