Yale suspends Bush's Fraternity

You're the dipshit wanted to make it about Bush, and turn it into a little pissing contest based on that.

Umm, no. You're the one who put his name in your headline--and who zeroed in a story that has no particular meaning as a news story (anywhere--it already had no meaning on this Web site) without the name.
 
Nicely stated.

As for the fraternity, if any little punk shouted that sort of crap they were saying to me, I'd string him up by his balls. It would be fun.

But I wouldn't blame all fraternities, or all universities, or the world in general.

At any rate, this thread has certainly circled 'round and 'round and 'round. You wanna dance?

:)

I'd love to dance, but 'round and 'round has made me motion sick. ;)
 
Umm, no. You're the one who put his name in your headline--and who zeroed in a story that has no particular meaning as a news story (anywhere--it already had no meaning on this Web site) without the name.
That's what the link said, I didn't say shit about Bush or fraternities, but all the sudden everybody gets defensive, flinging accusations around, sure I have issues with Fraternity punks, I don't "hate all fraternities" or whatever it is I'm being accused of, like I said, they're basically a bunch of fucking wannabe gangsters - the big difference here is these punks and being coddled and groomed for positions of power, they get away with shit for one reason: you let them.

Happens every few years, and it's always the same thing, "boys will be boys", blah, blah.

But a false accusation, ah, everybody's prejudiced, it's all so fucking unfair, poor things so put upon.

It's called enabling, and you wonder why they dump chemicals into your water, and come up with torture memos, crash the fucking economy and throw people out into the street - they're trained to do it.

Like I said, I wouldn't have even said anything if you all hadn't started reading all this shit into it, and going on the defensive - you made this interesting, I had no idea there was all this psychodrama lurking beneath the surface.

But you wanted to talk about it - now we talked.
 
That's what the link said, I didn't say shit about Bush or fraternities.

Umm, no once again. You are the one who chose to post it here and who composed the title of the thread--not the link. Have no idea why you are so embarrassed about admitting you were posting a provocative political thread on a porn writer's board just to get a rise. Guess you don't like having your irrelevance and impotence pointed out.

It wasn't the link that posted and titled this here--it quite clearly was you.

And, for the record, I went to snooty university with one of the worst reputations for fraternities (which almost everyone joined), but I didn't join one. But when I saw a frat guy, I assessed him for what I saw individually not because either that he was a frat member or that some politician was a member of his frat forty years ago. It would be silly to do that.
 
You're just a one note Johnny on that, that was what the link I followed to that story said, "Bush's fraternity suspended", you decided it was all some sort of smear, so I said what the hell, you want dots, here's some more - now it's fucking smear, I got no problem with that, deal with it shithead, I think he's a goddamn human trafficking child molester, could really give a shit about whatever bullshit misogynistic crap people like that have to do to get over their fear of women.

So there ya go, you can quit wheedling me about "inferences, that's an accusation, nothing subtle about it.
 
You're just a one note Johnny on that.

That's because it's the one note that's relevant--and that you slide away from and avoid addressing. :D

I'm addressing what you flat out posted. You, not some link somewhere.

Take ownership of your OP and for the obvious reason you posted it. To create mischief on a board you have no business to be on in the first place.

(And before you get around to idiotically accusing me of being a Bush Jr. hugger, as Lovecraft has done, check out how I've been referring to him on this board for years--Bush the Lesser--giving a contrast to his father, who wasn't a half-bad president, but who I didn't vote for, never having voted for a Republican in my life.)
 
Last edited:
Ya got me, the whole thing was ploy to get you to obsessively follow me around lit - guess it worked.
 
Someone mentioned the term "terminally stupid" on another thread in relation to these duped Rapture folks, xssve. I submit that this is exactly what you are being on your point that some link made you post this thread.
 
Goddamn you are one tedious motherfucker. You don't like it don't read it.

Same old shit, you out post everybody else in the thread by an order of magnitude, prattling about everything but the topic, lotsa words, but you never say anything, except make sure everybody knows you write dirty stories - how do you know I don't post under another name? I don't have to prove shit to you till the site owner tells me I have to, you need to just get off that one, we all heard it like a million fucking times.

