Brilliant Article: The Great Obama Catharsis

M

miles

Guest
by Victor Davis Hanson


Barack Obama has done the United States a great, though unforeseen, favor. He has brought to light, as no one else could, many of the pernicious assumptions of our culture from the last half-century. He turned theory and “what ifs” into fact for all America to see, experience, and, yes, suffer through.

The Years of Wandering…

Jimmy Carter tried to enact the therapeutic agenda, but he was inept. Liberals for the last thirty years blamed his failure on incompetence rather than his statist message. Until the Obama meltdown, progressives had faulted Bill Clinton as a wily sell-out who had won an improbable second term only by cynically reforming welfare and balancing budgets. Dick Morris engineered his comeback and now he works for Fox News: enough said. So the complaint was that the messenger was slick, but the noble message was diluted.

But Obama was supposed to be Clintonian in his political charisma and Carteresque in his devotion to liberal causes. When he boasted that he was “The One” we had been waiting for, he was more accurate than he thought in assessing liberal sentiment. You see, as a young, post-racial, first African-American president — glib, hip, cool, charismatic, with unapologetic Chicago hard-core leftist roots and Ivy League certification — Barack Obama was right out of liberal central casting. He would do what no other liberal had done in fifty years: prove to America that it really, really was left-of-center by ramming down its throat both a liberal agenda and thousands of left-wing facilitators. Greek columns, the Victory Monument, talk of a cooling planet, and worry whether the country would survive from December 2008 to January 2009 heralded His coming. We forget now that Obama arrived with a super-majority in the Senate, and a large majority in the House: anything was now possible and almost everything was thus tried.

Home at Last

At last we sheep got the messianic prophet to deliver the divine message. When he was declared a “god,” with supernatural powers that sent tingles up journalists’ legs, we were at last to climb the mount into the Promised Land. Electing him was the trick; simply enacting his redistributive agenda would be easy. “Wealthy” people would keep on working as before (they are by nature greedy and love working to buy superfluous things), but now the people’s money could be at last directed to saving the planet, helping mankind, and bringing heaven to earth.

Leading from Behind

I don’t think another president will ask the Arab League and the UN — but not the U.S. Congress — whether he can lead from behind France and Britain in bombing an Arab oil exporter on behalf of “rebels” who promise Sharia Law. “Putting light” between America and Israel earned us this week’s charade at the UN, and a new Middle East war on the horizon in the manner of 1967 or 1973, but this time with new enemies on the periphery like Iran, Turkey, and Pakistan in addition to a hostile Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. “Reset” won’t be used any more, and the idea that friends like Britain, Israel, Eastern Europe, etc. were to be shunned while rivals and enemies like the Palestinians, Russia, and the Latin American communists were to be courted is over also. Friends are friends for a reason, and enemies the same — regardless of what Obama learned at Chicago and Harvard.

Buffetism

After $5 trillion in borrowing and 9.1% unemployment, Keynesian economics has been slain by Obama. Oh, Obama may crisscross the country demanding just one more chance to borrow another half-trillion to “grow jobs,” but no one is listening any more. “Shovel ready,” “stimulus,” “investments,” and “infrastructure” simply have been redefined by Obama as euphemisms for wasteful borrowing. I doubt they will regain currency for a decade or so. And thanks to Obama, a billion is now a passé noun, and trillion has been reduced to the status of monopoly money. Poor Warren Buffett, calling for higher taxes on himself, as his companies and foundations seek to avoid existing taxes, learned too late the wages of signing up with the Obama redistribution plan, which is essentially an alliance of the super- and exempt rich and subsidized classes on the upper-middle-class private sector.

The old welfare state after Obama will soon be addressed as never before. With almost 50 million on food stamps, and record numbers on new extended unemployment insurance, with Medicare and Social Security nearly insolvent, the Obama boilerplate remedies of making “millionaires and billionaires,” “corporate jet owners,” and “fat cat bankers” pay their fair share won’t nearly be enough. Obama demagogued the “fair share” issue to the death, and it cannot be demagogued much longer since the money is about gone.

