COVID-19 RESOURCES
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

AI oof in peer reviewed paper...

Major oof. Especially given it was peer reviewed and nobody caught it. That's as good as the lawyer that used chatGPT to write his court filing.
 
Geez... I guess it's good they didn't copy-paste the prompt as well. I wonder if this was because of their lack of English skills or if they were just being lazy. There is no fighting this madness.
 
To be fair, getting something into a peer-reviewed journal is the start of the peer-reviewing process. Journals do reviews ahead of time, but it's often done by volunteers. Publishing corrections is often viewed as a normal part of the lifecycle of a paper.
 
lilshymynx said:
Major oof. Especially given it was peer reviewed and nobody caught it. That's as good as the lawyer that used chatGPT to write his court filing.
Click to expand...
That's the most egregious / funny thing here. I bet the publisher is rethinking their peer review process now...
 
Jackie.Hikaru said:
Wonder how often the phrase "Certainly, here are some..." pops up in Literotica stories
Click to expand...
"My god, I wish I could describe how perfect your tits are," he prompted her.

"Certainly. Here are some commonly used descriptors for attractive female breasts: ... "

"I was hoping for something more unusual. Your tits are anything but common."

"Of course. Here are some terms found in the lower quartile of frequency in popular usage: globes, gazongas, melons, funbags... "

""My, you sure are an interesting person, Charlotte Gupta."

"I do my best to be interesting to the male homo-sapiens that I interact with."
 
AwkwardMD said:
To be fair, getting something into a peer-reviewed journal is the start of the peer-reviewing process. Journals do reviews ahead of time, but it's often done by volunteers. Publishing corrections is often viewed as a normal part of the lifecycle of a paper.
Click to expand...
I suppose its different depending on the journal, but generally, if the paper was accepted and published, beside the reviewers, it would have had to pass through an editorial team (or at least an editor) and reviewed and approved by the journal's editor-in-chief.... ostensibly of course 🙃
 
Jackie.Hikaru said:
I suppose its different depending on the journal, but generally, if the paper was accepted and published, beside the reviewers, it would have had to pass through an editorial team (or at least an editor) and reviewed and approved by the journal's editor-in-chief.... ostensibly of course 🙃
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's no excuse to not do an editing pass.
 
intim8 said:
"My god, I wish I could describe how perfect your tits are," he prompted her.

"Certainly. Here are some commonly used descriptors for attractive female breasts: ... "

"I was hoping for something more unusual. Your tits are anything but common."

"Of course. Here are some terms found in the lower quartile of frequency in popular usage: globes, gazongas, melons, funbags... "

""My, you sure are an interesting person, Charlotte Gupta."

"I do my best to be interesting to the male homo-sapiens that I interact with."
Click to expand...
"Ooh, Charlotte, can you send me a photo of your tits?"

"Of course!"
1711127766998.png
 
This doesn't surprise me that much. There have been several instances in the last ten years or so of people submitting "spoof" articles that manage to get by peer review and get published, and some of them are quite embarrassingly bad or meaningless word salad.
 
astuffedshirt_perv said:
Meh. The only things important in scientific papers are the graphs, methods and equations. The rest is just fluff.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but if this fluff was generated by AI and everybody missed it, the rest of the paper is also suspect, because AI makes shit up. And these peers become suspect too, if they didn't spot a dead give away.

Would you trust them to write the software that flies the plane, if they collectively can't spot that the first word is wrong?
 
Jackie.Hikaru said:
AI's long shadow reaches many corners.
Taken from a peer reviewed paper.

View attachment 2330240
Wonder how often the phrase "Certainly, here are some..." pops up in Literotica stories 🤔

Or any of the other typical ChatGPTese.

Link to paper.
Click to expand...

FWIW, dendrites aren’t a problem with LiFePO 4 battery chemistry, and that’s what most Lithium battery manufacturers are steering toward these days. 😉
 
Apparently quite a lot of published papers have been recently exposed (link paywalled) by glaringly obvious goofs
the most common phrase being caught in the papers is "As of my latest knowledge update"

Makes me wonder how many lit stories are out there peppered with such ChatGPT phrases...
 
Jackie.Hikaru said:
Apparently quite a lot of published papers have been recently exposed (link paywalled) by glaringly obvious goofs
the most common phrase being caught in the papers is "As of my latest knowledge update"

Makes me wonder how many lit stories are out there peppered with such ChatGPT phrases...
Click to expand...
HAL 9000 would never get caught by such an obvious mistake. Far more cunning, he'd fake a, "Maybe in the future, the gadget will fail," scenario, and send a poor hapless astronaut out to "fix" the problem. These bots are rank amateurs compared to the master.
 
I saw a medical one recently with some blatant "as a large language model..." boilerplate in the discussion. If nothing else it makes me feel a little better about the quality of my own peer reviewing. I don't always understand everything, but I do read the whole thing.

Not a peer-reviewing thing but gonna dump this here as possibly the worst AI-related product idea yet: an app where you upload dick pics of your prospective partner and "AI" pretends to know whether they have a STI. https://www.patreon.com/posts/100691421
 
intim8 said:
I'd be curious to see what the peers had to say.
Click to expand...
Damn, I should have offered my students the beers after they'd finished all my peer reviews, not beforehand!

(have been said student. My supervisor and other senior scientists in my lab didn't have good enough English to peer-review anything.)
 
lilshymynx said:
As ElectricBlue said, AI is great at making things up. And I' sure that could include the data....graphs can always be back filled. Perfect example is what I mentioned above, the lawyers that used chatGPT to write their court filing.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...e-up-by-chatgpt-judge-calls-it-unprecedented/

Click to expand...

Yep, if you ask GPT a numeric question with a precise, definitive answer ("what was the population of town X according to census Y?" kind of thing) it will often give you an answer that's plausible but wrong.

It reminds me of the time Xerox scanners were using a data compression algorithm that changed numbers in scanned docs:

https://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/20...s_are_switching_written_numbers_when_scanning
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

scbolder
The AI Rejection Conversation Matters
2 3
Replies
73
Views
936
BobbyBrandt
BobbyBrandt
SimonDoom
How to Avoid AI Rejection
2 3
Replies
59
Views
828
pink_silk_glove
pink_silk_glove
EmilyMiller
Best current guidance on Literotica and AI
6 7 8
Replies
198
Views
5K
Vintage_DM
V
F
What will AI still struggle to do for writing in the future?
2
Replies
27
Views
488
AG31
AG31
B
"AI" Rejection
13 14 15
Replies
355
Views
11K
storyteller92
storyteller92
Back
Top