There's a temptation I have been unable to resist, so I am finally giving in to it: telling /my side of the story/ on the subject of making love. I tried to here and there "in dribbles", and oftentimes I earned nothing but snide remarks on what I posted. "So be it", I said to myself, you would not really expect chimpanzees to understand the thinking of Einstein either, would you?
So how do I differ from mainstream Literotica? Item one: fortunately I did not grow up in your country. I "visited" it for a while, but I declined to accept citizenship, and I am still glad about that. Because – as much as I love America, and intellectual Americans in particular – I do not connect very well to many ordinary Americans. Even though I am prepared to admit that many ordinary Americans are the most likeable people on earth for me. Maybe with the exception of certain Italians. If and when you are prepared to "overlook" their failings, like leaning much more than people in other countries to the "teachings" of organized religion.
But one thing ordinary Americans are NOT, as far as I experienced it: experts in love and erotica. It probably has to do with many Americans being religious, and the bible teaches nothing more than fucking. And procreation of course; for a while the only justification for fucking.
So no surprise that "American porn", as I have come to know it, is a mirror of American mainstream thinking. I sometimes claim that "American porn" is an oxymoron, like "Military Intelligence". It is to good porn (French or Italian) like using a hammer for screw driving. Fucking, fucking and fucking all over again, that is what American pornvids look like to me. No wonder so many Americans are hung up on the size of a penis.
IMHO, good sex begins when a couple graduates from fucking. With me it took a while as well. When they begin realizing that the vagina of a woman, and the penis of a man, do NOT possess all that many nerve endings, compared to other human organs.
Now a special case is a woman's clit. Sometimes, when the moon and the stars align perfectly, a female clit gets aroused when her man fucks her vagina. Probably happened to my first wife and me for a while, because – as far as I remember – we only fucked for fairly long. But, as I found out after our separation, for fucking to result in sexual bliss, all of the time or most of the time, the "topography" of both bodies must align more or less perfectly.
A much easier way to reach sexual bliss – so I found – comes from sex 2.0. That kind of sex needs no penetration whatsoever. Joining the vagina with the penis may happen, but that is optional. For hugging and kissing, and for looking one another in the eye, for instance, while some form of sexual union is happening.
Sex 2.0 simply involves so many more organs of the human body, and nerves not originally made for sex. Like the eyes in conjunction with the brain, for instance. I find it one of the most arousing experiences ever, to look at a woman, when we are NOT even touching each other. When we are so far away that I can take in her WHOLE body, not only part of it. When she then either looks at me with a longing in her eyes, or wears a piece of clothing, which accentuates her most erotic part(s), or when she touches herself, for instance.
When she presents a highly erotic image to me, in other words. And maybe I to her as well, although at my age that is difficult to do. Via my horny eyes for her, maybe, or by me speaking sweet or lewd words to her, which entice her. Or also by masturbating for her, showing her the reaction of my cock to her whole sweet and lovely and horny persona.
Now the strangest part of visually arousing one another: every sexual reaction takes place only in the brain. So maybe this is for nerds only? Or other intellectuals? I have never had much sexual fun, I must admit, with a woman who was not intelligent at least, and an intellectual preferable. With both of us sensing sapiosexual leanings, maybe on top of that.
And when we proceed from visually stimulating each other, and when touching begins, in various forms, we enjoy deploying "digits" very densely covered with nerves; fingertips and tips of tongues, for instance. Or, as I remember reading my dearest foe on Lit write lately, sqeezing a pointed nipple into the slit at the tip of a cock. Great idea, Jada!
I maintain that a woman's clit benefits from fucking only under exceptional circumstances, and it can be aroused much better in other ways. No wonder – for instance – that the "Cadillacs" of female love toys are the Womanizer or a Lelo toy, both of which work on the same principle.
It seems to me when a toy maker is able to charge premium prices, THAT shows how desirable such toys are. So much on the subject of big vs small dildos.
Now I do not really expect much positive reaction to this post of mine. Remembering my analogy of the chimpanzees. I don't mind either, if one or the other of you consider me arrogant. Most fans of the blonde somethingorother in the White House consider the rest of America arrogant also. Maybe that always happens to people, who dare violating the tennets of political correctness?
