Wuhan Flu update.

[Rightguide]

Here's an eye opener that might break out into the public view soon:

Why Was News of India’s Success With Ivermectin Suppressed?
Billions of dollars are at stake, not just for the mRNA vaccine makers, but for efforts to develop new antiviral drugs, ones that can be patented and sold at a significant markup.
By Benjamin Braddock

June 20, 2021

"Early in the pandemic, Wagstaff and a team of researchers at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia conducted cell culture experiments to see if Ivermectin might be a useful therapy in the war on COVID. Their findings blew away all expectations.

Ivermectin halted the replication of the virus and completely eradicated it from the cell culture in under 48 hours. Their findings were released on April 3, 2020. Since then the findings have been replicated in over 60 trials and natural experiments, including 31 randomized control trials. Most of the suffering could have been avoided, but the bureaucrats who run our public health establishments condemned hundreds of thousands of Americans to death.

India’s surge was over in a matter of weeks. India’s doctors and public health authorities responded much more effectively and intelligently than our own. India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare revised its guidelines on April 28 to include a recommendation that asymptomatic and mild cases be treated with Ivermectin. Along with the government, the Indian Council of Medical Research and AIIMS, Delhi (India’s premier medical college and hospital), and many state government and health authorities also bucked World Health Organization recommendations and urged the use of Ivermectin. Since then, case counts have declined in Delhi by 99 percent, in Uttar Pradesh by 98 percent, in Uttarakhand by 97 percent, and in Goa by 90 percent.

Why would this information be suppressed by our media outlets? Well, under the FDA’s rules, an emergency use authorization (EUA) like the ones given for the three main experimental gene therapy vaccines can only remain in force so long as there is not a superior alternative therapy available. When you consider that the absolute risk reduction from taking Ivermectin as a COVID prophylaxis is far superior to that of the products from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, the justification for administering these experimental treatments disappears."

https://amgreatness.com/2021/06/20/why-was-news-of-indias-success-with-ivermectin-suppressed/

Here is an additional study on Ivermectin:

https://journals.lww.com/americanth...in_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

 

[Lazaran]

.
Ivermectin, the new Hydroxychloroquine for suckers.

Also not recommended for the treatment or prevention of Covid-19.

Next???

 

[quietlylooking]

I'm gong to assume "HCL" used in several posts above is referring to hydroxychloroquine and not hydrochloric acid (HCl) or hypochlorous acid (a relative of bleach), etc. (those might be good at killing the viruses on surfaces but should not be taken internally).

An overwhelming number of the studies and meta-analyses published in the scientific literature which looked at the effect of hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19 outcomes did not find evidence of benefit. This is just the tip of the iceberg:

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/11/2503

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899036/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20477724.2021.1936818

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590098621000063?via=ihub

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40744-021-00315-x.pdf

https://ascpt********library.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/cts.13001

http://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC7384270&blobtype=pdf

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2022926


If you look hard, you can find a few studies in which there might be some evidence of benefit in a small subset of the population or in some non-randomized or otherwise less rigorous studies:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20477724.2021.1936818?journalCode=ypgh20

 

[quietlylooking]

Here's an eye opener that might break out into the public view soon:

Why Was News of India’s Success With Ivermectin Suppressed?
Billions of dollars are at stake, not just for the mRNA vaccine makers, but for efforts to develop new antiviral drugs, ones that can be patented and sold at a significant markup.
By Benjamin Braddock

June 20, 2021

"Early in the pandemic, Wagstaff and a team of researchers at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia conducted cell culture experiments to see if Ivermectin might be a useful therapy in the war on COVID. Their findings blew away all expectations.

Ivermectin halted the replication of the virus and completely eradicated it from the cell culture in under 48 hours. Their findings were released on April 3, 2020. Since then the findings have been replicated in over 60 trials and natural experiments, including 31 randomized control trials. Most of the suffering could have been avoided, but the bureaucrats who run our public health establishments condemned hundreds of thousands of Americans to death.

India’s surge was over in a matter of weeks. India’s doctors and public health authorities responded much more effectively and intelligently than our own. India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare revised its guidelines on April 28 to include a recommendation that asymptomatic and mild cases be treated with Ivermectin. Along with the government, the Indian Council of Medical Research and AIIMS, Delhi (India’s premier medical college and hospital), and many state government and health authorities also bucked World Health Organization recommendations and urged the use of Ivermectin. Since then, case counts have declined in Delhi by 99 percent, in Uttar Pradesh by 98 percent, in Uttarakhand by 97 percent, and in Goa by 90 percent.

