Our country's fetishizing of guns is revolting

This country's love affair with guns is revolting. ..And we're so far gone we don't see it for what it is - a twisted, psychotic fetish.

To think there are millions of American's who consider gun play a hobby, a lifestyle, or an activity around which the family spends time bonding - as though celebrating a device engineered to shoot a projectile that pierces skin, bone, and brain was a normal, wholesome thing.

Imagine you moved next door to a guy who, instead of worshipping guns, enjoys brewing poison for killing people and making full-size guillotine replicas. "Don't worry neighbor!" he tells you, "I would never use these on people unless forced to do so! I only use the poison on lab rats and the guillotines on pig carcasses." What would you think of the guy? ..You would think he was fucking nuts. ..But worshipping weapons that can kill multiple people from hundreds of yards away in a matter of seconds? Spending weekends at gun clubs showing off their arsenal and debating accuracy and stopping power with fellow nut-jobs? .Nope! nothing to see here people. ..He's just a normal American celebrating his birthright.

Are guns a necessity? ..Of course they are... for law enforcement and military personnel.
WOW, here you are pontificating on owning a gun when Biden just pardoned his son for an FLA violation and any crimes that he committed while enriching his father and family more than 10 years ago. HUH, what are they hiding? The only reason I'm saying this is that it shows that you are woefully ignorant and more than likely a Democrat and a big city person where multiple shootings happen at a rate higher than the Iraq war. We use our guns for sport hunting and protection which of course you wouldn't know about because you are O B livious. Your demonrat party is letting in undocumented immigrants and drugs and also sex trafficked children. Yet you want to blame us for your ridiculous assumption that we are the problem ....those of us who are law-abiding citizens. I'd say you are the problem with no critical thinking and very uneducated views of the real world except in your own HOOD. You have a tiny view of reality and I think you are the problem in this world
 
If a civilian hadn't been given access to an assault rifle (and no civilian has a reason to need one), there would not have been an assassination attempt on Donald Trump on Saturday.
GAM, what in sam hell got into you to step on dog crap and didn't notice the stink coming off your footsteps down the road. Any rifle could have made that shot. But there you are giving into the mainstream media manipulation of semiauto rifles. Not much critical thinking there and not much familiarity with firearms period. Grow a brain please it's people like you that make America look stupid
 
No civilian has any legitimate use for an automatic or semiautomatic rifle. That's much more firepower than you need for home defense, and it would be unsporting to use it to hunt.
 
No civilian has any legitimate use for an automatic or semiautomatic rifle. That's much more firepower than you need for home defense, and it would be unsporting to use it to hunt.
Considering that technically a revolver can be considered a "semi-automatic" since one trigger pull = one round fired without needing to manually reload or cycle the firearm, you are woefully overreaching.
 
No civilian has any legitimate use for an automatic or semiautomatic rifle. That's much more firepower than you need for home defense, and it would be unsporting to use it to hunt.
You are not judge and jury to determine what the 2nd ammendment allows.
 
Considering that technically a revolver can be considered a "semi-automatic" since one trigger pull = one round fired without needing to manually reload or cycle the firearm, you are woefully overreaching.
While rifles are more accurate at ranged shooting, you can have yourself a dandy little school massacre within the confines of a school classroom full of soft targets with a Glock 17 or Glock 19 pistol, which comes with a 17-round capacity magazine (bigger magazines are, of course, available). Even if you only hit half your targets, that should be enough to dominate the 24-hour news cycle.
 
No civilian has any legitimate use for an automatic or semiautomatic rifle. That's much more firepower than you need for home defense, and it would be unsporting to use it to hunt.

This is just feelings based ignorance and fear.

Talk about fetishizing . . .

At least he has an interest in something other than being a nosey as fuck Karen all up in everyone else's bidnizz.

While rifles are more accurate at ranged shooting, you can have yourself a dandy little school massacre within the confines of a school classroom full of soft targets with a Glock 17 or Glock 19 pistol, which comes with a 17-round capacity magazine (bigger magazines are, of course, available). Even if you only hit half your targets, that should be enough to dominate the 24-hour news cycle.

Probably why the vast majority of gun violence including mass shootings is done with pistols.

Makes you wonder what the (D)ipshit obsession with rifle bans is.
 
I saw one of the new Operator AOS's at the local shop today.......
https://cdn-fastly.thefirearmblog.com/media/2024/09/18/07191/tfb-review-springfield-armory-1911-operator-aos-5-45-acp.jpg?size=720x845&nocrop=1

Might have to pick one up in GAWDZ caliber as St. John Moses Browning intended the 1911 to be.

