Wuhan Flu update.

The Chicomms have a history and a pattern of behavior.

This reenforces any and all implications...



They could melt down a nuke plant and then with a straight face pronounce,

What nuke plant? There is no nuke plant there! We make fertilizer.

(Forget the fact that they're still using human excrement.)
 
The Chicomms have a history and a pattern of behavior.

This reenforces any and all implications...



They could melt down a nuke plant and then with a straight face pronounce,

What nuke plant? There is no nuke plant there! We make fertilizer.

(Forget the fact that they're still using human excrement.)

All common assumptions, probably all true.

Virus genesis- as yet unknown.

I like the bat story. The majesty of nature scares me less than those slitty eyed bastards.
 
Okay, in this thread, I have posited that the leak had to come from the lab.
I state, they have found no other infected bats.
I was countered with, Oh yeah?
They have them in the lab!



What can you possibly say to that kind of logic?
 
Okay, in this thread, I have posited that the leak had to come from the lab.
I state, they have found no other infected bats.
I was countered with, Oh yeah?
They have them in the lab!



What can you possibly say to that kind of logic?


I’d say that applying logic to Nature vs Secret Lab without facts is grassy knoll level shit.
 
It was never a secret lab. Just ask Dr. Fauci.

It was a lab most people had not heard of until things went wrong,
but that doesn't imply that it was "secret."

They were working on things so dangerous that
the research was banned here, which is why Fauci went there...
 
Two links to scientific papers detailing the probability that the Wuhan Flu was created in that lab are contained in this thread. As of yet I have seen NO scientific evidence to refute what those researchers have published beyond the par for the course name calling.

So those of you yelling 'science' had best get off your lazy asses and start posting links to writings refuting the assertions. If you can't but insist on yelling 'science' without anything to back you up then you're just pissing in the wind.
 
Here’s another problem for me, and that is the problem of location.
The outbreak did not occur where the bats live naturally.
It occurred in the vicinity of the lab that was importing and studying them…
 
I like the bat bit the pangolin, pangolin sold at wet market story best.

(Lee Harvey Oswald and Sirhan Sirhan both had pet pangolins.)

Mere coincidence?
 
They have already let us know.

As the saying goes, actions speak louder than words.

They have acted as guilty as the guilty can possibly act.
They were too quick with a cover story; there was no investigation
which strongly implies to me, that they knew that the virus had escaped their lab.

Your conjecture is not "them letting us know".

As the saying goes, AJ is "all talk no action".
 
Two links to scientific papers detailing the probability that the Wuhan Flu was created in that lab are contained in this thread. As of yet I have seen NO scientific evidence to refute what those researchers have published beyond the par for the course name calling.

So those of you yelling 'science' had best get off your lazy asses and start posting links to writings refuting the assertions. If you can't but insist on yelling 'science' without anything to back you up then you're just pissing in the wind.

The "science" pretty much shows what the usual suspects are denying. Namely that if you apply Occam's Razor to the evidence before you what they're saying cannot possible be true except only in the most remote circumstances. We know that SarsCovid virus was being studied in that lab for Gain of Function and Wuhan is ground zero for the pandemic. Anything else is deflection to avoid admitting that they've been lying all along because TDS.

The TDS sufferers can talk all they want about "the bat lady" and that Covid occurs naturally in bats 1000 miles away, but that does not overcome the evidence of presence, research and nucleus of the outbreak.
 
The "science" pretty much shows what the usual suspects are denying. Namely that if you apply Occam's Razor to the evidence before you what they're saying cannot possible be true except only in the most remote circumstances. We know that SarsCovid virus was being studied in that lab for Gain of Function and Wuhan is ground zero for the pandemic. Anything else is deflection to avoid admitting that they've been lying all along because TDS.

The TDS sufferers can talk all they want about "the bat lady" and that Covid occurs naturally in bats 1000 miles away, but that does not overcome the evidence of presence, research and nucleus of the outbreak.

Your track record on Lit is horrible. You know enough to embarrass yourself one more time.

You're an ambulance chaser. Stay in your lane, Harpy.
 
We know that SarsCovid virus was being studied in that lab for Gain of Function

Again, Tim, what evidence do you have for this? Repeating the same bullshit ten thousand times hardly constitutes evidence, let alone proof.
 