Why would this information be suppressed by our media outlets? Well, under the FDA’s rules, an emergency use authorization (EUA) like the ones given for the three main experimental gene therapy vaccines can only remain in force so long as there is not a superior alternative therapy available. When you consider that the absolute risk reduction from taking Ivermectin as a COVID prophylaxis is far superior to that of the products from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, the justification for administering these experimental treatments disappears."

https://amgreatness.com/2021/06/20/why-was-news-of-indias-success-with-ivermectin-suppressed/

Here is an additional study on Ivermectin:

https://journals.lww.com/americanth...in_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

Here's another take on the ivermectin meta-analysis cited above.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/iv...ermectin-is-the-new-hydroxychloroquine-take-2


It would be fantastic if a drug already on the market (in addition to corticosteroids) were found to be truly effective against COVID-19 or or its complications. But I don't think it's going to be ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine.

 

[HisArpy]

I'm gong to assume "HCL" used in several posts above is referring to hydroxychloroquine and not hydrochloric acid (HCl) or hypochlorous acid (a relative of bleach), etc. (those might be good at killing the viruses on surfaces but should not be taken internally).

An overwhelming number of the studies and meta-analyses published in the scientific literature which looked at the effect of hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19 outcomes did not find evidence of benefit. This is just the tip of the iceberg:

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/11/2503

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7899036/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20477724.2021.1936818

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590098621000063?via=ihub

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40744-021-00315-x.pdf

https://ascpt********library.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/cts.13001

http://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC7384270&blobtype=pdf

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2022926


If you look hard, you can find a few studies in which there might be some evidence of benefit in a small subset of the population or in some non-randomized or otherwise less rigorous studies:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20477724.2021.1936818?journalCode=ypgh20

All of that piggybacks on the "there's no benefit" narrative. It ignores the empirical evidence complied at the time. It ignores the Nov 2020 synthesis of 127 STUDIES on the use of HydroxyChloroquine which determined that the drug was OF benefit to patients if used early enough. And it also ignores the most recent study (as of April 2021) which determined that if HydroxyChloroquine is used as an early treatment, it's efficacy is 100%.


You see, the problem is that Trump touted it so the anti-Trump faction of the world immediately dunked on it and "declared" that it was worthless and then banned the use of it for Covid. Something we're just now learning was complete bullshit. Bullshit that had led directly to the deaths of thousands around the globe in the effort to minimize Trump, hopefully get rid of him, while in actuality committing genocide.

And you still want to keep on hyping the same material and sites as your source to say the same old crapola - Trump endorsed it so it's bad.

 

[HisArpy]

.
Ivermectin, the new Hydroxychloroquine for suckers.

Also not recommended for the treatment or prevention of Covid-19.

Next???

Still waiting on your book deal?

 

[Philthy_Phil]

I see the baby killer's thread is still going strong.

 

[HisArpy]

I see the baby killer's thread is still going strong.

^ still hasn't found somebody to love, love, love, love, love...

 

[rockcasbah]

India is having success?

Which Internet are you using?

Here's an eye opener that might break out into the public view soon:

Why Was News of India’s Success With Ivermectin Suppressed?
Billions of dollars are at stake, not just for the mRNA vaccine makers, but for efforts to develop new antiviral drugs, ones that can be patented and sold at a significant markup.
By Benjamin Braddock

June 20, 2021

"Early in the pandemic, Wagstaff and a team of researchers at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia conducted cell culture experiments to see if Ivermectin might be a useful therapy in the war on COVID. Their findings blew away all expectations.

Ivermectin halted the replication of the virus and completely eradicated it from the cell culture in under 48 hours. Their findings were released on April 3, 2020. Since then the findings have been replicated in over 60 trials and natural experiments, including 31 randomized control trials. Most of the suffering could have been avoided, but the bureaucrats who run our public health establishments condemned hundreds of thousands of Americans to death.

India’s surge was over in a matter of weeks. India’s doctors and public health authorities responded much more effectively and intelligently than our own. India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare revised its guidelines on April 28 to include a recommendation that asymptomatic and mild cases be treated with Ivermectin. Along with the government, the Indian Council of Medical Research and AIIMS, Delhi (India’s premier medical college and hospital), and many state government and health authorities also bucked World Health Organization recommendations and urged the use of Ivermectin. Since then, case counts have declined in Delhi by 99 percent, in Uttar Pradesh by 98 percent, in Uttarakhand by 97 percent, and in Goa by 90 percent.