Not that there is anything wrong with that I just wish they had them in 10mm so I could have both. :D
I'm a 1911 type guy. I think they're safer to carry concealed. For my EDC I'm still rocking my Kimber Ultra CDP II .45 ACP. It comes out of their custom shop and is a quality pistol. The only thing I'd say is to replace the stock magazines with Wilson Combat magazines. You'll get flawless performance.
 
The problem with the US is that people have forgotten about the Hatfields and McCoys.

And so has the government.
Do you actually know anything about the Hatfields and MCoys?

The famous feud was political.


Sid Hatfield, the prolabor sheriff portrayed here, was the heir to the Hatfield tradition of defending the Union.

That's THIS Union.


Discussing insurrection, terrorism, civil war, firearms, sex, food, books, movies, religion, gender etc. is best done on a basis of verifiable knowledge.

( O O )
 
No civilian has any legitimate use for an automatic or semiautomatic rifle. That's much more firepower than you need for home defense, and it would be unsporting to use it to hunt.
You need to just shut up. The Founders in crafting the Constitution left in the hands of the citizenry firearms weaponry of the same technology as the British Army they defeated.
 
Do you actually know anything about the Hatfields and MCoys?

The famous feud was political.



Sid Hatfield, the prolabor sheriff portrayed here, was the heir to the Hatfield tradition of defending the Union.

That's THIS Union.



Discussing insurrection, terrorism, civil war, firearms, sex, food, books, movies, religion, gender etc. is best done on a basis of verifiable knowledge.

( O O )
The bottom line is it was deadly.
 
This is just feelings based ignorance and fear.



At least he has an interest in something other than being a nosey as fuck Karen all up in everyone else's bidnizz.



Probably why the vast majority of gun violence including mass shootings is done with pistols.

Makes you wonder what the (D)ipshit obsession with rifle bans is.
UltraChud and its chud pals want to show off their failure to finish ESL.

For humans gifted with intelligence and reason, this issue is extremely simple.

Amendment 2 to the U.S. Consutilution states the necessity for a well-regulated militia.

The intent of Mr. Madison and other Framers was to assure the existence of a body of armed people that would act as a counterweight to a standing army.

These are precisely the issues being determined in the U.S. right now.

The same issues were central to Spain in 1936 and Yugoslavia in 1991.

The issue is the same everywhere.

State power is disintegrating.

Survival requires weapons.

Follow this goddess:



( O O )
 
I'm a 1911 type guy.

That makes you a better human than Tupperware toting soy boyz :cool:

SHOTS FIRED!!!
https://i.gifer.com/embedded/download/CPX4.gif
https://pnwflyfishing.com/forum/index.php?media/shots-fired-gif.4371/full

I think they're safer to carry concealed. For my EDC I'm still rocking my Kimber Ultra CDP II .45 ACP. It comes out of their custom shop and is a quality pistol. The only thing I'd say is to replace the stock magazines with Wilson Combat magazines. You'll get flawless performance.

Wilson Combat and Chip McCormick mags are all I run (y) (y)

Kimber makes some solid products at a relatively good price for sure. I haven't really looked at compacts in a bit....tis the season for full size and long slides, but I'll definitely feel one of those CDP's up they look snazzy and good for concealing in the "de-cock'er" position.
 
UltraChud and its chud pals want to show off their failure to finish ESL.

For humans gifted with intelligence and reason, this issue is extremely simple.

Amendment 2 to the U.S. Consutilution states the necessity for a well-regulated militia.

Now THAT is funny..... :ROFLMAO:
 
You need to just shut up. The Founders in crafting the Constitution left in the hands of the citizenry firearms weaponry of the same technology as the British Army they defeated.
Exactly. All they had in mind was single-shot muzzle-loading muskets.
 
That makes you a better human than Tupperware toting soy boyz :cool:

SHOTS FIRED!!!
https://i.gifer.com/embedded/download/CPX4.gif
https://pnwflyfishing.com/forum/index.php?media/shots-fired-gif.4371/full



Wilson Combat and Chip McCormick mags are all I run (y) (y)

Kimber makes some solid products at a relatively good price for sure. I haven't really looked at compacts in a bit....tis the season for full size and long slides, but I'll definitely feel one of those CDP's up they look snazzy and good for concealing in the "de-cock'er" position.
You're really not doing much, here, to refute the OP's thesis about revolting fetishization of firearms.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. All they had in mind was single-shot muzzle-loading muskets.
Then why did they write down "arms" ??

It's like you just can't ever stop bullshitting about 2A.

You're really not doing much, here, to refute the OP's thesis about revolting fetishization of firearms.

Wasn't my objective.

Leftoids hate civil rights....we got it.
 
Back
Top