Sobering thoughts from someone who should know

[jomar]

I’ll ask you a question, why were 2 felony tax evasion violations by Hunter Biden ( 2014/2015) allowed to run out the statute of limitations. I’ll tell you why, if taxes were filed the source of income would have to be identified which would have implicated Joe Biden and the firing of Shokin. I’ve written a while back that Shokin was on to corruption activities at Burisma, Trump’s inquiry into Burisma was spot on. Hunter Biden’s plea deal was arranged by both the prosecution and the defense. A pretty much all encompassing immunity deal hidden in a diversion document should those attorneys should be prosecuted for fraud on the courts. All attorneys involved should be prosecuted and lose the license to practice Law.

Sure. Your side loves to push that falsehood, though it’s been debunked time and again and trumps broken record strategy doesn’t make it true. So, in short, Shokin had shelved the Burisma investigation and Biden, backed by others, forced his firing because he WASN’T investigating corruption.
https://www.rferl.org/a/why-was-ukraine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin/30181445.html

On the other hand, let me ask you a couple of questions. Why did China fast track 48 or so trademarks to Ivanka while daddy was prez?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/28/business/ivanka-trump-china-trademarks.html

And after Trump overruled Congress and sold Saudi 8B worth of weapons, why did Jared get 2B from them for his private equity firm, something he had slim to none experience doing.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...shner-get-2-billion-from-the-saudis#xj4y7vzkg

 

[icanhelp1]

Sure. Your side loves to push that falsehood, though it’s been debunked time and again. However, trumps broken record strategy doesn’t make it true. So, in short, Shokin had shelved the Burisma investigation and Biden, backed by others, forced his firing because he WASN’T investigating corruption.
https://www.rferl.org/a/why-was-ukraine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin/30181445.html


On the other hand, let me ask you a couple of questions. Why did China fast track 48 or so

You’re uninformed. Old news. Shokin was investigating Burisma. If the DOJ would pull their head out of their ass and investigate

https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/2...ery-dirt-and-teases-damning-evidence-to-come/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/0...-firing-of-ukraines-prosecutor-are-laughable/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/01/evidence-of-biden-burisma-corruption-is-overwhelming/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/2...tes-biden-in-an-international-bribery-scheme/

“Ms. Trump’s representatives have said that there is nothing improper about Ms. Trump’s trademarks and that they prevent individuals from profiting off her name.
Abigail Klem, president of the Ivanka Trump brand, said in a statement on Monday that the brand’s protection of trademarks was “in the normal course of business,” especially in countries where trademark infringement was rampant.”

Ivanka Trump’s move were defensive, Ivanka had a legitimate business.

​

​

​

​

 

[Bray123]

You’re uninformed. Old news. Shokin was investigating Burisma. If the DOJ would pull their head out of their ass and investigate


https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/2...ery-dirt-and-teases-damning-evidence-to-come/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/0...-firing-of-ukraines-prosecutor-are-laughable/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/01/evidence-of-biden-burisma-corruption-is-overwhelming/

Two fully paid-up MAGAt congressmen from the House Oversight Committee took part in the transcribed interview with Devon Archer. There were four shocking revelations:
1. Hunter Biden put his father on speakerphone during meetings.
2. Hunter's meeting in 2013 with a Chinese partner was followed up with a conference call.
3. Hunter's law firm Boies Schiller Flexner (BSF) was lobbying US officials on Burisma's behalf but the law firm never notified the Justice Department of their work.
4. In 2014, Biden had a dinner at a restaurant with his son, Archer, the Moscow mayor's billionaire widow Elena Baturina, former Kazakh Prime Minister Karim Massimov, and Kazakh oligarch Kenes Rakishev. Archer said Joe arrived late, 'shook everybody's hand', then they 'ate and kind of talked about the world, I guess, and the weather,' over the course of an hour or two.

Those are sobering thoughts. (As in, they don't make me feel giddy).

 

[jomar]

You’re uninformed. Old news. Shokin was investigating Burisma. If the DOJ would pull their head out of their ass and investigate


https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/2...ery-dirt-and-teases-damning-evidence-to-come/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/0...-firing-of-ukraines-prosecutor-are-laughable/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/01/evidence-of-biden-burisma-corruption-is-overwhelming/

https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/2...tes-biden-in-an-international-bribery-scheme/

Jeebus. You’re as bad as RightGuide presenting peg the needle rwcj conspiracy sites as legitimate sources of credible anything. Old news my ass, lol. More like your same old spin again and again. Get back to me when AP backs your argument.

 

[icanhelp1]

Jeebus. You’re as bad as RightGuide presenting peg the needle rwcj conspiracy sites as legitimate sources of credible anything. Old news my ass, lol. More like your same old spin again and again. Get back to me when AP backs your argument.

It will come out eventually. Keep your head in the sand. Main stream media is part of the problem, they’re complicit in the cover up. The laptop was fake news, Biden’s tax evasion was covered up, IRS refusing to provide SARS to Congress. As an American citizen I would think you’d be concerned about corruption regardless of who it is. Trump has been investigated six ways to Sunday.

