Disgustipated
LAWLZ
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Posts
- 25,596
This is just way too easy
I'm just surprised you used "too" correctly. But the CIH defense only works once. You need a new excuse for being ... you next time, jr.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is just way too easy
Dear Reader,
Every Disgustipated post contains 2 full scoops of stoopid.

To celebrate the first African American to win a solo gold? If that was his intent I applaud him and her both. I also find it completely repulsive to post a picture of a 16 year old wearing a leotard doing the splits on a porn site. He is either extremely stupid or sick...or maybe both.
Sorry if you feel it is appropriate to post a 16 year old wearing almost nothing, legs spread, on a Porn Board. Maybe you should think about it some more.... Intent means shit when you do something that sick....
Right up there with apologizing for a 'monkey' commercial. Isn't it amazing that only racists can read 'racism' into everything they see?
Ishmael
You realize you just quoted your son regarding racism when he didn't mention racism in the post you quoted, right?
Right up there with apologizing for a 'monkey' commercial. Isn't it amazing that only racists can read 'racism' into everything they see?
Ishmael
Come out from behind your alts.
Dear Reader
Zumi cant get a real gang so he makes a virtual gang. But if you bitch slap any of them Zumi is the one gets hurt.
So you are just going to keep showing off your Pedo ways by keeping that picture in you sig?
Please choose which is correct.
I recall someone whose name i can't remember catching hell over posting about furniture called a Lolita bed. Bert Posting pics of his newborn grandchild. Both instances caused much adieu. So is it, or is it not, ok to post anything referencing persons under the age of 18?
Thanks in advance for the clarification.
Let me start by saying me original intent here was not to prove Zumi a pedo. At first I did not even think he was. I simply wanted to point out his hypocrisy in consistently calling people racist with absolutely no proof. You know exactly what I am talking about. But you do not even need to leave this thread to see an example. That is not to say I do not find posting a picture of an underage minor distasteful at best. Because I do. Not a person here would argue that Gabby or her mother would be disgusted to see her picture on a porn board sig line. Just like Zumi is free to find it distasteful that Blob talks to BB. But calling him a racist for it is pure bullshit. The fact is Zumi and the left wing nut jobs throw out racist and pedo with a lot less evidence.
But the hypocrisy goes even farther. Who would argue that if Vet/Kola/Eyer or someone else from the right posted that picture, Zumi/Luke/Sean/Rob or some other left wing nut job would be there in a second yelling pedophile?
Would Wings/Farah/Zip/Bronze/Kbate come to their defense? Sean has called people a pedo many times with less evidence and I have not seen the moral brigade come to their defense. Why do they sit on their hands when the left wing crazies throw out racist? Is a racist that much more acceptable than a pedophile? It is a simple herd mentality filled with double standards of stupid.
So while at first I did not truly believe he was a pedo, eventually I looked at his sig lines and drawings. The undertones of underage incest are obvious. The picture he used is preceded by many more innocent pictures in a simple google image search. While this is not 100% evidence, I have seen Kbate presume more with less in this very thread. If the left wings nuts had attached a right winger with this evidence the herd would not have sat on their hands….they would have applauded it as a fact.
So if he can presume racism is everywhere it is not, I am free to assume the sick fuck is a pedo. Difference is I have three times the circumstantial evidence to back me up…….
Let me start by saying me original intent here was not to prove Zumi a pedo. At first I did not even think he was. I simply wanted to point out his hypocrisy in consistently calling people racist with absolutely no proof. You know exactly what I am talking about. But you do not even need to leave this thread to see an example. That is not to say I do not find posting a picture of an underage minor distasteful at best. Because I do. Not a person here would argue that Gabby or her mother would be disgusted to see her picture on a porn board sig line. Just like Zumi is free to find it distasteful that Blob talks to BB. But calling him a racist for it is pure bullshit. The fact is Zumi and the left wing nut jobs throw out racist and pedo with a lot less evidence.
But the hypocrisy goes even farther. Who would argue that if Vet/Kola/Eyer or someone else from the right posted that picture, Zumi/Luke/Sean/Rob or some other left wing nut job would be there in a second yelling pedophile?
