While lameduck Obama plays hardass about possible outside election hacking...

about_average said:

Not entirely. They all agree it was Russia.
The FBI is not saying the reason for the hack was to get Trump elected.
The CIA is.

The FBI operates differently from the CIA. What they care about is winning a court case so that's their perspective. Facts that can be shown in court to get a guilty verdict.
The CIA does need to prove things in court. Their task is to reach a high enough level of probability to take action.

Click to expand...

No, "leaks" are saying that.

one is not like the other

the assholes that "believe" the CIA now

are the same assholes that DINT believe the CIA then

My sources say that Assange hinted at a DNC insider who had it in for Clinton...





Maybe even Joe Biden!

2020 is just around the corner, and that's what hindsight is bay-bee!

4est_4est_Gump said:

No, "leaks" are saying that.

Click to expand...

97% of liberals agree...it's settled!

in case you forgot

Head NIGGER said

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016...ction-will-not-be-rigged-what-does-that-mean/

water505 said:

Who is saying they all agree?

Click to expand...

These
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/intelligence-community/members-of-the-ic

"The media has ignored the reality that Moscow’s possible hacking of DNC and Podesta’s emails were retaliation for Hillary Clinton’s assertions that Russian elections in 2011 were “rigged” – an accusation that infuriated Putin. When protests erupted in Russia over the election outcome, Putin blamed Clinton. “She said they were dishonest and unfair,” Putin said at the time. He accused then Secretary of State Clinton for giving “a signal” to demonstrators organized “with the support of the U.S. State Department…We need to safeguard ourselves from this interference in our internal affairs,” Putin said. Does this sound familiar? Turnabout is fair play, and Putin has made it clear that if we mess with his elections, he will mess with ours."









http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/12/12/sore-loser-obama-turns-to-russian-hacking-to-delegitimize-trumps-triumph.html

ifrtbttrflys said:

Why are figureheads in the CIA and the US intelligence community and President Obama absolutely mum about how invasively intense their hacking efforts are toward Russian political, cultural, economic and military interests?

Click to expand...

Duh! Lets go around actually telling 'potential' enemies and competitors we have the ability to hack them and are spying on their commercial traffic! Real sound military and intelligence thinking there!

People bitch about how the 5 Eyes spy on their own citizens. Can you imagine what intel they collect on potential and real enemies and economic competitors.

Canada role is to spy on Brazilian commercial traffic. I'm sure the others have their spheres of interest.

Do you think that the US should close down it's foreign intelligence service? How long before the CIA and NSA release intelligence of 'wrongdoing' by the administration that attempts that?!

MeeMie said:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/12/12/sore-loser-obama-turns-to-russian-hacking-to-delegitimize-trumps-triumph.html

Click to expand...

Sorry, chump. You can't bury the link in white text and a tiny font. Your shit was a C&P from a partisan OP-Ed.

"The media has ignored the reality that Moscow’s possible hacking of DNC and Podesta’s emails were retaliation for Hillary Clinton’s assertions that Russian elections in 2011 were “rigged” – an accusation that infuriated Putin. When protests erupted in Russia over the election outcome, Putin blamed Clinton. “She said they were dishonest and unfair,” Putin said at the time. He accused then Secretary of State Clinton for giving “a signal” to demonstrators organized “with the support of the U.S. State Department…We need to safeguard ourselves from this interference in our internal affairs,” Putin said. Does this sound familiar? Turnabout is fair play, and Putin has made it clear that if we mess with his elections, he will mess with ours."

Click to expand...

Why is Eeyore using an AV painted by a Portuguese prostate plunger?

about_average said:

These
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/intelligence-community/members-of-the-ic

Click to expand...

That's a list of government agencies and military branches and nothing else. Try again to directly answer the question.

4est_4est_Gump said:

My sources say that Assange hinted at a DNC insider who had it in for Clinton...





Maybe even Joe Biden!

2020 is just around the corner, and that's what hindsight is bay-bee!

Click to expand...

LMAO - "my sources say"

zipman said:

LMAO - "my sources say"

Click to expand...