The 1023 was never fully investigated, more like covered by the FBI.

 

[jomar]

It will come out eventually. Keep your head in the sand. Main stream media is part of the problem, they’re complicit in the cover up.

Maybe, but your conspiracy theory whackadoodle links aren’t helping convince anyone but the pedophile pizza ring crowd.

The laptop was fake news, Biden’s tax evasion was covered up, IRS refusing to provide SARS to Congress. As an American citizen I would think you’d be concerned about corruption regardless of who it is. Trump has been investigated six ways to Sunday.

I‘m on record on this board saying if anyone committed crimes then bring it and hold them accountable

The 1023 was never fully investigated, more like covered by the FBI.

Maybe. Or maybe grassley released a four page document that fed his agenda and withheld the follow up ones that wound up saying it‘s all a bunch of bullshit. I admit I don’t know if other documents were released.

 

[icanhelp1]

Maybe, but your conspiracy theory whackadoodle links aren’t helping convince anyone but the pedophile pizza ring crowd.


I‘m on record on this board saying if anyone committed crimes then bring it and hold them accountable


Maybe. Or maybe grassley released a four page document that fed his agenda and withheld the follow up ones that wound up saying it‘s all a bunch of bullshit. I admit I don’t know if other documents were released.

The truth is the truth regardless of the source.

And maybe the DOJ should pursue possible criminal behavior by the Biden’s as fervently as they pursue Trump. Equal application of the law means just that!

Trump was impeached for an inquiry into Burisma corruption and Biden’s position on its board of directors. Even Obama warned Biden of the appearance of impropriety and a conflict of interest. Kent stated during Trump’s impeachment proceedings his concern of Hunter Biden’s position inside a corrupt business organization.

 

[jomar]

The truth is the truth regardless of what the source is.

Even the National Enquirer got a scoop now and then. But if you have to wade through a ton of partisan spin and bullshit to get to a kernel from a root source, it’s a big ask.

Like yesterday, RightGuide posted a link from American thinker on an ocean volcano eruption putting a lot of water vapor in the air. The article linked and quoted NASA, but came to biased and distorted and implied conclusions and spin and emphasis that were not supported by the NASA article.

So essentially, the american thinker article correctly quoted a root source, but then was misleading and distorting about it in accordance with its far right wing agenda.

Thats why I pretty much dismiss those peg the needle rwcj whackadoodle conspiracy opinion sites.

 

[jomar]

And maybe the DOJ should pursue possible criminal behavior by the Biden’s as fervently as they pursue Trump. Equal application of the law means just that!

Sure, do it

Trump was impeached for an inquiry into Burisma corruption and Biden’s position on its board of directors.

Oof. You were doing so well and then you float this lie. Tsk, tsk

Even Obama warned Biden of the appearance of impropriety and a conflict of interest. Kent stated during Trump’s impeachment proceedings his concern of Hunter Biden’s position inside a corrupt business organization.

No doubt Burisma hired Hunter in hopes of currying favor from Joe. I’m sure that’s what China and Saudi did with Ivanka and Jared.

 

[icanhelp1]

Sure, do it


Oof. You were doing so well and then you float this lie. Tsk, tsk


No doubt Burisma hired Hunter in hopes of currying favor from Joe. I’m sure that’s what China and Saudi did with Ivanka and Jared.

Like 74 touted about Trump a few days ago .. if you want to avoid criminal prosecution just run for office. Well, Biden not only avoided criminal prosecution but turned the Dem party into an impeachment mob accusing Trump of the very behavior Biden’s DOJ is doing today. Trump was spot on with his criticism of the Biden crime Family’s involvement with Burisma.

 

[Bray123]

The truth is the truth regardless of the source.

And maybe the DOJ should pursue possible criminal behavior by the Biden’s as fervently as they pursue Trump. Equal application of the law means just that!

Trump was impeached for an inquiry into Burisma corruption and Biden’s position on its board of directors. Even Obama warned Biden of the appearance of impropriety and a conflict of interest. Kent stated during Trump’s impeachment proceedings his concern of Hunter Biden’s position inside a corrupt business organization.

The impeachment followed an inquiry that reported that Trump withheld military aid and an invitation to the White House to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy in order to influence Ukraine to announce an investigation into Trump's political opponent Joe Biden and to promote a discredited conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, was behind interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Witnesses testified that they believed that President Trump wanted Zelenskyy to publicly announce investigations into the Bidens and Burisma.

The impeachment was not for an inquiry into Burisma corruption. It was for corruptly blackmailing Ukraine into announcing an investigation thus discrediting Hunter Biden's father.

 

[jomar]

Like 74 touted about Trump a few days ago .. if you want to avoid criminal prosecution just run for office. Well, Biden not only avoided criminal prosecution but turned the Dem party into an impeachment mob accusing Trump of the very behavior Biden’s DOJ is doing today. Trump was spot on with his criticism of the Biden crime Family’s involvement with Burisma.

