Why?

Joined
Jul 12, 2003
Posts
14,131
Why has Clutching_calliope deleted her poems in this forum and who drove her away? When other more vocal poets announce their imminent departure it's somehow less painful when they do go than when one of Callies caliber slips away silently. I'm really disappointed with he direction this forum is taking. Too many fine poets lose heart and leave, too many others post too infrequently. I keep checking in to see if things have improved and I'll continue to - I guess.


<mourning a hummimgbird>
 
Tristesse2 said:
Why has Clutching_calliope deleted her poems in this forum and who drove her away? When other more vocal poets announce their imminent departure it's somehow less painful when they do go than when one of Callies caliber slips away silently. I'm really disappointed with he direction this forum is taking. Too many fine poets lose heart and leave, too many others post too infrequently. I keep checking in to see if things have improved and I'll continue to - I guess.


<mourning a hummimgbird>

hi Tess :)

hugs xoxox

I have noticed that Cali deletes her work on a "regular" basis. If thatmakes a diff, I love reading her, so it is disheartening to go back in the passion thread and find her babies all gone
 
normal jean said:
hi Tess :)

hugs xoxox

I have noticed that Cali deletes her work on a "regular" basis. If thatmakes a diff, I love reading her, so it is disheartening to go back in the passion thread and find her babies all gone
Calli is systematically deleting her posts—just look at the "Find all posts" option. Gone, gone, gone, gone gone.

I am not happy.
 
Tzara said:
Calli is systematically deleting her posts—just look at the "Find all posts" option. Gone, gone, gone, gone gone.

I am not happy.

thats what I need to be doing
 
normal jean said:
thats what I need to be doing
If you start doing it too, I am so flying to South Carolina to kick your (rather cute, actually) little butt. :)
 
Tzara said:
If you start doing it too, I am so flying to South Carolina to kick your (rather cute, actually) little butt. :)

my hubby is leaving for a betterjob, without me, <sob, sob> no, Im not crying :D

Ihave been home ill, some icky virus, mightexplain why I was so friggin hateful last week, that mightmake a few parties happy, that I am sick, that is. anyway, hubby told me today the guys at work want their "smily faced flower child" helper back...they meant me, OMG!

and, he assigned this guy from Georgia, ( he has the word REDNECK written on his hardhat, thats whatwe call him.... he likes it)

oh well, hubby might not wanna leave me lone with redneck, ya know what IM sayin'? :D


hey, when WILL you be back in SC? I woudl loveto buy you a moonpie and show youhow to eatthe creamy without injuringthe cake, lol

:rose:

youre a darling, Tzara--CC will be back for you, I just know it!!
 
normal jean said:
hi Tess :)

hugs xoxox

I have noticed that Cali deletes her work on a "regular" basis. If thatmakes a diff, I love reading her, so it is disheartening to go back in the passion thread and find her babies all gone

Hello sweetie. I think it's a bit more serious than that. Callie must have her reasons but I will mis her presence.



normal jean said:
thats what I need to be doing

DON'T YOU DARE!!!!
 
Tristesse2 said:
Why has Clutching_calliope deleted her poems in this forum and who drove her away? When other more vocal poets announce their imminent departure it's somehow less painful when they do go than when one of Callies caliber slips away silently. I'm really disappointed with he direction this forum is taking. Too many fine poets lose heart and leave, too many others post too infrequently. I keep checking in to see if things have improved and I'll continue to - I guess.


<mourning a hummimgbird>
Who drove her away? Maybe no one. Maybe she left for other reasons.
I hope she left because someone is publishing her work and she needed to remove it from online. :)
 
WickedEve said:
I hope she left because someone is publishing her work and she needed to remove it from online. :)
One should never agree to publishing their work under such conditions. And one should not use "Literotica" like this, it's not nice. (I am not saying that this is what has happened).
 
Senna Jawa said:
And one should not use "Literotica" like this, it's not nice.
I agree. I think the same every time I look in the "all of a sudden passion suddenly" thread, for example, and see one third of the poems edited out, or threads like the very recent The Erotic Limerick that is now without its original first post. I find it all very disrespectful, no matter the reasons.
 
Senna Jawa:
"One should never agree to publishing their work under such conditions."

Huh?

Yes, it's within the publisher's rights to ask that you not have your work avilable for free online while they're publishing a book with your work in it.
 