Now Obama wants new taxes on those who make over $200,000. But unlike the Gingrich/Clinton budget deal of the 1990s, a return to those higher rates will not solve the debt crisis. Obama got us well beyond that. It is merely the opening salvo in taking far more, in a path that leads to the scene in Doctor Zhivago where the old enemy-of-the-people house is subdivided for more deserving families. Obama’s one idea of redistribution does not work, as we see the world over, from the fall of the Soviet system to the collapse of the EU to the implosion of blue-state America. The more Obama says it does in teleprompted eloquence, the more the proverbial people grow terrified of it.

The American National Health Service

For much of the 1950s and 1960s, we were told that we lacked a British-style National Health Service, thanks to all sorts of devilish AMA conspiracies. JFK, LBJ, and Carter could not get passed what we all secretly were supposed to have craved. Hillarycare failed. But Obama alone brought us federalized health care, a trillion-dollar borrowing plan that will supposedly streamline care, save us trillions in the long term, and cost less in the here and now, as state GS-20 doctors attend to us, in DMV lines, far better than their greedy counterparts. Despite all the noble lies, no one believes that. After 2012, ObamaCare will be repealed in short order, and there will be no more fantasies about economical cradle-to-grave health care denied us by conspiratorial doctors and greedy insurers.

Civility for Thee

In the manner of Richard Nixon, Obama and his supporters gave us first “Fight the Smears,” then Journolist, and now “AttackWatch.com” — the common denominator being to watch, monitor, report, and quash criticism of Him, in enlisting the loyal flock to go after the heretic on the list. The old liberal sermons on civility are dead too for the foreseeable future. The unanswered profane slurs of the Black Caucus and Jimmy Hoffa Jr. illustrated that Obama’s calls for polite discourse were inane at best, and at worst a crude ploy to silence conservative critics. Obama urged Latinos “to punish our enemies” one day, and lectured others to talk more cordially the next, and then kept still as his “base” let loose on political opponents as “son of bitches.” The next time Obama — or any other self-described no more red/no more blue state “unifier” — calls for an end to polarizing discourse, for good or evil, he will be met by outbursts of hilarity.

Race in the Raw

In an odd way, racial relations will become soon more honest as well. Under Obama the racial boilerplate of perpetual victims and perpetual oppressors, institutionalized across crude racial lines, was explicit. The head of the Black Caucus now sadly, but honestly, admits that if the president were not black (i.e., he were white), his cadre would be marching in furor on the White House (which I think means skin color alone adjudicates attitude, which I also think we used to call “racism”).

The Caucus members have told their opponents to go straight to hell, compared them with lynch mobs, insisted Tea Partiers wanted slavery back — the entire race-based invective that everyone long ago tired of, but is the inevitable result of a misguided 19th-century system of racial-gerrymandering that had the unintended effect of ensuring that most local black politicians never had to run competitively in statewide races, and instead could pander to mostly districted black consistencies. The old idea that any centrist black congressman could be elected as a U.S. senator in a Texas or even California is unlikely any more, given the Black Caucus record of racialist invective that polarizes the general electorate and, in circular fashion, also guarantees that a centrist would never be elected to Congress in a black district. When the head of the caucus admits race is all that matters in Black Caucus protest, the cards unfortunately are on the table.

This new racialist candor is also the dividend of the Obama bunch’s beer summit, “stupidly acting,” “punish our enemies,” “wise Latina,” “my people,” “cowards,” and the 2010 campaign video that appealed to supporters on the basis of race and gender.

The public thought, with their first “black” president, they would be hearing even-handed lectures, as one week Obama explained why the federal government had to ensure equality of opportunity in a multiracial society, while on the next he gently warned minorities not to rely on government to ensure parity when success or failure for all Americans far more often hinged on personal choices, discipline, and sacrifice. Instead, Obama voted present while his surrogates ensured that America is more racially polarized than any time in our history. But this too was cathartic. A majority of the population of all races has simply tuned out the now near meaningless charge of “racist” and sees the real danger to America in racial tribalization and balkanization rather than classical racial discrimination. We will see another black president some day, but race will be incidental not essential to his or her character.

