Interesting Breakdown of the Russian Investigation

Luk

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 11, 2007
Posts
32,404
*This came to me unsourced so I cannot give credit yet*

Ok, so I've actually sat down and read the entire 29 page Mueller indictment against the 12 Russian intelligence officers, and it is totally insane. I literally can't believe the scope of this thing. I'm making this status public (i.e., shareable), because people need to know about this shit. There is no way you can read the actual indictment and not conclude that 1) there WAS a RUSSIAN conspiracy, 2) that the scope of that conspiracy was GARGANTUAN, 3) that it was organized BY THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT [i.e., there's no way Putin didn't know about this], 4) That people connected to the Trump campaign [and, shockingly, other U.S. Gov't officials] WERE INVOLVED, and 5) this is just the beginning. If Mueller has already uncovered this amount of information with such specificity regarding the goings-on in far-away Russia, there's NO WAY some serious shit isn't going to hit the fan going forward right here in the U.S.

So, without further ado, here are the highlights:

Article 1 of the indictment states that the Russian government actively set up multiple intelligence units (known as the GRU) with the sole aim of interfering with the 2016 election. Two of these units, 26165, and 74455, were specifically tasked with acquiring and releasing stolen documents via hacking.

Article 2 specifically calls this a "conspiracy" and states that the 12 indicted Russians had contacts with "persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury."

Article 3: The aforementioned Russian intelligence units deliberately targeted the Clinton campaign.

Article 4: They deliberately targeted the DNC as a whole.

Article 6: In June of 2016, they released TENS OF THOUSANDS of hacked documents using fictitious online personas.

Article 10: One of the intelligence officers, Boris Antonov, oversaw a department within 26165 tasked with hacking the U.S. military, governmental (i.e., political) and non-governmental organizations. [i.e., they were spying on every level of our gov't].

Articles 12-18: The Russian hackers often used various online aliases, both male and female, such as (but not limited to) "Kate Milton," "James McMorgans," and "Karen Millen." Sergey Morgachev, another Russian hacker, was a Lt. Colonel in the Russian military. He created the hacking malware used by dept. 26165, known as "X-Agent." Another hacker named in the indictment, Nikolay Kozachek, was a Lt. Captain in the Russian military. Artem Malyshev (also named in the indictment) was a Second Lieutenant in the Russian military. Aleksandr Osadchuk (also named in the indictment) is a Colonel in the Russian Military. He oversaw the creation and dissemination of anti-Clinton material online.

Article 19: Russian Military Officer Aleksey Potemkin, assigned to 74455, supervised the creation of fake social media accounts used (among other things) in the release of DNC documents.

Article 21: Over 300 individuals affiliated with the DNC were SUCCESSFULLY targeted. (Article 21 is lengthy, and includes a detailed, play-by-play account of how 26165 and 74455 achieved their aims. Spoiler alert: It's crazy).

Article 24, subsection B: The Russian's hacking of the DNC was so advanced that they were able to monitor individual computers in real time. Subsection C states that their malware sent actual screenshots of DNC computer activity to a server in Arizona that the Russians had access to. They were also able to capture keystrokes entered by DCCC employees.

Article 24, subsection D: They monitored individual DNC / DCCC employees for hours on end, and obtained information about DNC fundraising plans and even banking information (as well as other personal information).

Article 26 subsection A: By June 2016 the Russians had complete access to 33 DNC computers, totally and completely.

Article 27: The GRU gained access to information regarding DNC opposition research, field operation plans, and the Benghazi operation.

Article 28, subsection B: Aside from the server in Arizona, the GRU also stored data to a server in Illinois, to which they filtered large gigabytes of stolen information via a program they developed known as "X-Tunnel."

Article 32: The DNC became aware of Russian attempts to hack their servers and hired a security firm to identify the extent of the intrusions. The security firm (identified in the indictment only as "company 1") also put in place measures to halt GRU access to DNC computers, but, despite this, the GRU was so efficient that they continued to maintain access via "X-Agent" well through October of 2016.

Article 33: The GRU immediately became aware of "company 1's" (referring here to the security firm that the DNC hired) efforts, and took countermeasures in response. This included investigating / hacking "company 1" itself, and later, apparently as a retaliatory measure against the DNC, setting up a wesbsite that redirected from a DNC online political donations website, to another website set up by the GRU (in other words, the GRU took funds from DNC donors, using the pretext of a false DNC donations website).