Lauren Hynde said:
I agree. I think the same every time I look in the "all of a sudden passion suddenly" thread, for example, and see one third of the poems edited out, or threads like the very recent The Erotic Limerick that is now without its original first post. I find it all very disrespectful, no matter the reasons.
I wouldn't call that disrespectful. I've edited out some of my poems, and it's usually because I'm freaked out by how awful the poem reads the day after I posted it. lol
We do use lit for its free forum and as a place to publish whatever we write. And lit uses us as a supplier of poems/stories. It seems to be working. :)
 
Never said:
Senna Jawa:
"One should never agree to publishing their work under such conditions."

Huh?

Yes, it's within the publisher's rights to ask that you not have your work avilable for free online while they're publishing a book with your work in it.
I know many poets who remove work from lit when they're published elsewhere. Right or wrong, it's often done.
 
WickedEve said:
I wouldn't call that disrespectful. I've edited out some of my poems, and it's usually because I'm freaked out by how awful the poem reads the day after I posted it. lol
Well, poems in that particular thread are supposed to freak you out the day after. You still shouldn't edit them out. ;)
 
She always deletes her stuff-- for whatever reason, they are hers to do with what she wishes including getting them published elsewhere. :)

Maybe we should wait and see what she has to say, she is still very active here and still continues to write new stuff every day in a number of threads :)

You just gotta be quick and read em before they disappear :rose:
 
Last edited:
Lauren Hynde said:
Well, poems in that particular thread are supposed to freak you out the day after. You still shouldn't edit them out. ;)
It would be preferable if a poet would enter that thread with one thought in mind: I am going to spontaneously write a poem and leave it here to be publicly viewed forever, no matter how much it may or may not suck.
I believe that was the original intent of the thread. But fortunately, we are free to remove our poems and leave "....." in place of the poem, which is rather unattractive and frustrating to the reader, but I do try to move those dots to the chit chat, keep clean whatever thread.
Personally, I don't need to be freaked out the day after anything. :D
 
Never said:
Senna Jawa:
"One should never agree to publishing their work under such conditions."

Huh?

Yes, it's within the publisher's rights to ask that you not have your work avilable for free online while they're publishing a book with your work in it.
Huh? Huh?

And it is within your rights to tell them to get lost. Nobody can force you to publish.
 
Senna Jawa said:
Huh? Huh?

And it is within your rights to tell them to get lost. Nobody is forcing you to publish.
Of course there is no force, but I'm sure some of us would be more than happy to comply with certain publishers' wishes.
 
WickedEve said:
I know many poets who remove work from lit when they're published elsewhere. Right or wrong, it's often done.
It's a good reason not to read them elsewhere!

The ironic thing about this whole hypocritical business of removing poems from Literotica is that it really makes no difference for the commercial or otherwise success of the published poem. The real reason seems to be something else. Some Lit authors don't want to have their Lit nick (user id) connected to their real name or to the published nick.
 
Last edited:
Lauren Hynde said:
Well, poems in that particular thread are supposed to freak you out the day after. You still shouldn't edit them out. ;)


I agree, also :D

My stuff there is always riddled with poor grammer, unnecessary repeats, etc it is awful, simply awful...

taking poetry out for editing from that thread is okay, I often do that, but leave the rough draft up everyone's poem is their own to do with what they wish but to me, it is like getting all dressed up at a nude beach ;) I personally prefer to see the poems without their make up, but that is just me
 
Senna Jawa said:
It's a good reason not to read them elsewhere!

The ironic thing about this whole hypocritical business of removing poems from Literotica is that it really makes no difference for the commercial or otherwise success of the published poem. The real reason seems to be something else. Some Lit authors don't want to have their Lit nick (user id) connected to their real name or to the published nick.


There are millions of people (okay 100) who want to read poetry. So to have them published elsewhere is just to present them to a different group of people.

I remove my poems from lit when requested to do so out of respect for the group of people who are kind enough to publish them elsewhere. I feel like lit is not an end to poetry, not a graveyard, it is more of a breeding ground, where I get good feedback. I do not know if this makes me a hypocrite. :confused:
 
WickedEve said:
Of course there is no force, but I'm sure some of us would be more than happy to comply with certain publishers' wishes.
And that's an ugly kind of prostitution (in a contrast to the physical, classical prostitution :). Such lack of principles takes away something important from poetry.
 
Back
Top