ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 63,842
It has done what it was meant to do - give more people access to health insurance.Not with regard to what the chart showed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It has done what it was meant to do - give more people access to health insurance.Not with regard to what the chart showed.
Equity isn't performance, it's leftism.Exactly. That is a performance ranking, not a leftist ranking. When you see "equity," that does not mean "leftist."
It as also supposed to lower costs. FAILED on that front.It has done what it was meant to do - give more people access to health insurance.
No, that's what the report and people doing the rankings say.
It was,but the final legislation basically gutted that part.It as also supposed to lower costs. FAILED on that front.
The recipients are chosen by a panel made up of health policy experts, clinicians, journalists and advocates. The awards are named after Martin Shkreli, the infamous “pharma bro” who rose to international notoriety after increasing the price of lifesaving anti-parasitic drug Daraprim 50-fold.
Blame Trump for not reforming ACA like he campaigned on. He said it was too hard and went golfing & pussy-grabbing instead.It as also supposed to lower costs. FAILED on that front.
Blame Trump for not reforming ACA like he campaigned on. He said it was too hard and went golfing & pussy-grabbing instead.
And Democrats blocked him from doing...they have to keep their big pharma/insurance buddies happy.
He wants warp speed. Burning the racket to the ground and growing something new out of the ashes would take at least a generation, maybe centuries. That is inconvenient for political speeches.Did Doddering Donnie issue an executive order to find his concept of a plan? The darn thing has gone missing again.
By "the racket" you do mean the private health-insurance companies, right? Those can be replaced by a workable single-payer system overnight.He wants warp speed. Burning the racket to the ground and growing something new out of the ashes would take at least a generation, maybe centuries. That is inconvenient for political speeches.
By "the racket" you do mean the private health-insurance companies, right? Those can be replaced by a workable single-payer system overnight.
That's only a slice. Pharmaceutical manufacturers get a big slice. Corporate clinics get most of the primary care physician slice. And they all spend on lawyers, lobbyists, and propagandists to guard their slices.By "the racket" you do mean the private health-insurance companies, right? Those can be replaced by a workable single-payer system overnight.
Better the government than corporate execs. Looking around the world -- something we should always do -- government has a much better track record in this area.Do you really want government running your healthcare?
Then they wouldn't be nearly as effective at healing as they are now.The medical professions could become more like car mechanics, with less formal education and more practical experience for modest income directly from patients.
Some possibilities are tropical climate, beaches, and poverty. Swimming is very healthy exercise. It has plenty of sunshine all year. It's too poor to grow the racket that keeps Americans medicated, addicted, sick, and controlled. And it exported many malcontents.Why does Cuba have better health outcomes than the USA, plus greater life expectancy at a fraction of the cost?
Because they don't have fuckwits trying to argue that it's the Democrats artificially raising the cost of health care to please their Big Business buddies.Why does Cuba have better health outcomes than the USA, plus greater life expectancy at a fraction of the cost?
About 100 million Americans owe an estimated $220bn in medical debt, with many dragging those financial obligations around for decades. Millions of low-income Americans have been trapped by medical debt that has prevented them from owning a car or house, keeping them and their spouses and children in poverty for generations.
But in south-west Ohio, local activists and medical centers are teaming up with Undue Medical Debt, a Boston-based non-profit formerly called RIP Medical Debt, on an ambitious effort to raise funding to settle longstanding medical bills for thousands of locals.
In a region with some of the highest medical debt rates in the country, about 13,000 people who owe more than $22m are eligible for debt relief, which can be bought from debt collecting agencies at a knockdown rate of $1 for $178 of debt.
Now tell us the reason we’re “the highest” in infant mortality. Do you even understand what that means? I’ll give you a hint…it’s not counted the same way in the US as it is in other countries. Without even looking, I can almost guarantee Norway doesn’t count babies weighing less than a pound or 21 weeks gestation as being “born.” That would be counted as a stillbirth, unlike here in the US.American Journal of Managed Care,
January 31, 2023
US Has Highest Infant, Maternal Mortality Rates Despite the Most Health Care Spending
Author(s):
Justina Petrullo
The United States possesses the highest infant and maternal mortality rates compared with any other high-income country, even though it spends the most on health care.
The United States has the highest infant and maternal mortality rates out of any other high-income country and simultaneously spends the most on health care, according to a report released Tuesday by the Commonwealth Fund.
The report evaluated US health spending, outcomes, status, and service use compared with Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. In addition, US health system efficiency was compared with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average of the 38 high-income countries that had available data from December 2022.
Of all countries in 2020, the United States possessed the highest infant mortality rate at 5.4 deaths per 1000 live births, which is markedly higher than the 1.6 deaths per 1000 live births in Norway, which has the lowest mortality rate...
US maternal mortality in 2020 was over 3 times the rate in most of the other high-income countries, with almost 24 (23.8) maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births....
The United States has lower life expectancy and much worse health outcomes than other countries, although the country spends 2-4 times as much on health care as most other high-income nations. In 2021, the United States spent 17.8% of gross domestic product on health care, nearly twice as much as the average OECD country...
The United States also possess the highest rate of physical assault deaths, including gun violence, with 7.4 deaths per 100,000 people...
The authors cited 3 reasons for the disparities that make the United States an outlier compared with other high-income countries: unaffordable coverage, high costs, and limited access to effective primary care to better prevent and manage chronic health conditions.
https://www.ajmc.com/view/us-has-hi...y-rates-despite-the-most-health-care-spending
You lack the ability to distinguish between facts and your opinions.
Now tell us the reason we’re “the highest” in infant mortality. Do you even understand what that means? I’ll give you a hint…it’s not counted the same way in the US as it is in other countries. Without even looking, I can almost guarantee Norway doesn’t count babies weighing less than a pound or 21 weeks gestation as being “born.” That would be counted as a stillbirth, unlike here in the US.
So the devil is in the details. Once again, Radicalized leftists making square pegs fit into round holes.
What was “made up?”HumpDay makes things up and pretends they are facts.Just like Totally Fact Free Chad and Chloe.
Stable genius.