Anyway, you're the one keeping at the top of the list, shut up and maybe it'll die a well deserved death.

You lonely man? I mean, I understand, but really, get a different hobby.
 
Goddamn you are one tedious motherfucker. You don't like it don't read it.

Same old shit, you out post everybody else in the thread by an order of magnitude, prattling about everything but the topic, lotsa words, but you never say anything, except make sure everybody knows you write dirty stories - how do you know I don't post under another name? I don't have to prove shit to you till the site owner tells me I have to, you need to just get off that one, we all heard it like a million fucking times.

Anyway, you're the one keeping at the top of the list, shut up and maybe it'll die a well deserved death.

You lonely man? I mean, I understand, but really, get a different hobby.

Nope, not responsve. Still playing the avoidance game and not facing up to your inanity, irrelevance to this Web site, and political impotence. ;)
 
Really, you need to get out more or something.

You're right about one thing though, it is an exercise in futility to do much about it now, the window of opportunity is about closed up, you dropped the fuckin' ball, nothing left now but wait for the bodies to start piling up.

It would be funny if it weren't so tragic.
 
Nope, still irrelevant to anything on this thread. Trying the old shell game, are we?
 
Okay, whoa, wait.

xssve started a thread called "Yale suspends Bush's fraternity." This mirrors many headlines that I found by googling the phrase "yale fraternity suspended." Also, if it wasn't in the headline, it was usually in the first couple of sentences. And this was across the board, at lots of sites. So, I'm willing to concede that nothing particularly against Bush was meant at the time.

Then, some people noted that as stupid, offensive, and idiotic as this was, it did not mean that every man who had been, or was, part of a fraternity was that stupid, offensive and idiotic. And that did not go over well with the OP or lovecraft.

Most of us felt that that some sort of punishment (honey and fire ants, anyone?) was warranted, and I, for one, am not at all disturbed by DKE losing their charter at Yale for whatever period of time it is.

Not enough, though. I guess we're all supposed to condemn any frat member for the terrible (and they were terrible) things that lc and xssve experienced. Even though some of us have had opposite experiences, or neutral experiences. And any noting of this means that we are coddling the privileged snobs, and may in fact be privileged snobs ourselves. Or privileged-snob enablers (PSEs).

Does that sound right?

Yeah, I just felt like poking at things this morning. :)
 
Okay, whoa, wait.

xssve started a thread called "Yale suspends Bush's fraternity." This mirrors many headlines that I found by googling the phrase "yale fraternity suspended." Also, if it wasn't in the headline, it was usually in the first couple of sentences. And this was across the board, at lots of sites. So, I'm willing to concede that nothing particularly against Bush was meant at the time.

Then, some people noted that as stupid, offensive, and idiotic as this was, it did not mean that every man who had been, or was, part of a fraternity was that stupid, offensive and idiotic. And that did not go over well with the OP or lovecraft.

Most of us felt that that some sort of punishment (honey and fire ants, anyone?) was warranted, and I, for one, am not at all disturbed by DKE losing their charter at Yale for whatever period of time it is.

Not enough, though. I guess we're all supposed to condemn any frat member for the terrible (and they were terrible) things that lc and xssve experienced. Even though some of us have had opposite experiences, or neutral experiences. And any noting of this means that we are coddling the privileged snobs, and may in fact be privileged snobs ourselves. Or privileged-snob enablers (PSEs).

Does that sound right?

Yeah, I just felt like poking at things this morning. :)

Poke all you want hon, believe it or not I don't take any of this to heart. Opinions vary and a lot of that variance does hinge on personal experience. Not every frat kid is a dink. RI is a small state and RIC and PC have frats that are just goofball kids having some fun. Brown does have some Ivy league snots but is a bit more education based than a couple of it's Ivy cousins like Yale Now URI on the other hand has had major frat issues including arrests for horrendous hazings and some really bad alcohol issues. This is the school my daughter is in hence my "frat rule"

However, as i said and will do again. Fraternities are clubs that are based on like minded individuals. In the very elite schools these consist of "pure breds" and you best do and say exactly what the fool next to you does. Which is what their daddy's and daddy's daddy's said and did. I find it ironic that the alleged best of the best are the worlds biggest lemmings.

