Wuhan Flu update.

[Sean]

It says right on it why it was redacted.

A possible criminal investigation. That's it. Investigation into what? By whom?

 

[Rightguide]

A possible criminal investigation. That's it. Investigation into what? By whom?

The exemption "claims" an investigation:

"Thus, as a general rule, exemption 7(A) may be invoked so long as the law enforcement proceeding involved remains pending."

Into what and who is the question the redaction exemption conceals. We don't know. It is believed by some that it concerns an ongoing criminal investigation into the likelihood that Daszak was running a campaign to bury the lab leak theory. I only posted the Mail article to provide background on Daszak.

 

[Sean]

The exemption "claims" an investigation:

"Thus, as a general rule, exemption 7(A) may be invoked so long as the law enforcement proceeding involved remains pending."

Into what and who is the question the redaction exemption conceals. We don't know. It is believed by some that it concerns an ongoing criminal investigation into the likelihood that Daszak was running a campaign to bury the lab leak theory. I only posted the Mail article to provide background on Daszak.

So your smoking gun is what? "it is believed by some"? Fuck off.

 

[Lazaran]

A possible criminal investigation. That's it. Investigation into what? By whom?

RotGut believes there was a crime committed because Dr. Fauci agreed with Dr. Daszak that the virus was most likely naturally occurring and not engineered in a lab(which is also the current concensus among scientists) and that the outbreak was not the result of a safety breach at the Wuhan lab(which is currently still the accepted scenario).

Because Dr.Fauci didn't(and won't) engage in conspiracy theories, RotGut is declaring Dr. Fauci and Dr. Daszak are guilty of "something". With the revelation that three Wuhan lab researcher were ill with "something" in November of 2019, the "Q" berts have ended their investigation and pronounced judgement: The virus was made in the Wuhan Lab, and it was intentionally released by China.

That's the Deplorable scientific method and legal system in a nutshell.

 

[Rightguide]

So your smoking gun is what? "it is believed by some"? Fuck off.

The smoking gun is the redaction of email content from Daszak to Fauci, that is stated to be the subject of a criminal investigation. Obviously one has to be sober to understand the implication of it all, so maybe you'll have to read about it in the future, and hopefully by then you'll have enough memory left to recall you heard it here first.

 

[jomar]

There were no "high crimes or misdemeanors," Nancy cannot make up new law or unique interpretations of the Constitution for political gain. The Senate agreed.

Apparently, whenever a jury (the Senate in this case) gives it's verdict based on the evidence presented to it; if you disagree with it, it's "wrong" instead of "correct."

...

The senate agreed to ignore any evidence and to vote no no matter what and pretty much said that’s what they were doing.

But hey, looking back the insurrection was actually more like a normal visiting day, right?

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Can Fauci and Daszck even be tried for the same crimes?

 

[Rightguide]

The senate agreed to ignore any evidence and to vote no no matter what and pretty much said that’s what they were doing.

The Senate in both cases decided to recognize with their vote, the non-evidence.

 

[Sean]

The smoking gun is the redaction of email content from Daszak to Fauci, that is stated to be the subject of a criminal investigation. Obviously one has to be sober to understand the implication of it all, so maybe you'll have to read about it in the future, and hopefully by then you'll have enough memory left to recall you heard it here first.

Do you realise how fucking insane you sound? Seriously? Your evidence is the lack of evidence?

 

[jomar]

The Senate in both cases decided to recognize with their vote, the non-evidence.

Ok, hang your hat on that then, lol

 

[Pookie]

I see you're still sick and afraid. You need a hijab.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif

 

[HisArpy]

The senate agreed to ignore any evidence and to vote no no matter what and pretty much said that’s what they were doing.

Cite?


You're as bad as Pookie in that what you WANT to believe is rarely what IS but, also like Pookie, that never stops you from shoving your foot down your own throat.

So, either post some sort of citation to a "statement" from "the Senate" (and not some do-rag leftist leaning publication offering a totally biased opinion) that supports your contention or STFU.