Articles 35-36: The GRU set up another website, the sole purpose of which was to release stolen DNC documents. They created fake social media accounts that falsely attributed this website's creation to a group of "American hacktivists." It received over 1 million hits.

Article 37: The GRU has also released stolen documents dating back to 2015 (i.e., they've been up to this for quite a while).

Article 40: The notion of a "lone Romanian hacker" being responsible for the DNC leaks was a fiction deliberately created by the GRU and disseminated via fake social media accounts.

Article 42: Using a popular blogging site, the GRU set up a blog that used the most "searched for" keywords by conspiracy theorists, (e.g., "Illuminati," "Worldwide," "Conspiracy," et. al.), -and used this website to further disseminate the "lone Romanian hacker" conspiracy theory. (Article 46 of the indictment further states that later entries on this blog site posted articles positing that the released, stolen documents had "nothing to do with Russia.")

Article 43, Subsection A: An individual the indictment identifies only as "a known member of congress" contacted an online GRU dummy persona, ("Guccifer 2.0") and requested stolen documents related to their political opponent, and the GRU / "Guccifer" responded by giving said member of congress access to the stolen data they were requesting.

Article 43, Subsection B: The GRU released stolen documents to what the indictment identifies as "a lobbyist and online source of political news."

Subsection C: "Guccifer" / The GRU sent stolen documents pertaining to the "Black Lives Matter" movement to a reporter (unidentified in the indictment), to which the reporter not only responded, but offered to write an article using said information.

Article 44: The GRU, posing as "Guccifer 2.0" wrote to a person who was in regular contact with SENIOR MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. (The indictment includes direct quotes of their online conversation, and this is CLEARLY referring to Roger Stone).

Article 45, subsection B: The GRU, using an alias, contacted a U.S. reporter (unnamed in the indictment) and ultimately gave them access to stolen DNC data.

Articles 47-49: Here the indictment refers to an organization, identified only as "Organization 1," [I'm thinking, Wikileaks] -which actually reached out to the GRU aliases seeking the stolen emails / data. "Organization 1" is directly quoted by the indictment as having communicated to "Guccifer," that they should "send [Organization 1] any new material [i.e., stolen data] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing." Organization 1 was given, and later released, said data, approximately 3 days before the Democratic National Convention. In total, between October and November of 2016, over 50,000 stolen documents were released.

Articles 50-79 : Lists the counts against the 11 Russian Military Personnel, which include charges of 1) Conspiracy to Commit Offenses Against The United States, 2) Aggravated Identity Theft, 3) Conspiracy to Launder Money [according to the indictment, over 95,000 USD$ was laundered], i.e. using cryptocurrency, that was then use to register domain names, set up websites, create server infrastructure, et. al.,3) The Use of Transferred Money To Commit Crimes Against The United States, 4) General Unlawful Conspiracy [It should be noted that many of these counts have sub-crimes attached to them, such as unlawful hacking, etc.].

So, there it is folks. This WAS A RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY, massive in scope, directly linked to the Trump campaign, the sole aim of which was to subvert Democracy. There is no way around it.
 
*This came to me unsourced so I cannot give credit yet*

Ok, so I've actually sat down and read the entire 29 page Mueller indictment against the 12 Russian intelligence officers, and it is totally insane. I literally can't believe the scope of this thing. I'm making this status public (i.e., shareable), because people need to know about this shit. There is no way you can read the actual indictment and not conclude that 1) there WAS a RUSSIAN conspiracy, 2) that the scope of that conspiracy was GARGANTUAN, 3) that it was organized BY THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT [i.e., there's no way Putin didn't know about this], 4) That people connected to the Trump campaign [and, shockingly, other U.S. Gov't officials] WERE INVOLVED, and 5) this is just the beginning. If Mueller has already uncovered this amount of information with such specificity regarding the goings-on in far-away Russia, there's NO WAY some serious shit isn't going to hit the fan going forward right here in the U.S.

So, without further ado, here are the highlights:

Article 1 of the indictment states that the Russian government actively set up multiple intelligence units (known as the GRU) with the sole aim of interfering with the 2016 election. Two of these units, 26165, and 74455, were specifically tasked with acquiring and releasing stolen documents via hacking.

