Cock Talk

[hotoldrguy]

Your enjoyment of the helicockter is entertaining to me.

It is not the easiest thing to do though

 

[hotwords229_A]

It is not the easiest thing to do though

No, it isn’t.
You need to be at just the right level of arousal without going over!

 

[hotoldrguy]

No, it isn’t.
You need to be at just the right level of arousal without going over!

I see you also have some experience at attempting this trick

 

[Wand3rlust]

 

[hotoldrguy]

No, it isn’t.
You need to be at just the right level of arousal without going over!

maybe we should splice together a vid of everyone's "outtakes"

 

[Endless_Night]

Wouldn’t that be Naked Men Behind People in Horse Costumes?

I think, in this instance, it would be the male in question *cough* Pmann *cough*

IN the horse costume.

I mean, maybe that's incorrect, but that's the way the thread read to me.

I just noticed the pic in your original post. I feel like that is aimed at me.

I certainly thought so. *nods*

Something I've always been curious about -

Pretty sure I wasn't around at that thread's inception, but I scrolled through it at some point. There's a picture of (presumably) you, in horse head, sitting in a high-backed chair reading a book. There is a small dog in your lap.

What was the dog's attitude towards your . . . costume?


Confused? Did it think it was a game? What are the crazy humans up to? Or was it all laissez-faire because you are always sitting about in horsey attire.

 

[Lord Pmann]

I think, in this instance, it would be the male in question *cough* Pmann *cough*

IN the horse costume.

I mean, maybe that's incorrect, but that's the way the thread read to me.


I certainly thought so. *nods*

Something I've always been curious about -

Pretty sure I wasn't around at that thread's inception, but I scrolled through it at some point. There's a picture of (presumably) you, in horse head, sitting in a high-backed chair reading a book. There is a small dog in your lap.

What was the dog's attitude towards your . . . costume?


Confused? Did it think it was a game? What are the crazy humans up to? Or was it all laissez-faire because you are always sitting about in horsey attire.

The dog (Duchess) was happy to be there. It wasn’t my dog, but a friend’s dog. I hadn’t been around the dog too much, so it wasn’t used to me. But my loving aura made it easy for animals to be in my presence.

 

[Wand3rlust]

The dog (Duchess) was happy to be there. It wasn’t my dog, but a friend’s dog. I hadn’t been around the dog too much, so it wasn’t used to me. But my loving aura* made it easy for animals to be in my presence.

*pocket full of kibble.

 

[AngelicaS1780]

Knobjectification
It has come to my attention that women don’t objectify men enough.

While I don't subscribe to/watch the Rampant Poles of Pleasure, Man Meat Monday, or Show Me The Soft Cock threads, I do subscribe to the Sexy Men of Literotica thread and @morelikeasong's helicockters thread. I'm at least trying to do my part.

Why do you think women don’t seem as visual as men, or are they and they are just better at keeping it under wraps?

I think that many women are just as aroused by images as men are, but are more specific about the images they choose.

Did you have a subscription to Playgirl growing up, or date someone who did?

No subscription, but did see some of the photos.

Did you have a sexy poster of a guy on your wall?

Michael Hutchence from INXS, Duran Duran, Adam Ant... lots of open shirts

Does looking at naked men stimulate you, or is it the fantasy created by the image more than the man himself, or do you have to have feelings for the man in the image?

I enjoy looking at naked men, when it is my choice to look at them. I greatly appreciate the male body overall. I’m a very visual person, so seeing a naked man who is attractive to me is often arousing. But it can depend on the situation, my mood, my experiences with the person, etc. I can acknowledge that a naked man is empirically sexy without it necessarily arousing me.

For me, I don't think it's the fantasy created by the image, more than the image itself, that I find arousing. The image inspires the fantasy and continues to play a role throughout. I don't need to have feelings for the man in the image, but if I do, that's a whole other level of arousal.

Is guy-on-guy hot or not?

It certainly can be.

When you see an image of a hot cock, do you think “Damn!” or “Gross, a dick!”?

While cocks can be very sexy and arousing to look at, a big aspect of that is how they are presented in the image. No matter how beautiful the cock, I will never be aroused by a super close up shot of just the cock of a person I don’t know. I don’t want to be that close to your cock unless I know you. A cock that is photographed by a man while he sits on the toilet will always be gross, regardless of how the cock itself looks.

Do you like seeing a man cum?

There are several circumstances in which I like/love seeing a man cum. The most arousing is when I have a connection with the person and have been involved in the process of bringing him to orgasm. Next would be having a connection with the person and having inspired the orgasm. What do I love about it? Watching how he touches himself, how his body moves and his breathing changes. Hearing his gasps and moans. I love it.

