The Second Amendment, Gun Control, and School Shootings.

Lest we not know the REALITY....

aanLrcq.jpg


...more guns do in fact make us safer, which is why the large security details of the VIP class... D'uh!

FACT: the attacks that result in the intended victim scaring off the attacker by the mere presence of a gun is RARELY even mentioned, as it just becomes one of millions of non-events that never happened. But a crime scene makes the news and the 24hour news cycle...

In the long run, statistics are irrelevant to self defense. The right to defend myself is inherent in my being, not dispensed nor stripped by government. It resides in every individual, in every country. It is simply willingly sacrificed to the government by those who fail to understand and cherish true individual freedom.
 
Last edited:
Oh, there have been several moments in this thread, when motivated, you went straight to Google to follow up.

Please, you do think we're stupid. You just do not want to accept facts and statistics that might be counter to your firmly held belief.

:rolleyes:

At this precise moment in time, I have a job I need to get to.

(Also, of course researching Kleck on the internet is going to be problematic, as apparently Google will just give me exactly what I'm wanting to find.)

You haven't SHOWN me any facts or stats that counter my beliefs with the one exception of a researcher whose name only rings a bell with me because I think in previous discussions I've discovered that his work was discredited. If these 'facts' are so obvious, it would surely be easy to locate them from another source?
 
So, you were alone, and didn't try avoidance and didn't start screaming fire at the top of your lungs. Do you fucking know anything what-so-ever about actual self-defense?

I really doubt it. I think you were more likely caught unaware, safe in your little self-absorbed cocoon.

I was alone - because I'm a citizen, and it's my fucking right to walk down a street if I want to.
I don't know how you avoid someone who's on the same street as you - there wasn't a handy side street that I could turn down.
I did scream. Extremely loudly.
 
I was alone - because I'm a citizen, and it's my fucking right to walk down a street if I want to.
I don't know how you avoid someone who's on the same street as you - there wasn't a handy side street that I could turn down.
I did scream. Extremely loudly.

Here we go again misusing, in the worst possible way, the word "right."

Then we play the victim card. And you walked right into that which I have been pointing out. Lack of situational awareness and being naive enough to put yourself into the position of being victimized. You are right in that a gun would not have helped you. You can't even help yourself because you deny basic human behavior.

I know you believe men predate, but then you act like no one can assault you because of some nebulous "right" to be safe and secure in your person with no regard to reality.
 
I think you're right. Hes arguing that more guns equals less gun violence. He was probably homeschooled on the reserve.

It's been the mantra that when someone references Hitler, Godwin's law is in effect. So what do you call it when your adversary is always 'dumb' because that's the go to liberal defensive crouch posture.... Maybe we just need to call it 'Intellectual fascism' and call it a day.

Perhaps someone needs to point out that when 90% of US Nobel Prize winners, 100% of Pulitzer Prize winners, 100% of Putnam Fellows, 95% of MacArthur grant recipients, and 96% of Intel Science Talent Search top 10 finalists exhibit left-wing donor profiles, it's NOT an example of intellectual superiority, simply an example of Hollywood style bias, snobbery and intellectual discrimination. Conservatives and liberals all fall on the same IQ bell curve. Time to get liberals out of this habit, and acting like adults for a change.
 
It's been the mantra that when someone references Hitler, Godwin's law is in effect. So what do you call it when your adversary is always 'dumb' because that's the go to liberal defensive crouch posture.... Maybe we just need to call it 'Intellectual fascism' and call it a day.

Perhaps someone needs to point out that when 90% of US Nobel Prize winners, 100% of Pulitzer Prize winners, 100% of Putnam Fellows, 95% of MacArthur grant recipients, and 96% of Intel Science Talent Search top 10 finalists exhibit left-wing donor profiles, it's NOT an example of intellectual superiority, simply an example of Hollywood style bias, snobbery and intellectual discrimination. Conservatives and liberals all fall on the same IQ bell curve. Time to get liberals out of this habit, and acting like adults for a change.

People call you dumb, Mensa boy, because you're a fucking imbecile.
 
Not after today, he's outed himself directly now. Did you notice how quick he resorted to personal attacks?