Would Wings/Farah/Zip/Bronze/Kbate come to their defense? Sean has called people a pedo many times with less evidence and I have not seen the moral brigade come to their defense. Why do they sit on their hands when the left wing crazies throw out racist? Is a racist that much more acceptable than a pedophile? It is a simple herd mentality filled with double standards of stupid.
So while at first I did not truly believe he was a pedo, eventually I looked at his sig lines and drawings. The undertones of underage incest are obvious. The picture he used is preceded by many more innocent pictures in a simple google image search. While this is not 100% evidence, I have seen Kbate presume more with less in this very thread. If the left wings nuts had attached a right winger with this evidence the herd would not have sat on their hands….they would have applauded it as a fact.
So if he can presume racism is everywhere it is not, I am free to assume the sick fuck is a pedo. Difference is I have three times the circumstantial evidence to back me up…….
Since you mentioned me, I'll answer. I don't know anything about the right-wingers, only what I gather from their posts when I can stomach reading them. I feel like I have a really good idea of the kind of man Zumi is. I, like most everyone, understand his reason for including Gabby in his sig, and what that pic signifies to him. I don't believe for a moment that you are a pedophile, but I do think that your interpretation speaks volumes more about you than about Zumi.
I don't think the right-wingers that you speak of (I am in now way generalizing all Republicans) even attempt to hide their racism. They wear it like a badge of honor. Their racism becomes their identity. To compare Zumi's sigline to the bigotry that is unabashedly spewed here every day is ridiculous.
Not touching that with a ten foot pole.So Blob is a Racist?
So Blob is a Racist?
If not, why did you not come to his defense?
Gabby's mom would be happy to have her daughters picture on a porn site?
Would Gabby and her mom applaud him for putting it up? Or me for pointing out that at the very least it is distasteful?
I am sure you thought you knew Grace well enough to judge her as not a pedo as well.... Was she not your BFF?
Achieving what she achieved should not be rewarded by be plastered on a porn board.
Oh I KNOW you did not just invoke the Grace thing. I KNOW that you'd be smarter than that. I KNOW what you used to do with her and if you think for one GODDAMN minute I'm going to let you get away with throwing that shot in Farrah's face you have hit your head too many times.
You need to apologize right now and you need to make it good or I'll publish the emails I have in regards to you and Grace.
You had better get to it.
Serioulsy?
Flirted with her before I knew she was a fat pedo? Guilty as charged. I am not the only one that was fooled. So for someone to say they think they know someone well enough to judge them on this site is naive at best. I am not even saying Zumi is. But if he can call me or blob or many others a racist with no proof. why do I not have the right to call him a pedo with the circumstantial evidence at hand?
And all Farrah did after the truth came out was try to help the people on here that she hurt. For you to imply that Farrah stood by her is both so misguided and so pathetically stupid you need to apologize just for that.
I will refer you to your own hypocritical post above. Reread and then go clean up your face, there's egg on it.
So Blob is a Racist?
If not, why did you not come to his defense?
Gabby's mom would be happy to have her daughters picture on a porn site?
Would Gabby and her mom applaud him for putting it up? Or me for pointing out that at the very least it is distasteful?
I am sure you thought you knew Grace well enough to judge her as not a pedo as well.... Was she not your BFF?
Achieving what she achieved should not be rewarded by be plastered on a porn board.
What tha good fuck?
So Blob is a Racist?
If not, why did you not come to his defense?
Gabby's mom would be happy to have her daughters picture on a porn site?
Would Gabby and her mom applaud him for putting it up? Or me for pointing out that at the very least it is distasteful?
I am sure you thought you knew Grace well enough to judge her as not a pedo as well.... Was she not your BFF?
Achieving what she achieved should not be rewarded by be plastered on a porn board.
I am sure you thought you knew Grace well enough to judge her as not a pedo as well.... Was she not your BFF
How does this imply she supported her after the truth came out?
It was intended that she be careful who she thinks she knows. That is it.
Please point out were I implied that Farrah stood by here? I did not. If you think I did I apologize for that. She was duped just like 99% of lit, including me. And that was my point!