Your take on the King hearings...

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

you know whats REALLY funny?

On INTERNAIONALS WOMANS DAY...2 days ago

Egyptian women were out protesting for rights and were BEATEN by EGYPTIAN MEN............and the same day the UN passed a RESOLUTION against ISRAEL vis a vis WOMEN

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

My take on the King hearings is that I simply don't know what he hopes they accomplish.

Approximately 99% of the Islam religion falls within two denominations, Sunni and Shia. Why would anyone be surprised that some unknown number of the 2.5 million American Muslims subscribe to the more radical teachings of the Koran?

We live in a country that tolerates, if not celebrates, the freedom to think, speak and advocate the most bizarre and hateful ideas including the very destruction of the country that invites the airing of those ideas. If King's hearings identify a population of radicalized American Muslims that is larger or smaller or about the same as one would expect, how would or should that change our commitment to religious freedom?

Since the wake up call of 9/11, the FBI and the nation's intelligence agencies have reorganized themselves and have worked tirelessly to keep us from harm. Sometimes they have been more lucky than good.

But I would be extremely surprised if the King hearings unveiled any great trend that the FBI is unaware of.

So what's the point?

It might be valuable if we could actually uncover the truth about the two Islams and that is not the Shia-Sunni split but the actual split in the Koran between how a Muslim (individual or community) behaves when he is weak and how he behaves when he is strong, and I do mean HE as the masculine, not the grammatically correct generic pronoun...

 

[Ishmael]

My take on the King hearings is that I simply don't know what he hopes they accomplish.

Approximately 99% of the Islam religion falls within two denominations, Sunni and Shia. Why would anyone be surprised that some unknown number of the 2.5 million American Muslims subscribe to the more radical teachings of the Koran?

We live in a country that tolerates, if not celebrates, the freedom to think, speak and advocate the most bizarre and hateful ideas including the very destruction of the country that invites the airing of those ideas. If King's hearings identify a population of radicalized American Muslims that is larger or smaller or about the same as one would expect, how would or should that change our commitment to religious freedom?

Since the wake up call of 9/11, the FBI and the nation's intelligence agencies have reorganized themselves and have worked tirelessly to keep us from harm. Sometimes they have been more lucky than good.

But I would be extremely surprised if the King hearings unveiled any great trend that the FBI is unaware of.

So what's the point?

A public exposure as to the extent of the problem is what he is attempting to accomplish. And perhaps an empowerment of those Muslim groups that truly believe in a peaceful, and secular, Islam. And by empowering I mean to elevate their voices so that they're heard above the noise front being thrown up by the naysayers and apologists. And in that respect King is performing a valuable service for those Muslims that actually don't want anything to do with the jihadists.

Ishmael

 

[busybody..]

Islamict terror protector CongressAsshole Ellison tearfully told a story yesterday at the hearings

made for greal play all over TV

only problem?

IT WASNT TRUE!

 

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

My take on the King hearings is that I simply don't know what he hopes they accomplish.

Approximately 99% of the Islam religion falls within two denominations, Sunni and Shia. Why would anyone be surprised that some unknown number of the 2.5 million American Muslims subscribe to the more radical teachings of the Koran?

So what's the point?

I love it how you and others opine on SUNNI-SHIT differences, as if it MEANS ANYTHING!

They want to kill us

They are doing all they can to do so

ALL? NO!

But we cant tell the diference, so ALL are suspect..........THE MORE WE SHINE A LIGHT ON EM, THE BETTER

Lemme give you a simple way of looking at SHIT -SUCKY brands of MOOSEFUCK "religon"....you may be too smart to get it

An ALPHA lion leading his pack, will attack another male lion that gets close to his pack......BUT THEY BOTH WILL ATTACK A HUMAN THAT GEST NEAR EM

Get it?

Stop with teh shit

SUNNI-SHITTY crap, THEY WANT US DEAD

 

[busybody..]

and you all outa stop with teh SHIT

WHAT DOES KING HOPE TO ACCOMPLISH?