I actually was a bit wrong, that glaringly specific post was from 2010, but the thread it resides in was started in 2009. Should've owned up to being who he was from the get-go, desperation only makes you sloppy. :D

This self-fail might even be better than Vetteman's self-fail.
 
Lest we not know the REALITY....

aanLrcq.jpg


...more guns do in fact make us safer, which is why the large security details of the VIP class... D'uh!

FACT: the attacks that result in the intended victim scaring off the attacker by the mere presence of a gun is RARELY even mentioned, as it just becomes one of millions of non-events that never happened. But a crime scene makes the news and the 24hour news cycle...

In the long run, statistics are irrelevant to self defense. The right to defend myself is inherent in my being, not dispensed nor stripped by government. It resides in every individual, in every country. It is simply willingly sacrificed to the government by those who fail to understand and cherish true individual freedom.

Argument by chart, that's the sign of high intellect.

What your chart shows is northing more than a pattern of domestic violence, one in which your country would involve kitchen knives or something similar. As I already pointed out, to focus on the gun is to ignore everything else that goes into a violent confrontation/domestic squabble writ large.

Your reliance upon statistics that you pick out over your ability to apply reason to the problem (because it is clearly such an emotional issue to you, it's like talking to the abortion-frist crowd) has been underscored from the very first answer to a very clear question, do you believe in the individual right to self-defense.

Answer: Yes, but ~~ caveats ~~

Most of the caveats, of course, were restrictions on the right to self defense meaning you don't think that it is an absolute individual right but more of a tribal compact, in this case, the compact to give up components of self-defense as a self-defense strategy.


Case in point.
 
People call you dumb, Mensa boy, because you're a fucking imbecile.

The butthurt of an 'intellectual fascist'..... why are you still riding in the back of the short bus, being just another 'mean kid' that refuses to grow up?
clCLaK6.jpg
 
The butthurt of an 'intellectual fascist'..... why are you still riding in the back of the short bus, being just another 'mean kid' that refuses to grow up?
clCLaK6.jpg

^ Suggests a poster ought to grow up while using a school yard insult.

Mensa sure chose wisely with this one. :rolleyes:
 
^ Suggests a poster ought to grow up while using a school yard insult.

Mensa sure chose wisely with this one. :rolleyes:

Seeing as you have nothing meaningful to contribute except a short list of school yard insults, I felt it appropriate. You can join the others on my ignore list now *IGNORE*
 
Seeing as you have nothing meaningful to contribute except a short list of school yard insults, I felt it appropriate. You can join the others on my ignore list now *IGNORE*

What's got your panties all in a bunch there Binky you should be used to be called a moron by now.
 
We should report his posts to Mensa. Can you imagine how pissed they'd be if they knew this asshole was claiming to be one of them?
 
We should report his posts to Mensa. Can you imagine how pissed they'd be if they knew this asshole was claiming to be one of them?

And the brilliance of suggesting Mensa go on a scavenger hunt for every conservative avatar on a porn board, now THAT's 'liberal fascism' in full bloom... BRILLIANCE of the left wingers on display once again, however did we conservatives ever expect to match such brainpower? (OBTW, join *IGNORE* with the others, I'm tired of your schoolyard bullshit)
 
Last edited:
And the brilliance of suggesting Mensa go on a scavenger hunt for every conservative avatar on a porn board, now THAT's 'liberal fascism' in full bloom... BRILLIANCE of the left wingers on display once again, however did we conservatives ever expect to match such brainpower?

The conservatives don't want you either.
 
I can't find it now, but someone had some a while back in another similar argument.

Yea...I'd be pretty scrutinizing of their source as I said, every security, police and military force on the planet says otherwise.

But basically, the guns-as-self-defense argument rests on everyone carrying a gun, and being prepared (and trained) to use it at all times.

It depends on you the individual to carry and be prepared.

Everyone else is really irrelevant.

And if some guys on top of me, holding a gun to me, I don't really see how I'm able to get my hypothetical gun of the bag I'm carrying.

If they get the drop on you there isn't much anyone can do....an ambush is an ambush is an ambush.
 
Back
Top