Rotadom
Victimless Rhyme
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2017
- Posts
- 12,387
In what way was that the original story?
The one that contradicted a certain interview of an unnamed individual.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In what way was that the original story?
I love the way everyone here speaks with such certainty about a new, microscopic airborne virus.
The GB is such a repository of expertise!
That is very close to being the truth, the virus was weaponized twice:
once in the lab and then as a political tool by certain elements,
the most dangerous was the left-leaning press...
The one that contradicted a certain interview of an unnamed individual.
In what way was that the original story?
Remember, when the first outbreaks occurred, Nancy Pelosi said come to San Fransisco
and Saint Fauci told us that going to the Superbowl was completely safe and then
suddenly, they changed their tune because they realized the inherent power
of fear. There was no single coherent position from anyone in government,
but the partisan faithful focused completely on he who shan't be named.
That is very close to being the truth, the virus was weaponized twice:
once in the lab and then as a political tool by certain elements,
the most dangerous was the left-leaning press...
The one that contradicted a certain interview of an unnamed individual.
In other words, rather than examine actual Science,
you are engaging in Political Science.
We get that.
You don't even see it, do you? That was just your last few posts.
The similar question is that in your passionate defense, do you see it?
Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said Sunday that accidental lab leaks "happen all the time" amid mounting concern regarding the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Gottlieb expressed concern about safety protocols at research labs in the U.S. and abroad during an appearance on CBS' "Face the Nation." The former commissioner said a conclusive determination on where the pandemic originated was critical to prevent deadly outbreaks in the future.
"These kinds of lab leaks happen all the time, actually," Gottlieb said. "Even here in the United States, we’ve had mishaps, and in China, the last six known outbreaks of SARS-1 have been out of labs, including the last known outbreak, which was a pretty extensive outbreak that China initially wouldn’t disclose that it came out of a lab."
...
"It’s important to understand what the possibility is that this came out of a lab so we can focus more international attention on trying to get better inventories around these labs, what they’re doing, better security, make sure they’re properly built," he added. "We need to also look at public health through the lens of national security. This was an asymmetric harm to the United States. COVID hurt the U.S. a lot more than it hurt many other countries."
Someone else already pointed out your deflection this morning so I'll just mention that.
Once y'all hit on a meme, you really hammer it to death...
I love the way everyone here speaks with such certainty about a new, microscopic airborne virus.
The GB is such a repository of expertise!
I love how the trumpian science deniers are suddenly the science backers and how the science followers are now painted as deniers.
Good times!
The full interview is in that link I posted earlier this AM. That and other little factoids. Such as the lab was sub-standard from the day it was built. That the lab was NOT certified to a level that would be required to do the sort of research they were doing to begin with (This fact calls into question Fauci's decision to fund them.). The fact that multiple SARS outbreaks were traced directly back to Chinese labs.
That interview is only 7 min. long and has more bullet points than I'm going to bother listing.
Actually, this is what we have been saying from Day 1 when we were called Science deniers...
And 2020 want's its trumping back.
That's what I thought.![]()
dudly,
1. How is it that you think you can discuss anything when you don't even known the basic and/or historical facts of the subject under discussion?
Or...
2. Anyone who fills you in on the information you obviously lack, is falling for your goalpost moving deflection.
eyerolls indeed.
1. I do know as much as anyone else in this discussion.
2. Not a single shred of information has been given to me that I already didn't know and as evident by your posts, you have no clue what deflection or goalpost moving means. In fact, I was the one pointing out goalpost moving.
You've done nothing but run your mouth today.
Then prove it and stop asking stupid questions about basic information.
Oh my....
So you didn't really need to know the answers to the questions you posted? One wonders why you asked for it then...
dudly,
1. How is it that you think you can discuss anything when you don't even known the basic and/or historical facts of the subject under discussion?
Again, patiently, I caught the Covid before the panic, before the lockdowns, before the mask mandates.
My spouse brought it home from the hospital where they thought it was just a flu outbreak
and this was during the time when Fauci and Pelosi were assuring us that
there was nothing to panic about.
You're like ThrobDownSouth in that you just make up facts and story lines as you go along.
Yeah, I know, deflection, Trumpism, goalposts, denier, I HOPE YOU DIE!,...