If you have to AXE

YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM

 

[busybody..]

why INVESTIGATE stuff going on NOW

when we can investigate stuff from 4 decades ago???????????????


If you needed evidence some Democrats will never take the threat of Islamist terror seriously, look no further than Al Green.
KP: It's been reported that of all the 126 terror indictments all of have been Muslim. Do you think that should be considered in this particular hearing?

REP. Al GREEN:I think that all criminals should be prosecuted. I think that all terrorists should be investigated which is why I said we ought to investigate all of them and that would include the KKK. Over a hundred years of terrorism why not investigate them too. They are rooted in a religion as well. Check their website out. You’ll see.

KP: Congressman King said they haven’t caused as many problems and...

REP. GREEN:Well ask the men who have been castrated whether they caused a problem. Ask the men who were lynched whether they caused a problem.

KP:When did that happen recently, sir?

REP. GREEN: Does it have to happen recently, and they are still existing for us to investigate them?

If you never had to live with a cross burning, you don’t appreciate what a cross burning can do in terms of terrorizing people. My suspicion is, based on what you’re saying to me, that I should say to you, I hope you won’t defend the KKK.

KP: I don’t have any plans to, sir.

REP. GREEN: I hope you won’t defend the KKK.

KP: But I’m just...

REP. GREEN: I hope you won’t defend the KKK.

REP. GREEN: I hope you won’t defend the KKK.

KP: But I’m just curious...

REP. GREEN: I hope you are not going to defend the KKK.

KP: Of course not, sir.

REP. GREEN: Be as curious as you like, but do not defend the KKK.

KP: Of Course not sir. But are they still causing terror right now?

REP. GREEN: Do not defend the KKK.

REP. GREEN: Do not defend the KKK.

REP. GREEN: You’re newspaper is going to defend the KKK tomorrow, I see.

KP: Um no...but sir...

I don't see anyone anywhere defending the KKK. But some Democrats will obviously go to any length to avoid facing reality.

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Golden oldie day! but...but...Clinton!!

Should I then begin calling Bill and Hillary the leaders of the modern American-Irish "terrorist" movement?

"King played an absolutely huge role in getting the Clinton White House involved in the Irish peace negotiations and he never shirked the hard task of making Sinn Féin completely aware of what America needed from them."

Link above...

Peace is a gud thing, no?

How did we get to the point where we had Irish peace negotiations?

From talking.

"Talking with your enemies" is tantamount to "pallin' around with Terra-ists" on Planet Wingnut (Frisco_Slug_Esq, Ambassador Plenipotentiary).

p.s. I bet you got pudding panties at the opportunity to drag out your old retired "but...but...Clinton!" meme!

 

[busybody..]

Bill Bennett writes:

If one community is engaging in terrorism “at a greater rate” than the rest of the community; and if we are at war with or on the defensive against such terrorism; and if the secretary of homeland security states, The terrorist threat facing our country “may be at its most heightened state” since 9/11; and if the attorney general can say that “homegrown terror” is “one of the things that keeps me up at night,” why should there not be 10 hearings a year?

One last point as to why, perhaps, our civilian political leadership is now voicing so much concern. It’s a point most Americans do not know, but it is eye-popping: Al Qaeda is now practically an American-led franchise. The top three operational leaders of the top three al Qaeda organizations (al Qaeda in East Africa, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and al Qaeda Central) are all homegrown terrorists, from America, either born or naturalized here.

Let us dispense with the nonsense that the U.S. government or the House Committee on Homeland Security is targeting or discriminating against a minority. As I point out in a book I have coming out later this month, there is one reason, and one reason only, that any of us speak of Islam in the context of terrorism, even as we know that most Muslims are not terrorists: When an adherent of the Muslim faith engages in an act of terrorism, he explains (or shouts out) that he is acting in the name of Islam.

 

[busybody..]

Bill Bennett writes:

If one community is engaging in terrorism “at a greater rate” than the rest of the community; and if we are at war with or on the defensive against such terrorism; and if the secretary of homeland security states, The terrorist threat facing our country “may be at its most heightened state” since 9/11; and if the attorney general can say that “homegrown terror” is “one of the things that keeps me up at night,” why should there not be 10 hearings a year?