“Millions of Green Jobs”

For the foreseeable future, “millions of green jobs” and “cap and trade” are also the stuff of comedy. Thanks to Obama we’ve been there with Van Jones, Solyndra, and EPA hyper-regulations, and done that. I don’t think Al Gore will be any more quoted or EU policies emulated. More likely we will go back to finding new fossil fuel sources as private technology keeps improving on alternative energy. Fairly or not, “green” conjures up everything from Climategate to Solyndra, and suggests an entire class of elite academics, financiers, and activists who wished to follow the oil companies’ crony-capitalist business plans of the 1940s and 1950s without the basic truth that oil is a logical energy source and so far a windmill isn’t.

The New Idiotocrats

After Obama, I don’t think there will be any more John Kerry or Al Gore sermons about the superior Europe model either. A disarmed, undemocratic, insolvent, shrinking, and increasingly polarized continent is now a model of what the United States should not be. There simply have been too many California as Greece stories for any politicians to advise us with the old admonition: “But In Europe, they….”

Obama thought that he would replicate the EU paradigm. He would bring in properly certified technocrats from academia or government like Chu, Geithner, Goolsbee, Holder, Orszag, Romer, and Summers to oversee massive new regulations and taxes that would dictate from on high how the ignorant masses must be protected from everything from cheap gas to old-style light bulbs. In less than three years, they all proved far more ignorant about what makes America work than the local car dealer, welder, or farmer. After Obama, Americans will not be fooled for a generation or so into thinking that a Harvard PhD or Berkeley professor “really” knows that borrowing is prosperity, that gas should cost as much as it does in Europe, and that the more we pay millions to regulate, the more the vastly fewer who produce make us all prosperous. (And given Obama’s mysterious silence about the undergraduate record at Occidental and Columbia that won him a scholarship to Harvard Law, we won’t take seriously any more the usual liberal critique of supposedly weak-minded conservative candidates who, based on their leaked undergraduate transcripts, could not get As decades ago in college.)

From Here On Out

Had McCain been elected, or had Obama proved a canny Clinton triangulator, we would never have gotten out of the bipartisan rut of massive borrowing, growing government, higher taxes, and unionized public employee regulators. But with Obama as the great liberal deliverer and with the masses scared to death of Him, the next president will inherit an America in catharsis. The future is uncertain, but at least now, after our cauterizing, we have some sort of chance to return to the old principles that might save us.
 
Yeah, brilliant. Pulitzer-grade. Thanks for pasting it up instead of doing any thinking or writing of your own.

So, who's the next President going to be? Got an article on that to paste for us...or do you have a prediction?
 
AJ is going to be pissed, c+ping polemics from VDH is his job.
 
by Victor Davis Hanson


....America is more racially polarized than any time in our history.


The entire article is, of course, idiotic, but this one statement is so incomparably stupid it's almost impossible to imagine anyone saying it, believing it, or quoting it with approval.
 
ROSE: I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.
BROKAW: No, I don't, either.
ROSE: I don't know how he really sees where China is.
BROKAW: We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.
ROSE: I don't really know. And do we know anything about the people who are advising him?
BROKAW: Yeah, it's an interesting question.
ROSE: He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational (sic) speeches.
BROKAW: Two of them! I don't know what books he's read.
ROSE: What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?
BROKAW: There's a lot about him we don't know.
Tom Brokaw and Charlie Rose, The Charlie Rose Show
October 30, 2008 [The week before the election.]

__________________
Obama, you see, is our nemesis. He is a totem, the logical manifestation of a warped media, the reification of some crazy — and arrogant — ideas about redistributive politics, the statist economy, and cultural and social life that permeated American life the last forty years. He is the president with a 1,000 faces that we have all seen at work, on TV, throughout American life, and at some point the odds determined that we had to have a rendezvous with him— perhaps a catharsis to teach us the wages of Keynesian debt, of a social policy contrary to human nature with its equality of result doctrines, of an all-powerful, all-growing unaccountable government, of the now hip ambiguity about past American protocols and history. Obama is the exaggeration of all the dubious ideas that arose since the 1960s — brought to fruition on his watch, delivered by mellifluous cadences by an untouchable persona.

In fact, a Barack Obama was long overdue. Had he not appeared out of nowhere in 2008, we would have surely had to invent him.

