worth repeating?

[bg23]

All understood.

But.

The only reason you cared about that the doofus was being a doofus in this case was that it meant kids were in danger. Before kids were in danger, he was no less a doofus, there just weren't kids in danger. So you didn't care about his doofusness either way.

Now we know that kids are no longer in danger. So he's back to a doofus that you don't need to care about either way.

See'I'm'sain? The salient factor is the kids. Doofus is constant. Kids are variable.

Poor, dead horse.

Sweet, abusable avatar tits.

Yeah, that makes sense.

Basically it launches the debate from "poor kids!" to "yell at the doofus" -- which then just becomes standard GB fare without kid-welfare being on the scales and par for the course for dolfthread

I thought I took them down! You made me look >-(

 

[CHNOPS]

Yeah, that makes sense.

Basically it launches the debate from "poor kids!" to "yell at the doofus" -- which then just becomes standard GB fare without kid-welfare being on the scales and par for the course for dolfthread

I thought I took them down! You made me look >-(

I have avs off. Last time I looked, my teeth itched.

 

[butters]

Not to get all bro's before ho's up in here, but:

Won't one of you admit that Cubbies did the right thing? He waited to act until he had more information. The information--it turned out--made acting irrelevant. The sick fuck is not working in schools.

He may be a sick fuck elsewhere, but everything that can legally be attended to about that, has been attended to.

Someone say it: he was right to wait. Sick fuck is still a sick fuck, but Cubbies' phone call would have been meaningless in this case.

yes, i'll say it and that makes three of us. but the way he worded it made it look like a whole other animal.

In practice? Yes. In actual intent? That's what I question.

Absolutely, if he wasn't sure about what was happening, what the guy was actually doing, and so forth - if THAT was the reason that he was waiting on making a phone call...that's totally justified. It's important to be sure.

But is that what he said his reasons were? Did he claim he was unsure of whether there was an actual danger? Was his reasoning, "Well, I'm not sure yet if I should because it might turn out to be pointless and he isn't actually violating any laws or posing any threat"?

This is what he said:
...
(stuff)

So -- is he right, in practice, for not having bothered? Sure -- the guy wasn't violating probation, not a whole lot he could do. But had the guy been violating probation, what would have changed?

Would his reasons for not wanting to "look bad" have changed? After all, these were the reasons he didn't want to speak up back when he WAS under the impression that the pedo was violating.

what she said ^

 

[cubbies]

Why does it have to be one or the other and not both? Kids can be in danger AND guy can be a jackass and my post can be about both!

It's great (those particular) kids aren't in danger - it's a relief.

Intent might not matter to you, but it does to me.

The guy who gets put in prison for soliciting sex from a fake 12 year old is as bad as the guy who does from a real 12 year old, imo, even if the first guy didn't actually harm anyone.

The outrage from my part on Cubbies behalf was because he was unwilling, despite knowing that the kids were in potential danger, to do anything for fear of looking bad.

That didn't change just because he apparently -- and I say apparently because this story change is far, far too convenient -- found out that the dude wasn't violating. Given that he wasn't willing to do anything when he thought he WAS, I have no reason to believe this had any relevance to his decision not to.

The kids aren't in danger anymore -- that's great, it really is -- because if they WERE still in danger there's nothing that leads me to believe he'd do anything anyway. After all -- he might still look bad, he's taking the high road...etc.

Obviously I have no idea what's in his head, what he really was thinking/basing his decisions on, what I judge him on is based completely on what he's posted here. And what he's posted has not changed my original opinion of him, as a person. There's no reason for him to give two shits about my opinion, I'm just some random chick on a porn board -- I'm just putting it out there because I can.

Then fry me. I wish that that was the answer. Fry me and make it go away. The reality is that the pedo is a very charming person. Its not the pedo you think it is. He is your husbands best friend. the high school coach. the dad who owns the house where your teenage kids are having a swim party at.

I am not the evil you dipshit.

Maybe the kids are still at danger. Sometimes there isnt a fucking thing we can do about it until there is another victim. and then and only then, can we hope that it was vile enough for him to be put away for a long time.

I'll give you that i wasn't going to do anything if he was violating because neither would you. I know that because people like you and I stood by and did nothing.

What do you want from me? an admission that I am a terrible person? you got it.

 

[cubbies]

To be honest, i have no idea if he does work on or off the campus. In a legal sense, no one would be able to prove he does.

the fact that whether he does or not says more about you than me.

 

[cubbies]

All understood.

But.

The only reason you cared about that the doofus was being a doofus in this case was that it meant kids were in danger. Before kids were in danger, he was no less a doofus, there just weren't kids in danger. So you didn't care about his doofusness either way.

Now we know that kids are no longer in danger. So he's back to a doofus that you don't need to care about either way.

See'I'm'sain? The salient factor is the kids. Doofus is constant. Kids are variable.

Poor, dead horse.

Sweet, abusable avatar tits.

heres the thing. i find it to be funny. if the guy was on campus and i knew about it, that was a bad thing. (because i am worse than pedos). yet, when he isn't actually on campus, thats ok.

The main thing that people are worried about is that kids are/or arent in danger.

the guy i know, it makes one shit not if he is actually on campus or not. it makes one shit not if i turn him in or not.

the only shit that gets made is, if you prevent him from fucking up your kids.

guys like me have nothing to do with it.

 

[bg23]

Then fry me. I wish that that was the answer. Fry me and make it go away. The reality is that the pedo is a very charming person. Its not the pedo you think it is. He is your husbands best friend. the high school coach. the dad who owns the house where your teenage kids are having a swim party at.

I am not the evil you dipshit.

Maybe the kids are still at danger. Sometimes there isnt a fucking thing we can do about it until there is another victim. and then and only then, can we hope that it was vile enough for him to be put away for a long time.

I'll give you that i wasn't going to do anything if he was violating because neither would you. I know that because people like you and I stood by and did nothing.

What do you want from me? an admission that I am a terrible person? you got it.

lol what?

do you even know what the fuck you're talking about?

you don't need to admit you're a terrible person, because you probably aren't - i reserve that for actual pedos. you're not evil. but you're a fucking moron is what you are. and while i wouldn't fry you i sure would like to punch you in your tiny, tiny balls.

oh, and you're a liar that has a problem with backpeddling. there was a very clear reason why i thought - and think - you're full of shit.

here it is! 2 days ago you claimed:

A letter won't do anything because he hasn't done anything.

Cops and DA have tried. He was recently in jail for 30 days on a violation and was released with the judge admonishing the DA.

I'm not endangering any children...

The point is, a lot of people know, however, he is doing nothing wrong..at the moment. No one can do anything if he isn't breaking the law. How do you not get this?

I rest very easy. Do you worry about everyone who can possibly get harmed by something???

I did a little homework. The "grey" area is that he doesn't do the actual work on site. He hires someone. He never goes on the school grounds.

bolding mine. which is of course the reason people actually got off your case eventually about the kids - because they, according to you, aren't in danger.

but then! just now!

To be honest, i have no idea if he does work on or off the campus. In a legal sense, no one would be able to prove he does.

the fact that whether he does or not says more about you than me.

What an amazing twist!

 

[girlsmiley]

fuck up.