One last point as to why, perhaps, our civilian political leadership is now voicing so much concern. It’s a point most Americans do not know, but it is eye-popping: Al Qaeda is now practically an American-led franchise. The top three operational leaders of the top three al Qaeda organizations (al Qaeda in East Africa, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and al Qaeda Central) are all homegrown terrorists, from America, either born or naturalized here.

Let us dispense with the nonsense that the U.S. government or the House Committee on Homeland Security is targeting or discriminating against a minority. As I point out in a book I have coming out later this month, there is one reason, and one reason only, that any of us speak of Islam in the context of terrorism, even as we know that most Muslims are not terrorists: When an adherent of the Muslim faith engages in an act of terrorism, he explains (or shouts out) that he is acting in the name of Islam.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Liar]

Al Green will require the rigors of a re-education camp to turn on his lights enough to understand.

http://www.kalamu.com/bol/wp-content/content/images/al%20green%2028.jpg

Al Green says "What the hell are you talking about?"

 

[Liar]

What I want to know is:

Does the American citizen Abdullah Mohammed have any greater responsibility to denounce, root out and defeat Islamic Extremism than the American citizen Bob Smith?

Yes or no.

 

[koalabear]

What I want to know is:

Does the American citizen Abdullah Mohammed have any greater responsibility to denounce, root out and defeat Islamic Extremism than the American citizen Bob Smith?

Yes or no.

Where's he live?

 

[busybody..]

What I want to know is:

Does the American citizen Abdullah Mohammed have any greater responsibility to denounce, root out and defeat Islamic Extremism than the American citizen Bob Smith?

Yes or no.

Yes!

 

[unregistered]

 

[Liar]

Where's he live?

Cleveland. So he's been punished enough already.

 

[koalabear]

Cleveland. So he's been punished enough already.

That's a strong union town, he has it made.

 

[Liar]

What has Farrakhan done to denounce radical Islam? Oh wait, he is radical Islam.

Farrakhan is a UFO cult freak. Real Islamists don't even think he's Muslim.

 

[Liar]

That's a strong union town, he has it made.

Yeah but come on. Cleveland. I've been there. It's Limbo on earth.

 

[phrodeau]

Islamict terror protector CongressAsshole Ellison tearfully told a story yesterday at the hearings

made for greal play all over TV

only problem?

IT WASNT TRUE!

Yes, it was.

http://mediamatters.org/research/201103110017

 

[unregistered]

 

[Colonel Hogan]

I love it how you and others opine on SUNNI-SHIT differences, as if it MEANS ANYTHING!

They want to kill us

They are doing all they can to do so

ALL? NO!

But we cant tell the diference, so ALL are suspect..........THE MORE WE SHINE A LIGHT ON EM, THE BETTER

Lemme give you a simple way of looking at SHIT -SUCKY brands of MOOSEFUCK "religon"....you may be too smart to get it

An ALPHA lion leading his pack, will attack another male lion that gets close to his pack......BUT THEY BOTH WILL ATTACK A HUMAN THAT GEST NEAR EM

Get it?

Stop with teh shit

SUNNI-SHITTY crap, THEY WANT US DEAD

I love how you assert that there is no difference in the murderous intent of Sunni or Shia and then admit that all Muslims DON'T want to kill us, but that the critical fact is that we can't tell the difference.

All you've done in your 5.5 million posts, is repeatedly emphasize your belief that the lack of difference in physical appearance between two different people is more important to you than the factual difference between those people who want to kill you and those who don't.

You freely alternate between two lies of your own construction. One lie is that the person who doesn't want to kill you is actually lying himself and is secretly waiting for the perfect opportunity to knock you off.

The second lie is that even if the first person doesn't want to kill you, you're still entitled to kill him as an act of self-defense because of his physical resemblance to someone who does want to kill you.

Those are just two reasons why, if I have a passing interest in Islamic theology, I don't call you first.