Fani disqualified in Trump Georgia case

[Rightguide]

As George Staphinmetropolis found out. The hard way.

There may be more to come.

 

[Rightguide]

Check out the latest Fani Meme:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1869758316865609818

 

[Lazaran]

Fani Fights Back! Fani Willis Asks Georgia Supreme Court to Intervene After Appeals Court Boots Her From Trump RICO Case​

by Cristina Laila Dec. 19, 2024 7:00 pm

Fani Willis is fighting back after a Georgia Appeals court booted her from the Trump RICO case.

As reported earlier, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her entire office were disqualified from prosecuting Trump in their lawfare RICO case.

The appeals court did not throw out the charges, however, Fani Willis and her office have “no authority to proceed.”


The Georgia Appeals Court disqualified Fani Willis because of an appearance of impropriety.

Fani Willis asked the Georgia Supreme Court to intervene later Thursday after she got tossed from the case.

More here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/fani-fights-back-fani-willis-asks-georgia-supreme/

The question is, will the State Supreme Court take the case? I think they will pass and let the Appeals Court decision stand.

The PB’s RWCJ seems surprised that Fani appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court…





The PB’s RWCJ



Side note:

The ramifications of the appeals court’s flawed decision (it was spilt 2-1) are too enormous for the Georgia Supreme Court to ignore.

The appeal WILL be heard, AND the appeals court’s flawed decision WILL be overturned.

 

[Rightguide]

The PB’s RWCJ seems surprised that Fani appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court…





The PB’s RWCJ



Side note:

The ramifications of the appeals court’s flawed decision (it was spilt 2-1) are too enormous for the Georgia Supreme Court to ignore.

The appeal WILL be heard, AND the appeals court’s flawed decision WILL be overturned.

Nobody is surprised that she appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court. I would be surprised if they elect to hear it. She is a legal and administrative dumpster fire.

 

[Lazaran]

Nobody is surprised that she appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court. I would be surprised if they elect to hear it. She is a legal and administrative dumpster fire.

Fani Willis ALREADY secured FOUR guilty pleas in the Georgia election interference RICO scheme.

Hope that ^ helps.



Rightard

 

[Rebel5soul]

Nobody is surprised that she appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court. I would be surprised if they elect to hear it. She is a legal and administrative dumpster fire.

Without a stay the wheels of justice will continue to grind her under.

 

[Rightguide]

Without a stay the wheels of justice will continue to grind her under.

I just can't see how they can get around that "odor of mendacity" the original trial judge identified but didn't go far enough in addressing. It was still there to be identified by the Appeals Court. Just my opinion but I think the Supreme Court will take a look at this and decide the Appeals Court did the right thing and that no further remedy is needed.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Mention "rape" and "Trump" in the same sentence and there's a near-statistical certainty that one or both of Literotica's foremost rape enablers (Rightguide and HisArpy) will make their presence known in your thread.

"If you know someone who quote sexually assaulted you unquote, how can we be sure it's not 'morning after regret?' "
"Why didn't she go to the police immediately?"
"What was she wearing?"
"Why was she drinking alcohol at a social event without someone looking out for her?"
"Where were her parents?"
"If her vagina and his penis never made contact, it's not 'rape' OR 'sexual assault' "

...the usual excuses.....

 

[Deleted member 6873114]

Trump didn't have a "rape" conviction and Fani Willis' incompetence and inherent corruption is what got her and her entire office disqualified.

They know that Trump was never convicted of rape. ABC "news" and George Snufolockupus know it too. But they say stuff like that in their eco chamber to try to keep the dying embers of WOKE lies from going smoldering out. I hate to keep saying this but their woke nonsense only can make sense to a person if they take enough drugs. A clear mind is not going to buy any of this crap. Also, not only was Trump not guilty of rape, I could claim that any one of these libtards grabbed my pussy in a department story 20 years ago and drag them through legal hell. Only a very sick money grubbing bitch would do such a thing. But it happens every time. The whole libtard weapon system is to call everyone that stands in their way a raciest or a rapist. So nice to see their movement exposed.

 

[Lazaran]

They know that Trump was never convicted of rape. ABC "news" and George Snufolockupus know it too. But they say stuff like that in their eco chamber to try to keep the dying embers of WOKE lies from going smoldering out. I hate to keep saying this but their woke nonsense only can make sense to a person if they take enough drugs. A clear mind is not going to buy any of this crap. Also, not only was Trump not guilty of rape, I could claim that any one of these libtards grabbed my pussy in a department story 20 years ago and drag them through legal hell. Only a very sick money grubbing bitch would do such a thing. But it happens every time. The whole libtard weapon system is to call everyone that stands in their way a raciest or a rapist. So nice to see their movement exposed.

