Lesbian public nudity plotline?

Davefoonster

Virgin
Joined
May 22, 2022
Posts
4
I had an idea, pretty similar to toomanyxs, about a setting where a court ruling allows Lesbian women (and only lesbian women) to be naked in public. In my head, I have a long story about how this happens, but it's not really sexy.

So what I'm trying to figure out a shortish story about a girl discovering this, joining the nudist lesbian lifestyle, having sex with other naked girls, and the reactions of her family and friends as well as random people she encounters in her day to day life.

Is this a plotline anyone would like to see? Any ideas or input is appreciated.
 
As a person who had been watching lesbian porn exclusively, I find your idea very, very hot.

I'd get rid of this court thing, it seems weird. Either that or you should explain it thorougly.

Some ideas:

1. The MC starts shy and get braver when the story progress. First time she has public sex, it's somewhere in the back alley or somewhere hidden, and the last she openly fucks in the town square.

2. Her family visits her and has to accept her shennigans. Like they have a game night or something, but she has one woman between her legs and another sucking on her boob.

3. She's invited to a sleepover with her ordinary friends. When they're a little tipsy, they started asking her question and the meeting soon turns into an orgy with her as a guide for others.

4. Some lesbian organization holds a charity even when the highest bidder can fuck two of them. But only fuck, no kissing or touching allowed - they just use his cock for their pleasure.
 
The court thing is to explain why gay women don't have to wear clothes. I think it can be explained in a paragraph or two.

These are good ideas. I probably won't include any men in my stories, not my thing. Thanks for the feedback.
 
I personally would not be completely into such a story. I’m into watching lesbians but I’m male so making a story exclusively lesbian is problematic for me. But that may be part of the attraction for another reader. Follow your vision and see where it leads.
 
I'm in belief almost nobody is strictly straight or strictly gay either. Sure, those preferences can be strong, but almost everyone is actually on the scale somewhere in between. The strict duality is socially constructed in attempt to restrict certain behaviors. That's the long way of saying, the qualifying condition for the permission is slippery, and impossible to objectively test.

So basically the ruling is, women are allowed to be naked and engage in displays of affection if they claim to be lesbian and keep it between themselves. Or else, are they required to be card carrying registered lesbians? It's hard to carry a card with nothing on, I would hate tattoos, especially mandatory, and it kills the casual spontaneity of it.

As to the logic of the ruling, it could be extended from claim that nudity of asexual women isn't indecent, and well, lesbianism is just a specific form of asexuality, and thus isn't indecency. Yes, it's twisted dissonant logic, but deliberately so. Could be, something like ChatGPT have invented it. Indeed, nobody need the details of the ruling, or the exact context it come from, and it could indeed be completely made up just as easily, all that matters is that in a certain local context at the time of events depicted it's assumed and accepted to be true.

Now, I think it's common pitfall to be avoided to assume that the permission automatically means it's widely adopted practice. If my memory is not mistaken, it is/was allowed for women to be topless anywhere in New York? Overwhelmingly most women decide(d) to wear tops regardless, and it remains potentially scandalous to engage that right. There's no reason to think, this would be much different, even if for story purposes we assume the enthusiasm for it, at least in the local bubble our heroes are in or penetrate into.

Permission doesn't imply acceptance, and that can vary widely from context to context.

The situation is different but not necessarily dissimilar if the ruling obliged women that qualify (by whatever arcane system) to be unclad. For some reason I don't think that's implied here.
 
Last edited:
Above musings out of the way...

Genesis -- A girl, or girls could engage in spontaneous episodic casual nudism, like skinny dipping in assumed privacy, but get caught, and call (or indeed, make up) this ruling as fast defense. Somehow, it worked, and worked too well, and now they're locally famous for that behavior and are incited to explore the limits how far they could take it.

Exploration -- A new (classically shy) girl is introduced into a group of women experiencing and engaging into the above, or alternatively, just in general vicinity, social or spatial, to where such a traction exists and get sucked in on it.
 
Either way, I would try to keep it limited. As close to only one (couple) naked as possible, and think the most sexy part is them getting out of their clothes in seemingly unexpected places and times, more so than being nude round the clock constantly.
 
I would also be very careful with this story. You’re going to offend people who have issues with exclusive nudity or sexuality. That is to be avoided in the opinion of freedom loving good beings such as myself.
 
Having women actually able to walk around naked in public is a huge departure from reality, and it is going to be difficult to make it sound plausible. So I think you have two options: Make the story a complete farce where people don't question the unreality of it (which some authors could pull off hilariously), or isolate the characters into a situation where it is not so disruptive to reality.

For example, maybe it is a hidden enclave, or a private resort, or a secret island, which only admits women. Nudity might be required, or it might only be optional, depending on the needs of the story. If one is a lesbian or not is kind of a moot point now, because if she wants to have sex, it is going to have to be with another woman. And this being Lit, she probably will!

Maybe there are a few men allowed on the island, as employees: maids, bartenders, repairmen, maybe to give massages. The only reason I suggest this possibility is that it might be interesting to have the story told from the perspective of one of these men. I'm guessing most consumers of lesbian porn are men, so it might feel more natural told through the eyes of a male observer.
 
And if some women on the island are willing to give up their nudity rights to leave with the male characters at the climax or the male characters are allowed new freedoms while staying on the island, boom, you have me as a reader. Just so you know.
 
A group of hot and shameless girls decided to show off their exhibitionist side by getting naked and having a sapphic lesbian orgy at a park. A man see this and jumps to the occasion by getting naked and joining them. Surprisingly, the girls lovingly welcome the guy and this lesbian orgy becomes a public reverse gangbang.

The naked girls make the naked guy a part of their clique, making him an "honorary male lesbian".
 
I’d get behind such a tale. At the same time maybe there’s one or two who aren’t into the guy and push him away and he’s ok with that. Keep it comfortable and real, yo!
 
As a guy I recommend going with what you want! I don't see the idea of having to include men at all! I do like the idea that someone said I'd having a man be an observer, but in the case of they can watch but never join in. Idk, I'd enjoy that more and I'm a guy, albeit one of the few who would prefer it to be strictly lesbian.
 
There was a restaurant in France where the women could, and were encouraged to wear only shoes. I think it closed after only a few years of being in business, but it did exist.

I think you could write the story that you want to, just maybe limit it to a very finite area like a certain beach, resort or other location to make it more plausible.
 
Perhaps just an island where that is part of their culture.
There is no shortage of cultures with varying ways to distinguish role and status in the group, why do we have wedding rings after all.
Perhaps there is some kind of clothing code, only married men can wear pants, unmarried men wear shorts, married and unmarried women have some other distinguishing character.
Gay men never wear shirts, lesbian women are naked.
Nothing stops people from doing what they want, no one forces you to wear a wedding ring, or not wear one, but most of society accepts the convention.
No one needs to know or care how the custom started, it just did.
 
Back
Top