The only thing they are good for is reality television...

[4est_4est_Gump]

There is nothing to look forward to other than the bloody spectacle of the debates (if her majesty deigns to stoop so low on her way to the coronation).

This writer pretty much nails the way I feel about the two candidates:

http://spectator.org/articles/66213/trump-or-not-trump

Read it or not, I do not give a shit.

 

[Saint Peter]

As much as it causes me immense pain to the very bottom of my core to admit this, I agree.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I thought it was about time for my ignore list winners to start waking up and putting in their $.02 worth...

 

[miles]

Why don't we see liberals condemning BOTH candidates the way so many conservatives do?

 

[pointless]

Why don't we see liberals condemning BOTH candidates the way so many conservatives do?

because you put them all on ignore.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Why don't we see liberals condemning BOTH candidates the way so many conservatives do?

The illogical lockstep of groupthink reenforced by the ignorance of hating everyone who refuses to conform to your rapidly evolving set of mores and values in order to promote the highest of virtues, tolerance and diversity.

 

[Saint Peter]

because you put them all on ignore.

No shit.

 

[miles]

The illogical lockstep of groupthink reenforced by the ignorance of hating everyone who refuses to conform to your rapidly evolving set of mores and values in order to promote the highest of virtues, tolerance and diversity.

You make them sound like Germans who supported The Nazi party.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You make them sound like Germans who supported The Nazi party.

No, they are fine outstanding citizens who support the National (Socialist) Democratic Party and the leadership of its divine Ruler, Hillary Clinton. When she says, I didn't do that, they nod their heads and say she didn't do that. Trump is a bit naive when he claims he could kill someone and get away with it when she is the one who has actually pulled it off.

 

[Saint Peter]

It is very convenient to be a "not republican" when things are not smelling like roses.

 

[Aglaopheme]

One can simply ignore the endless investigations carried out by the Republicans.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

One can simply ignore the endless investigations carried out by the Republicans.

Or the fact that State and Clinton did whatever it took to hide, destroy and even "lose" evidence while the Obama Administration whistled Dixie.



And thus an investigation thwarted, but restarted as evidence finally trickles in has morphed into "endless" and because of the short attention span of the average American never proved anything, even when it did. She said she didn't do any of that, therefore she didn't. Her lack of competence didn't kill anyone, it was a movie...

She's slicker than Willie!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The House Benghazi Select Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) was pleasantly surprised by the Obama administration on Thursday. After months of accusing the committee of hampering progress in the investigation for political reasons, the State Department has finally admitted it deserves the blame for the delayed findings.

The State Department’s review unit into documents uncovered by the Benghazi committee was supposed to be functional by June 2015, but the agency failed to make that target. State Department spokesman Mark Toner noted that Gowdy did his part, even helping to secure funds for the department to obtain the relevant records.

In a new statement, Gowdy was grateful for the acknowledgment.

"After years of frustrating delays by the State Department, and its refusal to answer questions about why it was taking so long to produce documents, I appreciate the Obama administration finally confirming the Benghazi Committee went the extra mile to complete its investigation as soon as possible by helping the State Department get extra funding," he said.

Yet, that doesn’t mean Gowdy isn’t frustrated with the administration’s unbearably slow pace in complying with the committee’s requests. For instance, the Defense Department has failed to approve witness testimonies that are critical to the investigation, the chairman told Politico.​

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...nghazi-committee-went-the-extra-mile-n2159074

 

[Aglaopheme]

What the article in Politico actually says

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trey-gowdy-benghazi-probe-222867

 

[Aglaopheme]

Surprisingly, it's doesn't resemble your post at all. I'm just not sure what happened in the translation there.

 

[Saint Peter]

Go easy on AJ!



iggy is one small click away

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Surprisingly, it's doesn't resemble your post at all. I'm just not sure what happened in the translation there.

Well, there is also an article on Politico detailing how Trump will win. So what?

Of course, their editorial policy leans towards the Democrats.

And since the FEC does too...

 

[miles]

No, they are fine outstanding citizens who support the National (Socialist) Democratic Party and the leadership of its divine Ruler, Hillary Clinton. When she says, I didn't do that, they nod their heads and say she didn't do that. Trump is a bit naive when he claims he could kill someone and get away with it when she is the one who has actually pulled it off.

Shhhhh....the bait is still in the water.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

 

[Disgustipated]

because you put them all on ignore.

I used to believe that but it's really just because he's an ignorant twat. Of course, putting those who disagree with him on iggy makes him even more ignorant.

 

[rosco rathbone]

There is nothing to look forward to other than the bloody spectacle of the debates (if her majesty deigns to stoop so low on her way to the coronation).

This writer pretty much nails the way I feel about the two candidates:

http://spectator.org/articles/66213/trump-or-not-trump

Read it or not, I do not give a shit.

Bit of a harsh realm for libertarians this election season, eh?

I"m sure it will all work out. After the angry-prole wing of the GOP is soundly chastized at the polls this year; they'll slink back to their barstools and shuttered machine-shops until the next Wallace or Buchanan comes along, about 2036 or so. Now is the time for all humble non-coms in the war of all against all to hunker down in the foxholes, ride out the coronation, and lay the groundwork for Ted's comeback.

 

[Saint Peter]

Keep those fuckers out of my machine shop.


There are enough bad haircuts in there the way it is.

 

[rosco rathbone]

government machine shop

 

[Saint Peter]

You want it when?

 

[Aglaopheme]

The House Benghazi Select Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) was pleasantly surprised by the Obama administration on Thursday. After months of accusing the committee of hampering progress in the investigation for political reasons, the State Department has finally admitted it deserves the blame for the delayed findings.

The State Department’s review unit into documents uncovered by the Benghazi committee was supposed to be functional by June 2015, but the agency failed to make that target. State Department spokesman Mark Toner noted that Gowdy did his part, even helping to secure funds for the department to obtain the relevant records.

In a new statement, Gowdy was grateful for the acknowledgment.

"After years of frustrating delays by the State Department, and its refusal to answer questions about why it was taking so long to produce documents, I appreciate the Obama administration finally confirming the Benghazi Committee went the extra mile to complete its investigation as soon as possible by helping the State Department get extra funding," he said.

Yet, that doesn’t mean Gowdy isn’t frustrated with the administration’s unbearably slow pace in complying with the committee’s requests. For instance, the Defense Department has failed to approve witness testimonies that are critical to the investigation, the chairman told Politico.​

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...nghazi-committee-went-the-extra-mile-n2159074

Well, there is also an article on Politico detailing how Trump will win. So what?

Of course, their editorial policy leans towards the Democrats.

And since the FEC does too...

The article you posted was a total, cited conservative skew of the Politico piece I linked.