Looks like recess is over and it’s back to the partisan talking points

 

[icanhelp1]

The impeachment followed an inquiry that reported that Trump withheld military aid and an invitation to the White House to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy in order to influence Ukraine to announce an investigation into Trump's political opponent Joe Biden and to promote a discredited conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, was behind interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Witnesses testified that they believed that President Trump wanted Zelenskyy to publicly announce investigations into the Bidens and Burisma.

The impeachment was not for an inquiry into Burisma corruption. It was for corruptly blackmailing Ukraine into announcing an investigation thus discrediting Hunter Biden's father.

The president has a sworn obligation to protect the interests of US citizens. It was widely known within political circles that Hunter Biden received excessive compensation from Burisma. It was within the president’s purview to request from Zelensky an internal investigation of corruption within Burisma and a correlation into Hunter Biden’s position on the board of directors and Joe Biden’s publicly forced firing of the prosecutor general of Ukraine while Hunter was knocking down excessive compensation. If Trump influenced the DOJ to investigate the Biden’s then you have a case. Trump was spot on with corruption allegations. Hunter was not running for office.

 

[icanhelp1]

Looks like recess is over and it’s back to the partisan talking points

It can’t be helped. Democrats spent 4 years of accusing Trump of behavior the Dems were doing behind the scenes. Hillary Clinton conspired with the Russians to affect the presidential election and nothing, where was the outrage then.

I’m not going to sway your opinion but in the 70 years I’ve been on this planet I’ve never seen the level of corruption in our political and judicial systems like we have today. The Mueller investigation was predicated on lies and creative prosecutors like Andrew Weissmann. It destroyed Trump’s administration. You hate Trump I get it, but this is not about Trump it’s about equal application of the law and equal protection under the law.

 

[StepMomSteph]

Good insight video of banktrumpter's Truth Social (DWAC)

 

[phrodeau]

The Mueller investigation was predicated on lies and creative prosecutors like Andrew Weissmann. It destroyed Trump’s administration.

Mueller is Republican. What else did you expect?

Even the oranges were investigated by Durham, a Republican.

 

[HisArpy]

Nick Fuentes is a Nazi.
The follower of a Nazi is called 'a Nazi'.
It was you who quoted Riley June Williams as a fine upstanding member of society for giving the Speaker's laptop to Russia, not me.
The officers who had their riot shields, tasers and pepper spray stolen and used against them were not quietly escorting anybody.

Rittenhouse shot people who glared at him whilst holding skateboards and that's OK.

You're a disgrace to the legal profession.

Unfortunately for you, your version of history doesn't quite match up with the videotapes.

Which is fine because it only highlights that you see and hear what you want to see and hear instead of truth.

 

[HisArpy]

Yes, I am at exactly that point in my life, good catch. Thank you for entertaining me, at least your flames are better than most.

Admitting that you're a lazy assed SOB isn't a good look for anyone. Better luck in the future.

 

[HisArpy]

I've yet to witness a single conservative being outraged over the actions of the mob on January 6th.

If you never look, you will never see that which you claim doesn't exist because you haven't seen it.

 

[HisArpy]

If found guilty, ban any Trump or Biden family member from ever holding public office and impoverish them! Never allow them to make political contributions ever again. Remove their freedom of speech as well!

Yup, that should do it

There it is, that corruption of the blood thing rears its ugly liberal Leftist head again.

 

[schism666]

another arpy meltdown.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

If you never look, you will never see that which you claim doesn't exist because you haven't seen it.

Do you condemn the actions of the mob on January 6th?

If there is evidence that Donald Trump conspired to use the January 6th mob to overturn the 2020 election, will you condemn him?

 

[schism666]

Do you condemn the actions of the mob on January 6th?

If there is evidence that Donald Trump conspired to use the January 6th mob to overturn the 2020 election, will you condemn him?

 

[HisArpy]

Do you condemn the actions of the mob on January 6th?

If there is evidence that Donald Trump conspired to use the January 6th mob to overturn the 2020 election, will you condemn him?

I stand for the law. If the protesters violated the law then they should be (and have been) punished. Since I stand for the law, I can take no position on guilt or innocence since, under the law, they are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

All I can do is condemn violence, hate, and stupidity in general.

Beyond that I wonder how you support "civil disobedience" while condemning those who merely do as you do?

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

I stand for the law. If the protesters violated the law then they should be (and have been) punished. Since I stand for the law, I can take no position on guilt or innocence since, under the law, they are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

All I can do is condemn violence, hate, and stupidity in general.

Beyond that I wonder how you support "civil disobedience" while condemning those who merely do as you do?

Many of the mob have been found guilty of various crimes, so presumably you should find it easy to condemn their actions on that day.

Civil disobedience can only be justified if it serves a larger moral purpose. Overturning a legitimate election does not qualify.