Wives in bad ‘mood’ still have sexual ‘obligation’ to husbands

[JackLuis]

Listen up girls. It is your duty to God!

A conservative radio host who hosted a fundraiser for Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) this week has said that a wife should have sex with her husband — regardless of her “mood” — because it was one of the “mutual obligations” of being married.

On Wednesday, Dennis Prager was one of several speakers hosting a political fundraiser for Senate Majority Leader in California. Tickets for the event reportedly cost $30,400 for couples.

The Hill pointed out that some of Prager’s past writings were probably not going to help McConnell win over women voters in Kentucky.

 

[lovecraft68]

Could they get any dumber? Even if its what they believe why do they feel the need to say it? The repugs have pretty much made it so a woman has to be nuts to vote their way.

However with lits policies and attitudes towards women I would imagine they have a lot of supporters here. After all rape babies are gifts from god(according to the repugs) and its openly supported here and ignorance to women greatly encouraged on the boards.

 

[soflabbwlvr]

The author of the story isn't too bright, either. McConnell is the Senate minority leader, not the majority leader.

 

[Zeb_Carter]

Guess he isn't get any from the old lady and wants a special amendment to make it so he gets it whenever HE wants. Asshole.

 

[robertreams]

The key sexual difference between men and wmen, I think Is this: A man will say fuck me to make me feel better. A woman will say make me feel better(good) then I'll feel like fucking.

 

[ProxyAccount]

There's no doubt that there is mutual obligation in a committed relationship, but I think that's a matter between two spouses as to what is essential and unessential in their mutual obligation. ...And both probably have differing opinions. LOL!

 

[Handley_Page]

"said that a wife should have sex with her husband — regardless of her “mood” — because it was one of the “mutual obligations” of being married."

Obviously, he's not a a man who likes "making love with a wife", but who treats her like a live-in, unpaid, whore and who fucks when he feels like it.
(Superior ladies in an earlier time in England were advised to "just lie still and think of England")

 

[StrangeLife]

There's no doubt that there is mutual obligation in a committed relationship, but I think that's a matter between two spouses as to what is essential and unessential in their mutual obligation. ...And both probably have differing opinions. LOL!

In either case it goes both ways.

Erectile inadequacies should never be a show-stopper as long as the man in question is equipped with a tongue. In return his partner sometimes may need to ignore her headache for a few minutes and take one for the team.

 

[ProxyAccount]

In either case it goes both ways.

Erectile inadequacies should never be a show-stopper as long as the man in question is equipped with a tongue. In return his partner sometimes may need to ignore her headache for a few minutes and take one for the team.

Exactly. We all do things for our partner that we might not feel like doing. In my case, I have nooo problems with worshiping a woman's pearly gates, but I hate shopping for clothes and decorative items. On the other hand, my girlfriend can spend hours shopping for that stuff. (Maybe it's a stereotype, but I've never dated a girl that hated shopping.) But when she asks me to go with her, I do, even though I'd rather put a hole in my head with hammer drill. At the same time, I expect that she'll reciprocate whenever I get it in my head that I feel like going out to shoot bambi or porky, butcher it, and have a BBQ while being harassed by the insect population. Relationships depend upon that sort of give-and-take to survive.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

You people are so fulla shit.

Females wanna be bred and make babies, the only serious question is: Does he have enough money to take care of her and junior.

 

[StrangeLife]

Females wanna be bred and make babies...

I wish you had told me this sooner. I could have save a ton of money by breeding her more and sending her shopping less....

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

I wish you had told me this sooner. I could have save a ton of money by breeding her more and sending her shopping less....

It took me more than 60 years to figger it out. A gal confirmed it this AM, she told me WE JUST WANNA BE RODE HARD, FUCK THE FLOWERS AND CANDY.

 

[StrangeLife]

...JUST WANNA BE RODE HARD, FUCK THE FLOWERS AND CANDY.

I live for the day a girl tells me that

 

[trace_ekies]

... take one for the team.

An ex referred to this as a "mercy fuck". And it wasn't all one-sided either.

... Relationships depend upon that sort of give-and-take to survive.

 

[patientlee]

You people are so fulla shit.

Females wanna be bred and make babies, the only serious question is: Does he have enough money to take care of her and junior.

No more breeding for me, thanks. I can't handle the ones I have.

 

[Swilly]

I wish you had told me this sooner. I could have save a ton of money by breeding her more and sending her shopping less....

Kids are expensive. Try fucking instead of breeding.