 

[HisArpy]

Do you realise how fucking insane you sound? Seriously? Your evidence is the lack of evidence?

No Archie, his evidence is the existence of an email on the subject. That the email was redacted in part due to an ongoing criminal investigation doesn't change the fact that it exists.

 

[Pookie]

Cite?


You're as bad as Pookie in that what you WANT to believe is rarely what IS but, also like Pookie, that never stops you from shoving your foot down your own throat.
.

Oh, the irony.

 

[rockcasbah]

Were the emails on the Clinton server in Benghazi?

 

[jomar]

Cite?

You're as bad as Pookie in that what you WANT to believe is rarely what IS but, also like Pookie, that never stops you from shoving your foot down your own throat.

So, either post some sort of citation to a "statement" from "the Senate" (and not some do-rag leftist leaning publication offering a totally biased opinion) that supports your contention or STFU.

Yeah yeah, I know the game. You’ll reject anything left of OANN. And then reject anything that doesn’t specifically say, “We republicans in the senate reject any evidence in advance of a trial and will vote no.”

But we both know republicans lined up behind trump and decided ahead of time to vote no pretty much in lockstep no matter the evidence. At least some had the balls to see past party to vote for country.

 

[Rightguide]

Do you realise how fucking insane you sound? Seriously? Your evidence is the lack of evidence?

I realize how stupid you look when faced with smoking gun information and play like it has no meaning.

 

[Rightguide]

https://media2.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif

How deep and original. Are you sure your eyes aren't brown?

 

[HisArpy]

Yeah yeah, I know the game. You’ll reject anything left of OANN. And then reject anything that doesn’t specifically say, “We republicans in the senate reject any evidence in advance of a trial and will vote no.”

But we both know republicans lined up behind trump and decided ahead of time to vote no pretty much in lockstep no matter the evidence. At least some had the balls to see past party to vote for country.

Actually we don't "KNOW" anything of the sort.

What we know is that the senate voted to not convict. WHY they did so is only subject to conjecture by morons who think they can read minds.

I, on the other hand, understand that when the "jury" hears the evidence then decides to not convict, it's a fairly easy bet that the guy didn't do what he's been accused of.

 

[HisArpy]

I realize how stupid you look when faced with smoking gun information and play like it has no meaning.

It's Archie's 1 and only mode of ignorance.

 

[HisArpy]

Oh, the irony.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/02/91/e9/0291e9d79f0e50021ded05ae24df48d4.jpg

 

[jomar]

Actually we don't "KNOW" anything of the sort.

Either you didn’t pay attention or you’re in denial.

What we know is that the senate voted to not convict. WHY they did so is only subject to conjecture by morons who think they can read minds.

Lol, zing!

See above.

I, on the other hand, understand that when the "jury" hears the evidence then decides to not convict, it's a fairly easy bet that the guy didn't do what he's been accused of.

So you think republican senators actually “heard” the evidence?

You probably think OJ is actually innocent.

I don’t think you ever answered my question about what type of law you practice.

 

[HisArpy]

Either you didn’t pay attention or you’re in denial.



Lol, zing!

See above.



So you think republican senators actually “heard” the evidence?

You probably think OJ is actually innocent.

I don’t think you ever answered my question about what type of law you practice.

^ moar dumbfuckery masquerading as idjitry.

Seriously dudly, if that's all you got, go the fuck home and stay there.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

^ moar dumbfuckery masquerading as idjitry.

Seriously dudly, if that's all you got, go the fuck home and stay there.

You have never had an understanding of irony. You'll *attempt* something irrelevant and lame thogh for sure.

 

[jomar]

^ moar dumbfuckery masquerading as idjitry.

Seriously dudly, if that's all you got, go the fuck home and stay there.

God I’d love to see you in action on the job.

Harpy: “Your Honor, the idjit stands accused of dumbfuckery. He has failed to keep up with the class! I rest my case.”

Judge: “How did this clown get in my court again!”