I occasionally enjoy watching someone I know, but with whom I don't necessarily have an intimate connection. It's a bit like being a voyeur, even if they have posted it for people to see. They don't know you're watching it. It feels a bit naughty and exciting. And can satisfy a certain curiosity.

Have you gone to a male strip joint, bachelorette party, etc.? Full nude?

The opportunity has never presented itself. I wouldn't be opposed to it, but it's not something I'm seeking out.

Do you prefer an erotic image of a sexy man with a woman (romance novel style cover), or a hot naked, confident man who looks ready to fuck, or just specific body parts, or all of the above?

I'm a big fan of images of naked men who are comfortable and confident in their nudity. I prefer more of a complete picture, as opposed to specific body parts. The idea of a romance novel cover style pose is not so appealing. If he's with a woman, I'd rather have a shot from her POV.

 

[Endless_Night]

The dog (Duchess) was happy to be there. It wasn’t my dog, but a friend’s dog. I hadn’t been around the dog too much, so it wasn’t used to me. But my loving aura made it easy for animals to be in my presence.

Well! This explains so much. I was wondering how meticulous P, who showers twice a day and is punctilious when it comes to the question of dress, managed having one of those little dogs who are relentlessly insistent about sleeping in the bed with their people.

#mysterysolved

 

[aussiegeekygal]

*pocket full of kibble.

I was going to say balls slathered with peanut butter, but you're probably right

 

[Endless_Night]

So, random question. Sparked by the visual talk.

I do not show my face on Lit. Even when I play. Admittedly, play for me is something of a rarity, but . . . no.

There's a handful of people that have seen a few body shots. Nothing too risqué, but enough to get a general idea of my form, but no face.

Lately, I find myself curious. Is that unusual? Do most people show their faces to their partner's when they play?

(Define play how you like.)

I was going to say balls slathered with peanut butter, but you're probably right

Also, ewwwwwww.

 

[MischiefMakerAlways]

So, random question. Sparked by the visual talk.

I do not show my face on Lit. Even when I play. Admittedly, play for me is something of a rarity, but . . . no.

There's a handful of people that have seen a few body shots. Nothing too risqué, but enough to get a general idea of my form, but no face.

Lately, I find myself curious. Is that unusual? Do most people show their faces to their partner's when they play?

(Define play how you like.)


Also, ewwwwwww.

I don't think it's unusual. I don't have a history of playing with any randos, so I only have a history of playing with people I've built trust with. I'm not the kind of guy that shows off to begin with, so I only share what is asked for. That said, so long as there is a little history and a lot of trust, yes, I show my face.

 

[aussiegeekygal]

I like to know what someone looks like before I play. I don't know why, but it's a thing with me. But I don't play like others. I'm not one to do a video chat (with although there are a few people in my life that I would do that with if the circumstances were right) so I'm not looking at people in real time.

I fling nudes around and have some flirty texts, but that's about it.

Almost all my nudes obscure my face. Not all, though.

 

[hotwords229_A]

So, random question. Sparked by the visual talk.

I do not show my face on Lit. Even when I play. Admittedly, play for me is something of a rarity, but . . . no.

There's a handful of people that have seen a few body shots. Nothing too risqué, but enough to get a general idea of my form, but no face.

Lately, I find myself curious. Is that unusual? Do most people show their faces to their partner's when they play?

(Define play how you like.)


Also, ewwwwwww.

I’ve never posted my face on Lit, nor do I plan to.
I have posted Harrison Ford circa 1981 as Indiana Jones and said it was me.
Sorry if I misled anyone.

 

[MindYaBitness]

So, random question. Sparked by the visual talk.

I do not show my face on Lit. Even when I play. Admittedly, play for me is something of a rarity, but . . . no.

There's a handful of people that have seen a few body shots. Nothing too risqué, but enough to get a general idea of my form, but no face.

Lately, I find myself curious. Is that unusual? Do most people show their faces to their partner's when they play?

(Define play how you like.)


Also, ewwwwwww.

I was like that when I first started being active in the forums, but a lot has changed in two years.

I post pics fairly frequently in the chaos thread, and people I'm friendly on outside chat apps have definitely seen my face, if they missed me posting in the faces threads once in awhile. I'm not shy, and I don't want my playmate to be either.

My amigovio sees all of me, and vice versa. I'm so visual that I wouldnt enjoy it nearly as much if it were always only voice or chat. If that's all I wanted, they've got audio porn & Ai boyfriend apps for that. I want to see you from head to toe, enjoying yourself, which exponentially maximizes my own pleasure.

