Write a controversial opinion

Pineapple on pizza is amazing, as is barbecue sauce and Alfredo sauce. However a pineapple ham or glazed ham is gross. Don't ask me why, just accept that taste buds are just as weird as brains.
 
Last edited:
On the same pizza? Or two different, side by side pizza’s?

I ask because the thought of both on one pizza still has me making a very displeased face. Definitely not for me.
I've never had them both on the same pizza. It would be interesting to try it though.🤔
 
Pineapple on pizza is amazing, as is barbecue sauce and Alfredo sauce. However a pineapple ham or glazed ham is gross. Don't ask me why, just accept that taste buds are just as weird as brains.
I agree. To attest to that, I believe anyone who likes black licorice should be whipped with the stuff. Vile, nasty stuff it is!

Comshaw
 
I agree. To attest to that, I believe anyone who likes black licorice should be whipped with the stuff. Vile, nasty stuff it is!

Comshaw
I was always grateful that my grandpa loved it, because it gave me someone to give my black jelly beans to at Easter.
 
Pineapple on pizza is amazing, as is barbecue sauce and Alfredo sauce. However a pineapple ham or glazed ham is gross. Don't ask me why, just accept that taste buds are just as weird as brains.
Ok ok. Ummm... At first you said pineapple on pizza and BBQ sauce, so I figured, yeah we can be pals. Buuuuuttttt then you went and said pineapple on ham or glazed ham is gross. So now I have a conundrum.
 
Tacos ARE a glorified sandwich, and just to get myself banned, those who keep promoting them as something extra special should have to pay an extra tax😂.
 
OK so I don't know what you call it, what the name for it is when this happens. Commercial novel excerpt follows:

The bad weather kept them inside for six days.

Corene didn't mind too much, since she was still exploring the enormous palace. She thought she might stay within its walls for a quintile and never visit all its music rooms, libraries, studies, and dining areas—there was even a greenhouse so humid and warm that she thought it would be her favorite spot on cold Quinnelay afternoons. Now, of course, the weather was hot and naturally humid, but she liked the conservatory anyway.

But everybody else seemed edgy and morose at being cooped up indoors. By everybody Corene meant the small group of people who quickly came to constitute her particular circle: Steff, Melissande, Jiramondi, and Liramelli. Corene was not the kind of person to make friends easily, but she liked this group; she found it enjoyable to pass the time in their company.

What am I pointing out? The bold part: The narrator is not Corene. So, projecting something Corene "means" onto what Corene didn't say ("everybody") is some kind of malwriting. Corene isn't talking to someone, she isn't thinking to herself, she isn't narrating, so, adding in what she means is nonsensical and weirdly choppy.

This happens a lot. Sure, this example of third person narration is the kind we call "close", but, when the conceit of the narration is not that it's the actual character's own thoughts, but then the character seems to be aware of what the narrator is narrating, that's too fucking close.

This kind of thing needs to be fixed. There are a few ways to do it:
* Put it in Corene's head before pulling it back out again: "Corene thought to herself that everybody else seemed edgy and morose." NOW you can say who Corene means by "everybody."
* Restructure those sentences so that it's already clear who "everybody" is before referring to them as "everybody." Do this in narrator voice, not Corene's. This avoids having to say what anyone means by "everybody," which is an awkward way to write this. It's overly conversational for this particular piece—it's inconsistent with the rest of the narrative style.
* Or do it in Corene's voice, so that she can have an intention regarding who "everybody" is. As written, she can't, because she isn't the one who said or thought about "everybody."
* Restructure in a way which just avoids Corene's point of view on the matter entirely. It isn't her who "means" everybody, it's the narrator - or, more precisely, the author, who just didn't figure out how to write it without introducing this clumsy flaw.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top