Again, Tim, what evidence do you have for this? Repeating the same bullshit ten thousand times hardly constitutes evidence, let alone proof.


Shoving your own head up your own ass doesn't mean that the evidence doesn't exist either, ARCHIE.


It's a suspicion that the coronavirus may have escaped, accidentally or otherwise, from a laboratory in the central Chinese city of Wuhan where the virus was first recorded. Its supporters point to the presence of a major biological research facility in the city. The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) has been studying coronaviruses in bats for over a decade....

A classified US intelligence report - saying three researchers at the Wuhan laboratory were treated in hospital in November 2019, just before the virus began infecting humans in the city ...

Dr Fauci now says he's "not convinced" the virus originated naturally
...

Supporters of the natural origin hypothesis say Covid-19 emerged in bats and then jumped to humans, most likely through another animal, or "intermediary host". That idea was backed by the WHO report, which said it was "likely to very likely" that Covid had made it to humans through an intermediate host. This hypothesis was widely accepted at the start of the pandemic, but as time has worn on, scientists have not found a virus in either bats or another animal that matches the genetic make-up of Covid-19...

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57268111


You can either believe the facts, as given by your own BBC, or continue to stick your head further up your own ass because you insist on being a fucking ignoramus in public while trying to show us how much of "a man" you are by sniping from the sidelines and totally failing at that too.
 
Last edited:
Your track record on Lit is horrible. You know enough to embarrass yourself one more time.

You're an ambulance chaser. Stay in your lane, Harpy.

My track record is my track record. Whether you agree with my positions or not, at least I stand up and GIVE THEM. Unlike those who skulk in the shadows hoping to elevate themselves by standing on the backs of their betters.
 
Shoving your own head up your own ass doesn't mean that the evidence doesn't exist either, ARCHIE.





You can either believe the facts, as given by your own BBC, or continue to stick your head further up your own ass because you insist on being fucking stupid in public while trying to show us how much of "a man" you are and totally failing at that too.

And where does it mention "gain of function", Tim?
 
It’s not a lie… if You believe it.

George Costanza

I don't believe in anything except facts. If I make a statement on a topic, then there are facts which have led me to that position.

You can ignore the facts and decry my opinion, but that still doesn't change the facts.
 
And where does it mention "gain of function", Tim?


Jesus fucking Christ, are you REALLY THAT FUCKING STUPID that you don't know how to GODDAMN GOOGLE ANYTHING????


Why the hell am I even asking that question - OF FUCKING COURSE you are.

Read this and then try to lie and say Fauci didn't fund Gain of Function research at Wuhan because the facts say otherwise


Unless you want to quibble over nomenclature and Fauci's perjury to Congress because the EVIDENCE exists to show that the NIH (ie Fauci because he approved the grants - because EVIDENCE exists that he signed off on them) funded the research at Wuhan to the tune of at least 41.7 billion.
 
I don't believe in anything except facts. If I make a statement on a topic, then there are facts which have led me to that position.

You can ignore the facts and decry my opinion, but that still doesn't change the facts.

Dude, you're even in over your head with George Costanza. Sheesh.
 
Sorry, but you don't get points for being an extroverted idiot.

As opposed to you being just an idiot with a big mouth and small brain?


You need to shut up and learn shit before you go shooting off that mouth of yours. It'd serve you better in life and Lit if you did.
 
Jesus fucking Christ, are you REALLY THAT FUCKING STUPID that you don't know how to GODDAMN GOOGLE ANYTHING????


Why the hell am I even asking that question - OF FUCKING COURSE you are.

Read this and then try to lie and say Fauci didn't fund Gain of Function research at Wuhan because the facts say otherwise


Unless you want to quibble over nomenclature and Fauci's perjury to Congress because the EVIDENCE exists to show that the NIH (ie Fauci because he approved the grants - because EVIDENCE exists that he signed off on them) funded the research at Wuhan to the tune of at least 41.7 billion.

LMAO. That's a high quality source you have there, Tim. If I dig through the articles am I gonna find that the lizard people control the new world order?
 
LMAO. That's a high quality source you have there, Tim. If I dig through the articles am I gonna find that the lizard people control the new world order?


^ facts and science denier right there folks.


ARCHIE has staked his reputation on his denials and thus cannot refute the facts so he tries to dismiss the source with stupid jokes.

I wonder if it's because the topic is too much for ARCHIE to understand?
 
Back
Top