 

[Endless_Night]

Thank you for the responses!


Hmmm. It does sound like I am an outlier.

Except for Indiana Jones up there.

 

[aussiegeekygal]

Yeah, I'm cool with y'all knowing what I look like

 

[Endless_Night]

Yeah, I'm cool with y'all knowing what I look like

And you are lovely!

 

[SassySheDevil]

Yeah, I'm cool with y'all knowing what I look like

You are so stinking cute.

 

[Mei5ter]

So, random question. Sparked by the visual talk.

I do not show my face on Lit. Even when I play. Admittedly, play for me is something of a rarity, but . . . no.

There's a handful of people that have seen a few body shots. Nothing too risqué, but enough to get a general idea of my form, but no face.

Lately, I find myself curious. Is that unusual? Do most people show their faces to their partners when they play?

(Define play how you like.)

I don't play casually on Lit, so I don't have a sense of what's considered usual here. My Lit person knows what I look like, but we've been together a fair while and known each other for years.

From my limited experience, having messed around on other sites in the past, I can say that none of my play partners before Lit saw my face. And they were fine with that, including people who became good friends and long term play partners.

For some people, seeing a play partner's face is what gives them the comfort level to play without inhibitions. For others, that comfort level comes from anonymity. While I'm Team Anonymity here, I'm not saying either is right or wrong - just that some people clearly expect one, while others clearly expect the other, and I'm not sure where they'd then find common ground.

 

[Apisto42]

So, random question. Sparked by the visual talk.

I do not show my face on Lit. Even when I play. Admittedly, play for me is something of a rarity, but . . . no.

There's a handful of people that have seen a few body shots. Nothing too risqué, but enough to get a general idea of my form, but no face.

Lately, I find myself curious. Is that unusual? Do most people show their faces to their partner's when they play?

(Define play how you like.)


Also, ewwwwwww.

If I’m not comfortable enough with someone to share face pics, I’m not opening my mind to them intimately either. I need some kind of connection that’s deeper than sharing boob and dick pics to write messages back and forth that are a turn on. If we don’t trust each other enough to share faces with, do I really know you well enough to turn you on with just words?

Otherwise it might as well be cut and paste from other sexting.

@aussiegeekygal - totes adorbs shot, no matter what that pony fucker might say.

 

[RosewoodTulip]

So, random question. Sparked by the visual talk.

I do not show my face on Lit. Even when I play. Admittedly, play for me is something of a rarity, but . . . no.

There's a handful of people that have seen a few body shots. Nothing too risqué, but enough to get a general idea of my form, but no face.

Lately, I find myself curious. Is that unusual? Do most people show their faces to their partner's when they play?

(Define play how you like.)

I'm very selective about who gets to see my face here. It's probably rooted in insecurity if I'm honest.
I've had play partners here I've known next to nothing about - I liked how they wrote or how their voice sounded - and seeing each others faces didn't seem to be important for something casual.

But if I am close to someone here and want to - I guess level up the relationship whether friendship or more - then I do like to see faces and learn names. It becomes a small sign that I trust them and want to be trusted in return.

I've shared a few pics on here, cleavage mostly (I play to my strengths!), enough to give an idea of me, but I'm pretty open about sharing more in private to people I've built some kind of connection with.
I posted my face once in the Show Your Face thread and panicked the whole entire time it was there so that's not something I'm going to do again.

I don't think there's a right or wrong way to do things. As I said on my last post here I'm not that fussed about the visual. Turn my brain on instead

 

[Wand3rlust]

So, random question. Sparked by the visual talk.

I do not show my face on Lit. Even when I play. Admittedly, play for me is something of a rarity, but . . . no.

There's a handful of people that have seen a few body shots. Nothing too risqué, but enough to get a general idea of my form, but no face.

Lately, I find myself curious. Is that unusual? Do most people show their faces to their partner's when they play?

(Define play how you like.)


Also, ewwwwwww.

I've shown my face multiple times. I'm not fussed about that. It's a relatively nice, if unremarkable face. I'm not fussed about that either.

I would expect someone to share to the same level as I do with them. But I wouldn't play (i mean I have very rarely been tempted on here anyway) If I didn't think they were who they said they were.

For me, it works the same as other relationships, except you get to talk to me first.

If I met you irl, you'd have already seen my face. More intimate sharing comes a lot later. If at all. And only if I'm connected with you. I can get myself off rather than have a meaningless sext session. (I've done that. Its empty and soulless for me).

 

[peekingone]

Yeah, I'm cool with y'all knowing what I look like

Such an energetic personality from this photo. Love it.