Victor Davis Hanson
 
Some of you see hypocrisy with Obama’s abject about-face on Guantanamo, renditions, tribunals, preventative detention, Predators, Iraq, public campaign financing, revolving door appointments, earmarks, and promises to post legislation on the internet. Others note the paradox of an anti-war Laureate invading a third Arab Muslim oil-exporting nation that posed no threat to U.S. security. Still others can’t figure out how progressives, people of the people, so easily melt into Martha’s Vineyard, Vail, or Costa del Sol. Or how a reformer, a hope and change avatar, can preside over the tax-cheating or tax-avoidance of Timothy Geithner, Eric Holder, and Hilda Solis (and let us not forget Tom Daschle or Charles Rangel).

Easy answer: sophisticated guardians, as liberal technocrats, cannot possibly live by the myriad of complex rules and regulations that are necessary to corral a less able, wild society. They need “down” time, given their herculean labors, and surely as Ivy-League experts can be trusted without the intrusive oversight accorded to hoi polloi. In the Obama dream, Harvard- and Yale- trained lawyers, empathetic Wall Street magnates, and progressive CEOs need not be bothered with fear of hypocrisy, conflict of interest, or taxes inasmuch as they have devoted their entire lives to making sure that we, the ignorant, do not destroy our own lives. What we see as rank hypocrisy, they see as an occasional expected carelessness, or overindulgence of the guardian class who is simply exhausted....

Victor Davis Hanson

__________________
The European Union is unwinding for two very simple reasons. First, it is not a constitutional state, but a loose conglomeration of nations run by elites who are not responsible to the people. For decades the undemocratic nature of rule from Brussels was masked by politically correct edicts on everything from global warming to anti-Americanism. But as the money runs out, the elites’ fraud becomes impossible to hide.

Second, Mediterranean countries were allowed to cook their books in such a way that northwestern European money would continue to be loaned to the siesta cultures that had not produced goods and services to justify the influx of foreign capital and the attendant lifestyle it ensured. Now we are well past any chance that German money can be paid back; the only mystery is over the conditions of the default — whether slow and incremental, or sudden and cataclysmic — and whether it will leave in its wake a downsized EU or no EU at all.

In other words, the notion that platitudinous elites could, by their proclaimed virtue, establish a constitutional union without real democratic values proved unrealizable. More important still, socialism came to an end with fiscal insolvency. This happened, of course, most dramatically in southern Europe, where climate and culture conspired to hasten its demise; but northern Europeans now realize that they too have a rendezvous with a Greek-like reckoning unless they increase worker productivity, curb government, prune the power of public-employee unions, bring market-based incentives back into the workplace, reestablish national sovereignty, raise the retirement age, and address the declining demography that is so often the handmaiden of socialism. In short, EU elites have done what the half-century-long threat of Red Army tanks and missiles never could: destabilize Europe to the point of anarchy.

Victor Davis Hanson
 
VDH Today in NRO

The residents of George Orwell’s Oceania daily screamed at the infamous visage of arch-enemy of the people Emmanuel Goldstein. In the same way, almost every week for the last 140, Americans have been reminded just how nefarious and lasting was the work of George W. Bush. Now ensconced somewhere in Texas, Bush, in insidious ways, somehow still blocks our collective recovery.

Wall Street likewise continues to conspire to thwart Americans. “Fat-cat bankers,” “millionaires and billionaires,” people who fly in “corporate jets,” and those who “don’t pay their fair share” and who junket to Las Vegas or jet to the Super Bowl “on the taxpayers’ dime” have all ignored the president’s warnings. Did they not hear that “now is not the time for profit” and “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money”?

There are other guilty parties. The president also reminded us that there are fewer bank-teller jobs because of ATMs. And he added that online ticketing has meant that there is likewise far less employment for travel agents. Such accelerated automation after January 2009 apparently helps explain why unemployment is still over 9 percent.

And if technologically induced instability were not enough, there is the culpable Republican-controlled House. Until November 2010, a considerable Democratic majority in the House and a super-majority in the Senate were supposedly allowing the president to make headway. But then, for still poorly understood reasons, the people foolishly voted in a Republican majority in the House. The new Congress that was seated in January stopped the Obama success of the prior 24 months in its tracks. Since then, for the last nine months, the president has had to “fight Congress” in a way he had apparently not had to in his first two years of triumph. “They need to do their job,” the president remarked of the mysterious congressional ennui that started in January of this year.