From the interwebz:

“On October 7, 2016, one month before the United States presidential election, The Washington Postpublished a video and article about then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and television host Billy Bushhaving a lewd conversation about women in September 2005. Trump and Bush were on a bus on their way to film an episode of Access Hollywood, a show owned by NBCUniversal. In the video, Trump described his attempt to seduce a married woman and indicated he might start kissing a woman that he and Bush were about to meet. He added, "I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. ... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."



Hope that ^ helps.

 

[Deleted member 6873114]

From the interwebz:

“On October 7, 2016, one month before the United States presidential election, The Washington Postpublished a video and article about then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and television host Billy Bushhaving a lewd conversation about women in September 2005. Trump and Bush were on a bus on their way to film an episode of Access Hollywood, a show owned by NBCUniversal. In the video, Trump described his attempt to seduce a married woman and indicated he might start kissing a woman that he and Bush were about to meet. He added, "I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. ... Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."



Hope that ^ helps.

You just made the point that Trump said "they let you do it." I have let lots of guys grab my pussy but I have never been raped. You may feel that sexual encounters are wrong but some of us on Literotica enjoy sex and enjoy variety. But the bottom line is regardless of your views it is NOT illegal if a legal adult "lets you do it." But I am sure you knew that and choose to post things like that because some people are dumb enough to not see the difference.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You just made the point that Trump said "they let you do it." I have let lots of guys grab my pussy but I have never been raped. You may feel that sexual encounters are wrong but some of us on Literotica enjoy sex and enjoy variety. But the bottom line is regardless of your views it is NOT illegal if a legal adult "lets you do it." But I am sure you knew that and choose to post things like that because some people are dumb enough to not see the difference.

Doesn’t sound like she let him.

The part of the book that caused the most controversy concerns Trump’s divorce from his first wife, Ivana. Hurt obtained a copy of her sworn divorce deposition, from 1990, in which she stated that, the previous year, her husband had raped her in a fit of rage. In Hurt’s account, Trump was furious that a “scalp reduction” operation he’d undergone to eliminate a bald spot had been unexpectedly painful. Ivana had recommended the plastic surgeon. In retaliation, Hurt wrote, Trump yanked out a handful of his wife’s hair, and then forced himself on her sexually.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/24/documenting-trumps-abuse-of-women

 

[Lazaran]

You just made the point that Trump said "they let you do it." I have let lots of guys grab my pussy but I have never been raped. You may feel that sexual encounters are wrong but some of us on Literotica enjoy sex and enjoy variety. But the bottom line is regardless of your views it is NOT illegal if a legal adult "lets you do it." But I am sure you knew that and choose to post things like that because some people are dumb enough to not see the difference.

Just because some wealthy sociopath says “they let you do it” does NOT make it so. When a woman says: “No, I did NOT let DonOld do it” (did NOT (give consent) , then it IS sexual assault / rape if a jury can be convinced by the preponderance of the evidence. In a court of law, E. Jean Carroll said she did NOT give DonOld consent to grab her by the pussy, and a jury was convinced by the preponderance of the evidence and found DonOld guilty of sexually abusing her.

Also;

The Judge presiding over the E. Jean Carroll case clarified that DonOld’s conduct WAS rape for all intents and purposes.

Hope that ^ helps.

 

[Deleted member 6873114]

Just because some wealthy sociopath says “they let you do it” does NOT make it so. When a woman says: “No, I did NOT let DonOld do it” (did NOT (give consent) , then it IS sexual assault / rape if a jury can be convinced by the preponderance of the evidence. In a court of law, E. Jean Carroll said she did NOT give DonOld consent to grab her by the pussy, and a jury was convinced by the preponderance of the evidence and found DonOld guilty of sexually abusing her.

Also;

The Judge presiding over the E. Jean Carroll case clarified that DonOld’s conduct WAS rape for all intents and purposes.

Hope that ^ helps.

The problem is it was just her word against his. So I don't buy it. If that same day she ran to the cops I might think there was something to it. But this is bull shit and any person that is fair minded knows that in a he said she said situation it is impossible to convict. He was NOT convicted of rape. ABC news now knows there are 16 million reason that making that false claim is stupid.