I think it is safe to assume every kid in that particular frat is an elitist chauvinistic dick. Just like good old GB is. But back in the day info like this was squashed because back in the propaganda days we were not allowed to know that the "cream of the crop" could still contain "the bottom of the barrel." The media would not "embarrass the rich with their own behavior.

Think about this; Clinton goes through all this crap because he got a blowjob. Okay well that to me is between him and Hilary. Now my lady what do you think was going on during "Camelot" JFk was fucking Marylin right on the desk in the oval office but hey we didn't know about that back then.

Said it before will say it again. What I see in these kids is no different than the attitude exhibited by the IMF asshole that everyone is (rightly) crucifying. America has more than it's share of hotshots who are above the law. Just most of ours are in the entertainment industry.

These kids got caught with their pants down as did Yale who knows damn well this has been going down. It's about time and it is well deserved negative publicity. All I am saying is they got what they deserved and people need to look beyond money and social status because these little cockheads are living breathing proof it does not buy class.

On another note I have been very well behaved here because it has taken and act of will not to pick yet another fight with Mr Perfect good old SR who is as cutting edge as my mom's meatloaf but thinks he is some type of unique individual who has seen and done it all and is never wrong. I will let "X" deal with him this time.
 
Right, everybody hate you because you're beautiful.

Why are you hating on me then? I didn't do it, I'm all for the ERA, somebody else is blocking that legislation in committee, gee I wonder who?

You can hate on me all you want, hun, you all apparently think it's all some kind of popularity contest, ethics has nothing to do with it - you learn that in college too? What else did you major in besides ass kissing?

I just can't figure out why you're making excuses for 'em, must be some motivation.

It's easier to go with the flow than swim upstream. I agree though not sure why anyone is defending these rednecks in suits. They all got caught and as for the "good ones" I am sure they exist but not in that frat because they would not be allowed in it if they did not have those beliefs.

I mean aren't frat boys "brothers" don;t they all stick together? Well then they all fall together.

Confusing thing about "sweetsub" is the comment of stringing someone like that up by the balls. Well then string them all up then because every little prick in that frat house was doing this. And you don;t have to be a brainiac to know GB has these beliefs but just never got caught like this.
 
You are so totally missing the point. No one is trying to excuse these guys. All we're saying is that just because those guys did it, doesn't mean every guy in a (not THE, but A) frat is like that.

However, it appears that you think only your experiences with this group are valid, so never mind.
 
I wasn’t interested in this, but as the thread kept returning, I finally read the original article. Now that I have, I’m surprised so much talk was expended on class. Had I read it on my own, the class angle would have barely registered. The article is about misogyny young women face, and it’s pretty deluded to think it’s limited to spoiled rich boys.

So they chanted obscenities against women and rated slu—sorry, female freshmen, on attractiveness. Totally unheard of in any other social stratum, right?

Instead of pretending it’s “those fuckers” who somehow perversely deviate from the respect for women everyone else so obviously holds, it's more interesting to me to note they barely did more than repeated a cultural message that’s practically ubiquitous.
 
I wasn’t interested in this, but as the thread kept returning, I finally read the original article. Now that I have, I’m surprised so much talk was expended on class. Had I read it on my own, the class angle would have barely registered. The article is about misogyny young women face, and it’s pretty deluded to think it’s limited to spoiled rich boys.

So they chanted obscenities against women and rated slu—sorry, female freshmen, on attractiveness. Totally unheard of in any other social stratum, right?

Instead of pretending it’s “those fuckers” who somehow perversely deviate from the respect for women everyone else so obviously holds, it's more interesting to me to note they barely did more than repeated a cultural message that’s practically ubiquitous.

Yeah, what Verdad said. :)
 
Back
Top