 

[ProxyAccount]

I have been informed by my parents that the purpose of children is cheap labor. :-D

 

[Sugary_Comfort]

Oh my gosh, seriously? If I'm mad at whatever guy I'm dating there's no way he's getting any, he won't even be allowed to watch if I felt the need to take care of business and I'd be quite so he couldn't listen in either.

But I will say that I think it's incredibly wrong for a woman (or man if that ever happens) to withhold sex to punish the guy. My not giving a man sex or anything if I'm mad at him is not me punishing him, it's just that touching me would only make me more mad and mad for longer.

 

[StrangeLife]

Oh my gosh, seriously? If I'm mad at whatever guy I'm dating there's no way he's getting any, he won't even be allowed to watch if I felt the need to take care of business and I'd be quite so he couldn't listen in either.

But I will say that I think it's incredibly wrong for a woman (or man if that ever happens) to withhold sex to punish the guy. My not giving a man sex or anything if I'm mad at him is not me punishing him, it's just that touching me would only make me more mad and mad for longer.

I was thinking more in the long term. If a couple is poorly balanced sexually for an extended period in the relationship, who gets to decide "how often"?

There's a tendency to go for the lowest common denominator - i.e. the one with the lowest sex-drive gets to decide how often they have sex. Shoving your own agenda down your partners throat has nothing to do with compromise. A spouse with that attitude is basically telling his or her partner that they don't care about the others needs: "Unless it's convenient for me you can go f... yourself" (literally ).

This is where I'm of the opinion that the one with the low sex-drive needs to step up to the plate instead, even if he/she would rather watch CSI and eat crumpets. If the guy can't get hard, he can use those little blue pills or tongue action and if the girl has similar problems a combination of Astroglide and acting talent is all that's needed.

I bet a lot of broken marriages could be saved that way...

 

[Hypoxia]

I have been informed by my parents that the purpose of children is cheap labor. :-D

Grandkids too. Nieces and nephews when possible. The young must serve their elders. I read that somewhere.

 

[Handley_Page]

Grandkids too. Nieces and nephews when possible. The young must serve their elders. I read that somewhere.

It worked until all the do-gooders got on their high horses.

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

Gosh, Dennis, if your marriage is that unhappy, maybe you need to get counseling or divorced. Or just, you know, talk frankly. Tell her how sex is important to you and listen to what is important to her. Maybe it is sex (and you're doing something), maybe not.

Granted, sex is like air....it's not important, until you don't get any. And, yes it is wrong to use sex as a weapon. It's also stupid and dangerous to expect someone to want and automatically grant sexual favors on demand. After all, if you're sufficiently out of sorts (not even angry, but maybe stressed, tired, or even drunk), you might not be up to sex, either, and in your case, no amount of coaxing is going to make that little soldier stand and salute.

So, if it comes to that, put yourself in her shoes.....picture her pressuring you to get it on, and the old staff not being so sturdy.

 

[SikFuk]

I was thinking more in the long term. If a couple is poorly balanced sexually for an extended period in the relationship, who gets to decide "how often"?.....

....This is where I'm of the opinion that the one with the low sex-drive needs to step up to the plate...

Or consider an alternative: masturbation in the company of the spouse. If the urge to get off is that overpowering, just step up to the plate and whip it out. At least then the issue is out in the open (pun intended). If your partner doesn't want to assist in some way, so what? Be responsible for your own orgasm. You could also surprise your partner by being responsible for something you don't normally do, like the dishes, or taking the kids to Chucky Cheese. You could even offer it as a trade: "If I take the kids for ice cream, will you let me cream on your tits later?"

I suppose masturbating in front of a spouse could also backfire. "OMG! I married a pervert!" If that happens, chances are the relationship was doomed from the beginning. Better to resolve it now than let it drag on indefinitely.

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

Ain't that the truth? And sometimes, yes, there is a serious incompatibility in the sexual inclinations of husband and wife....in which case, maybe divorce isn't such a bad idea. People say work at it, and that is good, if there is something worth working toward....but if there is too much of a difference and fundamentally, mutually exclusive ideas, then maybe you should consult a lawyer.

 

[StrangeLife]

I suppose masturbating in front of a spouse could also backfire. "OMG! I married a pervert!" If that happens, chances are the relationship was doomed from the beginning.

That will be the result in 99% of the cases, I think. The standard reply will be, "All you ever think about is sex!"

When you're not in the mood it's easy to dismiss your partner as "a sex maniac." Divorce usually follows within a short time...