I’ll have that in the next 5 mins!Right. I'll be the first to tell you that your approach is... unusual, shall we say. Posting your picture in your first-ever post in AH. It raises red flags and it makes people instantly think you are a troll.
Now this is a second picture. It still doesn't prove anything. If you want to put this to rest, I'll tell you what will prove something. Take a pic holding a piece of paper with a handwritten text "AwkwardlySet, you are so smart!" With your clothes fully on, please.
And doneRight. I'll be the first to tell you that your approach is... unusual, shall we say. Posting your picture in your first-ever post in AH. It raises red flags and it makes people instantly think you are a troll.
Now this is a second picture. It still doesn't prove anything. If you want to put this to rest, I'll tell you what will prove something. Take a pic holding a piece of paper with a handwritten text "AwkwardlySet, you are so smart!" With your clothes fully on, please.
Happy to do whatever it takes… to an extentHah! I didn't think you were actually going to do it.
Okay, I'll turn the paranoia mode off. Welcome to the AH.
Stacnash will be turning in their grave knowing I’m not Pervy Pete 
He wasn’t the first to wonder. I would rather people believe my gender and age than assume I’m a perverted old man, as has been the assumption so far. My pictures are all over the internet already, a few more in the ether don’t worry me in the slightest
Rice was the creator of the whiny mopey sadkin vampire. Blech.
But Rice could dedicate three pages to the description of drapes like no other!!!
That's kinda the whole idea.
I have no interest in posting pictures here, if there is, however, a rule against posting my face within this forum then I shall refrain from doing so. As I have said, I am new to the forum side of this site!
That I cannot argue with.
I want to add that I read Ann as a teenager. Her books will stay with me for life, nothing wrong with that! Rice gave us vampires with depth, passion, and existential crises, which is why they’re still beloved by many! If you prefer pure carnage, Lumley’s Wamphyrie are definitely a solid pick. But shredding Lestat? I don't know that I agree
I liked Lumley's take on the vampire that they were a parasite (leech) the way they morphed people into various types of machines and servants was Cronenberg level body horror and they engaged in BDSM style sex. Those fuckers ruled. I also have a soft spot for Lumley's series due to the fact the fourth book with the 'essential salts' paid homage to Lovecraft's case of Charles Dexter Ward.I want to add that I read Ann as a teenager. Her books will stay with me for life, nothing wrong with that! Rice gave us vampires with depth, passion, and existential crises, which is why they’re still beloved by many! If you prefer pure carnage, Lumley’s Wamphyrie are definitely a solid pick. But shredding Lestat? I don't know that I agree
I have no interest in posting pictures to be honest, if there is a rule against posting my face within this forum then I shall refrain from doing so. As I have said, I am new to the forum side of this site. The other forums are rather intimidating and I would like to make writer friends. I simply wanted to prove myself as a 25 year old woman. As I say, I have no interest in being here to be looked at, I am young, I guess the way I use the internet is different to how the older generation do...and I want to fit in. The more I get told off, the more I'll learn!
That may be the sexiest thing I've ever seen posted here.
This is why I left those books with my teenage self. I prefer authors like Jon Athan and Audrey Rush....writers who don’t shy away from real gore. Athan’s work is brutally graphic, If you haven't read any I would recommend "Are your parents home" and "The Groomer" whereas Audrey blends body horror with psychological torment ("My Girl" and "Bunny" for example). I’m with you—I want to smell the blood, not the roses.