Article 2 specifically calls this a "conspiracy" and states that the 12 indicted Russians had contacts with "persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury."

Article 3: The aforementioned Russian intelligence units deliberately targeted the Clinton campaign.

Article 4: They deliberately targeted the DNC as a whole.

Article 6: In June of 2016, they released TENS OF THOUSANDS of hacked documents using fictitious online personas.

Article 10: One of the intelligence officers, Boris Antonov, oversaw a department within 26165 tasked with hacking the U.S. military, governmental (i.e., political) and non-governmental organizations. [i.e., they were spying on every level of our gov't].

Articles 12-18: The Russian hackers often used various online aliases, both male and female, such as (but not limited to) "Kate Milton," "James McMorgans," and "Karen Millen." Sergey Morgachev, another Russian hacker, was a Lt. Colonel in the Russian military. He created the hacking malware used by dept. 26165, known as "X-Agent." Another hacker named in the indictment, Nikolay Kozachek, was a Lt. Captain in the Russian military. Artem Malyshev (also named in the indictment) was a Second Lieutenant in the Russian military. Aleksandr Osadchuk (also named in the indictment) is a Colonel in the Russian Military. He oversaw the creation and dissemination of anti-Clinton material online.

Article 19: Russian Military Officer Aleksey Potemkin, assigned to 74455, supervised the creation of fake social media accounts used (among other things) in the release of DNC documents.

Article 21: Over 300 individuals affiliated with the DNC were SUCCESSFULLY targeted. (Article 21 is lengthy, and includes a detailed, play-by-play account of how 26165 and 74455 achieved their aims. Spoiler alert: It's crazy).

Article 24, subsection B: The Russian's hacking of the DNC was so advanced that they were able to monitor individual computers in real time. Subsection C states that their malware sent actual screenshots of DNC computer activity to a server in Arizona that the Russians had access to. They were also able to capture keystrokes entered by DCCC employees.

Article 24, subsection D: They monitored individual DNC / DCCC employees for hours on end, and obtained information about DNC fundraising plans and even banking information (as well as other personal information).

Article 26 subsection A: By June 2016 the Russians had complete access to 33 DNC computers, totally and completely.

Article 27: The GRU gained access to information regarding DNC opposition research, field operation plans, and the Benghazi operation.

Article 28, subsection B: Aside from the server in Arizona, the GRU also stored data to a server in Illinois, to which they filtered large gigabytes of stolen information via a program they developed known as "X-Tunnel."

Article 32: The DNC became aware of Russian attempts to hack their servers and hired a security firm to identify the extent of the intrusions. The security firm (identified in the indictment only as "company 1") also put in place measures to halt GRU access to DNC computers, but, despite this, the GRU was so efficient that they continued to maintain access via "X-Agent" well through October of 2016.

Article 33: The GRU immediately became aware of "company 1's" (referring here to the security firm that the DNC hired) efforts, and took countermeasures in response. This included investigating / hacking "company 1" itself, and later, apparently as a retaliatory measure against the DNC, setting up a wesbsite that redirected from a DNC online political donations website, to another website set up by the GRU (in other words, the GRU took funds from DNC donors, using the pretext of a false DNC donations website).

Articles 35-36: The GRU set up another website, the sole purpose of which was to release stolen DNC documents. They created fake social media accounts that falsely attributed this website's creation to a group of "American hacktivists." It received over 1 million hits.

Article 37: The GRU has also released stolen documents dating back to 2015 (i.e., they've been up to this for quite a while).

Article 40: The notion of a "lone Romanian hacker" being responsible for the DNC leaks was a fiction deliberately created by the GRU and disseminated via fake social media accounts.

Article 42: Using a popular blogging site, the GRU set up a blog that used the most "searched for" keywords by conspiracy theorists, (e.g., "Illuminati," "Worldwide," "Conspiracy," et. al.), -and used this website to further disseminate the "lone Romanian hacker" conspiracy theory. (Article 46 of the indictment further states that later entries on this blog site posted articles positing that the released, stolen documents had "nothing to do with Russia.")