Why would this information be suppressed by our media outlets? Well, under the FDA’s rules, an emergency use authorization (EUA) like the ones given for the three main experimental gene therapy vaccines can only remain in force so long as there is not a superior alternative therapy available. When you consider that the absolute risk reduction from taking Ivermectin as a COVID prophylaxis is far superior to that of the products from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, the justification for administering these experimental treatments disappears."

https://amgreatness.com/2021/06/20/why-was-news-of-indias-success-with-ivermectin-suppressed/

Here is an additional study on Ivermectin:

https://journals.lww.com/americanth...in_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

 

[BBCfan]

So reviving this with MY Wuhan conspiracy theory.

What has completely disappeared from the news that was the biggest threat to the Chinese Communist dictatorship flourishing and expanding where possible, especially in China?

Definitely the riots in Hong Kong. They completely dissipated when Wuhan flu arrived.

Seems obvious the Wuhan lab engineered a strain that would be released in Hong Kong to quell the rising voice of freedom and change.

Problem was they underestimated it's contagion abilities and it was accidentally released in Wuhan 1st.

They also had help from North Korean as well.

Remember...you heard it here first!!!

My internet crashed while typing this...no shit...OH SHIT!

 

[Rightguide]

I wonder what the ramifications for for updates on the Wuhan Theory will be when the full scope and meaning of this event are known, Oh my, the possibilities of a whole range of understanding may soon become known:

EXCLUSIVE: Chinese Defector's Identity Confirmed, Was Top Counterintelligence Official
By Jennifer Van Laar | Jun 17, 2021 8:00 PM ET

https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2021...ficial-n398374

 

[BBCfan]

I wonder what the ramifications for for updates on the Wuhan Theory will be when the full scope and meaning of this event are known, Oh my, the possibilities of a whole range of understanding may soon become known:

EXCLUSIVE: Chinese Defector's Identity Confirmed, Was Top Counterintelligence Official
By Jennifer Van Laar | Jun 17, 2021 8:00 PM ET

https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2021...ficial-n398374

Link didn't work for me. Found story but didn't see it on any so called legitimate news sites. Would be cool if it was true.

Just to be clear. I like Chinese people very much.

Not to be confused with the insidious as fuck Communist dictatorship party that is now forgoing any semblance of fair elections going forward.

 

[HisArpy]

Uh oh. You lab leak deniers need to start paying attention.


China deleted early test data that shows that CV was circulating much earlier than previously thought

 

[BBCfan]

Uh oh. You lab leak deniers need to start paying attention.


China deleted early test data that shows that CV was circulating much earlier than previously thought

not surprised AT ALL. The dam of lies begins to crumble!!? Seems my Alien source was right!

 

[Lazaran]

.
Harpy apparently can't differentiate between an intelligent person waiting for proof of the origin of Covid and "lab leak deniers". Intelligent people are STILL waiting for definitive proof. The newly retrieved deleted sequences change nothing.

I actually can't remember anyone posting that they accepted China's account of the Covid outbreak, and everyone from Dr. Fauci to President Biden has been critical of China's lack of transparency from the get go.

I do seem to recall however, that the traitor in chief praised China's handling of the Covid outbreak 15 times, even as scientists were asking China for more access to material and data.

Another attempt at rewriting history by a Deplorable fails in epic fashion.

No surprise there.

 

[rockcasbah]

You guys should send me your wives’ email addresses so i can ask them to talk to you about this stuff at home. Or at least to pretend to listen.

Grown men of your age should be arguing on the internet about synthetic versus dino-oil and your favorite lesbians…. You know, the important stuff.

 

[BBCfan]

.
Harpy apparently can't differentiate between an intelligent person waiting for proof of the origin of Covid and "lab leak deniers". Intelligent people are STILL waiting for definitive proof. The newly retrieved deleted sequences change nothing.

I actually can't remember anyone posting that they accepted China's account of the Covid outbreak, and everyone from Dr. Fauci to President Biden has been critical of China's lack of transparency from the get go.

I do seem to recall however, that the traitor in chief praised China's handling of the Covid outbreak 15 times, even as scientists were asking China for more access to material and data.

Another attempt at rewriting history by a Deplorable fails in epic fashion.

No surprise there.

I can't see how there will ever be definitive proof where China is involved unless a whistle blower exists or leaked info comes out.

Bloom(scientist in article) seems very sure that it DIDN'T originate in wet market.

Deleted data that is part of a cover up points to some kind of shenanigans of a very sinister nature.

1+1=2 ...where there's smoke there's fire...etc.