 

[dmallord]

The problem is it was just her word against his. So I don't buy it. If that same day she ran to the cops I might think there was something to it. But this is bull shit and any person that is fair minded knows that in a he said she said situation it is impossible to convict. He was NOT convicted of rape. ABC news now knows there are 16 million reason that making that false claim is stupid.

It reminds me of Trump's claim that if you're not guilty, you don't plead the Fifth. Yet when confronted with personal charges, he contradicted his own decree. That seems similar to me. Perhaps you didn't fully read about the circumstances surrounding her case... or at all.

Is it a paradox to suggest that both were victims and, therefore, neither should be charged concerning a false claim involving a rape allegation? I think not. Donald's 'technical call' rendering didn't see it as a rape victim sees it. Dawn, no fair-minded woman or man would.

 

[Lazaran]

The problem is it was just her word against his. So I don't buy it. If that same day she ran to the cops I might think there was something to it. But this is bull shit and any person that is fair minded knows that in a he said she said situation it is impossible to convict. He was NOT convicted of rape. ABC news now knows there are 16 million reason that making that false claim is stupid.

It was obviously NOT impossible for the jury that SAW AND HEARD ALL THE EVIDENCE to convict DonOld (find DonOld liable for sexually abusing / “raping” E.Jean Carroll - and it cost DonOld $90 MILLION.



Hope that ^ helps.

 

[BAstoicguy]

They know that Trump was never convicted of rape. ABC "news" and George Snufolockupus know it too. But they say stuff like that in their eco chamber to try to keep the dying embers of WOKE lies from going smoldering out. I hate to keep saying this but their woke nonsense only can make sense to a person if they take enough drugs. A clear mind is not going to buy any of this crap. Also, not only was Trump not guilty of rape, I could claim that any one of these libtards grabbed my pussy in a department story 20 years ago and drag them through legal hell. Only a very sick money grubbing bitch would do such a thing. But it happens every time. The whole libtard weapon system is to call everyone that stands in their way a raciest or a rapist. So nice to see their movement exposed.

As they do here. A tidbit just posited in the same even: Why do small minds have to latch on to and fetish meaningless symbols while at once holding onto some of the most poisonous and proven destructive ideologies of man not named as "original" sins?

 

[BAstoicguy]

The problem is it was just her word against his. So I don't buy it. If that same day she ran to the cops I might think there was something to it. But this is bull shit and any person that is fair minded knows that in a he said she said situation it is impossible to convict. He was NOT convicted of rape. ABC news now knows there are 16 million reason that making that false claim is stupid.

A jury, under the full influence of a MSM and Non-Musk or Truth Social Social Media still could not find itself to bring any significant finding in a CIVIL case meaning as a criminal case, it would never have been brought to trial, but The Left demanded show trials through the Democrat Machine.

Must read on the outline: https://www.tabletmag.com/feature/rapid-onset-political-enlightenment

 

[BAstoicguy]

But you watch. They're going to get him now. He's running the government unconstitutionally. That is treason.


They will get very serious now over saving Democracy (the very people you see here praising Socialism).

We LOVE a Democratic Socialism: You get to choose the stylish chain of the day.

 

[Deleted member 6873114]

Still beating on the "Get Trump" drum? OMG! TDS is amazing.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Fanny is a classic case of what you get when you lower standards.

 

[BAstoicguy]

When any standard will do? Sounds like a Sensei K parable or the happy finishing to AA and it's ugly red-headed step-child, DEI, but not the agonizing demise of the 60s Civil Rights movement. That something so glorious and noble could have been allowed to degenerate into what we have here today...

Black Lives Matter? A Communist money scam?

Kamala Harris? The paragon exemplar-ess?

 

[Rebel5soul]

It's a bubble of stupid bubbling up in society. It's going to manifest itself in the medical profession soon enough.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

A jury, under the full influence of a MSM and Non-Musk or Truth Social Social Media still could not find itself to bring any significant finding in a CIVIL case meaning as a criminal case, it would never have been brought to trial, but The Left demanded show trials through the Democrat Machine.

Must read on the outline: https://www.tabletmag.com/feature/rapid-onset-political-enlightenment

Why did Trump pick people who were under the full influence of the MSM to be on the jury??

 

[BAstoicguy]

You must take pride in your ability

to underwhelm​

with your stupidity.​