Article 43, Subsection A: An individual the indictment identifies only as "a known member of congress" contacted an online GRU dummy persona, ("Guccifer 2.0") and requested stolen documents related to their political opponent, and the GRU / "Guccifer" responded by giving said member of congress access to the stolen data they were requesting.

Article 43, Subsection B: The GRU released stolen documents to what the indictment identifies as "a lobbyist and online source of political news."

Subsection C: "Guccifer" / The GRU sent stolen documents pertaining to the "Black Lives Matter" movement to a reporter (unidentified in the indictment), to which the reporter not only responded, but offered to write an article using said information.

Article 44: The GRU, posing as "Guccifer 2.0" wrote to a person who was in regular contact with SENIOR MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. (The indictment includes direct quotes of their online conversation, and this is CLEARLY referring to Roger Stone).

Article 45, subsection B: The GRU, using an alias, contacted a U.S. reporter (unnamed in the indictment) and ultimately gave them access to stolen DNC data.

Articles 47-49: Here the indictment refers to an organization, identified only as "Organization 1," [I'm thinking, Wikileaks] -which actually reached out to the GRU aliases seeking the stolen emails / data. "Organization 1" is directly quoted by the indictment as having communicated to "Guccifer," that they should "send [Organization 1] any new material [i.e., stolen data] here for us to review and it will have a much higher impact than what you are doing." Organization 1 was given, and later released, said data, approximately 3 days before the Democratic National Convention. In total, between October and November of 2016, over 50,000 stolen documents were released.

Articles 50-79 : Lists the counts against the 11 Russian Military Personnel, which include charges of 1) Conspiracy to Commit Offenses Against The United States, 2) Aggravated Identity Theft, 3) Conspiracy to Launder Money [according to the indictment, over 95,000 USD$ was laundered], i.e. using cryptocurrency, that was then use to register domain names, set up websites, create server infrastructure, et. al.,3) The Use of Transferred Money To Commit Crimes Against The United States, 4) General Unlawful Conspiracy [It should be noted that many of these counts have sub-crimes attached to them, such as unlawful hacking, etc.].

So, there it is folks. This WAS A RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY, massive in scope, directly linked to the Trump campaign, the sole aim of which was to subvert Democracy. There is no way around it.

Of course the Trump campaign was "directly linked" to the Russian intelligence conspiracy. They were the beneficiary OF the conspiracy. That does not mean, and nothing this report includes suggests, that any member of the Trump campaign or Congress had direct knowledge of a conspiracy by Russian intelligence to torpedo the Clinton campaign and participated IN that conspiracy based ON that specific knowledge. That would include Roger Stone, if in fact, he IS the person indicated by the referenced email exchange.

The GRU set up a "dummy persona" named "Guccifer"? Why would they do that if not to conceal the very involvement of the GRU from those members of Congress, the press, and the Trump campaign who were also "involved," i.e. TARGETED as part of the conspiracy?

If I visited a friend in Rio during the 2016 Olympics and agreed to carry a present (say a DVD player) back to the United States for his uncle living in Pittsburgh, and customs agents inspected it upon my entry into the U. S. and found the device to be packed with cocaine, I would certainly be "involved" -- dangerously and suspiciously involved.

Nonetheless, I would not be criminally involved if I had no knowledge of my friend's criminal act and had no reason to believe that he was enlisting me in a criminal act.

The same is true for each and every person "involved in" or affected by, even if beneficially, the Russian intelligence conspiracy.

Which is almost certainly why Mueller's Russian indictments named ONLY Russians.
 
you left out a few things

1-The "Russians" tried phishing the REPOZ as well and they couldnt get in.....so they tried BOTH sides

2-The FBI went to DNC and said you are being hacked, let us help, DNC said NO

3-Only DUMMIES answer PHISHING emails
 
7ca6e907db2cdbdd744cbd067ca577e9



Lots of room for a Trump tatt.
 
Of course the Trump campaign was "directly linked" to the Russian intelligence conspiracy. They were the beneficiary OF the conspiracy. That does not mean, and nothing this report includes suggests, that any member of the Trump campaign or Congress had direct knowledge of a conspiracy by Russian intelligence to torpedo the Clinton campaign and participated IN that conspiracy based ON that specific knowledge. That would include Roger Stone, if in fact, he IS the person indicated by the referenced email exchange.
Nope, you're right, it doesn't.

