Stella_Omega
No Gentleman
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Posts
- 39,700
Xssve is noted for his occasional incoherence. It's nothing personal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're the dipshit wanted to make it about Bush, and turn it into a little pissing contest based on that.
Nicely stated.
As for the fraternity, if any little punk shouted that sort of crap they were saying to me, I'd string him up by his balls. It would be fun.
But I wouldn't blame all fraternities, or all universities, or the world in general.
At any rate, this thread has certainly circled 'round and 'round and 'round. You wanna dance?
![]()
That's what the link said, I didn't say shit about Bush or fraternities, but all the sudden everybody gets defensive, flinging accusations around, sure I have issues with Fraternity punks, I don't "hate all fraternities" or whatever it is I'm being accused of, like I said, they're basically a bunch of fucking wannabe gangsters - the big difference here is these punks and being coddled and groomed for positions of power, they get away with shit for one reason: you let them.Umm, no. You're the one who put his name in your headline--and who zeroed in a story that has no particular meaning as a news story (anywhere--it already had no meaning on this Web site) without the name.
That's what the link said, I didn't say shit about Bush or fraternities.
You're just a one note Johnny on that.
Ya got me, the whole thing was ploy to get you to obsessively follow me around lit - guess it worked.
Goddamn you are one tedious motherfucker. You don't like it don't read it.
Same old shit, you out post everybody else in the thread by an order of magnitude, prattling about everything but the topic, lotsa words, but you never say anything, except make sure everybody knows you write dirty stories - how do you know I don't post under another name? I don't have to prove shit to you till the site owner tells me I have to, you need to just get off that one, we all heard it like a million fucking times.
Anyway, you're the one keeping at the top of the list, shut up and maybe it'll die a well deserved death.
You lonely man? I mean, I understand, but really, get a different hobby.
Okay, whoa, wait.
xssve started a thread called "Yale suspends Bush's fraternity." This mirrors many headlines that I found by googling the phrase "yale fraternity suspended." Also, if it wasn't in the headline, it was usually in the first couple of sentences. And this was across the board, at lots of sites. So, I'm willing to concede that nothing particularly against Bush was meant at the time.
Then, some people noted that as stupid, offensive, and idiotic as this was, it did not mean that every man who had been, or was, part of a fraternity was that stupid, offensive and idiotic. And that did not go over well with the OP or lovecraft.
Most of us felt that that some sort of punishment (honey and fire ants, anyone?) was warranted, and I, for one, am not at all disturbed by DKE losing their charter at Yale for whatever period of time it is.
Not enough, though. I guess we're all supposed to condemn any frat member for the terrible (and they were terrible) things that lc and xssve experienced. Even though some of us have had opposite experiences, or neutral experiences. And any noting of this means that we are coddling the privileged snobs, and may in fact be privileged snobs ourselves. Or privileged-snob enablers (PSEs).
Does that sound right?
Yeah, I just felt like poking at things this morning.![]()
Right, everybody hate you because you're beautiful.
Why are you hating on me then? I didn't do it, I'm all for the ERA, somebody else is blocking that legislation in committee, gee I wonder who?
You can hate on me all you want, hun, you all apparently think it's all some kind of popularity contest, ethics has nothing to do with it - you learn that in college too? What else did you major in besides ass kissing?
I just can't figure out why you're making excuses for 'em, must be some motivation.
I wasn’t interested in this, but as the thread kept returning, I finally read the original article. Now that I have, I’m surprised so much talk was expended on class. Had I read it on my own, the class angle would have barely registered. The article is about misogyny young women face, and it’s pretty deluded to think it’s limited to spoiled rich boys.
So they chanted obscenities against women and rated slu—sorry, female freshmen, on attractiveness. Totally unheard of in any other social stratum, right?
Instead of pretending it’s “those fuckers” who somehow perversely deviate from the respect for women everyone else so obviously holds, it's more interesting to me to note they barely did more than repeated a cultural message that’s practically ubiquitous.