von_Bismarck
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2003
- Posts
- 6,587
Partisanhacksayswhat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's a foolproof method for determining when he's lost an argument:
he begins to shriek, fling monkey poo and hurl ad hominems.
When that happens, it's patently obvious that he's incapable of producing any other kind of response.
And your point is?
You do realize that the "tradition" isn't law, or that other Presidents since the "tradition" began have also not released their returns. Yes?
What makes Trump so special he has to be singled out for scrutiny? Merely running for office is not, nor should it be, a waiver of Constitutional Rights and protections. Nor should wanting to remain a private person financially be a reason for social stigma.
The sore loser stuff from 2016 is a dealbreaker for me. Too many other qualified people running who didn't work to undermine the last nominee.
In 38 years as a legislator Bernie Sanders has sponsored 2 things:-
1 A cost of living increase for service people.
2 The re-naming of a post office in Vermont to commemorate Thaddeus Stevens.
And he has talked a bit - then a bit more - then a bit ---
Sanders is at least consistent. He misses more votes than most Senators but he voted with the GOP against Sanctions for Russia on every single occasion bar none.
So much for his concern about Russian interference in the election.
There's a foolproof method for determining when he's lost an argument:
he begins to shriek, fling monkey poo and hurl ad hominems.
When that happens, it's patently obvious that he's incapable of producing any other kind of response.
So, it's not "What's good for the goose..." then?
The destruction of established social norms is a prime indicator of the decline of Western Civilizations.
*nods*
#TimmehDoesntUnderstand
Really? "Mark Craig" a nothing from nowheresville on https://www.mediaite.com
warrants a " they’re still at it. "?
Give me a break.
“Then we said, four years ago, you know, maybe it doesn’t make a lot of sense for a small number of superdelegates at the Democratic National Convention to control the outcome!” Sanders said.
“Well, a funny thing happened over the last few years,” he continued, then touted winning Michigan, and securing 1,700 delegates at the convention, and getting 13 million votes in the primary, but never circled back to the superdelegates. He was likely alluding to the DNC’s subsequent rule change that diluted the power of superdelegates.
Sanders actually won 1,846 delegates to Hillary Clinton’s 2205, not counting superdelegates. And while Sanders is correct that he won 13 million votes during the Democratic primary, Clinton won nearly 17 million.
And your point is?
You do realize that the "tradition" isn't law, or that other Presidents since the "tradition" began have also not released their returns. Yes?
What makes Trump so special he has to be singled out for scrutiny? Merely running for office is not, nor should it be, a waiver of Constitutional Rights and protections. Nor should wanting to remain a private person financially be a reason for social stigma.
You're correct. What you're wrong about is what the "norm" being destroyed is.
Hint: It's not about Trump's taxes. It's about whether Gov can force you to do things despite having a Constitutional protection against Gov trying to force you to do things.
For some people today, none of that is important so long as they can show Trump in a bad light. What they're missing is that if the Gov gets away with it today, they'll get away with it tomorrow. And, tomorrow, it might be YOU in the crosshairs.
How's that for the 'destroying norms' argument?
What is a "Dittohead?"
*whispers in Trysail's ear*
"global warming is REAAAAAAL!"
You claim to have driven 3 million miles in the past ten years and you've never heard Limbaugh on the radio?
Like Trysail's math, something doesn't add up here.