Isolated BDSM Blurts: Facehugger Fetish

She was watching your relationship dynamics the second you entered the room. Right cues, wrong interpretation - she interpreted the cues of freedom and control you have as a power dynamic between you two
I was considering starting a thread about that, but I’m not feeling coherent enough.

That does happen at times - people looking from the outside, interpreting things they pick up and sometimes getting it confused.
It can be both about what you see in a person and about relationship dynamics.
 
Time as adult: 3 decades
Bodycount: 11*
Of which were single: 2
In love**: 3 times
Women married: 1
Women buried: 1

* including non-PIV encounters
** would have said "yes" to a proposal
 
I’m not much of a helicopter parent, but damn there are some things I’d really like to shield them from.
 
Not enough naked Swedish girls celebrating the NATO accession.
Is it cause for celebration?
I find it hard to answer that question myself, so I’m really asking.

For me it feels like more like A Nice Day For a White Wedding:
Hey little sister, what have you done?
Hey little sister, who's the only one?
Hey little sister, who's your Superman?
Hey little sister, who's the one I want?
Hey little sister, shotgun
… Oh, it's a nice day to start again
Come on, nice day for a white wedding day
Ooh yeah, a nice day to start again
… Hey, little sister, what is it you wish?
Hey, little sister, what's your vice or wish?
You see, I've been away for so long (so long)
I let you go for so long (so long)
Hey, little sister, shotgun
… Oh, it's a nice day to start again
Well, a nice day for a white wedding day
Ooh yeah, a nice day to start again
Yaw!
.
.
.
… There ain't nothin' fair in this world
There ain't nothin' sure in this world
There ain't nothin' safe in this world
There ain't nothin' pure in this world
I look for something left in this world
… I said, start again
Come on, it's a nice day for a white wedding, aw!
Ooh yeah, a nice day to start again

 
Number of NATO-members that had to defend their country from a war of aggression the last 75 years: 0
Yup.
There are things to be said for good and strong allies.
And I’ve never bought the argument
”they’ll defend us anyway because of our location” - I mean, congratulations on being a leach I guess?

On the other hand, last time Sweden did fight a war was in 1814 and Sweden was the aggressor.
That is a lot of generations of Swedes who have never had to go to war.
Some have anyway and men around my age and older had to do military service, but those are both different from having to go to war, let alone going to war for a country you have absolutely no say in.

Yes, I know I have trust issues. :D
 
Dear Instagram,
I’d like to know why you thought this would be a good content to recommed for me?
Hrmpf!
IMG_2187.jpeg
 
I mean I can't speak for you, but the logic of the statement seems sound. I'd settle for wealthy. Don't really need to be successful.
It’s absolutely valid, but still a bit ”Hrumph!”.
I mean, I might claim the Rebel Circus label quite volontarily but don’t come and paste it on me just like that, Instagram!

And yeah, wealthy is better insurance against other peoples opinions and meddling.
Poor but respectable and proud, might be heroic and romantic but not nearly as fun as rich, eccentric aunt, I think.
 
Back
Top