If there's no "absolute proof" we just let it slide this time? Haven't people been convicted with less evidence or a least charged with interfering in the course of an investigation?

I'm not suggesting a witch hunt but some kind of international actions must be put forward to make Chinese Communist dictatorship accountable in some way, even if just for the obvious cover up of "something".

They will NEVER admit anything by choice.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

.
Harpy apparently can't differentiate between an intelligent person waiting for proof of the origin of Covid and "lab leak deniers". Intelligent people are STILL waiting for definitive proof. The newly retrieved deleted sequences change nothing.

I actually can't remember anyone posting that they accepted China's account of the Covid outbreak, and everyone from Dr. Fauci to President Biden has been critical of China's lack of transparency from the get go.

I do seem to recall however, that the traitor in chief praised China's handling of the Covid outbreak 15 times, even as scientists were asking China for more access to material and data.

Another attempt at rewriting history by a Deplorable fails in epic fashion.

No surprise there.

If he were an actual lawyer he would abide by your first paragraph too. Perhaps more of what you wrote too, but I got bored and stopped reading it.

 

[BBCfan]

You guys should send me your wives’ email addresses so i can ask them to talk to you about this stuff at home. Or at least to pretend to listen.

Grown men of your age should be arguing on the internet about synthetic versus dino-oil and your favorite lesbians…. You know, the important stuff.

haha...indeed...I'm a loser baby.

 

[BBCfan]

This best sums up the Wuhan Lab " conspiracy" idea for me...funny as fuck too.

https://youtu.be/sSfejgwbDQ8

 

[rockcasbah]

Americans rarely find anything Canadian to be of any real interest, but fluspiracy buffs might enjoy digging around in this:

Canadian scientist sent deadly viruses to Wuhan lab months before RCMP asked to investigate

Xiangguo Qiu, her biologist husband and her students have not returned to work at the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg, after being escorted out in July 2019. The RCMP is still investigating a possible 'policy breach' reported by the Public Health Agency of Canada. (CBC)

The manifests of what was sent haven't been made public, but at the time the story was about Ebola and possibly other viruses sent from a Canadian Government lab to the Wuhan lab....without Canadian Government knowledge or permission.

Since then, the story's had a lid on it for national security reasons.

 

[BBCfan]

Americans rarely find anything Canadian to be of any real interest, but fluspiracy buffs might enjoy digging around in this:




The manifests of what was sent haven't been made public, but at the time the story was about Ebola and possibly other viruses sent from a Canadian Government lab to the Wuhan lab....without Canadian Government knowledge or permission.

Since then, the story's had a lid on it for national security reasons.

Saw that one recently...made me a bit paranoid my Chinese neighbours might be spies... but she is pretty hot, so then a James Bond spy fuck scenario popped in my head... too bad I got no info to swap for hot spy sex.

 

[HisArpy]

NIH Deleted Data on Early Wuhan COVID Cases at Request of Chinese Researchers

 

[quietlylooking]

NIH Deleted Data on Early Wuhan COVID Cases at Request of Chinese Researchers

For more details on this, read here:


"In a preprint published on bioRxiv, Fred Hutch's Dr. Jesse Bloom reported his discovery of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from early in the Wuhan outbreak that had been deleted from a National Institutes of Health database. In a complementary Twitter thread, he explained how he found and reconstructed 34 of these sequences and what he learned from his analysis of them.

He wrote that the sequences support other lines of evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was circulating in Wuhan before the December 2019 outbreak in a seafood market. They do not provide evidence either for or against either a natural animal origin for the virus or an accidental lab leak. More early sequences are probably out there, he wrote, and scientists should focus on identifying them and analyzing all available data to determine the origins of the pandemic. "

 

[bellisarius]

For more details on this, read here:


"In a preprint published on bioRxiv, Fred Hutch's Dr. Jesse Bloom reported his discovery of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from early in the Wuhan outbreak that had been deleted from a National Institutes of Health database. In a complementary Twitter thread, he explained how he found and reconstructed 34 of these sequences and what he learned from his analysis of them.

He wrote that the sequences support other lines of evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was circulating in Wuhan before the December 2019 outbreak in a seafood market. They do not provide evidence either for or against either a natural animal origin for the virus or an accidental lab leak. More early sequences are probably out there, he wrote, and scientists should focus on identifying them and analyzing all available data to determine the origins of the pandemic. "

This starts to tie in with the Nov. hospitalization of three lab workers.

But as the quotes states, it does not prove anything one way or the other.