Nevertheless I am curious as to what yall's comments might be. Maybe I as well, can learn something new.
So how do I differ from mainstream Literotica? Item one: fortunately I did not grow up in your country. I "visited" it for a while, but I declined to accept citizenship, and I am still glad about that. Because – as much as I love America, and intellectual Americans in particular – I do not connect very well to many ordinary Americans. Even though I am prepared to admit that many ordinary Americans are the most likeable people on earth for me. Maybe with the exception of certain Italians. If and when you are prepared to "overlook" their failings, like leaning much more than people in other countries to the "teachings" of organized religion.
But one thing ordinary Americans are NOT, as far as I experienced it: experts in love and erotica. It probably has to do with many Americans being religious, and the bible teaches nothing more than fucking. And procreation of course; for a while the only justification for fucking.
So no surprise that "American porn", as I have come to know it, is a mirror of American mainstream thinking. I sometimes claim that "American porn" is an oxymoron, like "Military Intelligence". It is to good porn (French or Italian) like using a hammer for screw driving. Fucking, fucking and fucking all over again, that is what American pornvids look like to me. No wonder so many Americans are hung up on the size of a penis.
IMHO, good sex begins when a couple graduates from fucking. With me it took a while as well. When they begin realizing that the vagina of a woman, and the penis of a man, do NOT possess all that many nerve endings, compared to other human organs.
Now a special case is a woman's clit. Sometimes, when the moon and the stars align perfectly, a female clit gets aroused when her man fucks her vagina. Probably happened to my first wife and me for a while, because – as far as I remember – we only fucked for fairly long. But, as I found out after our separation, for fucking to result in sexual bliss, all of the time or most of the time, the "topography" of both bodies must align more or less perfectly.
A much easier way to reach sexual bliss – so I found – comes from sex 2.0. That kind of sex needs no penetration whatsoever. Joining the vagina with the penis may happen, but that is optional. For hugging and kissing, and for looking one another in the eye, for instance, while some form of sexual union is happening.
Sex 2.0 simply involves so many more organs of the human body, and nerves not originally made for sex. Like the eyes in conjunction with the brain, for instance. I find it one of the most arousing experiences ever, to look at a woman, when we are NOT even touching each other. When we are so far away that I can take in her WHOLE body, not only part of it. When she then either looks at me with a longing in her eyes, or wears a piece of clothing, which accentuates her most erotic part(s), or when she touches herself, for instance.
When she presents a highly erotic image to me, in other words. And maybe I to her as well, although at my age that is difficult to do. Via my horny eyes for her, maybe, or by me speaking sweet or lewd words to her, which entice her. Or also by masturbating for her, showing her the reaction of my cock to her whole sweet and lovely and horny persona.
Now the strangest part of visually arousing one another: every sexual reaction takes place only in the brain. So maybe this is for nerds only? Or other intellectuals? I have never had much sexual fun, I must admit, with a woman who was not intelligent at least, and an intellectual preferable. With both of us sensing sapiosexual leanings, maybe on top of that.
And when we proceed from visually stimulating each other, and when touching begins, in various forms, we enjoy deploying "digits" very densely covered with nerves; fingertips and tips of tongues, for instance. Or, as I remember reading my dearest foe on Lit write lately, sqeezing a pointed nipple into the slit at the tip of a cock. Great idea, Jada!
I maintain that a woman's clit benefits from fucking only under exceptional circumstances, and it can be aroused much better in other ways. No wonder – for instance – that the "Cadillacs" of female love toys are the Womanizer or a Lelo toy, both of which work on the same principle.
It seems to me when a toy maker is able to charge premium prices, THAT shows how desirable such toys are. So much on the subject of big vs small dildos.
Now I do not really expect much positive reaction to this post of mine. Remembering my analogy of the chimpanzees. I don't mind either, if one or the other of you consider me arrogant. Most fans of the blonde somethingorother in the White House consider the rest of America arrogant also. Maybe that always happens to people, who dare violating the tennets of political correctness?
Nevertheless I am curious as to what yall's comments might be. Maybe I as well, can learn something new.