However, we should not loose sight of the fact that the Trump organization has admitted and provided proof that they did, in fact, try to conspire with the Russian government during the election.

It could be that they never succeeded in their attempts to work with the Russians. On the other hand, given that they tried to and then Trump's treason today, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if those indictments follow later.
 
you left out a few things

1-The "Russians" tried phishing the REPOZ as well and they couldnt get in.....so they tried BOTH sides

2-The FBI went to DNC and said you are being hacked, let us help, DNC said NO

3-Only DUMMIES answer PHISHING emails

TREASON


DNC Chair Tom Perez Dodges Twice When Asked Why He’s Refused To Let The FBI Access The DNC’s Servers
 
TREASON


DNC Chair Tom Perez Dodges Twice When Asked Why He’s Refused To Let The FBI Access The DNC’s Servers
So if the FBI asks to inspect the contents of your computer you'd say, "Sure, anything you want!"? :rolleyes:
 
I wonder if the people claiming the Russians never hacked/infiltrated US elections systems will shut up now.
 
At each point that new indictments are handed down, the Trumpettes here pretend that everything is over and that it means the Trumpers had no involvement. That's so quaint. ;)
 
Nope, you're right, it doesn't.

However, we should not loose sight of the fact that the Trump organization has admitted and provided proof that they did, in fact, try to conspire with the Russian government during the election.

It could be that they never succeeded in their attempts to work with the Russians. On the other hand, given that they tried to and then Trump's treason today, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if those indictments follow later.

So if the FBI asks to inspect the contents of your computer you'd say, "Sure, anything you want!"? :rolleyes:

So just to make sure I've got this right....

The DNC was fully within its rights to deny FBI access to hacked computer systems (at that time most likely hacked by a foreign government and, if so, would have also quite likely have presented valuable evidence in an ongoing criminal investigation) but the current President of the United States is, in your view, committing the specific illegal act of treason by merely meeting with the head of that same government completely irrespective of what they talked about at that meeting.

Legal or not, the DNC's actions strike me as akin to a burglary victim who, upon the police wanting to inspect his ransacked home for clues, asks to see a search warrant. :rolleyes:

Fascinating.

And this President meeting with a foreign leader who he has himself targeted and been targeted by for strategic and political intelligence is not one iota different than the countless other meetings with foreign leaders who meet the exact same characterization.

As for your lack of surprise at criminal indictments "following later" based on prior "admissions" that the Trump organization attempted to "conspire with the Russian government," I am literally ASTOUNDED that those indictments have not already been issued based ON THOSE SAME ADMISSIONS!!!

What the hell is taking so long? It is almost as if Bob Mueller is under the impression that no "crime" of Russian "collusion" has actually been committed.

I mean....you know. As if we didn't KNOW better. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
So just to make sure I've got this right....

The DNC was fully within its rights to deny FBI access to hacked computer systems (at that time most likely hacked by a foreign government and, if so, would have also quite likely have presented valuable evidence in an ongoing criminal investigation) but the current President of the United States is, in your view, committing the specific illegal act of treason by merely meeting with the head of that same government completely irrespective of what they talked about at that meeting.
Not what I said, so no, you don't have it right.

Legal or not, the DNC's actions strike me as akin to a burglary victim who, upon the police wanting to inspect his ransacked home for clues, asks to see a search warrant. :rolleyes:
Fascinating.
No argument from me that the DNC people were idiots
As was the Democratic party for nominating Clinton.

As for your lack of surprise at criminal indictments "following later" based on prior "admissions" that the Trump organization attempted to "conspire with the Russian government," I am literally ASTOUNDED that those indictments have not already been issued based ON THOSE SAME ADMISSIONS!!!
It isn't to me. A person may decide they're going to take a hit out on their spouse and meet with someone to finalize the contract, then get cold feet and decide not to. As far as I know that's not illegal (correct me if I'm wrong).
 
Yeah, you are wrong.

Solicitation of murder, whether you pay for it or not is illegal.
 
The major takeaway from this whole incident is that the Russians demonstrated that Clinton and the Democrats cannot be trusted with computers and National secrets.
 
Yeah, you are wrong.

Solicitation of murder, whether you pay for it or not is illegal.

What about solicitation for a beating? I remember your hero trumpy requesting someone gets beat up.