The president also noticed that sometimes even the gods conspire to derail the expected recovery. In August, in a series of speeches, Mr. Obama outlined the perfect storm that had hit us — a veritable quadrafecta of unexpected bad news. First there was the Arab Spring, which created global uncertainty. Then oil prices spiked and sidetracked the nascent recovery. To top that off, the Japanese tsunami did its share to halt the president’s plans for economic restoration. Nor, he reminded us, should we forget the financial uncertainty in Europe.

Former top Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee best summed up the weird alignment of the stars: “Earthquakes, tsunamis, revolutions in the Middle East, financial crisis, and now we even have earthquakes outside of Washington, D.C.” Other administration spokesmen noted the deleterious role of Hurricane Irene, which interrupted the president’s vacation and paralyzed the East Coast. Earlier they had noted the damage done by BP and the seemingly unending oil spill. In other words, if Republicans in Congress and ATMs were not enough, we also had Arabs, Japanese, Europeans, and the angry earth shaker and tidal-wave maker, Poseidon, all in league against this administration.

__________________
Sideshow Barry Barker 2012 Says: "It's NOT the economy, Stupid!" It's the Birthers! The Tea Party! SARAH PALIN!
Bush!
BAD LUCK!!
RACISM!!!
ATMs, KIOSKs & CORPORATE JETS!!!
TSUNAMIS, TORNADOS, & the ARAB SPRING!!!
EARTHQUAKES & HURRICANES!!!!!
EUROPE’s €PIIGS!!!!!!!!

OBSTRUCTION!!!
Americans have grown “Soft!”
obama-wide-grin80.jpg

”’Shovel-ready’ was not as shovel-ready as we expected.” (Laughter)
 
The past ten years have been difficult for the USA.

Obviously, blaming your President is convenient.

It's also convenient for Democrats and Republicans to blame each other.

I don't see any evidence that the blame game will change anything, however.

The USA needs to get its groove back, and that starts with confidence in your way of life and your political institutions and respect for the people you elected to office.

If you give those things up, you are on the same path as Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, etc. It's just a matter of time.
 
what we can learn from a farmer

by Victor Davis Hanson....is brilliant. He may come off as a righ-winger, but he aint'. Funny what you can learn from a farmer.....and not your typical Marxist professor
 
Nice platitudes.

Simple truths are hard to argue against because they are true.

Respect for your elected officials and working together for a better tomorrow are core values that have been fundamental to the success of the USA as a country and society.

Step away from those and you're stepping closer to the kind of societies and governance practiced by the less successful countries.
 
The past ten years have been difficult for the USA.

Obviously, blaming your President is convenient.

It's also convenient for Democrats and Republicans to blame each other.

I don't see any evidence that the blame game will change anything, however.

The USA needs to get its groove back, and that starts with confidence in your way of life and your political institutions and respect for the people you elected to office.

If you give those things up, you are on the same path as Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, etc. It's just a matter of time.

Or maybe we could just start electing people we respect?

Ishmael
 
You need to read more of the full history of US politics.

This fallacy you bandy about has never been true.

It's always been confrontation.

Jefferson-Hamilton

;) ;) :kiss:
 
Ninety-nine percent of people care about prosperity and protection. So long as they get it theyll gas Jews, hang Niggaz, or anything. Nuthin else matters to them.
 
The Great Obama Catharsis by Victor Davis Hanson...

Thank you, Miles, for the article. Being oft accused of maximum verbosity, (ZORK), if memory serves, I suggest Hanson kept on beating the horse long after its' demise.

The Catharsis brought about by Obama and his cronies is really a stark realization that statism brings to the surface the very worst of the political class, the true moochers and parasites of Ayn Rand's Novels, for all to see, and it has brought a really distasteful perception of welfare state policies and politics.

When Obama called Americans 'soft', he was using the old socialist trick of berating the people because they weren't good enough to be true socialists or communists, they couldn't make the ultimate sacrifice of self, to the greater good, that socialism requires.