How is that different than the pronouncements by the proven liars in the Obama Administration in general and Hillary Clinton specifically?

My sources for example say it's a lot harder to get guns into Mexico now that the Obama Administration is not actively encouraging the walking of illegal guns across the border.

Meanwhile

Niggerz

Dont

Care

D
N
C

Rigged shit vs Bernie

N

Fed

CuntClinton

Questions

B4

Debates

.....

Ten members of the College have made a formal request to the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, to supply more information on the relationship between Trump and Russia before they finalise their votes on December 19.


They said they are doing so to ‘investigate, discuss and deliberate with our colleagues about whom to vote for in the election’ and to help them decide if Trump is ‘fit to serve as President of the United States.’

Click to expand...

Wow. That's why so many read about american politics. Some more drama and excitement every week. This is James Bond movies stuff.

But regardless of Hillary (who's a lot worse)
their request seems pretty appropriate to me, given CIA's recent comments that Russia interfered with the US elections.

Heck with the lightweight "fake news" approach, the legendary CIA collaborator - The New York Times - has obviously decided that flat-out lying is now the way to go:

Russian Hackers Acted to Aid Trump in Election, U.S. Says
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/us/obama-russia-election-hack.html?_r=0

THE ONLY SOURCE which makes that claim is an anonymously-leaked CIA "secret" assessment.

In fact, the nation's highest intelligence authority - the Office of National Intelligence - specifically states they see no evidence of that anonymously-leaked CIA "secret" assessment being true. The FBI also says there is no actual evidence of it being true, even after the FBI conducted a FISA warrant investigation into any possible incriminating connections between Donald Trump, his associates, and the Russian government.

Why ever would the CIA "secretly" assess that Russia acted to influence an America presidential election which Hillary Clinton happened to lose?

Perhaps it has something to do with the CIA's involvement with then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's personal interference in Russian elections in 2011?

Keep in mind: this same "U.S." has 37 days to construct a full report covering everything about Russian hacking activities in this year's election and have it on President Obama's desk before he leaves office, an exercise which cannot conceivably be completed in that short time with any trace of precise and complete accountability - which obviously doesn't matter, anyway, since this report will remain "secret", too, with the only public commentary emitting from it being in the very same lying vein TNT is already publishing.

You people will fucking believe anything if it comes out of the mouth of a Democrat.

Please don't stop believing.

Lancecastor said:

.....

Click to expand...

This has as much to do with discussing and deliberating as the recount had to do with counting.

This is all about trying to delegitimize the election so that they can fire up their base for fundraising. Nothing more. They dined out forever on the Supreme Court telling them to shut the hell up and accept the results of the Bush v Gore.

The election already took into account anything that the public might care about who outed Clinton's and the DNC's own words. They already made the charges that the Russians are coming the Russians are coming before the election and the electorate rejected them.

If the Russians did it, how dare they show America what a slimy, two-faced lying politician that the election-rigging DNC was pushing. Heaven forfend America be able to make an actual, informed choice about her character.

water505 said:

You people will fucking believe anything if it comes out of the mouth of a Democrat.

Please don't stop believing.

Click to expand...

You will believe anything if it comes from the mouth of a Republican. And nothing from the mouth of a Democrat.

Please start thinking for yourself.

about_average said:

These
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/intelligence-community/members-of-the-ic

Click to expand...

poor below NIGGER average

REUTERS: Exclusive: Top U.S. spy agency has not embraced CIA assessment on Russia hacking – sources. Is there even a “CIA assessment?” I thought there were just anonymous sources within the CIA saying this, and that’s what this story (not the headline) says, too.

water505 said:

That's a list of government agencies and military branches and nothing else. Try again to directly answer the question.

Click to expand...

The Director of National Intelligence oversees all those agencies and they all report to him.

about_average said:

The Director of National Intelligence oversees all those agencies and they all report to him.

Click to expand...

And exactly what did he say?

Hard_Rom said:

You will believe anything if it comes from the mouth of a Republican. And nothing from the mouth of a Democrat.

Please start thinking for yourself.

Click to expand...

Okay, now that's funny.

You turned my words around to say something really stupid then tell me to think for myself.