Of course your little tranny mind will put a spin on it and try to show how evil Hillary is...

What a stupid tranny, no wonder his wife dumped his ass.
 
What about solicitation for a beating? I remember your hero trumpy requesting someone gets beat up.

Of course your little tranny mind will put a spin on it and try to show how evil Hillary is...

What a stupid tranny, no wonder his wife dumped his ass.
"But, but TRRRUMMMPPPP!"

Your fear is palpable. You can't even finish an entire post WHILE USING A SOCK-PUPPET without sliding into third person.

You're such a pussy!
 
The major takeaway from this whole incident is that the Russians demonstrated that Clinton and the Democrats cannot be trusted with computers and National secrets.

Let's go with that.

Now, on to the fact that 45 is throwing America under the bus in front of god and everyone. No thoughts? No conservatives care that he's completely undermining US Intelligence?
 
So just to make sure I've got this right....

The DNC was fully within its rights to deny FBI access to hacked computer systems (at that time most likely hacked by a foreign government and, if so, would have also quite likely have presented valuable evidence in an ongoing criminal investigation) but the current President of the United States is, in your view, committing the specific illegal act of treason by merely meeting with the head of that same government completely irrespective of what they talked about at that meeting.

Legal or not, the DNC's actions strike me as akin to a burglary victim who, upon the police wanting to inspect his ransacked home for clues, asks to see a search warrant. :rolleyes:

Fascinating.

And this President meeting with a foreign leader who he has himself targeted and been targeted by for strategic and political intelligence is not one iota different than the countless other meetings with foreign leaders who meet the exact same characterization.

As for your lack of surprise at criminal indictments "following later" based on prior "admissions" that the Trump organization attempted to "conspire with the Russian government," I am literally ASTOUNDED that those indictments have not already been issued based ON THOSE SAME ADMISSIONS!!!

What the hell is taking so long? It is almost as if Bob Mueller is under the impression that no "crime" of Russian "collusion" has actually been committed.

I mean....you know. As if we didn't KNOW better. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Since the Muellar team has been so damned good at containing leaks that we have no idea what they know and what they have found, your question is irreverent and erroneous. Keep this in mind, in the light of EVERY investigation that has gone before, this one is still in it's infancy, but does seem to be maturing to a conclusion much faster then any other. Patience my dear sir.....patience.....


fifomQ.gif


Comshaw
 
"But, but TRRRUMMMPPPP!"

Your fear is palpable. You can't even finish an entire post WHILE USING A SOCK-PUPPET without sliding into third person.

You're such a pussy!

Trump is relevant, Clinton is not.

Your fear of her can stop, she has no authority.

But thanks for making my point about you being a stupid trump suckin desert tranny. :)
 
Let's go with that.

Now, on to the fact that 45 is throwing America under the bus in front of god and everyone. No thoughts? No conservatives care that he's completely undermining US Intelligence?

US intelligence undermined US intelligence. When it gets political it's supposed to get political because it's undermining one of our enemies. They aren't supposed to be doing that influence us politics. Under Clapper that was clearly done. And it's absolutely wrong.

You know the same US intelligence the Democrats were castigating for the entire Obama administration for leading us into a war on a lie.

On a serious note though I have no idea what the hell is up to none of it makes any particular sense.

On the one hand it was a chickenshit move for them to release that indictment right before he shows up for this meeting to put Trump on the spot. They aren't in charge of foreign policy they work for him. They're under control the executive branch they have no business interfering with whatever he does or doesn't want to do regarding us Russian policies.

If they don't like it they can always tender a letter of resignation in protest.

I think some of it is that Trump is like the poster boy for being susceptible to reverse psychology. Every single time anyone tells him he can't do something or shouldn't do something he does it. I don't know why people that don't like him don't use that to their his their advantage more.
 
"What is taking so long?" is a false flag argument by Colonel H and others. They need to go back and review the timelines of past special counsel investigations--and look for a new excuse to give (because throwing up false flags is so much easier than looking at the writing on the wall).
 
"What is taking so long?" is a false flag argument by Colonel H and others. They need to go back and review the timelines of past special counsel investigations--and look for a new excuse to give (because throwing up false flags is so much easier than looking at the writing on the wall).

I believe the Benghazi investigations will wind up soon.
 
Back
Top