I think among most of the people, the perception is there, but without the comprehension; and there is a need to clarify the degradation that the welfare state brings about.

We have a year plus to uncover the swamp slime of the Left, let us proceed with vigor!

;)

(practicing pomposity)

ami:rose:
 
Catharsis? Naaah.

Catharsis is your destination NOT your journey. Catharsis is to destination as thrill is to journey.

I'm reminded of a friend named Bruno. On liberty in New York, Bruno and a shipmate picked up 2 gals at a bar. They drank, laughed, danced, 'traded spit', and adjourned to an apartment.

In the cab, Bruno was in front with his sweetie, and his pally was in the back with the other broad. Along the way Bruno's buddy put his hand up the gal's leg and screamed, THIS BITCH HAS BALLS!

The cabbie stopped the car, the guys tossed the ladies to the curb, and left.

They got no catharsis that nite.
 
Or maybe we could just start electing people we respect?

Ishmael

Obviously that's the best approach...but you also need to pull together even when you've got substandard leadership. Especially when you've got substandard leadership.

Right now, the partisan static and blame-gaming is harming not only your economic power but your social fabric.

There are those who suggest the Republicans are purposefully letting the USA swirl the bowl in a game of brinksmanship designed to regain elected power.

it's easy to say "that's politics", but there is also a point where your duty to your country, its institutions and your way of life supercede politics.

Are you at that point? I don't know, but you're certainly at a low ebb.
 
Obviously that's the best approach...but you also need to pull together even when you've got substandard leadership. Especially when you've got substandard leadership.

Right now, the partisan static and blame-gaming is harming not only your economic power but your social fabric.

There are those who suggest the Republicans are purposefully letting the USA swirl the bowl in a game of brinksmanship designed to regain elected power.

it's easy to say "that's politics", but there is also a point where your duty to your country, its institutions and your way of life supercede politics.

Are you at that point? I don't know, but you're certainly at a low ebb.

Actually we don't. Point in fact is that there are more than a few in congress that are perfectly willing, even eager, to follow sub-standard leadership, particularly on fiscal matters.

If you bother to pay close attention you see that the 'blame game' is essentially uni-directional and coming from the white house. It's one of those certain indicators of the sub-standard leadership you've already alluded to.

Exactly so, and that's precisely what the tea party is all about. The democrats are poised to lose even more of their ass in the house and most likely will suffer big losses in the senate. Barring some miracle we'll also be finished with the ghetto organizer currently occupying the white house.

As far as the republicans go, it's most likely that whoever they nominate will win, but unless the winner understands that government is the problem, not the solution, the engine of our economy will continue to sputter along while the rest of the worlds engines grind to a halt. Just look at the EU today, it's on the verge of coming undone.

Ishmael
 
Actually we don't. Point in fact is that there are more than a few in congress that are perfectly willing, even eager, to follow sub-standard leadership, particularly on fiscal matters.

If you bother to pay close attention you see that the 'blame game' is essentially uni-directional and coming from the white house. It's one of those certain indicators of the sub-standard leadership you've already alluded to.

Exactly so, and that's precisely what the tea party is all about. The democrats are poised to lose even more of their ass in the house and most likely will suffer big losses in the senate. Barring some miracle we'll also be finished with the ghetto organizer currently occupying the white house.

As far as the republicans go, it's most likely that whoever they nominate will win, but unless the winner understands that government is the problem, not the solution, the engine of our economy will continue to sputter along while the rest of the worlds engines grind to a halt. Just look at the EU today, it's on the verge of coming undone.

Ishmael

My crystal ball reveals a sinister scenario. America is too fragmented for cooperation and collateral purpose. Its like Weimar Germany. The Democrats are a coagulation of communists, socialists, and day treatment freaks; the GOP longs for someone to lead them in singing Horst Wessel.
 
Here in Canada, we don't see much of Obama, not even on CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC or their news offshoots.

What we do see a lot of are your various congressional and senate spokespeople and officials, each blaming the other party for a lack of action.

The so-called "washington gridlock" message is the one the your bond-rating agencies and trading partners are seeing, hearing and talking about, fyi.
 
Back
Top